Meds are superior to whites

[88jose88]

they created civilization,have a sense of aesthetics and are not pink skinned albinoid harsh faced people like nerdics.

meds also don't fall for the race mixing propoganda like white women,and med women have loathing for inferior races in general.

[Lucas88]

they created civilization,have a sense of aesthetics and are not pink skinned albinoid harsh faced people like nerdics.

I generally agree with this statement.

Mediterraneans are by and large the most well-constituted Europeans and have developed a superior sense of aesthetics which can be seen in their architecture, art, music and even their languages. Italians in particular constitute a superior people.

A lot of Mediterranean males have attractive "Aryan" facial features yet at the same time a beautiful olive or light-brown skin complexion that actually looks healthy and human. Mediterranean females generally look better than Anglo and "Nerdic" females. Furthermore, Southern Europe is far more beautiful than Northern Europe both architecturally and scenically and has better culture, the best cuisine, and the most beautiful languages. The Renaissance emerged in Italy.





Northern European countries, on the other hand, have a preponderance of weird-looking albinoid people. A minority of Northern Europeans have a high level of genetic quality and a good potential for beauty (those with good tanning genetics), but the majority of Anglos and Nerdics are indeed ugly melanin-deficient pinkoids that just look unhealthy and subhuman. Anglos are probably the worst Europeans from a genetic standpoint--in addition to having ghastly pale skin, many of them look like complete sewer mutants.

I think that Scandinavians have higher genetic quality than Anglos and constitute a better type of Northern European. With more of them coming from haplogroup I1a which represents an early indigenous population within the region (in contrast, most British and Irish people belong to haplogroup R1b) in conjunction with a more sunny albeit colder climate, a greater percentage of Swedes and Norwegians have a nice golden sun-kissed skin tone. Most Scandinavians are still melanin-deficient pinkoids but a significant subset of them have decent potential for tanning and therefore aren't unsightly pinkoids. Furthermore, Scandinavians also tend to have better facial aesthetics than Anglos. I think that Scandinavians could look like a very decent people if in the future they chose to take control of their own genetic destiny and use CRISPR-CAS technology to actively select for good tanning genes.





Northern Europeans have contributed a lot to science and technology in the last century and have therefore surpassed Mediterraneans in many ways but, despite this, they still lack the aesthetic sensitivity and joie d'vivre characteristic of places such as Italy, Spain and France. Anglo culture in particular is mechanical and crudely pragmatic and lacks beauty and spontaneity. British cities, for example, are absolutely hideous. Meanwhile, German and Scandinavian cities look far more aesthetically pleasing than British cities and those places also seem to have a more elevated aesthetic and intellectual culture. However, Mediterranean countries are still a full lap ahead in terms of beauty and style.




Mediterraneans → Continental Germanics → Anglos

meds also don't fall for the race mixing propoganda like white women,and med women have loathing for inferior races in general.

Nordics weren't always pussies. They used to be like this: