I'm done trying to get fornication with western women,going on complete boycott

[MrMan]

is like me in not being able to perceive the difference between what women perceive as a good-looking man and an regular-looking man. I know I'm not the only one. The idea of men being able to tell the difference is still odd to me.

It's not a subject that comes up all that often between me and other men, but it has, from time to time. Mostly it is women who discuss the looks of men, of course. Most men seem capable of telling who looks better than who. For instance if you saw Michael Moore and Brad Pitt entering a room together, who would women look at, fawn over? It ain't Michael Moore, man.

I know they wouldn't fawn over Michael Moore because he's fat, his face is fat and sags. I know they find that kind of stuff and wrinkles unattractive. I find it bad-looking. I can tell if a man looks particularly fat, saggy, odd-looking, etc. It's the average to good-looking where I cannot tell. Maybe I can guess since the topic came up that if a man has a square jaw or whatever, he is good-looking. My wife and I have a friend of middle eastern heritage who keeps looking for a wife. He has a great job, debt free real estate investments, teaches Bible studies, is a kind man, a good communicator. In regard to those things, I considered him a catch. I was talking to my wife about his quest to find a wife, and whether he was a catch, and I said I didn't know if he was for looks. She let me know that he was. I could tell he wasn't Michael Moore, but between average guy and good-looking, I can't perceive that, or have almost no sense of it. I can intellectually look for sharp features and such. I would imagine poorly defined features, kind of round blob noses might be unattractive on men like they are on girls. But it's an intellectual exercise to guess not something I just see like a see with a woman.

With a woman, I see if she's pretty or not, and I could rank them for looks on a 1 to 10 scale out to the third decimal point. With a man, I can just tell if he's ugly.

And Brad Pitt is getting older. I can't tell if he's still good-looking to women or not or if he's just attractive to them because he's famous and has money and they remember what he used to look like. If I had to guess, I would guess that Harrison Ford lost his looks when the wrinkles on his face started blowing in the wind.

I hear there are people who are 'face blind' who can't tell if anyone is good-looking. Maybe one of our posters who likes to complain could find a woman like that.

When I figured out I lacked an ability, I asked a few men in Indonesia to discuss it with. One of them said male attractiveness was something women see. That was my prior understanding of it. My mom never commented on men's looks so as not to make my dad jealous. My brother said he has only the slightest inkling of it. It could just be mainly 'nuture' for me, rather than nature, not hearing any comments on men's looks during my formative years.

I had a son about half a year ago. He's a handsome little lad. I can tell, because he has sharp features, a well-shaped nose, a perfectly round skull and nice eyebrows and thick hair. Had he been hairless, eyebrowless, with a bumpy skull and a flat, broad nose, I would have been forced to admit my kid is kinda ugly. But I can tell he's handsome just as I can tell my daughters are pretty.

I would have to put together a mental list of features and guess at whether a man is good-looking. With a girl, I just see it. But I can tell if little kids are cute. But cute kids may or may not grow up to be attractive adults. It's a different kind of good-looking.

Likewise, I can tell I'm an objectively good-looking man. And I can tell which of my friends are not. Not because I want to do ungodly things with them, because I don't, but because I'm not blind. You can tell when a painting or statue is well-made, too, doesn't mean you want to f**k a Rembrandt or Michaelangelo.

I can tell Michaelangelo's David is a well-made statue. But I can't tell if he's good-looking. The Mona Lisa is maybe a 4+ for looks. The statue of Liberty is about the same or maybe 0.1 better looking than Mona Lisa.

[yick]

Your trying to live this down.

'You're'

I couldn't give two shits, who are you? You're a halfwit of no importance, if you think I am gay then who cares? You are some fat, middle aged spastic who looks like the mayor.

You said you appreciate a good-looking man. I wonder if @mahayana is like me in not being able to perceive the difference between what women perceive as a good-looking man and an regular-looking man. I know I'm not the only one. The idea of men being able to tell the difference is still odd to me.

You'll be in the small minority, I mean, you keep talking about it - I don't - go and have a look at my posting history, whereas your posting history, it is a bit of a Rainman obsession of yours.

Why do you keep talking about sex in regard to this topic.

Because YOU brought it up.

You f***ing idiot.

Let's see what the evidence for slander of me is.

Won't it be libel as it is written and not spoken? Like I said, thick as shit

Well, there is no 'evidence' of libel because you started the libellous slurs, all that has happened is you have got them back except I have proof and you have none.

