Dude, that guy for a long time now has been coming on here and making threads about how he wants most of us exterminated and even reveling in news of people dying and saying that he wishes it could be more. He's obviously a vile human being. And this is not just some one-off venting either. This is a view which he consistently expresses here on the forum. But you give him a free pass just because he identifies as a "traditionalist" and is in favor of marriage while at the same time you criticize me over simply a hypothetical alt-history scenario and condemn Cornfed for celebrating the deaths of "vax lemmings". You're a hypocrite, Outcast! For you, it's one rule for those who agree with you and another rule for everyone else. You don't really have any uniform moral compass!Outcast9428 wrote: ↑January 4th, 2023, 9:48 pmI do criticize Fschmidt some. I told him he needs to just focus on finding his people and stop fantasizing about everyone dying. That being said, his rants sound more like frustrated venting as opposed to a serious desire. That being said if he was to start seeking power yes I would be very concerned.
Well, you are an extremist. You literally advocate for a medieval-style authoritarian Christian theocracy based on some insane "holy book" chock-full of all kinds of atrocities and sick perversions and run by crazy religious fanatics!Outcast9428 wrote: ↑January 4th, 2023, 9:48 pmYou sort of backed off the idea of slaughtering a large number of Jews, sort of… Pixel on the other hand did not. The reason I bring it up is because you and Pixel basically tried to pull this “Outcast is a crazy extremist!” Card. When the truth is, both of you are quite frankly more extreme and “crazy” then I am.
We on the other hand aren't really that extreme. We simply advocate for a movement of resistance with a military force of its own in order to fight against the ZOGs and destroy the Jewish power elite - the same Jewish power elite which regards us all as nothing more than human cattle and wishes to enslave or destroy us in all kinds of ways. Taking up arms and fighting against a hostile enemy isn't extreme! It's necessary for our survival and self-preservation! You only see it as "extreme" because you've imbibed too much your weak, pacifistic education - put in place by the enemy to keep men passive and docile - and it offends your sensitivities.
Pixel--Dude and I are not naïve. We understand that armed rebellions and military resistance are necessary in order to take down the most powerful, longest-running, most destructive global mafia to ever exist. We actually think about this in realistic terms. But you would rather imagine some fantasy solution. Martial force is simply the basis of power regardless of what form a system takes. In order to overthrow the New World Order, a resistance movement must equal or surpass its martial force. Martial force is necessary to remove the Jewish and Zionist evildoers from power. This is not extreme. It's just realism.
Oh, and there's a huge difference between wanting to overthrow an oppressive evil elite through military force and wanting to kill millions or billions of innocent people subjectively perceived as "modern scum".

I'm sure pleased that your envisioned society doesn't exist. It sounds worse than communist China with a perverse social credit system. I certainly wouldn't want to get married under your tyrannical system (too risky). And long prison sentences for BDSM between consenting adults? I don't even like BDSM but we don't need another prison state! Fortunately, this batshit-crazy ideological vision will be massively unpopular in Western societies based on Enlightenment principles and the ideal of freedom - unpopular even among conservatives. I don't think that we'll ever have to worry about your dystopian incel revenge porn fantasy coming to fruition.Outcast9428 wrote: ↑January 4th, 2023, 9:48 pmI do advocate a lot of authoritarian policies but I have said before that I don’t support executing or arresting political opponents. I do support basically completely sabotaging their ability to spread their ideology by not letting them have any power and possibly displacing them from their jobs and finding them a less influential job instead. If someone actually does immoral things they would be punished more harshly. The BDSM stuff for example should incur long prison sentences. I would eliminate any distinction between consensual or non-consensual domestic abuse so people living those lifestyles would go to prison for the same amount of time as a pervasive abuser would. Sleeping with another man’s wife would also require you to turn over half of your financial assets to the victimized husband. A cheating husband would hand half of his assets over to his wife. Cheating women wouldn’t get any support at all after marriage (and also would not have worked in the first place so would have no assets built up). Yes it would be a dictatorship but it’s really more of a paternalistic dictatorship then a tyrannical one.

