Are Jews responsible for Feminism?

[hb2345]

@hb2345

I certainly don't claim to have extensive, or even rudimentary knowledge about the totality of the 'holocaust'(I quote that because there have been many holocaust in history, ie an intentional destruction of a group of peoples, but those dead bodies could be anyone of any nationality( ie, slavs, poles, Russians, etc.) Furthermore, dead bodies doesn't necessarily mean MURDERED bodies. I mean, it certainly doesn't make it OK, but is there is a difference between detaining people(Americans did this with japanese) and them dying of disease or famine, and actually killing them? There have been, to my admittedly neophyte level of knowledge, several so called holocaust deniers. David irving, Robert faurisson, Ernest Zundel, Arthur Butz, etc.. However, most interesting of all is a guy named David Cole, himself a jew, for obvious reasons. He made his rounds on Donahue in the early 90s, and like most liberals, kept calling him names instead of actually trying to rebuke his claims. He had gone to Auschwitz in the early 90s and was immediately skeptical of the claims being made, and just got the ball rolling from there. I haven't studied his work in its entirety, but his claims seem reasonable. FOR THE RECORD, he believes the Nazis had pre conceived plans of sending Jews (and others) to camps and doing bad things to them, including killing them. He also claims that there were indeed very real and provable mass killings taken place after Germany invaded the USSR, mainly by shootings. But he doesn't beleive Auschwitz, Dachau, Majdanek, and some others were EXTERMINATION camps. Yes, he believes that people, including jews, were intentionally killed there, but THE SIZE AND SCOPE AND DURATION were not what were generally told. I shall read his works in depth soon.

You're not making any sense at this point. You are aware of the Nazis "Final Solution" plans and Hitler's personal written works. They're well documented and available to general public. You saw countless examples of Nazi Germany antisemitic propaganda. Movies. Caricatures of Jews. Articles in papers and magazines. You saw the footage of numerous concentration camp prisoners with yellow David star on their robes, as well as a footage of mass graves, as well as filmed Nuremberg trials with top ranking Nazis giving their testimony, but you're still denying Holocaust. Are you saying those Jewish people just gathered at some camp in Poland and committed a mass suicide? Are you saying they weren't gassed to death even though there are actual gas chambers on site at every concentration camp and remains biopsy confirmed that victims didn't die a natural death? Are you seriously comparing temporarily detained Japanese-Americans with 6 millions of dead Jews? How many Japanese detainees died in captivity?

I think on the poonani front, it's hard to deny a biological clock that's ticking. Late 30s isn't that old, but, yeah, my best years are probably behind me. I just read about guys having sex like THOUSANDS of times, THOUSANDS, and i just felt really insecure or something. And they just believed it was the norm. I had a few girlfriends, as I said, and we had sex about 10 or 12 times, for both. Weird, like same amount. The first one I lost my V to, and man it was a powerful experience. She could have multiple orgasms and would even squirt(at times) on my floor. That shit was powerful to a 19 or 20 year old. I couldn't beleive my average sized peen could do that. Not surprisingly, I got my second gf only a little after we broke up, as well as some random hookups. I did pretty good teens 20s. But man, it's been a dry spell since.

Over time you lost your appeal to women. I don't know why that happened. I don't know you personally. That's for you to ponder. All I know is that looks can't take you that far. You can't go off your looks forever. As you age and lose your youthful looks you have to adopt new personal traits and conform to social standards which continue to make you appealing when you become older. I guess you failed on that front.

As I alluded to before, I really do think the rapidity of technological change plays a part in these issues. 20 or 25 years ago, you were just OUT. OUTSIDE, talking, socializing, meeting people. Or it at least seemed that way. Yeah, people had cell phones, but they weren't staring into them all hours of the day like they are nowadays. Going to your apartment pool in 2005 and and going to one in 2025 are like night and day.

Yes, advances in technology provided women with more choices. Dating is now global. Plainly speaking you got bigger competition. In 2005 that girl at a pool had only you to talk to her. Now the girl at a pool is on her phone scrolling through hundreds of men to choose from. Too bad for you.

I feel like in many ways, I'm 'out of the loop' so to speak. Im on the other side of life so to speak. I said earlier, I don't have any social media, I don't even have a damn smartphone. Though probably not fair, 90 percent of women would certainly think there's something wrong with this guy, he's a loner and a loser. I MEAN EVERYONE has social media. Even the 'cool kids' in high school who made fun of computer nerds are on it. 'Normal' people stare at phones all day, are on Facebook and insta, are in relationships, and are unfriendly and antisocial.