I can't tell if men or women are good-looking. I brought the topic here because I'm anonymous here. It's a topic that would make American men uncomfortable, admitting if they can tell men are good-looking, I guess. I also find transvestitism and homosexuality repulsive. I've also posted pages and pages worth of posts telling young men not to fornicate, the superiorty of sex in marriage as opposed to out of it. That doesn't mean I'm sleeping around, and if someone accused me of that because I posted against it, such a thread could turn to a long thread, or might have years back during a time when I was less busy with work.

You are the classic case of a repressed homosexual which cumulates into your obsessions, your accusations and your denials.

yick on the other hand is thinking of men's body parts mentioned in the post above. These are the thoughts on your mind, not mine. You posted that you 'appreciate a good-looking man', then you wrote, 'homosexual arse bandit cannot see anything but dicks and bare arses in the shower'. These are your gross, icky thoughts, not mine.

Who brought all this up in the first place? Who accused of who of being gay first? You did, because your repression and your shame makes you accuse others just so you can feel better about yourself.

Don't use porn. I talked to a street evangelist once who said he'd perceive a homosexual spirit on a man, then get to talking to the man and find out that the man watched porn, and he'd admit that he'd had homosexual thoughts. He thought a spirit got on the man from watching porn. I don't know if there is a spirit that gets on men or not, or if it's just putting that junk in your brain, watching men's body parts in porn videos. Whatever it is, stay away from that kind of junk and then maybe you won't think about stuff like that nasty junk you wrote about in your post.

Your repression of your true desires is a form of mental illness.

You also posted that you cannot tell between a beautiful black woman and a black man if the beautiful black women is beautiful or not - that is also a form of mental illness - nobody would admit that in public because everyone would think you are an idiot, a racist or mentally ill.

I am going for the third option, go and seek help for this, it isn't a good way to live.

[mahayana]

If I saw Brat Pitt and Michael Moore together I wouldn't be able to tell which one is more attractive because I don't want to stick my dick into either one's disgusting asshole like some homosexual freak of nature.

[yick]

If I saw Brat Pitt and Michael Moore together I wouldn't be able to tell which one is more attractive because I don't want to stick my dick into either one's disgusting asshole like some homosexual freak of nature.

Shut up Rock McKinnon.

[MrMan]

Your trying to live this down.

'You're'

I couldn't give two shits, who are you? You're a halfwit of no importance, if you think I am gay then who cares? You are some fat, middle aged spastic who looks like the mayor.

I could say the same about you. But you don't like it if someone insinuates you might be gay, do you? That's fairly common. Straight men do not want to be considered gay... or women. So why don't you treat others the way you want to be treated?

I don't know where you get the fat spastic part. I am middle aged. I've had people tell me I look younger than I am, and one person told me I looked like a mayor. Are mayors usually fat and spastic?

Why do you keep talking about sex in regard to this topic.

Because YOU brought it up.

You f***ing idiot.
[/quote]

Shemp brought up the gay thing, then you. (That's Shemp who has posted in the past that one can satisfy urges with a woman, man, or animal.) Then you made your comment about appreciating a good-looking man. Don't think that won't come up if you start accusing people of being gay on the forum.

Not being able to tell if men are good-looking is not evidence for being gay. I'll admit that having a perception or opinion on the matter doesn't make you gay. If you don't like being accused of being gay, don't make such accusations... without evidence. Life is a lot better if you are less obtuse and try not to come off as bitter and and ornery.

The idea that if someone is disgusted by homosexuality, he must be gay, is pretty stupid reasoning. The idea that if someone can't tell if men are good-looking, he must be gay is equally stupid reasoning.

Let's see what the evidence for slander of me is.

Won't it be libel as it is written and not spoken? Like I said, thick as shit

Well, there is no 'evidence' of libel because you started the libellous slurs, all that has happened is you have got them back except I have proof and you have none.

I never actually called you gay. You and Shemp are the ones committing libel. Though our legal systems are so messed up some judges may not have the good sense to realize that accusing someone of homosexual activity is an attack on ones character.

You are the classic case of a repressed homosexual which cumulates into your obsessions, your accusations and your denials.

