Why do Anglo women like BDSM so much?

[ArchibaultNew]

Hey guys,
I haven noticed this thread in Anglo women. Especially, American women. Many people will say BDSM is universal. However, I would not say so. Actually, there this guy that said that some White American women got off BDSM because they were used to getting their own way on everything and finally someone putting a stop to the "felt right."

Roosh also said that his impressions with American women was that many of them wanted, "Caveman Game." Meaning that they wanted a "non-intelligent, brute" type of guy. This was the only type of guy that would turn them on.

In contrast, with Latinas and other women which wanted to get to know you a bit and appeal to their "logical brain." It was a more balanced approach.

Also there's some weirdos who will say, this is the true women sexuality. But they seem to not see beyond this specific culture. For instance, I have met friends who said that in France and Brazil women valued intellectualism and education much more.

[MrMan]

I heard some women on a Christian radio station back when '50 Shades of Gray' was all the rage that this appealed to a skewed version of a need for a woman to submit to a man. Maybe it's an overreaction to the unnatural philosophy of feminism and men kowtowing to it. Having a man spank them, chain them up, smack them around a bit or whatever might be an extreme way to experience that, like a pressure release valve for being such uptight feminists.

[publicduende]

I heard some women on a Christian radio station back when '50 Shades of Gray' was all the rage that this appealed to a skewed version of a need for a woman to submit to a man. Maybe it's an overreaction to the unnatural philosophy of feminism and men kowtowing to it. Having a man spank them, chain them up, smack them around a bit or whatever might be an extreme way to experience that, like a pressure release valve for being such uptight feminists.

The honest statement is "need for a woman to submit to a man they find attractive".

Unless you look like actor Jamie Dornan, good luck pulling that stuff on women. The mere mention of it will have you reported and arrested

[MrMan]

I heard some women on a Christian radio station back when '50 Shades of Gray' was all the rage that this appealed to a skewed version of a need for a woman to submit to a man. Maybe it's an overreaction to the unnatural philosophy of feminism and men kowtowing to it. Having a man spank them, chain them up, smack them around a bit or whatever might be an extreme way to experience that, like a pressure release valve for being such uptight feminists.

The honest statement is "need for a woman to submit to a man they find attractive".

Unless you look like actor Jamie Dornan, good luck pulling that stuff on women. The mere mention of it will have you reported and arrested

Pull what on a woman? I was talking about feminists going into sado-masochism and wanting to be spanked and smacked around, not men 'pulling' that.

[publicduende]

Pull what on a woman? I was talking about feminists going into sado-masochism and wanting to be spanked and smacked around, not men 'pulling' that.

@MrMan

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough. By "pulling that off" I meant "successfully approach a young, attractive woman and ask if she wants him to spank them, smack them around and basically rape them". Unless you look like the movie version of Christian Grey, or better, the mere mention of that to said girl will land you in jail.

[Outcast9428]

Pull what on a woman? I was talking about feminists going into sado-masochism and wanting to be spanked and smacked around, not men 'pulling' that.

@MrMan

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough. By "pulling that off" I meant "successfully approach a young, attractive woman and ask if she wants him to spank them, smack them around and basically rape them". Unless you look like the movie version of Christian Grey, or better, the mere mention of that to said girl will land you in jail.

I think all of them should go to jail. BDSM is a repulsive and hideous perversion of sexuality. Possibly the most severe form of perversion there is. We should burn every copy of 50 shades in a bonfire and treat violent pornography like we currently treat child porn.

[rudder]

Hey guys,
I haven noticed this thread in Anglo women. Especially, American women. Many people will say BDSM is universal. However, I would not say so. Actually, there this guy that said that some White American women got off BDSM because they were used to getting their own way on everything and finally someone putting a stop to the "felt right."

Roosh also said that his impressions with American women was that many of them wanted, "Caveman Game." Meaning that they wanted a "non-intelligent, brute" type of guy. This was the only type of guy that would turn them on.

In contrast, with Latinas and other women which wanted to get to know you a bit and appeal to their "logical brain." It was a more balanced approach.

Also there's some weirdos who will say, this is the true women sexuality. But they seem to see beyond this specific culture. For instance, I have met friends who said that in France and Brazil women valued intellectualism and education much more.

Another reason to not pursue Anglo white women.

