Evidence for the Sexual Superiority of Monogamy and Marriage.

[Outcast9428]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

[WilliamSmith]

I'm one of the biggest enthusiasts for love and "romance" (my impression so far being that you and I are the biggest enthusiasts for that around here, from what I've seen), and I'm in favor of happy monogamous marriages that actually work, because I want people to be happy... and I understand what you might call the "Confucian" importance of a strong happy family where there's a positive male father figure and a positive female mother figure in the home as role models for children...

However, like most tradcon delusions, pretty much the exact polar opposite of everything else you said in your post is the actual reality:

1) Almost all TMM doesn't work worth !@#$, as proven by 75-80% of monogamous relations ending at some point. (Though in theory this could be OK if the man and woman involved have a solid prenuptial agreement and decide to separate amicably after the children are grown-up and have left the home.)

2) TMM infamously features the least sexual fulfillment, rather than the most, in the majority of cases (which doesn't mean that your other stuff you might want to start tantrumizing about as usual, such as "hookup culture" or gross pornographic behavior of some sort, is the solution, since I agree that's no good either). However, your cerebrally rationalizing and grasping at straws to try to say monogamous TMM couples are the most sexually fulfilled is total nonsense and not even slightly true in the majority of cases:
It's completely obvious from observation as well as the catastrophic rates of long-term relationships ending (not that they're all trainwrecks, like I said, but 75-80% ending obviously tells you something about "lifetime" monogamy!!)), and most of the men you see in TMM become a bunch of effeminate little male hens dominated by their angry grumpy shrew wives, or else it's the other way around and there's a grumpy man bossing and bullying around a dissatisfied woman. These are obviously mostly totally sexually unfulfilled people. It's even WORSE in some countries you delusionally imagine to be strongholds of traditionalism, such as Japan, where the social alienation and the "sexless marriage" is an infamous problem.

TMM is the most infamous source of sexually unfulfilled people out there, unless they're doing an open marriage. The kicker based on my research of tons of marriages and why they nearly always fail miserably, is usually the wife losing more and more attraction to the man over time (which is not really either of their fault, it's just how it is + biological factors combined with men not committing to maintaining a high level of attraction in their marriage, which is easier said than done, but tends to be totally neglected because the men tend to try to seek comfort like rodents while under the delusion they've somehow bagged the wife for all the vanilla sex they want based on the tradcon delusions they then won't have to put anymore work into scoring with women).
'
I agree that being with a girl long enough to really learn how to max out her orgasmic responses is awesome (and I agree that's vastly superior to "one night stands," which I've never been into myself either, both because I'd rather be at least real friends with any woman I jumped in the sack with, but also because why waste the effort to get a chick into the sack and then run off, LOL?).

I'll say again, I'm NOT against TMM if the people who do it are actually happy with it, but all the evidence points to it not working worth !@#$ unless it's being forced on an unwilling population through some sort of government or institutional coercion, in which case you want to imagine that the people being forced to do it are supposedly "fulfilled", while in reality the only ones satisfied are either covert skirt-chasers like me (who wouldn't ever nail a married woman, unless idiot tradcons actually succeeded in instigating "theocracy," in which case I would, and it'd be easier than ever if so since TMM doesn't work worth !@#$).

[WilliamSmith]

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

In the end, hooking up does not seem to have brought @Winston all that much joy. He's turning fifty this year, has never married, and is no longer together with the mother of his only son, both of whom live in another country than him. That sounds kind of sad to me, to be alone at his age.

The kicker there is: I know some older men who are in their 60's and 70's who HAVE married, delusionally believing themselves to be "as monogamous as a Canada goose" (as one of them put it, during a sympathetic phone conversation)........ and not only are they now divorced by their homely, unattractive, angry old dissatisfied and overly-entitled shrew wives, those wives also cleaned their clocks in a divorce settlement, since these fools never even set up an enforceable prenuptial agreement, and also got betaized into combining funds and joint-ownership of financial assets. (By the way, I'm not being contemptuous when I called them "fools," but am "calling a spade a spade," since it was utter folly, even if they did it with well-intentioned motives and aren't worthy of contempt.)
As for the ruin of their TMM: The shrew wives were able to swipe all their assets after 1-2+ more decades more of supposed TMM than Winston's modest age of 50 years. So Winston will be fine, but as for the holders: The only "benefit" of TMM was for the ball-breaking shrews to spend those additional decades spending their cuckold TMM husbands' money before the final death-blow of cleaning his clock for most of the rest of it after the marriage failed miserably while he was even older with less of his own life left to live.
In some cases this was also accompanied by the shrew wife stealing at least half of his retirement savings, and also absconding with and/or alienating the man from his own children.
I think jamesbond posted a case study of this awhile ago (or was that @publicduende?) where a nice old American gent in his 60's got his clock completely cleaned by one of these old harridan TMM wives who then stole all his $$'s and also his kids, then he had a triple-bypass nearly died, contemplated suicide, and then (fortunately) managed to get "Happier Abroad" with a cute under-valued Pinay village girl.
However, that happy ending just proves as the umpteenth zillionth case that TMM doesn't worth work !@#$.