If you apply your own short-sighted and ignorant reasoning to yourself, you would have to conclude that you, yourself are a repressed homosexual. After all you appreciate a good-looking man, and then you deny you are a homosexual. If denial is evidence of homosexuality... you are denying it.

yick on the other hand is thinking of men's body parts mentioned in the post above. These are the thoughts on your mind, not mine. You posted that you 'appreciate a good-looking man', then you wrote, 'homosexual arse bandit cannot see anything but dicks and bare arses in the shower'. These are your gross, icky thoughts, not mine.

Who brought all this up in the first place? Who accused of who of being gay first? You did, [/quote]

Shemp then you. Read the thread.

because your repression and your shame makes you accuse others just so you can feel better about yourself.

I haven't accused you of being gay, so if accusing someone of being gay or homosexual is necessarily the result of repression and shame, then what does that say about you. Apply your idiotic reasoning to yourself, dude.

Or you could just resolve to behave yourself socially instead of trying to turn a thread into an idiotic insult war room.

Your repression of your true desires is a form of mental illness.

Are you some kind of English major? Stay out of the field of psychology. How many doctoral seminars in Psychology have you had?

You also posted that you cannot tell between a beautiful black woman and a black man if the beautiful black women is beautiful or not - that is also a form of mental illness -

Is your confused misremembering of my past posts mental illness? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For me, most black women aren't pretty. Maybe one in 500 or 100 young black women are pretty to me. Some bi-racial women and women from the horn of Africa, and to some extent the Khoisan may be exceptions for facial beauty. For black men, I can't tell if white or black men are average or good-looking. I can tell if I think one black woman is better looking than another, but usually the prettier one might be on par with an average white woman to me. Freema Agyeman, Jessica Lucas, a young Halle Berry would be exceptions to the rule as far as my perceptions go. There are some pretty Ethiopian and Somali models. Come to think of it, a Kenyan woman I worked with was kind of good-looking.

It's all subjective, so it doesn't matter since another man may be attracted to her. Good-looking is something I can perceive for females. Male features are not attractive or good-looking to me. I'd just have to intellectually look for symmetry or square jaws or defined features or something like that, which don't always push the right buttons with females. With women it's instant recognition.

nobody would admit that in public because everyone would think you are an idiot, a racist or mentally ill.

I'm using an anonymous username. I wouldn't go up on a stage and tell people I don't consider black women to be good-looking, or say that at work. Is it racist to only be attracted to different races? That's a stupid definition of racism. If I were only attracted to Asians, would I be racist against my own race? Was Contrarian Expat racist against his own race for not being attracted to Black women?

[mahayana]

@MrMan, you seem straight to me. I'm willing to bet that the posters on here accusing you of being gay are really the closet homosexuals. Thank you for putting these cum guzzling faggots like @Yick and @Shemp in their place.

[mahayana]

My wife and I have a friend of middle eastern heritage who keeps looking for a wife. He has a great job, debt free real estate investments, teaches Bible studies, is a kind man, a good communicator. In regard to those things, I considered him a catch. I was talking to my wife about his quest to find a wife, and whether he was a catch, and I said I didn't know if he was for looks. She let me know that he was. I could tell he wasn't Michael Moore, but between average guy and good-looking, I can't perceive that, or have almost no sense of it. I can intellectually look for sharp features and such. I would imagine poorly defined features, kind of round blob noses might be unattractive on men like they are on girls. But it's an intellectual exercise to guess not something I just see like a see with a woman.

Why would he be religious if he was cursed as a subhuman, genetic failure who can't get a wife because of his looks? It seems like it would be smarter to be an atheist in that case. The fact that some men are good looking who get all of the women while others are genetic failures who get none basically shows that religion is fake and that evolution is real. It seems very cucked to be a worshipper when you were created as a genetic failure. As much as I hate incels I can actually respect them more for being a detriment to society instead of being a submissive, religious cuck. Imagine contributing to a society that hates you and not a single woman out of billions in the planet will let you stick your penis into her smelly fish hole.

[MrMan]

My wife and I have a friend of middle eastern heritage who keeps looking for a wife. He has a great job, debt free real estate investments, teaches Bible studies, is a kind man, a good communicator. In regard to those things, I considered him a catch. I was talking to my wife about his quest to find a wife, and whether he was a catch, and I said I didn't know if he was for looks. She let me know that he was. I could tell he wasn't Michael Moore, but between average guy and good-looking, I can't perceive that, or have almost no sense of it. I can intellectually look for sharp features and such. I would imagine poorly defined features, kind of round blob noses might be unattractive on men like they are on girls. But it's an intellectual exercise to guess not something I just see like a see with a woman.