People move through life in stages. It's called human development. Maturing. Evolving. Bettering yourself. My guess you didn't do that. You got stuck in life, which explains your current state of affairs, but I wouldn't blame it on technology. Technology has been developing forever and ever. Humans adopt to it over time. You're like that jock who peaked in High School and now he's poor, uneducated, fat loser stuck in a dead end job, wondering where did it all go. Always nostalgic about his youth, how he was a star of his football team, f***ing hot girls and stuffing nerds in lockers. Now he's an aging nobody, while those nerds rule the world. It's life. It's moving on and you have to move on with it. Some do, some don't.

Do you just simply learn to not give a fu ck about this? I mean, TRULY. Were a social species, so when you're not 'connected', your mental health can deteriorate.

You're nearing that age when you just give up and die inside. Your hopes and dreams are gone forever and you just accept new reality, learn to live with it, become content. It gets much easier afterwards. Like an enlightenment of some sort. Human psyche has plenty of natural defense mechanisms that help you cope and prevent deterioration. It gets better over time.

[Rygar1]

@hb2345

Arthur Butz in particular beleived those confessions were extracted through torture(mainly by the British) to remove any and all reasonable doubt as to the extent of the slaughter. It's certainly feasible, but his evidence was, in my opinion, rather weak. Not only that, but several of them, even in old age have asserted the crimes they did and or witnessed. I suppose it's possible that they're just scared old men at this point, but why admit this even all these years later in your own home? I just...I dunno..I've always been a bit of a doubting thomas. Many factors didn't add up, like all the supposed z'documentaion' outlining their plans, recording the amount oF prisoners arriving, the amount of deaths, etc... and I'm like, if these guys were so smart as to take over half the world, round Jews up left and right, devise relatively sophisticated means of killing them, dispose of the ashes, why would they document this at all? If someone is doing something really bad, wouldn't they want as little evidence of this as possible? They can incinerate countless bodies, grind up bone, dispose of ashes, but they can't get rid of...paper? Paper. It's a sincere question, and forgive my ignorance, but that seems contradictory. mr Cole, for example,beleives those gas chambers were in reality delousing chambers to destroy lice(which carries the diseases) He asserts they were air raid shelters that were tampered with AFTER the war(by the russians). He interviewed a Dr Francizek Piper in 1992 that supposedly goes into this in detail, I haven't listened to it, though. It's all so very fascinating.

My beef with technology lies in the fact that we have to conform to IT, rather than IT having to conform to us, as humans. It's back asswards. You said I didn't conform to new modes of socializing, and being left behind because of it. That may be true, but why should I(or anyone) conform just to experience what should be an almost innate biological need? Yes, technology has, is, and always will be changing, growing, moving forward. Like a snowball rolling downhill, it gets bigger and bigger and bigger. And yes, we have, for the most part, adapted to it. But, I dunno, something seems so demonstrably DIFFERENT about technology as it relates to social media at least. We may have had to adapt to the automobile, for eaxample(by reorganizing cites so there could be roads to drive them on) but there wasn't anything SOCIAL about it. You and I both know that wherever you go, most humans are staring into phones. I mean everyone. This is certainly a fairly dramatic change from a mere 25 or 30 years ago that I just don't know how to deal with it. Dating, sex, socializing in general, is on there. I mean, if a guy, for whatever reason doesn't conform to that, it's mighty hard and uncomfortable.

Really, what is the POINT of social media? I mean, there was always forums, chat rooms, email, etc.. but there was no MEDIA to it. There's just something so...personal about it. Intrusive..in your face. Most people had photos of memories and good times, events etc.but they were private, kept in their house. Nowadays, Megan Jones from Plainview has hundreds of personal photos for millions to see. there's definitely some elucidating to be done there. I would like to hear your views.

Yes, there does seem to be an ever increasing sense of despair with age. Are you speaking from personal experience? I'm often reminded of that brilliant quote from Fight Club. "We've all been led to led to believe we were going to grow up to be millionaires and rock stars and movie gods, but we won't. And we know it. And we're very, very pissed off." You never got 'rich', you never slept with a lot of women, you're broke, confused, lost and angry. And it sucks.

You seem to know a SIGNIFICANT amount of info on girls/women. I mean, when I lay in bed at night and ponder something someone has said online for days afterwards, you've made a good impression, trust me. It's a good metric to go by. I've read countless books, talked to many men, but damn, I found myself saying, "that was brilliant". I don't know if it's true or not, and I don't even know how you would measure it, but a often quoted line is 20 percent of guys get 80 percent of girls. I dunno, but it does seem to be lopsided. Why is that? I mean, what does it all -BOIL down to? A pretty boy who is perpetually frustrated and ugly dudes pulling left and right. Explain. Is it just motivation? These guys can better provide? Perhaps after 25 or so, she'll want to 'nest', and look for a good, strong, provider. Are these guys just more 'manly'? We'll agree that any amount of being with a woman is stressful and demanding, and perhaps these dudes just have better stress tolerance or something. Any number of factors, really. Studying these dynamics is also fascinating.