Also, I point out that this is NOT a misogynist post, because women sometimes get totally screwed by trying to do TMM just as badly or worse (including sexual abuse and violence, sometimes even killed by angry men), yet all the stuff I said about the utter folly of blindly believing in the moral superiority and functionality of TMM is still true from the ruined men's POV as well.
I mentioned it mostly from the man's POV to point out that obviously Winston has done a lot better than that, however dissatisfied he may be that he hasn't bagged a full harem of New Age European "10's" capable of holding on hours of deep conversation, compared with the many cute Pinays he's been scoring with over the years.

You're a lucky fellow, Outcast, because you found your special lady early in life. I'm not saying it is the ultimate recipe to happiness for all men to settle down and stay with one woman for life. But a lot of men have that inate desire and seem miserable when, for whatever reason, it doesn't materialize and they remain alone. The aging bachelor is sometimes admired by young men for his wealth, his disposable income allowing him to still "slay" beautiful women as he grows old. But when he comes home at night, who's there waiting for him? Nobody. I figure the man who comes home and can tell his wife about his day is probably a lot happier, like @MrMan.

I sincerely wish @Outcast9428 and the latest Asian chick 100% happiness and success, however, sorry to point out that: No, he hasn't "found his special lady," he's just got another Asian chick, who he'll probably waste a bunch of money on while squawking at the rest of us that we're "degenerates," after which something else will happen and no more Asian chick like the other one he wasted $$$ on buying her cute outfits.
P.S. I buy my girlfriends lingerie and cute stuff too, but I don't give it to them like a chump obsessed with throwing away $$$ and then have to declare it all a total financial loss like he did: I just buy it and then they can put it on at my place or on my boat so we can have fun. (I don't send them a bill for the alcohol and food they consume though, and I'm more than generous when it comes to paying them a lot of attention physically, and also listening to them spend hours bitching about some other dominant-personality chick they currently had some high-drama squabble with, LOL.)

I'll get married soon as well. Hoping and praying that two really is a charm. There's a great sense of peace that comes over me by having a wife, children, a legacy that materializes, grows, expands before my eyes. Little human beings made in my own image, God's greatest blessing. Nothing quite beats that experience to me. No amount of porn, video games, drugs or whores would ever compare.

Hahahha, I considered it myself recently...

Personally, I'm looking in great detail with research and interviewing of people who do the so-called 'Open Marriage' (not as a journalist, of course, but definitely researching it heavily). It turns out that a lot of the TMM that other people mistake for some of the seemingly happiest marriages actually ARE open marriages, but the couples keep that secret to keep up appearances. (And I'm not talking about gross stuff like "wife swapping" or "swinger" culture, which I personally find gross and anti-romantic myself, but "open" still means there's an understanding that both the husband and wife can see as many other "friends with benefits" types as they like on the side.)

I've looked into the alternative of actual polygamy (ancient China historically, Africa at the present time, not counting in theocracies), but in line with the interesting "faux-traditionalism" topic, it's usually rooted in whatever rather domineering men in the culture have managed to get away with classifying as "traditionalism," but seems to involve both high drama between numerous wives squabbling + the men actively trying to police one of 12 wives under the same roof to try to stop them from eloping with other men in the village, LOL.

Speaking as the forum's foremost "radical feminist," (as Cornfed termed me since I am actually in favor women's empowerment, even though I deny any connection to the 2nd wave female jew feminism that promoted homosexuality/transgenderism and the deliberate targeted destruction of the nuclear family), I'm against all this drama and trying to keep women down.

So personally, I'm either going for the "open marriage" in theory, or (more likely) go on happily with "Friends with benefits" relations with as many nice women as cross my path.

Damn, I've been on here for hours again.... popped back in because I heard by email that subversive trolls were trying to undermine @Pixel--dude's authority or something, but I still haven't caught up on all the reading...

OK, if my muscles have shrunk into spaghetti noodles in the morning, it's all your guys' fault!!!

No........... actually, it's mine.... I seem to have discipline issues when it comes to limiting time spent on HA....

[Outcast9428]

@WilliamSmith

The statistics you posted are not true, the success rate of marriages is much much higher then you claim it is. The divorce rate in terms of how many first marriages will end in divorce is actually 40%, not 80%.

https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-stat ... and-facts/

Not even the most pessimistic statistics claim that 80% of marriages fail which leads me to the conclusion that you simply made that figure up.