Why would he be religious if he was cursed as a subhuman, genetic failure who can't get a wife because of his looks? It seems like it would be smarter to be an atheist in that case. The fact that some men are good looking who get all of the women while others are genetic failures who get none basically shows that religion is fake and that evolution is real. It seems very cucked to be a worshipper when you were created as a genetic failure. As much as I hate incels I can actually respect them more for being a detriment to society instead of being a submissive, religious cuck. Imagine contributing to a society that hates you and not a single woman out of billions in the planet will let you stick your penis into her smelly fish hole.

No matter what you look like you should be reconciled to your creator.

My wife says our friend is good-looking, btw. It sounds like he might be getting somewhere with his most recent candidate, a girl from the old country so to speak.

[MrMan]

My wife and I have a friend of middle eastern heritage who keeps looking for a wife. He has a great job, debt free real estate investments, teaches Bible studies, is a kind man, a good communicator. In regard to those things, I considered him a catch. I was talking to my wife about his quest to find a wife, and whether he was a catch, and I said I didn't know if he was for looks. She let me know that he was. I could tell he wasn't Michael Moore, but between average guy and good-looking, I can't perceive that, or have almost no sense of it. I can intellectually look for sharp features and such. I would imagine poorly defined features, kind of round blob noses might be unattractive on men like they are on girls. But it's an intellectual exercise to guess not something I just see like a see with a woman.

Why would he be religious if he was cursed as a subhuman, genetic failure who can't get a wife because of his looks? It seems like it would be smarter to be an atheist in that case. The fact that some men are good looking who get all of the women while others are genetic failures who get none basically shows that religion is fake and that evolution is real. It seems very cucked to be a worshipper when you were created as a genetic failure. As much as I hate incels I can actually respect them more for being a detriment to society instead of being a submissive, religious cuck. Imagine contributing to a society that hates you and not a single woman out of billions in the planet will let you stick your penis into her smelly fish hole.

No matter what you look like you should be reconciled to your creator.

My wife says our friend is good-looking, btw. It sounds like he might be getting somewhere with his most recent candidate, a girl from the old country so to speak.

[yick]

I could say the same about you. But you don't like it if someone insinuates you might be gay, do you? That's fairly common. Straight men do not want to be considered gay... or women. So why don't you treat others the way you want to be treated?

Wrong! I don't care what you think - what social sanction could you bring on me if I was gay? There is nothing you could do and thus your opinion on my sexuality and who I prefer has as much gravitas as a worm or a piece of dirt.

I don't know where you get the fat spastic part. I am middle aged. I've had people tell me I look younger than I am, and one person told me I looked like a mayor. Are mayors usually fat and spastic?

Do you think Hugh Jackman gets people coming up to him and saying he looks like the mayor? People come up to you and tell you that you look like the mayor and that's because you look like a bag of shit.

Shemp brought up the gay thing, then you. (That's Shemp who has posted in the past that one can satisfy urges with a woman, man, or animal.) Then you made your comment about appreciating a good-looking man. Don't think that won't come up if you start accusing people of being gay on the forum.

No he didn't YOU did - you are so stupid you don't think any of us are capable of researching a few pages back on a thread on Happier Abroad - where did you get your PhD from, genius? From a box of cheerios?

What is your frame of reference? Are some men good-looking to you? Do you look at other men besides Willy here and say, "Wow! That's a good-looking man."?

I still have difficulty relating to it. I just really realized a few years ago that non-gay men really had opinions about what other men were good-looking. I just can't tell hardly at all. I can go by female reactions, or I can tell if a man is strange-looking.

I really wouldn't care if men found me to be a good-looking man or not. I understand a single man wanting to be attractive to _women_ he finds attractive, but women he finds unattractive or other men.... who cares?

Not being able to tell if men are good-looking is not evidence for being gay. I'll admit that having a perception or opinion on the matter doesn't make you gay. If you don't like being accused of being gay, don't make such accusations... without evidence. Life is a lot better if you are less obtuse and try not to come off as bitter and and ornery.

It's a sign of your repressed feelings towards men for sex and your homosexuality, you don't have an opinion, you have an obsessed that spans pages on this forum - nobody else talks about it like you do.