Keep it coming.

[hb2345]

@hb2345

Arthur Butz in particular beleived those confessions were extracted through torture(mainly by the British) to remove any and all reasonable doubt as to the extent of the slaughter. It's certainly feasible, but his evidence was, in my opinion, rather weak. Not only that, but several of them, even in old age have asserted the crimes they did and or witnessed. I suppose it's possible that they're just scared old men at this point, but why admit this even all these years later in your own home? I just...I dunno..I've always been a bit of a doubting thomas. Many factors didn't add up, like all the supposed z'documentaion' outlining their plans, recording the amount oF prisoners arriving, the amount of deaths, etc... and I'm like, if these guys were so smart as to take over half the world, round Jews up left and right, devise relatively sophisticated means of killing them, dispose of the ashes, why would they document this at all? If someone is doing something really bad, wouldn't they want as little evidence of this as possible? They can incinerate countless bodies, grind up bone, dispose of ashes, but they can't get rid of...paper? Paper. It's a sincere question, and forgive my ignorance, but that seems contradictory. mr Cole, for example,beleives those gas chambers were in reality delousing chambers to destroy lice(which carries the diseases) He asserts they were air raid shelters that were tampered with AFTER the war(by the russians). He interviewed a Dr Francizek Piper in 1992 that supposedly goes into this in detail, I haven't listened to it, though. It's all so very fascinating.

First of all it would be impossible to carry such massive operation like "Final Solution" without keeping track. These are the Germans we're talking about. Obviously they were gonna document and archive everything down to a smallest detail. Second of all, the Nazis didn't see Holocaust as something bad. Third of all, they didn't anticipate someone is going to hold them responsible for their crimes against humanity. Let's not forget that Hitler was drug addicted, batshit crazy, uneducated, low IQ, low ranking soldier with PTSD and a whole lot of insane ideas. He was neither a good strategist/tactician, nor was he a good long term planner. And like I said before, the biopsy of the prisoners remains had revealed that the cause of death was gassing. How the fu ck do you kill lice with gas without killing a person anyway? It's a bunch of Holocaust denying bullshit. And if you're saying Nazis didn't mean any harm to the Jews, then why did they apprehended an entire Jewish population anyway? For what? To protect them from air raids and keep the lice away? Don't you realize how ridiculous it is?

My beef with technology lies in the fact that we have to conform to IT, rather than IT having to conform to us, as humans. It's back asswards. You said I didn't conform to new modes of socializing, and being left behind because of it. That may be true, but why should I(or anyone) conform just to experience what should be an almost innate biological need? Yes, technology has, is, and always will be changing, growing, moving forward. Like a snowball rolling downhill, it gets bigger and bigger and bigger. And yes, we have, for the most part, adapted to it. But, I dunno, something seems so demonstrably DIFFERENT about technology as it relates to social media at least. We may have had to adapt to the automobile, for eaxample(by reorganizing cites so there could be roads to drive them on) but there wasn't anything SOCIAL about it. You and I both know that wherever you go, most humans are staring into phones. I mean everyone. This is certainly a fairly dramatic change from a mere 25 or 30 years ago that I just don't know how to deal with it. Dating, sex, socializing in general, is on there. I mean, if a guy, for whatever reason doesn't conform to that, it's mighty hard and uncomfortable.

I didn't say you didn't conform to new modes of socializing, and being left behind because of it. I said you probably failed to adopt new personal traits and conform to social standards, which continue to make you appealing when you become older. What I meant was education, career, money, and social status. Attributes which society expects you to gain as you go through life.

Really, what is the POINT of social media? I mean, there was always forums, chat rooms, email, etc.. but there was no MEDIA to it. There's just something so...personal about it. Intrusive..in your face. Most people had photos of memories and good times, events etc.but they were private, kept in their house. Nowadays, Megan Jones from Plainview has hundreds of personal photos for millions to see. there's definitely some elucidating to be done there. I would like to hear your views.