Is that a fact or did you just come up with some theory based on your suggested videos at pornhub?

[Tsar]

Hey guys,
I haven noticed this thread in Anglo women. Especially, American women. Many people will say BDSM is universal. However, I would not say so. Actually, there this guy that said that some White American women got off BDSM because they were used to getting their own way on everything and finally someone putting a stop to the "felt right."

Roosh also said that his impressions with American women was that many of them wanted, "Caveman Game." Meaning that they wanted a "non-intelligent, brute" type of guy. This was the only type of guy that would turn them on.

In contrast, with Latinas and other women which wanted to get to know you a bit and appeal to their "logical brain." It was a more balanced approach.

Also there's some weirdos who will say, this is the true women sexuality. But they seem to see beyond this specific culture. For instance, I have met friends who said that in France and Brazil women valued intellectualism and education much more.

Another reason to not pursue Anglo white women.

Is that a fact or did you just come up with some theory based on your suggested videos at pornhub?

It's real. I did a poll on a website and it got a lot of views. Most females voted they like choking, ass slapping, and other BDSM type of sex. More females than men voted they like doing that sort of stuff. It really shows that girls are into BDSM and getting pain inflicted on them because they can't actually get dominated any other way since feminism and girls are more sexual than guys in 2022.

[MrMan]

Pull what on a woman? I was talking about feminists going into sado-masochism and wanting to be spanked and smacked around, not men 'pulling' that.

@MrMan

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough. By "pulling that off" I meant "successfully approach a young, attractive woman and ask if she wants him to spank them, smack them around and basically rape them". Unless you look like the movie version of Christian Grey, or better, the mere mention of that to said girl will land you in jail.

I think all of them should go to jail. BDSM is a repulsive and hideous perversion of sexuality. Possibly the most severe form of perversion there is. We should burn every copy of 50 shades in a bonfire and treat violent pornography like we currently treat child porn.

I suppose it encompasses stuff like burning, cutting, whipping, beating and stuff like that. But they also sell fuzzy handcuffs and blindfolds at Spencer's at the mall. There is a nearly 100 billion porn industry, so any kind of sex niche aside from underaged, maybe animals or whatever, has legally protected porn proponents. Some women watch porn and get into weird stuff, but men watching it is a huge problem. And they want to try what they see in porn and get women into it, too.


There are women's magazines and blogs on how to spice up your sex life that might recommend blindfolds, getting tied up, etc. I know my wife wouldn't care for ropes and stuff like that. But if a couple wanted to put some fuzzy handcuffs on her and tie her up, or even if she wanted to spank her a bit or be a bit forceful and they are both cool with it and not really damaging her, I don't know why anyone else should care about it. If they are doing stuff they both enjoy and it contributes toward sexual intimacy in the marriage or it doesn't hurt it, I do not want the state intruding into the bedroom. There is also a positive side to having a spouse who wants to 'spice things up', since it shows interest in this aspect of marriage, and marriage is for the long haul. But the harmful violence stuff is a bad trend, especially in the extreme forms.

I don't find it as alarming as the weird trans stuff, the gay stuff, brainwashing the kids with this agenda, the widespread adultery and divorce in society, and the trend of women not submitting to men in marriage. The violence-in-the-bedroom stuff isn't as in-your-face on the street as some of this other stuff. It makes it's way into some movies from time to time, so it's there.

Maybe this will be the next step for liberals as they desensitize the public into a sexually perverse direction. Our culture experienced the sexual revolution with 'free love', then widespread divorce. Bar girls were once looked down on. Bars were for men in the 1950's. But then picking up women at bars became accepted as kind of normal. Divorce and remarriage became acceptable by society. More flagrant adultery was still considered wrong, but legal penalties not pursued and not as scandalized before.

Then the media and politicians brainwashed much of society into the courts into thinking homosexual sex was okay and into accepting a new definition of marriage. Men who as boys knew same-sex sexual activity was disgusting and degrading, who used to insult other boys in the locker room by calling them gay allowed themselves to be brainwashed and support this sexual perversion as if it were normal. Now we have this idiotic trans thing, where educated adults are talking about what pronouns to use, as if going with the dude-look-like a lady's self-deception is a moral thing to do, with underlying threats of losing your job if you do not go along with it. A few years ago, if a little boy says he wants to be a girl when he sees the girls get to play with the lipstick, and that would be fun to draw on the wall with, his parents would tell him he's a boy. Nowadays, the same idiotic left-wing brainwashed lemming-like parents might consider hormone treatments to prepare him for an operation. The idea that kids can choose their gender is being promoted in school.