The idea that if someone is disgusted by homosexuality, he must be gay, is pretty stupid reasoning. The idea that if someone can't tell if men are good-looking, he must be gay is equally stupid reasoning.

Deflection

I never actually called you gay. You and Shemp are the ones committing libel. Though our legal systems are so messed up some judges may not have the good sense to realize that accusing someone of homosexual activity is an attack on ones character.

You insinuated it though and then Shemp called you out. A judge would see how much evidence there is regards your obsession of bum sex and that you have a fascination with it.

If you apply your own short-sighted and ignorant reasoning to yourself, you would have to conclude that you, yourself are a repressed homosexual. After all you appreciate a good-looking man, and then you deny you are a homosexual. If denial is evidence of homosexuality... you are denying it.

I am not but I don't care what you think you bent twat - if you think that then go ahead - you are still hiding repressed homosexual feelings, how many posts about homosexuality have you written on here now? Must be now at 200.

Shemp then you. Read the thread.

What is your frame of reference? Are some men good-looking to you? Do you look at other men besides Willy here and say, "Wow! That's a good-looking man."?

I still have difficulty relating to it. I just really realized a few years ago that non-gay men really had opinions about what other men were good-looking. I just can't tell hardly at all. I can go by female reactions, or I can tell if a man is strange-looking.

I really wouldn't care if men found me to be a good-looking man or not. I understand a single man wanting to be attractive to _women_ he finds attractive, but women he finds unattractive or other men.... who cares?

I haven't accused you of being gay, so if accusing someone of being gay or homosexual is necessarily the result of repression and shame, then what does that say about you. Apply your idiotic reasoning to yourself, dude.

Yes, you did, you insinuated it that anyone who thinks another man is 'good looking' cannot be straight like you you f***ing raging queer - the repression and the denial is there for all to see.

Or you could just resolve to behave yourself socially instead of trying to turn a thread into an idiotic insult war room.

You voluntary involved yourself into this didn't you? Who asked for your opinion? Did I ask for your opinion?

Are you some kind of English major? Stay out of the field of psychology. How many doctoral seminars in Psychology have you had?

The same as you, none! you are as much a PhD holder as I am a trapeze artist.

Is your confused misremembering of my past posts mental illness? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For me, most black women aren't pretty. Maybe one in 500 or 100 young black women are pretty to me. Some bi-racial women and women from the horn of Africa, and to some extent the Khoisan may be exceptions for facial beauty. For black men, I can't tell if white or black men are average or good-looking. I can tell if I think one black woman is better looking than another, but usually the prettier one might be on par with an average white woman to me. Freema Agyeman, Jessica Lucas, a young Halle Berry would be exceptions to the rule as far as my perceptions go. There are some pretty Ethiopian and Somali models. Come to think of it, a Kenyan woman I worked with was kind of good-looking.

It's all subjective, so it doesn't matter since another man may be attracted to her. Good-looking is something I can perceive for females. Male features are not attractive or good-looking to me. I'd just have to intellectually look for symmetry or square jaws or defined features or something like that, which don't always push the right buttons with females. With women it's instant recognition.

I will search it out where you said you couldn't tell the difference in attractiveness between black men and black women - racist cunt.

I'm using an anonymous username. I wouldn't go up on a stage and tell people I don't consider black women to be good-looking, or say that at work. Is it racist to only be attracted to different races? That's a stupid definition of racism. If I were only attracted to Asians, would I be racist against my own race? Was Contrarian Expat racist against his own race for not being attracted to Black women?

When you say that you can't tell between an attractive black women and an average black men then yeah, it is, as for your anonymous username, have you thought about changing it to something more suitable to your posting history like 'RagingRepressedQueer'

[MrMan]

Wrong! I don't care what you think - what social sanction could you bring on me if I was gay? There is nothing you could do and thus your opinion on my sexuality and who I prefer has as much gravitas as a worm or a piece of dirt.

If you didn't care at all, you wouldn't have posted your long bitter diatribe.

Do you think Hugh Jackman gets people coming up to him and saying he looks like the mayor?

Hugh Jackman played a mayor in one of his movies, so your question is kind of ironic.

No he didn't YOU did - you are so stupid you don't think any of us are capable of researching a few pages back on a thread on Happier Abroad - where did you get your PhD from, genius? From a box of cheerios?

Go ahead. You threw out the 'gay' word before I did. I just said it was odd you were commenting on another poster's looks. Why do you feel compelled to be so rude and antagonistic toward other posters anyway?