Forums and chat rooms were an early forms of social media. People from all over the globe were able to gather and communicate with each other. There's absolutely nothing wrong with social media, actually. Facebook, Instagram and other platforms is a great way to keep in touch with your family and friends. A grandma in Kentucky can see the photos of her children in Texas, the photos of her grandkids in California, while communicating through Messenger with her sister in Florida, and keeping in touch with friends in Brazil. It's wonderful, easy, convenient, and we've never had this ability before. Problem is retarded narcissistic people (mainly Millennials and Gen Z's) use it in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons, giving social media a bad name. Blame the users, not the technology.

Yes, there does seem to be an ever increasing sense of despair with age. Are you speaking from personal experience? I'm often reminded of that brilliant quote from Fight Club. "We've all been led to led to believe we were going to grow up to be millionaires and rock stars and movie gods, but we won't. And we know it. And we're very, very pissed off." You never got 'rich', you never slept with a lot of women, you're broke, confused, lost and angry. And it sucks.

No, I'm not speaking from a personal experience. I've never aspired to be rich and famous. I have my own goals and values.

You seem to know a SIGNIFICANT amount of info on girls/women. I mean, when I lay in bed at night and ponder something someone has said online for days afterwards, you've made a good impression, trust me. It's a good metric to go by. I've read countless books, talked to many men, but damn, I found myself saying, "that was brilliant". I don't know if it's true or not, and I don't even know how you would measure it, but a often quoted line is 20 percent of guys get 80 percent of girls. I dunno, but it does seem to be lopsided. Why is that? I mean, what does it all -BOIL down to? A pretty boy who is perpetually frustrated and ugly dudes pulling left and right. Explain. Is it just motivation? These guys can better provide? Perhaps after 25 or so, she'll want to 'nest', and look for a good, strong, provider. Are these guys just more 'manly'? We'll agree that any amount of being with a woman is stressful and demanding, and perhaps these dudes just have better stress tolerance or something. Any number of factors, really. Studying these dynamics is also fascinating.

Like I said before, personal relationships were never my top priority. I was never interested in the affairs of the heart and all the melodrama that comes with it. It was never more than a school girls gossip to me. You know, on that level. Whom some random woman chooses to fu ck and why is really unimportant to me. Don't know, don't care, and I'm not trying to find out. It's very low on my interest list. I've got other things to worry about.

If it helps you any I can share a little story from my own life. The friends of my parents have a daughter. I never knew her personally, but I've seen her photos. Back then she was young and good looking. Had a nice body too. She worked at a gym as a fitness instructor. I know nothing about the history of her personal life and dating, but in the end she married a fat, ugly millionaire who was much older than her (I've seen their wedding photos on Facebook). As far as I know they're still married and have children together. Make of it what you will. One logical conclusion about this situation that I made was this - of all the muscly handsome gigachad clients and personal trainers that worked at her gym she had chosen a pudgy old man with money. Gave him her heart. Tied their lives together. This tells me all I need to know about the "true love" and how much it's really worth.

[Rygar1]

@hb2345

The Krauts had rounded up the jews and 'detained' them to try and prevent them from interfering with their war efforts. Hitler and his henchman beleived, whether rightly or wrongly, that jews made up a disproportionate amount of people in the govt which had surrendered in WW1, hence the 'stab in the back' legend. They also beleived they were, again, disproportionately involved in communism and other far left ideologies. That's the bottom line. NOBODY would disagree that there was an official policy to enact this, from the top down. It was called the Madagascar Plan, whereby they wanted to relocate them to Madagascar afterwards. I think they also entertained Siberia as well, but I'm not sure. Obviously the logistics of this is absolutely incredible, and wasn't feasible in the long term, so they may have had to resort to other means. It's possible that Hitler's excessive drug usage made him more and more paranoid and crazy as time went on, and gave the ok for it, but it's very debatable. I won't get into all of the details here, because I believe, like you, people should arrive at their own conclusions based on the mountain of evidence for and against something. However, specifically, inconsistencies with Zyklon B (the gas supposedly used), the time frames, and just simply the incredible amount of deceased has been hotly debated. For every book, eyewitness, document, photo, etc asserting the standard narrative, there is one questioning it.

Your views on social media seem rather contradictory. Upthread you referred to it as "brain rot, cancer, and a Petri dish of all sorts of bad behavior", yet you seem to sing it's praises. I guess I can infer you metaphorically mean it's not the tool it's the user type thing, like a hammer can help build a house, or it can kill someone, depending on whose hands it's in. I think it's patently obvious that it's being used to brag, boast and to proclaim, "my life is better than yours" though. It perpetuates and encourages closed, cliquish behavior, to where it's always the same people over and over commenting on the photos. It doesn't seem like there is any new, random people that get friended. But opinions can differ.