I don't know what the next step of the brainwashing perversion agenda will be in our society, unless there is some kind of backlash, religious transformation, or institutions crumble to the point that pop culture cannot disseminate such trends. After the gay marriage thing went through the SCOTUS, I would have predicted the attention would have gone to supporting child molestation or beastiality. But it went to the trans thing. So some other guesses now might be promoting BDSM, with actors publically coming out to support BDSM rights, and the EEOC saying that if someone comes out as a whips and chains person, you cannot refuse to hire them in an interview. They might hire spankers and whippers to a company to increase diversity like they do with race. Probably not, but it's possible. This is more likely-- kids sex education in school might contain ideas from BDSM. I've already seen stuff about oral and anal in middle school kids' school materials that makes legislatures blush or be uncomfortable to talk about in the legislature.

Another step of perversion toward the children would be to double-down on the gay thing and require teens to have full-blown sex partners in sex-ed class, requiring them to try male, female, and made-up gender partners, matching them up, then giving them an F if they have decency and morals and refuse.

I could imagine a number of things interfering with this. Natural disasters or war ruining social structures, large hail stones. I'm not sure how bad societies are allowed to get exactly before the cup is full.

I remember when Sarah Palin ran for VP, seeing a clip from a couple of people, including that smart-alecky atheist liberal Bill Maher going on about how she looked like a librarian from a porn movie. I didn't know about this stuff, but I guess his audience was watching the porn movies and thought it was funny. Our culture had sunk pretty low for comedian-commentators to be talking about this and for the audience to understand. And liberals, maybe not that guy, but many of them were supposed to be against demeaning women by objectifying them and using sexual stereotypes. But with Republican candidates, they probably didn't care much. Of course, liberal atheists tend to demonstrate the lower end of the culture, generally. And Maher also can be a realist and see through a lot of propaganda on things like Covid restrictions.

I wasn't watching much TV in much of the 10's years of the 2000's. (Did I just name the decade?) I remember turning on the TV and seeing a comedian talk to a large audience. He started talking about tropes in porn. I didn't really know what he was talking about, but what I noticed was the audience laughing about it. When I was a child, porn was something one had to ask the guy behind the cash register for at the convenience store, and I think it getting into convenience stores was new. I did not get any for religious reasons, but having that extra layer of social discomfort was probably good so I wouldn't satiate my adolescent curiosity with something damaging. Now, kids can click and see super nasty abusive unrealistic sex at the click of a button, and look for opportunities to try this junk with the younger kids on the playground.

And it's so pervasive, that if a comedian tells a joke about what happens in porn movies, the audience laughs because they know what he's talking about, I guess. And they didn't even seem ashamed to laugh and show that they watch porn by doing so...not even the women.

I heard an anti-porn advocate talk about how they basically rape some of the porn actresses, and there was a clip of one throwing up after a rather rough oral experience and that was made a part of the movie. She had been in the industry. She was a rebellious teen who'd been molested by other kids. Her dad kicked her out on the street at 18. Someone saw her and offered her work. She ended up as a prostitute, then a porn star. Porn stars are prostitutes if they are sleeping around for money and the sex ends up on film. (Outlawing distribution of filmed prostitution--making it illegal if those engaged in sex get paid anything-- might deal with part of it without it being directly against freedom of expression in our legal system.) She says they use a lot of drugs on the girls. When they get to the set, there are a lot of men there expecting to have sex with them on film, and they can feel pressured to perform. Sets can be nasty places with unwashed sheets and leftover used condoms. It sounded pretty nasty.

And then men watch these bizarre extreme scenarios and think that is how to have sex. I hear they use men on the extremes when it comes to size, and this probably drives a lot of business for men who want male-enhancement surgery, who think women will want a 10 inch Coke can.

[Outcast9428]

@Tsar

Girls liking BDSM is not a sign that “they are more sexual then men.” The only person who would engage in BDSM is someone who is sexually dead on the inside. People with healthy sex drives do not get into crap like that because they are easily satisfied with the normal stuff. It’s the people who have deficient sex drives doing this stuff because they get bored easily and need something “special” to trigger their interest now. Not to mention we should not normalize perversion as being the same as being sexual.

