The Least Offensive, Yet Effective Tax?

Discuss issues related to politics, government and law.
Post Reply

Which Tax Would You Prefer?

VAT
0
No votes
Combination
0
No votes
Income Tax
0
No votes
Corporate Tax
0
No votes
Income + Corporate Tax
0
No votes
Tariff
2
67%
Voluntary Tax
0
No votes
Usage Fees
0
No votes
State Taxes (Similar to How the Articles of Con. taxed, but mandatory to pay back if you use the services)
1
33%
 
Total votes: 3
zacb
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1573
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 8:33 pm
Location: Somewhere out in the American West (for now)

The Least Offensive, Yet Effective Tax?

Post by zacb »

What are your thoughts on this?
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
momopi
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4898
Joined: August 31st, 2007, 9:44 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: The Least Offensive, Yet Effective Tax?

Post by momopi »

zacb wrote:What are your thoughts on this?
Flat tax.
zacb
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1573
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 8:33 pm
Location: Somewhere out in the American West (for now)

Post by zacb »

Sorry for not putting that. Should have put that :D .
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2790
Joined: August 13th, 2012, 4:48 pm
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Post by Teal Lantern »

Should we really be giving .gov better ideas on how to screw us over? :?
не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
zacb
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1573
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 8:33 pm
Location: Somewhere out in the American West (for now)

Post by zacb »

Actually, no XD . I think if we are to have a tax, I think it should be a tax based upon how much a state takes, thus it would be voluntary (at least on the national level). Then when the state of California imposes taxes on everyone, there will be a revolution. The other taxes outside of usage fees are coercive in my opinion.
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
zboy1
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4648
Joined: October 3rd, 2007, 9:33 pm

Post by zboy1 »

Either a Flat tax or a Fair Tax would be good for the U.S. or any other country for that matter...

The U.S. before the Income Tax, relied on user fees, tariffs, land sales and excise taxes to meet the needs of the government. Why can't the country go back to that as Ron Paul has stated many times before...? It would certainly boost a terrible economy out of the doldrums...
gsjackson
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3766
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Contact:

Post by gsjackson »

zboy1 wrote:Either a Flat tax or a Fair Tax would be good for the U.S. or any other country for that matter...
Unless you happen to be a poor-to-middle-class person, and/or have the slightest concern about achieving a somewhat equitable distribution of society's resources.

Suppose a flat tax of 15 percent. If you make $10K a year -- and quite a few people now are right in that neighborhood -- you're left with $8,500 of disposable income -- barely enough to avoid starving and keep some sort of roof over your head. If you make $20 billion, you're left with $17 billion to dispose of. Considering that most people making that kind of money get it from extracting rents of various kinds, essentially leeching off of the productive economy, this hardly seems like an equitable system of taxation. And please don't tell me that their income reflects the value they have created for society. In the vast majority of cases it doesn't. More like the value they have extracted from society.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Post by Cornfed »

Obviously the best and fairest tax at the moment would be to round up all the banksters, their corporate cronies, hired goons and publicists and all their families, acquaintances and lickspittles, hire them out for medical experiments, and distribute the revenue from the medical experiments along with the assets they have stolen from us (including their more attractive corporate whores) to the rest of us. It is a no-brainer really.
gsjackson
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3766
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Contact:

Post by gsjackson »

Cornfed wrote:Obviously the best and fairest tax at the moment would be to round up all the banksters, their corporate cronies, hired goons and publicists and all their families, acquaintances and lickspittles, hire them out for medical experiments, and distribute the revenue from the medical experiments along with the assets they have stolen from us (including their more attractive corporate whores) to the rest of us. It is a no-brainer really.
Best "revenue enhancement" program I've heard of yet.
Devil Dog
Freshman Poster
Posts: 477
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 10:55 pm

Post by Devil Dog »

gsjackson wrote:
zboy1 wrote:Either a Flat tax or a Fair Tax would be good for the U.S. or any other country for that matter...
Unless you happen to be a poor-to-middle-class person, and/or have the slightest concern about achieving a somewhat equitable distribution of society's resources.

Suppose a flat tax of 15 percent. If you make $10K a year -- and quite a few people now are right in that neighborhood -- you're left with $8,500 of disposable income -- barely enough to avoid starving and keep some sort of roof over your head....
You don't understand FairTax. A single person making $10K per year would have more than $10K with that plan. Research it.
gsjackson
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3766
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Contact:

Post by gsjackson »

Devil Dog wrote:
gsjackson wrote:
zboy1 wrote:Either a Flat tax or a Fair Tax would be good for the U.S. or any other country for that matter...
Unless you happen to be a poor-to-middle-class person, and/or have the slightest concern about achieving a somewhat equitable distribution of society's resources.

Suppose a flat tax of 15 percent. If you make $10K a year -- and quite a few people now are right in that neighborhood -- you're left with $8,500 of disposable income -- barely enough to avoid starving and keep some sort of roof over your head....
You don't understand FairTax. A single person making $10K per year would have more than $10K with that plan. Research it.
I was addressing a flat tax, which is what usually gets floated out there by "reformers."
Moretorque
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6275
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 7:00 am

Post by Moretorque »

The whole tax system is based on socialist wealth control mechanisms. They don't need the taxes they can just debase the money further by printing more to pay the bills and are doing this as I write this.

Change the money and change the system, other than that you are pissing in the wind.

We cannot believe people still cannot see this counterfeiting con job!

Go read the essay put out by none other than the ex FED chair Alan Greenspan called " Gold and Economic Freedom", these guys know exactly what they are doing. Under the current system a tax code change will change nothing.

Allow me to issue the currency and I care who not makes the laws, and that applies to the taxing code as well.
Time to Hide!
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics, Government, Law”