http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/ ... g-the-smp/
This graphic is very telling.

The SMV placed on men and women is relative to each others gender only, not to where each gender stands relative to societal standards. A man's dating value cannot lower to that of an equal valued woman.RobinHood wrote: It's is of no relevance to the dating marketplace in the west, where men have a low dating value and woman's is very high.
Ridiculous. Yes, men aged 30 have the same SMV as a man aged 50, or at least in generalities they do. The graph does not show attractiveness or physical shape, but overall "score" based on several factors. A man aged 30 will be much more attractive than a man aged 50. Is attractiveness the only thing that determines ones value?Banano wrote:Graph is a joke
man at 30 and 50 have the same sexual market value
In the west women at 40 have more sexual value than men of the same age,
I did four searches; SMV, sexual market value, navigating the sexual market place, and the authors name, none yielding the results. Sorry if I couldn't find it.djfourmoney wrote:Repost... If we had a mod he would lock this.
Superb graph, brilliant article. Thanks for posting.MrJowee wrote:Here's an excellent article on the relationship between male and female desirability and their overall "sexual market value" in the dating world (the so-called "sexual market place"), and how these factors correlate with age comparable to each gender.
http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/ ... g-the-smp/
This graphic is very telling.
To be sure the sexual revolution and feminine-ubiquitous hormonal birth control has radically shifted primacy to the feminine imperative and its prime directive of hypergamy, but what this means is a readjustment of the masculine imperative is now necessary. With the rise of the internet and the meta Game that is the manosphere I think we’re seeing this adjustment in its beginnings.
This.Maker55 wrote:The graph is pretty correct.
However, a man continues to gain value throughout his forties.
The graph has a man's peak value at 36, I would say a man is in his peak in his 40s.
Many men in their 40s say that they attracted more women in that time of their lives than at any other time.
60 years ago, many men were quite valuable in their 20s and this was like it was in the ancient days as well.
I would say 36 is about right. Have you seen the average 35-36 Man in America? Most are overweight, especially if they come from poor/rural areas.Maker55 wrote:The graph is pretty correct.
However, a man continues to gain value throughout his forties.
The graph has a man's peak value at 36, I would say a man is in his peak in his 40s.
Many men in their 40s say that they attracted more women in that time of their lives than at any other time.
60 years ago, many men were quite valuable in their 20s and this was like it was in the ancient days as well.