Join John Adams Mon and Wed nights 7:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar!


Share This Page

View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       Elegance Theme       Dark Theme

POLL: Would you always...

Discuss and talk about any general topic.
Post Reply

Would you always use a condom when sleeping with a whore?

Yes, I don't want to get an STD
2
50%
Sometimes, I don't use a condom with every whore
0
No votes
No, I never use condoms
2
50%
 
Total votes: 4

Tsar
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4753
Joined: August 7th, 2012, 12:40 pm
Location: Somwhere, Maine

POLL: Would you always...

Post by Tsar »

Would you always use a condom when sleeping with a whore?
I'm a visionary and a philosopher king 👑

User avatar
HouseMD
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Location: Right Behind You

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by HouseMD »

Given the enormous risk of HPV (huge increase in risk of oral, anal, and penile cancers), HTLV (massive risk of leukemia), herpes (it's f***ing herpes, no explanation needed), and HIV in whores, you'd have to be a retard to bang them without a condom.

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by Cornfed »

Do whores include just actual prostitutes, or all non-wife class females?

Tsar
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4753
Joined: August 7th, 2012, 12:40 pm
Location: Somwhere, Maine

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by Tsar »

In this poll it's about p4p whores. Not the regular slut/whores that most guys date (and many marry).
I'm a visionary and a philosopher king 👑

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by Cornfed »

I'd generally want to go without if permissible and if the hoes were regularly checked. If you have to eat a chocolate bar with the wrapper on, is it really worth bothering?

User avatar
HouseMD
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Location: Right Behind You

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by HouseMD »

Cornfed wrote:I'd generally want to go without if permissible and if the hoes were regularly checked. If you have to eat a chocolate bar with the wrapper on, is it really worth bothering?
You realize that the majority of STDs aren't tested for, right? Genital warts, herpes, HTLV, etc...

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by Cornfed »

HouseMD wrote:
Cornfed wrote:I'd generally want to go without if permissible and if the hoes were regularly checked. If you have to eat a chocolate bar with the wrapper on, is it really worth bothering?
You realize that the majority of STDs aren't tested for, right? Genital warts, herpes, HTLV, etc...
I meant visually checked as well as swabs, blood tests and such.

User avatar
HouseMD
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Location: Right Behind You

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by HouseMD »

Cornfed wrote:
HouseMD wrote:
Cornfed wrote:I'd generally want to go without if permissible and if the hoes were regularly checked. If you have to eat a chocolate bar with the wrapper on, is it really worth bothering?
You realize that the majority of STDs aren't tested for, right? Genital warts, herpes, HTLV, etc...
I meant visually checked as well as swabs, blood tests and such.
Herpes, HTLV, and HPV are actually not visible the majority of the time and yet can still be passed on. In fact, the forms of HPV that substantially increase your risk of oral, anal, and penile cancer only cause microscopic changes to the female cervix the majority of the time, while causing no signs or symptoms in males aside from that little "3.5x the chance of oral cancer" thing (your risk without HPV is 1 in 84, while with HPV it is 1 in 28). Just some thoughs.

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by Cornfed »

Yeah well, nothing ventured nothing gained. What if I slip over in the shower? Oh well, better not take showers.

User avatar
HouseMD
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Location: Right Behind You

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by HouseMD »

Cornfed wrote:Yeah well, nothing ventured nothing gained. What if I slip over in the shower? Oh well, better not take showers.
Given that 80% of whores have a chance of giving you HPV, 2% have a chance of giving you leukemia in Asia, and one in four has a chance of giving you herpes- in addition to ALL of the other shit out there they could give you if they lied about testing- you've got approximately a 3% chance of getting cancer from a disease a whore gives you and a one in four chance of the 'ol herp (which is actually MUCH worse than many people realize, as it has far more manifestations than a bit of blistering and burning in many people). There's way less than a 3% chance of each new shower I hop in giving me cancer, and a far, far lower chance than one in four of it giving me an unending illness that can cause everything from painful ulcers to fatal meningitis.

I'll stick with the showers and not banging whores, but if I ever do, I'll use a condom.

drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by drealm »

Another reason why mid teen girls are the best. It was only a few years ago that Sweden or Switzerland (forget which one) still allowed legalized prostitution for girls in the 16-17 age range. Unfortunately I missed that golden era.

Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5983
Joined: April 16th, 2011, 6:23 pm

Post by Ghost »

.
Last edited by Ghost on January 10th, 2020, 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
HouseMD
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2262
Joined: February 13th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Location: Right Behind You

Re: POLL: Would you always...

Post by HouseMD »

http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/article ... eid=795486

A lot of things weren't considered problems until recently. The big reason that we didn't consider HSV-2 a big deal was we didn't realize how serious the neurological implications were until we started learning how the virus damaged the nervous system, often irreparably, in a significant minority of people. HPV is another one that we didn't realize was present in the majority of certain cancers until we started doing genome sequencing and realized that it inserted oncogenic genes into cells that moved them one step up the cancer pathway, and that HPV was present in the majority of certain types of cancer. We didn't realize that human leukemia virus was a thing until we found it in the explosively replicating immune cells of every person with a particular type of leukemia in Asia and Africa. These are but three examples- I've got a whole box of horrors I could share with you. The worst part is, some of them, like herpes, can't really be protected against even with condoms and can be spread even with no visible lesions, while others, such as human leukemia virus, just straight up aren't tested for and you pop up with hairy cell leukemia a few years after you bang some random hoe in Asia.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”