mattyman wrote: ↑December 30th, 2020, 7:55 pm
RE
The people listed are people that need protection
"It's simple. You have to stop the spreaders."
There's better ways of protecting these segments than restricting freedom of movement, e.g. older/c;inically-vulnerable should get croceries/medicines delivered, they shold avoid public transport where possible, should hav the option to book a seat with distancing etc.
Dear Yick, why are you so fanatical about lockdowns (movement restrictions, restrictions on meeting people, shutting-down social venues). I can only conclude you're in love with your tv and the mainstream news. It's very clear you haven't listened to anything I've said on both threads, this one and the one on facts of covid.
That's right - they need protection from the people spreading it - therefore - the spreaders need to be quarantined.
It isn't hard is it? Like any virus or disease - it is the spreader of the virus/disease that needs to be cured and have preventive measures took against them.
Restricting 'Freedom of Movement' works - it worked in China, it worked in Japan, South Korea, Mongolia - which is why none of those countries have a 73000 death toll. I understand you DON'T want to do it but this is why our country has the death rate it has, because of the weakest link.
You don't care about anyone but yourself - you're selfish - but you're in good company - which is why there are 73000 people dead where you are (and rising...)