I owned or own real estate in Italy, UK, and the Philippines. Assuming Italy not to be an emerging country (rather, a submerging country!), owning real estate in an emerging country is not different from any other place. There are mortgages and interest rates, rental yields and taxes, markets that may go up or down and, finally, a certain amount of fungibility for your asset - that is - how fast those walls can be converted back into cash, and at what profit.Shemp wrote: ↑November 1st, 2024, 4:47 pmTitle of thread itself is misleading: real-estate is not fully passive unless you own it as a publicly traded stock (REIT, timber and other natural resources companies that own lots of land, certain other businesses whose real-estate holdings dwarf the primary business, etc). Preceding statement is doubly true in less developed (aka 3rd world) countries. That is, directly owning real estate is effectively owning a business that has to be managed. As with any business, you can hire a manager to manage the day-to-day operation, but a manager cuts profits and can cause problems if incompetent or dishonest.
My main objection to real estate in less developed countries where you are a foreigner is that this is not a business where you are doing something a local could not do. So if it becomes known you are making big money, locals will push you aside by some crooked scheme. Maybe just kill you. Best businesses for foreigners are businesses that depend totally on the foreigner's personal involvement to be profitable. For example, the foreigner is who the clients trust and no local could ever gain that trust. In a business like this, locals can (and eventually will) milk the foreigner in some way but they won't cut him out entirely or kill him unless they are idiots.
Which brings up another point. Some foreigners like to surround themselves with idiots because idiots are easier to compete against. Problem is, idiots do idiotic things. For example, dishonest idiots might try to steal a business or kill the owner of a business that the idiot himself is incapable of running, but even honest idiots do dangerous things. Assuming your business depends on your personal involvement, better to be surrounded be intelligent thieves who understand that a milk cow has to be kept alive if they want to continue milking it.
So far I cannot say RE in the Philippines has been a good investment. In fact, it has been a pretty shitty investment. I was lucky enough to have never purchased RE on a mortgage, always cash up-front or full payment within 2 years. While this decreased my leverage considerably, it allowed me to take advantage of those rental yields with costs limited to taxes, dues, and occasional maintenance.
Still, I haven't had much luck with the 2 condo units I purchased. One of them, the Davao one, has been rented to a Japanese civil engineer for 3 years now. Chances are high that said Japanese tenant will renew for another 2 years. The underwriter of the contract is actually his company, a JV of large Japanese multinational and a Filipino local company. Said company pays me 12 months of rent in advance, and the rental yield is decent.
The problem is that, because of the massive oversupply of new condo units that plagues all large cities in the Philippines, primarily Manila but also Cebu and, to a lesser extent, Davao, a condo has to truly stand out to be spotted by the elusive tenant, let alone a long-term one like the one I came across.
And here's the problem: in order to make my unit stand out, I had to splash an inordinate quantity of money on things like centralised aircon, large TVs in every room, Bosch appliances in the kitchen, and quality furniture and accessories, down to mattresses and pillows. The whole renovation and fit-out costed me more than $40,000 dollars, or 2 million Pesos, equivalent to a good 20% of the cost of the bare unit.
This means that yes, I got the unit rented. And yes, the entire rental yield of the first 2 years only covered the cost of renovation and fit-out. I only started to have a return on the actual unit last year, and will probably continue for another couple of years. The Japanese tenant and his lovely family are obviously very happy to enjoy a place that is furnished and decorated beyond what they could even afford in Japan. They are not moving any time soon.
The takeway from this is: in an overcrowded market, it's either this extreme measures (20% of the cost of the asset just on beautification), or a unit that might stay unrented, making for an unproductive assets, for months, perhaps year, before finding its tenant. Or, as it happens, a unit that needs to rent below market rate to hope to entice someone in.
A RE market like this, as you may understand, is not a healthy market. Manila has its fair share of super-luxury 300 sqm houses or apartments catering the tiny number of legit expats moving there (e.g. the Country Manager of Unilever, or the Ambassador of Brunei). Apart from that, not many middle-class and even upper-class Filipinos can afford splashing 50,000 Pesos on a 2-bedroom condo for their families. And I think the message is reaching home, that Manila is an unlivable shithole that no foreigner in their sane mind would like to live in for more than maybe a couple of months.