That personal trainer story is, sadly, probably not uncommon. I can't really say it's the norm, but many hottish girls do eventually seem to be paired up with ugly dudes. It's a survival and or replication thing. If a dude is loaded, he gives her security. It's biological on some level. But most attractive girls seem to be with equally attractive guys, generally speaking. You just have to....want it. Hustle. Take action. But even still, it ain't for everyone, brother. If women give you bad vibes and or trouble and stress, avoid them. It's really all you can do in this world. It gets lonely and horny, but you eventually adapt.

Ready for more

[Shemp]

@hb2345 ...

Ready for more

Whatever you look at/with your eyes or listen to with your ears can affect your mind, and if you don't have a strong mental immune system, you can easily allow demons in, and hb2345 was full of demons that he could infect you with. In particular, he was filling you with the demonic notion that you "must be sexually aggressive and have lots of sex partners and lots of sexual experience" which is precisely one of the demons you are fighting. If your inner self actually wants sex, then you will get it, after you remove all demons that are inhibiting you. If your inner self doesn't care, then you won't. It's that simple. Adding new demons to your mind isn't helping clean things up but rather exacerbating the problem.

Fortunately, hb2345 is now banned. I won't say "about time" because I think Winston is correct to move slowly in banning people. Everyone deserves a few chances to misbehave, but there is a limit. Demonic creatures like hb2345 cannot stop themselves from causing trouble and so will eventually exceed the limit and get what they deserve, so no reason to rush things.

Below is a video of hb2345 that I posted earlier.
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/GSggVSby5x4

[Rygar1]

My man Shemp back again! Long time, no hear.

Yeah, he was a grade A Douchebag, no doubt about it. There's always a few. But he was smart, there's no doubt in my mind. He took the time to respond to every post as well. I'm not really sure why you think he was "trying to fill my mind with demons that I must bang a lot of chicks"if anything he overtly stated he did NOT pursue women, and encouraged me to do the same. Could you quote it? I may have missed it.

Yeah, there's alot of issues going on here. You bring up a good point of something 'inhibiting natural desire. What is it? What inhibits us in any area of life? Our minds operate in seemingly contradictory ways. How do we remove these demons?

Is that really hb2345 in that video, or just a joke? If so, how do you know?

Adios.

[my life is trash]

Cucks say women aren't sex objects that they are people just like us and should be regarded as such. But in reality women are just cunts that our bodies require to fulfill our sexual and reproductive needs. In order to unlock the holes of these creatures, the right genetic keys are required, which involves an attractive face, tall height, right ethnicity, NTish personality and some amount of intelligence and money, the first three factors mattering the most. The most important traits are almost purely genetic and cannot really be changed significantly through hard work or money. That's why self improvement is a sham, the only possible way for a subhuman is reincarnation.

[Rygar1]

Cucks say women aren't sex objects that they are people just like us and should be regarded as such. But in reality women are just cunts that our bodies require to fulfill our sexual and reproductive needs. In order to unlock the holes of these creatures, the right genetic keys are required, which involves an attractive face, tall height, right ethnicity, NTish personality and some amount of intelligence and money, the first three factors mattering the most. The most important traits are almost purely genetic and cannot really be changed significantly through hard work or money. That's why self improvement is a sham, the only possible way for a subhuman is reincarnation.

You're right, for the MOST part, but there are always exceptions, man. ALWAYS. I've got the first three factors you mentioned, as well as a pretty good intellect to boot. I definitely don't have money making skills, however, and I'm not sure what you mean by NTish personality. Do you mean neuro typical as opposed to neuro divergent? If so, I definitely don't have that. My honest, everyday, raw observation of reality tells me most women care little about the first two past a certain age. I mean come on, how many attractive, borderline hot girls do you see with average at best, overweight, scruffy beard dudes everywhere? I see quite a few.

Social factors play a part in this as well. For example, in the late 90s early 2000s, a lot of boy bands dominated the charts. These guys were very handsome, popular, and put forth a certain 'image'. Clean cut, stylish, all american. Very good singers as well. So a 'pretty boy' look was in. However, some 15 20 years later, thats changed, almost radically. Scruffy beards, tattoos, muscles galore seems to be the 'trend'. Most women tend to be easily manipulated and follow along to whatever they see on TV, so they just go along with it in real life. "Society tells me what kind of men to like, so I'll follow it".

This shit is overrated, anyway mate. It really is. Sex feels good, but it's not THAT good. Relationships as a whole are stressful, demanding, and kinda boring, imo. Those people who you see on social media platforms all happy, smiling, laughing, kissing, is fabricated. They argue, fight, perhaps cheat, etc..