Traditional monogamous society vs. promiscuous culture

[MattHanson1990]

A traditional monogamous society is most ideal when it comes to mating, especially for men. It's one man and one woman pairing up, and the man can get sex via p4p while normal women remain chaste through marriage and the woman only bears her man's children. On the other hand, promiscuous societies make it easier to get laid, but the consequence is that the top tier men get all the women, leaving most of the men out. On top of that, men deflower other men's future wives, and it's particularly bad when p4p is illegal and the government subsidizes female promiscuity. But in less developed countries, men still have more options compared to Western males. However, once women have gotten knocked up by her share of bad boys, she would look for a chump to pay for her mistakes. Oftentimes, the girls who have been knocked up would throw themselves at chumps, wanting to marry them really quickly.

So far, I've heard that many cultures these days are promiscuous. Certainly a lot of third world countries are naturally promiscuous. But America has also been exporting its values all over the world. One of the last traditionally monogamous societies left is in the interior of Mexico, especially the Bajío. At least most of Mexico is resisting the American cultural disease.

Now, a downside I read about monogamous cultures is that if you wait too long, then the number of eligible women decreases. Does this mean that past a certain age, it's too late, you're now invisible to single women and you have no chance of even getting a foothold in the dating scene? I'm 26 and hoping to date more Mexican women in the Bajío.

[drronnie]

A traditional monogamous society is most ideal when it comes to mating, especially for men. It's one man and one woman pairing up, and the man can get sex via p4p while normal women remain chaste through marriage and the woman only bears her man's children. On the other hand, promiscuous societies make it easier to get laid, but the consequence is that the top tier men get all the women, leaving most of the men out. On top of that, men deflower other men's future wives, and it's particularly bad when p4p is illegal and the government subsidizes female promiscuity. But in less developed countries, men still have more options compared to Western males. However, once women have gotten knocked up by her share of bad boys, she would look for a chump to pay for her mistakes. Oftentimes, the girls who have been knocked up would throw themselves at chumps, wanting to marry them really quickly.

So far, I've heard that many cultures these days are promiscuous. Certainly a lot of third world countries are naturally promiscuous. But America has also been exporting its values all over the world. One of the last traditionally monogamous societies left is in the interior of Mexico, especially the Bajío. At least most of Mexico is resisting the American cultural disease.

Now, a downside I read about monogamous cultures is that if you wait too long, then the number of eligible women decreases. Does this mean that past a certain age, it's too late, you're now invisible to single women and you have no chance of even getting a foothold in the dating scene? I'm 26 and hoping to date more Mexican women in the Bajío.

this is mainly what many redpills are saying. In a patriachal society basically everyone who has a decent character and job gets a adequate partner. That is the way its supposed to be. I thought too that when I start working in Thailand that I would end up getting a decent partner without the bullshit of social circle or game. Man was I disappointed