Btw, I got all my degrees from different flagship state universities in the US. I don't want to give too much detail.

Not being able to tell if men are good-looking is not evidence for being gay. I'll admit that having a perception or opinion on the matter doesn't make you gay. If you don't like being accused of being gay, don't make such accusations... without evidence. Life is a lot better if you are less obtuse and try not to come off as bitter and and ornery.

It's a sign of your repressed feelings towards men for sex and your homosexuality, you don't have an opinion, you have an obsessed that spans pages on this forum - nobody else talks about it like you do.

I figure you are probably just saying that because you are desperate for an argument. But don't make yourself look like an idiot by specious arguments. Your the one who appreciates a good-looking man, as you posted earlier. Not everyone feels like you about the topic. And not everyone has something to repress.

Are you some kind of English major? Stay out of the field of psychology. How many doctoral seminars in Psychology have you had?

The same as you, none! you are as much a PhD holder as I am a trapeze artist.

Is trapeze artist slang for something nowadays? Do you do the trapeze stuff with a good-looking man?

I've got no reason to lie about my education or vocation.

When you say that you can't tell between an attractive black women and an average black men then yeah, it is, as for your anonymous username, have you thought about changing it to something more suitable to your posting history like 'RagingRepressedQueer'

Except I didn't say that, unless there was some kind of typo, but you really did post several messages back that you appreciate a good-looking man... a point that will likely be raised whenever you accuse other posters of being gay. I can't tell if a black man is good-looking. I could tell if a man is strange-looking. Relatively few Black women are good-looking to me. But I can tell what black women I think are better looking than other black women. I don't have an perception of that for black men unless they are strange-looking.

I remember watching Sanford and Son as a child and some man commented on how a black woman was good-looking. I remember I didn't see it. I could tell that Virna Lisi or Elly May Clampett were good-looking.

I wonder if you secretly don't find black women as good-looking as white women, and just don't want to say that because you don't want to admit you are racist... by your own criteria. It's all subjective. It doesn't matter, and it doesn't mean you are a racist if you don't find women from certain races to, generally, be as pretty as others.

Let's keep in mind that this is coming from a poster who appreciates a good-looking man. You said it. You should drop the topic before you dig your hole any deeper or fly your trapeze any higher.

[yick]

If you didn't care at all, you wouldn't have posted your long bitter diatribe.

Wrong, I am replying to your posts that are replying to me. If you don't want replies then shut the f**k up.

Hugh Jackman played a mayor in one of his movies, so your question is kind of ironic.

He does? In what film?

Not in real life though, that is the sort of thing Winston would say.

Go ahead. You threw out the 'gay' word before I did. I just said it was odd you were commenting on another poster's looks. Why do you feel compelled to be so rude and antagonistic toward other posters anyway?

No I didn't/

Btw, I got all my degrees from different flagship state universities in the US. I don't want to give too much detail.

I don't believe you, I know alumni from these flagship universities know how to spell Colombia correctly.

I figure you are probably just saying that because you are desperate for an argument. But don't make yourself look like an idiot by specious arguments. Your the one who appreciates a good-looking man, as you posted earlier. Not everyone feels like you about the topic. And not everyone has something to repress.

Yeah I do, so what? I am not gay but if you think I am, it doesn't matter because your opinion is not important and if I was gay, I would just come out and say it, you never get round to answering this point, what is stopping me in 2023 in coming out? Nothing!

Is trapeze artist slang for something nowadays? Do you do the trapeze stuff with a good-looking man?

I've got no reason to lie about my education or vocation.

What you say on here, your spelling and grammar and overall stupidity doesn't say 'PhD'.

Except I didn't say that, unless there was some kind of typo, but you really did post several messages back that you appreciate a good-looking man... a point that will likely be raised whenever you accuse other posters of being gay. I can't tell if a black man is good-looking. I could tell if a man is strange-looking. Relatively few Black women are good-looking to me. But I can tell what black women I think are better looking than other black women. I don't have an perception of that for black men unless they are strange-looking.

I remember watching Sanford and Son as a child and some man commented on how a black woman was good-looking. I remember I didn't see it. I could tell that Virna Lisi or Elly May Clampett were good-looking.

I wonder if you secretly don't find black women as good-looking as white women, and just don't want to say that because you don't want to admit you are racist... by your own criteria. It's all subjective. It doesn't matter, and it doesn't mean you are a racist if you don't find women from certain races to, generally, be as pretty as others.

