Alpha Male bullshit and Evo-psyche.

[OutWest]

ROFL at Primebait's suggestion that IQ means nothing. I find it ironic that he's saying this while using a computer, (presumably) wearing clothes, and (presumably) sitting in a nice, air conditioned house.

Well it clearly means little to him. What's with this guys photo he is using? Why is he using a photo of Chad White, a male model? What straight man does shit like that?

[The_Adventurer]

I don't buy it. First, if chimps and bonobos are our ancestors, why are they still running around alive today? As far as I heard, humans and apes SHARE a common ancestor, which wasn't even an ape! It wws some tiny rodent thing hopping around in the trees. All these apes developed each on their own path.

Hunter gatherer societies still exist today. There are plenty of great documentaries on them in both Africa and South America. They have marriage and, in some cases polygamy. Granted, there's nothing saying these wives are always faithful, but to assume it's just a free for all, with everyone f***ing everyone is absurd.

There are TONS of historical writings of european's first forays into hunter gatherer societies all over he world. If you want to see some polyamorous societies, look to the Asia pacific islands and polynesian societies. Societies in Africa and the Americas had marriage and, sometimes, polygamy.

Here's an idea. There IS NO one way. There is no one classification that will work. There are reasons, genetic, environmental, cultural and more why filipinas are so different from white women. Hunter gather societies in hot tropical climates came out wholly different than hunter gatherer societies in harsh, cold mountain climates.

In the end, none of it makes a damn bit of difference to the world YOU must hunt in today. How are you going to get your women TODAY?

[C.J.]

Ugh don't get me started on filipinos, especially pinays. Even the great looking ones turn me off, because they LOOK like multiple civilizations! They gotta cut down on the race mixing. -_-

[theprimebait]

ROFL at Primebait's suggestion that IQ means nothing. I find it ironic that he's saying this while using a computer, (presumably) wearing clothes, and (presumably) sitting in a nice, air conditioned house.

all this means nothing in the wild,300,000 yrs ago when we were coming out the african Savannah.Evolution,or better sexual selection doesn't care for IQ because beyond a certain percentage,it means nothing.

did you read my comment?I said beyond a PERCENTAGE,Iq matters nothing.

85-100 is ENOUGH.high intelligence beyond that serves no purpose in our habitat,the wild.

therefore evolution did not select for intelligence as a marker for mating.it did so for other qualities.

noone cares if you can fix a Rubic cube,it doesn't wet p***y,because it has no practical application in the wild.

tall,robust,masculine Jocks (especially Black ones)DO wet young nubile p***y,you know the ''douchebags''and ''scum''you guys are jealous of.


robust Black hoodlum=Evolutionary winner aka ''superior''

Nerdy,aspergic,frail Tradcon=Evolutionary ment to not pass on his Genes

what the manosphere consists of is butthurt Hypergamous nerds that are jealous they are the losers.women should like me!I follow my societies rules and I am a genuine guy!

you sound like fat feminists:men are shallow to go for the dumb Hot cheerleaders,they should go for a woman of REAL quality!I am a educated smart woman!men should be attracted to my intelligence!not those hot bodies and pretty faces of those dumb idiotic cheerleaders!

[theprimebait]

There's a difference between intelligence and practical application.

he didn't even read what I said:

I said:

and scum?who are you to say who is scum?obviousely the physichaly challenged nerds are scum.from a pure genetic view,they are scum.they don't deserve to reproduce.IQ is a liability and not a asset after a certain percentage,it serves no purpose in nature.

so they rather resort to character attacks,and quoting me out of context,insults etc than adress my premise.


that

1.they are nothing but hypergamous themselves

2.they have a inflated view of their own sexual value(sound kina familiar?)

3.they think women should go for IQ and being a genuine guy,over a hot hunk(sound familiar?feminists who are so deluded they think men should like them for their smarts and accomplishments over the dumb but hot 9/10 girl enxt door),especially if that hunk is from a race with they look down on and has a high ratio of hunks(sound familiar?butthurt white women and their hatred for asian women perhaps?)

4.if we can't compete in the physical mating competitions,then we will FORCE women to choose us by laws,shaming,degradation and social stigma(sound familiar?kina like feminists trying to outlaw mail order brides and prostitution so that men will be forced to go with them?calling old men with young women ''creeps''?telling men to ''man up''and marry cum receptacles?)

everything they project unto feminists is a reflection of themselves.