@MrMan

BDSM is far worse and far more immoral then the gay and tranny stuff. They don’t need to use propaganda in schools because the porn industry already serves as the propaganda machine pushing people into this. Unlike the gay and tranny stuff, the BDSM shit is literally ruining sex for heterosexual people. 70% of men under the age of 40 have hit a girl in some form during sex and at least 70% of women have been hit during sex but it could be higher because some of the remaining 30% “refused to answer.” Masochistic fantasies and responses have gotten significantly higher in the modern era. Even Alfred Kinsey who is notoriously known for having tried to exaggerate the prevalence of deviant behavior only found that 50% of women responded this way to being injured. Given the fact that everybody, including liberal academics however believe that Kinsey exaggerated things we can assume the real percentage was no higher then 40%. Studies done in 1980 found about 50% of women having masochistic fantasies. By 1980 the sexual revolution had been going on for awhile so it makes sense that the number would go up a bit compared to the 1950s.

Today, however, 70% of women now have masochistic fantasies. Every guy I know who is sexually actively complains about girls pressuring them into slapping her or pretending to rape her. There have been cases of people killed during rough sex where the perpetrator actually got off legally simply due to saying that she consented to rough sex and her death was an accident.

In case you think I’m pulling this shit out of my ass like Mercury does here you go…

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... 546184.amp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesco ... r-men/amp/

https://wecantconsenttothis.uk/

According to this link below, 88% of porn contains violence towards the participants…

https://www.mcgill.ca/sociology/files/s ... search.pdf

Oh and by the way, they are teaching BDSM to college students…

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailym ... -more.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newswe ... %3Famp%3D1

This is a disease… An epidemic worse then COVID and certainly worse then faggots and trannies. As much as conservatives talk about them these days I almost never meet faggots or trannies and when I do all I have to do is avoid what is clearly a very small minority of the country.

The BDSM shit is not like that. Fortunately my girlfriend doesn’t like that stuff but I have had girls try to pressure me into it before. I have always refused but some guys don’t have the same willpower. I have unfortunately met countless girls who mentioned wanting to be choked or various other things. I knew a girl back in high school who had to stop dating because she had been with an abusive partner who was very into the BDSM stuff and she told me she was only attracted to abusive partners now because she got so f***ed up from how violent the sex was that she couldn’t enjoy normal sex anymore but she didn’t want to be abused so her only option was to stop dating entirely.

I am sick and tired of the right’s obsession with faggots and trannies but almost complete silence on this. This is by far the biggest issue our country faces. It’s destroying relationships, turning women into addicts for abuse and destroying their ability to enjoy healthy relationships based on love and affection, and it’s promoting criminality because women who like BDSM also tend to like violent men in general. A lot of the problems with girls liking thugs and bad boys is heavily connected to the increasing masochism of today’s women.

[rudder]

Pull what on a woman? I was talking about feminists going into sado-masochism and wanting to be spanked and smacked around, not men 'pulling' that.

@MrMan

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough. By "pulling that off" I meant "successfully approach a young, attractive woman and ask if she wants him to spank them, smack them around and basically rape them". Unless you look like the movie version of Christian Grey, or better, the mere mention of that to said girl will land you in jail.

I think all of them should go to jail. BDSM is a repulsive and hideous perversion of sexuality. Possibly the most severe form of perversion there is. We should burn every copy of 50 shades in a bonfire and treat violent pornography like we currently treat child porn.

I suppose it encompasses stuff like burning, cutting, whipping, beating and stuff like that. But they also sell fuzzy handcuffs and blindfolds at Spencer's at the mall. There is a nearly 100 billion porn industry, so any kind of sex niche aside from underaged, maybe animals or whatever, has legally protected porn proponents. Some women watch porn and get into weird stuff, but men watching it is a huge problem. And they want to try what they see in porn and get women into it, too.


