The Psychology behind Beauty and the Beast (my title)

[Think Different]

Two interesting articles from Psychology Today that talk about why handsome men (compared to their spouse/GF) make worse husbands but better lovers and ugly men make better husbands:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... husbands-i

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... usbands-ii

[Hook]

Two interesting articles from Psychology Today that talk about why handsome men (compared to their spouse/GF) make worse husbands but better lovers and ugly men make better husbands:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... husbands-i

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... usbands-ii

Of course, as you know, you should only infer averages. Pierce Brosnan is by most women's account a hunk. But he is a very faithful husband to his wife.

[magnum]

Wait, I didn't read this yet....

but whatthey are saying is, hunks are better in bed, but suck at relationships.

And ugly guys suck in bed but are good husbands?

that logic is so retarder simple and false...

a hunk is a bad husband because he has 400 women wanting him in bed at any one given time, thus his ability to cheat on his wife and his temptation to do so are 100% more.

Now lets take ugly....he's just thankful someone was willing to want to spend 5 minuets with him let alone the rest of a life time, thus he's going to be faithful because lets face it, he isn't getting many more chances if any in >AMERICA<

I didn't read the article yet, but I call bs, I might change my mind after reading it, lets see.

[magnum]

Meh, probably true....

but they still are mainly speaking from the majority.


I've seen a lot of instances where a guy "and woman" are super ugly but the mate was substantially better looking, I'm rather sure it didn't have much to do with financial power.

but sadly that's the world we live in for the most part.