Let's keep in mind that this is coming from a poster who appreciates a good-looking man. You said it. You should drop the topic before you dig your hole any deeper or fly your trapeze any higher.

There is 'no hole to dig' if I was gay in 2023, nothing to stop me from coming out and living an open life as a homosexual - nobody would care - you would care because your 200 plus posts states you care but like I said, what sanction do you bring? You bring no sanctions at all you fat, mayor looking repressed closet case queer.

[MrMan]

Yick,

I don't have a doctorate in spelling, and I do not put a lot of time into editing posts like this. I have no reason ti lie to you.

If you want to come out of a closet that is your choice. I do not know your motivation. I didn't say you were gay. I pointed out it was odd you were concerned with another man's looks and getting on his case about it. Then you posted about appreciating a good looking man.

[MrMan]

Hugh Jackman played a mayor in one of his movies, so your question is kind of ironic.

He does? In what film?

I wonder if you were too young to have a girlfriend or group of friends drag you to see 'Les Miserables', where he plays a thief who stole a loaf of bread, changes his identity, becomes a businessman and a mayor.

Go ahead. You threw out the 'gay' word before I did. I just said it was odd you were commenting on another poster's looks. Why do you feel compelled to be so rude and antagonistic toward other posters anyway?

No I didn't/

It's on the previous pages. You can look it up.

Btw, I got all my degrees from different flagship state universities in the US. I don't want to give too much detail.

I don't believe you, I know alumni from these flagship universities know how to spell Colombia correctly.

Spelling varies. If I am in a faculty meeting with the English faculty, it can be comical the extent to which they haggle over wording of policies. If one wants to table a discussion without actually being so direct as to do so, one could suggest rewording a portion of a policy, then the English faculty go crazy. But other faculty do make spelling errors from time to time. This isn't all that serious, btw.

I've got no reason to make up stuff about my past.

Yeah I do, so what? I am not gay but if you think I am, it doesn't matter because your opinion is not important and if I was gay, I would just come out and say it, you never get round to answering this point, what is stopping me in 2023 in coming out? Nothing!

If you want to keep making accusations at me-- with gross pornographic language that comes out of your own mind--you should consider your own logic. Other people could 'come out', too. There is not much reason to hide it in an anonymous forum... some reason if you have been here a while and have some emotional investment in your image or the opinions of other anonymous posters.

But if we apply your own theory to yourself, that someone expending effort to eny being gay and discusses the topic in threads, then the more you type, the more evidence you are piling up against yourself. Except in our brief interactions, you have spewed out crude descriptions of gay sex acts and expressed how you appreciate a good-looking man... content you don't find in my posts.

Is trapeze artist slang for something nowadays? Do you do the trapeze stuff with a good-looking man?

I've got no reason to lie about my education or vocation.

What you say on here, your spelling and grammar and overall stupidity doesn't say 'PhD'.

Not sure what your beef is with my grammar. I sometimes write colloquial American spoken English (like I did with the sentence fragment in the first sentence which I would penalize my students for if it were a college paper; but this is not a college paper.)

There is 'no hole to dig' if I was gay in 2023, nothing to stop me from coming out and living an open life as a homosexual - nobody would care - you would care because your 200 plus posts states you care but like I said, what sanction do you bring? You bring no sanctions at all you fat, mayor looking repressed closet case queer.

There you go, providing nice quote fodder for future discussions if you want pages and pages of whether or not you are a suppressed gay. If you think denying you are gay is evidence for being gay, you are adding to the mountain of evidence, here.

I don't believe in that idiotic theory. Most men aren't normally going to turn out gay, even the ones who do not bond with their fathers, and a lot of the ones who are molested end up exclusively with a female or females. Recent propaganda might have changed it. But if you hold to this 'suppression' theory that someone who expends effort to deny that he is gay must be suppressed, it must make sense to you based on your own personal tastes, preferences, and views of the world, right? Are you gay, or is your theory false?

[Shemp]

What you say on here, your spelling and grammar and overall stupidity doesn't say 'PhD'.

BS = exactly what it says (at least in social sciences, engineering and natural science another story)
MS = more of the same
PhD = piled higher and deeper

He's pedantic, long-winded, not the sharpest tool in the box, obsessive-compulsive, etc. Sounds like a typical social sciences PhD to me.