There are women's magazines and blogs on how to spice up your sex life that might recommend blindfolds, getting tied up, etc. I know my wife wouldn't care for ropes and stuff like that. But if a couple wanted to put some fuzzy handcuffs on her and tie her up, or even if she wanted to spank her a bit or be a bit forceful and they are both cool with it and not really damaging her, I don't know why anyone else should care about it. If they are doing stuff they both enjoy and it contributes toward sexual intimacy in the marriage or it doesn't hurt it, I do not want the state intruding into the bedroom. There is also a positive side to having a spouse who wants to 'spice things up', since it shows interest in this aspect of marriage, and marriage is for the long haul. But the harmful violence stuff is a bad trend, especially in the extreme forms.

I don't find it as alarming as the weird trans stuff, the gay stuff, brainwashing the kids with this agenda, the widespread adultery and divorce in society, and the trend of women not submitting to men in marriage. The violence-in-the-bedroom stuff isn't as in-your-face on the street as some of this other stuff. It makes it's way into some movies from time to time, so it's there.

Maybe this will be the next step for liberals as they desensitize the public into a sexually perverse direction. Our culture experienced the sexual revolution with 'free love', then widespread divorce. Bar girls were once looked down on. Bars were for men in the 1950's. But then picking up women at bars became accepted as kind of normal. Divorce and remarriage became acceptable by society. More flagrant adultery was still considered wrong, but legal penalties not pursued and not as scandalized before.

Then the media and politicians brainwashed much of society into the courts into thinking homosexual sex was okay and into accepting a new definition of marriage. Men who as boys knew same-sex sexual activity was disgusting and degrading, who used to insult other boys in the locker room by calling them gay allowed themselves to be brainwashed and support this sexual perversion as if it were normal. Now we have this idiotic trans thing, where educated adults are talking about what pronouns to use, as if going with the dude-look-like a lady's self-deception is a moral thing to do, with underlying threats of losing your job if you do not go along with it. A few years ago, if a little boy says he wants to be a girl when he sees the girls get to play with the lipstick, and that would be fun to draw on the wall with, his parents would tell him he's a boy. Nowadays, the same idiotic left-wing brainwashed lemming-like parents might consider hormone treatments to prepare him for an operation. The idea that kids can choose their gender is being promoted in school.

I don't know what the next step of the brainwashing perversion agenda will be in our society, unless there is some kind of backlash, religious transformation, or institutions crumble to the point that pop culture cannot disseminate such trends. After the gay marriage thing went through the SCOTUS, I would have predicted the attention would have gone to supporting child molestation or beastiality. But it went to the trans thing. So some other guesses now might be promoting BDSM, with actors publically coming out to support BDSM rights, and the EEOC saying that if someone comes out as a whips and chains person, you cannot refuse to hire them in an interview. They might hire spankers and whippers to a company to increase diversity like they do with race. Probably not, but it's possible. This is more likely-- kids sex education in school might contain ideas from BDSM. I've already seen stuff about oral and anal in middle school kids' school materials that makes legislatures blush or be uncomfortable to talk about in the legislature.

Another step of perversion toward the children would be to double-down on the gay thing and require teens to have full-blown sex partners in sex-ed class, requiring them to try male, female, and made-up gender partners, matching them up, then giving them an F if they have decency and morals and refuse.

I could imagine a number of things interfering with this. Natural disasters or war ruining social structures, large hail stones. I'm not sure how bad societies are allowed to get exactly before the cup is full.

I remember when Sarah Palin ran for VP, seeing a clip from a couple of people, including that smart-alecky atheist liberal Bill Maher going on about how she looked like a librarian from a porn movie. I didn't know about this stuff, but I guess his audience was watching the porn movies and thought it was funny. Our culture had sunk pretty low for comedian-commentators to be talking about this and for the audience to understand. And liberals, maybe not that guy, but many of them were supposed to be against demeaning women by objectifying them and using sexual stereotypes. But with Republican candidates, they probably didn't care much. Of course, liberal atheists tend to demonstrate the lower end of the culture, generally. And Maher also can be a realist and see through a lot of propaganda on things like Covid restrictions.

I wasn't watching much TV in much of the 10's years of the 2000's. (Did I just name the decade?) I remember turning on the TV and seeing a comedian talk to a large audience. He started talking about tropes in porn. I didn't really know what he was talking about, but what I noticed was the audience laughing about it. When I was a child, porn was something one had to ask the guy behind the cash register for at the convenience store, and I think it getting into convenience stores was new. I did not get any for religious reasons, but having that extra layer of social discomfort was probably good so I wouldn't satiate my adolescent curiosity with something damaging. Now, kids can click and see super nasty abusive unrealistic sex at the click of a button, and look for opportunities to try this junk with the younger kids on the playground.

And it's so pervasive, that if a comedian tells a joke about what happens in porn movies, the audience laughs because they know what he's talking about, I guess. And they didn't even seem ashamed to laugh and show that they watch porn by doing so...not even the women.

I heard an anti-porn advocate talk about how they basically rape some of the porn actresses, and there was a clip of one throwing up after a rather rough oral experience and that was made a part of the movie. She had been in the industry. She was a rebellious teen who'd been molested by other kids. Her dad kicked her out on the street at 18. Someone saw her and offered her work. She ended up as a prostitute, then a porn star. Porn stars are prostitutes if they are sleeping around for money and the sex ends up on film. (Outlawing distribution of filmed prostitution--making it illegal if those engaged in sex get paid anything-- might deal with part of it without it being directly against freedom of expression in our legal system.) She says they use a lot of drugs on the girls. When they get to the set, there are a lot of men there expecting to have sex with them on film, and they can feel pressured to perform. Sets can be nasty places with unwashed sheets and leftover used condoms. It sounded pretty nasty.

And then men watch these bizarre extreme scenarios and think that is how to have sex. I hear they use men on the extremes when it comes to size, and this probably drives a lot of business for men who want male-enhancement surgery, who think women will want a 10 inch Coke can.

TL,DR
Sheesh, get yourself a post at some college campus with tenure and start getting paid to lecture.

[rudder]

@Tsar

Girls liking BDSM is not a sign that “they are more sexual then men.” The only person who would engage in BDSM is someone who is sexually dead on the inside. People with healthy sex drives do not get into crap like that because they are easily satisfied with the normal stuff. It’s the people who have deficient sex drives doing this stuff because they get bored easily and need something “special” to trigger their interest now. Not to mention we should not normalize perversion as being the same as being sexual.

@MrMan

BDSM is far worse and far more immoral then the gay and tranny stuff. They don’t need to use propaganda in schools because the porn industry already serves as the propaganda machine pushing people into this. Unlike the gay and tranny stuff, the BDSM shit is literally ruining sex for heterosexual people. 70% of men under the age of 40 have hit a girl in some form during sex and at least 70% of women have been hit during sex but it could be higher because some of the remaining 30% “refused to answer.” Masochistic fantasies and responses have gotten significantly higher in the modern era. Even Alfred Kinsey who is notoriously known for having tried to exaggerate the prevalence of deviant behavior only found that 50% of women responded this way to being injured. Given the fact that everybody, including liberal academics however believe that Kinsey exaggerated things we can assume the real percentage was no higher then 40%. Studies done in 1980 found about 50% of women having masochistic fantasies. By 1980 the sexual revolution had been going on for awhile so it makes sense that the number would go up a bit compared to the 1950s.

Today, however, 70% of women now have masochistic fantasies. Every guy I know who is sexually actively complains about girls pressuring them into slapping her or pretending to rape her. There have been cases of people killed during rough sex where the perpetrator actually got off legally simply due to saying that she consented to rough sex and her death was an accident.

In case you think I’m pulling this shit out of my ass like Mercury does here you go…

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co ... 546184.amp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesco ... r-men/amp/

https://wecantconsenttothis.uk/

According to this link below, 88% of porn contains violence towards the participants…

https://www.mcgill.ca/sociology/files/s ... search.pdf

Oh and by the way, they are teaching BDSM to college students…

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailym ... -more.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newswe ... %3Famp%3D1

This is a disease… An epidemic worse then COVID and certainly worse then faggots and trannies. As much as conservatives talk about them these days I almost never meet faggots or trannies and when I do all I have to do is avoid what is clearly a very small minority of the country.

The BDSM shit is not like that. Fortunately my girlfriend doesn’t like that stuff but I have had girls try to pressure me into it before. I have always refused but some guys don’t have the same willpower. I have unfortunately met countless girls who mentioned wanting to be choked or various other things. I knew a girl back in high school who had to stop dating because she had been with an abusive partner who was very into the BDSM stuff and she told me she was only attracted to abusive partners now because she got so f***ed up from how violent the sex was that she couldn’t enjoy normal sex anymore but she didn’t want to be abused so her only option was to stop dating entirely.

I am sick and tired of the right’s obsession with faggots and trannies but almost complete silence on this. This is by far the biggest issue our country faces. It’s destroying relationships, turning women into addicts for abuse and destroying their ability to enjoy healthy relationships based on love and affection, and it’s promoting criminality because women who like BDSM also tend to like violent men in general. A lot of the problems with girls liking thugs and bad boys is heavily connected to the increasing masochism of today’s women.

Worse than faggots and trannies? Are you for real!?

It's a form of sexual play that is often carried out by married couples that love each other very much. Not everyone is content to just have missionary sex with the lights off.

[Outcast9428]

@rudder

Not everyone is content to just have missionary sex with the lights off.

Taking an extreme example to invalidate my argument I see. No healthy form of sexuality would involve pain, degradation, humiliation or exposure to toxic bodily waste (read between the lines here).

If a person is immoral enough to hurt the person they pledged to love and devote themselves to then why should I put it as above them to lie about how much they looooove their spouse while they slap her around and scratch his back? If you enjoy such things you do not love your spouse, you are nothing more then a selfish, sadistic degenerate who enjoys the pain of others and discovered a loophole that you think other people aren't allowed to criticize you for. Masochists meanwhile, enable sadists and sociopaths in their degeneracy. Sadists and sociopaths would never be able to thrive if it weren't for masochists supporting their actions at every step of the way. One thing is clear, S&M is a circle of evil. This is the most serious form of evil in our current modern day society. Even worse then the hookup culture, the LGBT culture, and the criminal culture. Any society serious about maintaining its citizens virtue should do everything possible to abolish S&M behaviors from its citizenry.

Yes, BDSM perverts are causing 100x more damage then the faggots could dream of causing. Most of the worst things faggots do are BDSM and fetish related anyway.

[MrMan]

@rudder

Not everyone is content to just have missionary sex with the lights off.

Taking an extreme example to invalidate my argument I see. No healthy form of sexuality would involve pain, degradation, humiliation or exposure to toxic bodily waste (read between the lines here).

If a person is immoral enough to hurt the person they pledged to love and devote themselves to then why should I put it as above them to lie about how much they looooove their spouse while they slap her around and scratch his back? If you enjoy such things you do not love your spouse, you are nothing more then a selfish, sadistic degenerate who enjoys the pain of others and discovered a loophole that you think other people aren't allowed to criticize you for. Masochists meanwhile, enable sadists and sociopaths in their degeneracy. Sadists and sociopaths would never be able to thrive if it weren't for masochists supporting their actions at every step of the way. One thing is clear, S&M is a circle of evil. This is the most serious form of evil in our current modern day society. Even worse then the hookup culture, the LGBT culture, and the criminal culture. Any society serious about maintaining its citizens virtue should do everything possible to abolish S&M behaviors from its citizenry.

Yes, BDSM perverts are causing 100x more damage then the faggots could dream of causing. Most of the worst things faggots do are BDSM and fetish related anyway.

Since God had two men put to death for having sex with each other and didn't make spanking or hitting a woman a death penalty crime, I'd say any form of male homosexual sex is worse than non-lethal BDSM. So is plain all adultery without whips or chains. The 'B' in 'BDSM' is 'bondage' right? Tying a woman during sex if who wants it might be a little weird, but it isn't as vile as some of the things you are talking about. My wife wouldn't enjoy that, so it's not really an issue for me, but someone's wife wants to be tied up and blindfolded when they do it, it doesn't affect me.

Pooping on each other during sex? (The toxic bodily waste.) That's pretty sick.

People are probably getting these ideas from porn, and they leak into the more popular mainstream stuff like rated R movies.

[MrMan]

Btw, my guess is the minority of Anglo women like to be slapped around, beaten, brutalized, burned, or tied up in sexual situations. I haven't surveyed them to find out. There are more men than women who regularly watch porn, too. So there are probably more men whose minds are warped by that stuff who want to be rough with women because they think that's normal sex.

I don't want to hurt my wife, I don't tie her up or slap her around, etc. But even just for regular sex, I learned early on if you are gentle with it, the chances or another round the next day is greater than if you get too aggressive with it.