Also the statistics show that single people are sexless at staggering rates. In my own observations of reality I definitely conclude that the studies claiming large numbers of sexless single men to be accurate. In my experience, single men with highly active sex lives are a tiny minority while the majority of single men have no sex at all. This is true even on college campuses.

This article for example found that 66% of male university students in Britain and 53% of female students (about 59% of the total university population) now did not have any sex at all in the past year.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210430055 ... w-whether/

This is because unlike what PUAs claim. Picking women up is very difficult for the majority of men. I imagine the small, 5% of single people who are having sex twice a week or more are guys like myself who are in monogamous relationships that basically create pseudo marriage like conditions for us… Not playboys in bachelor pads bringing women back to their apartment all the time.

Manosphere people keep talking about how risky marriage is yet I work at a company where every other guy working here has some baby momma they pay child support to. MGTOWers talk about marriage as uniquely risky when the truth is, the risk is in sex itself.

Nationally, a father who makes $55,000 a year would have to pay $720 a month in child support payments. That is regardless of whether he’s a divorced father or simply knocked a woman up. A man who knocks women up several times in his life, which I’ve found to be quite common of men who spend their entire lives as bachelors, could rack up a very significant child support bill. And the more money you make the more you have to pay.

https://www.custodyxchange.com/topics/r ... t-2019.php

So basically unless you are planning on abstaining from sexual intercourse entirely you are at risk of having to pay significant amounts of money every year.

Now in my state of Virginia, if the woman commits adultery and that is proven in court. Then she will likely not be granted any alimony payments by the courts. Child support payments will be reduced if she even manages to get primary custody.

A man who knocks a woman up on the other hand and wants to flee responsibly for his decision will have the book thrown at him.

[CaptainSkelebob]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

I find it absolutly hilarious that a incel little omega faggit thinks he knows what sexual superiority is
Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!
Ive f***ed loads of women and had them screaming my name
DANIEL OH YEAH DANIEL!!!
Ive had their wet pussys squirting all over my face like a supersoaker everytime my tongue is using their clit as a punching bag
Ive f***ed more women than this beta queer can even count
Even tho hes f***ed when he counts past his 11 fingers and 12 toes
So yeah.....
A beta little incel claiming his traditionalism fantasy makes him sexually superior is funny
Exspecialy when he gets his little swimmers all over his pink thrilly pantys when a girl just happens to brush past him
His girlfriend is probly lipstick drawn on his hand
Fuckin beta loser

[Cornfed]

Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!

Actually, for a man being sexually superior would be having women sexually satisfy you. If your highest value is to sexually satisfy your partner then you clearly are taking the subordinate female role, which makes perfect sense for a fag like you.

[Outcast9428]

@CaptainSkelebob Lmao that’s rich. If you were so great at sex then you wouldn’t have to blackmail that fat bitch Denise for sex every week. I won’t go into detail because that’s quite impolite to do so but all I will say is that I’m doing perfectly fine in the bedroom.

To continue my response to @WilliamSmith even though 40% of first marriages fail, I’d argue a little bit of common sense will still take you a long ways towards reducing that risk. 60% of divorces involve adultery. Stats show that men and women commit adultery in equal numbers so simply not committing adultery should reduce your risk of divorce by 30%. In addition, 25% of divorce cases involve domestic abuse, so not abusing your wife helps too lol. Having a close relationship with your wife’s family also reduces the risk of divorce by 20%.

These are all some really easy fixes that statistically can cut a man’s chances of divorce in half. Of course there are plenty of men who do everything right and still get f***ed over. The only way to stop that from happening is fix the divorce laws. But if the risk of that is 20% then I suspect a big part of it is simply choosing bad women to get married to. If a man chooses a good woman and doesn’t abuse her, commit adultery, sexually deprive her, and maintains a good relationship with her family… The chances of divorce are actually pretty low.

And I can confirm that all the men in my family have acted in precisely that manner, and none of them are divorced.

[CaptainSkelebob]

Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!

Actually, for a man being sexually superior would be having women sexually satisfy you. If your highest value is to sexually satisfy your partner then you clearly are taking the subordinate female role, which makes perfect sense for a fag like you.

Fella
I can satisfy women and it requires no effort at all
But ur mistaken if you think I give a fk about these women
They are jySt pieces of meat I can blow my load into...
Ive fuked hundreds of women
How many women you f***ed you big dumb legohead???

[MrMan]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

I find it absolutly hilarious that a incel little omega faggit thinks he knows what sexual superiority is
Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!
Ive f***ed loads of women and had them screaming my name
DANIEL OH YEAH DANIEL!!!
Ive had their wet pussys squirting all over my face like a supersoaker everytime my tongue is using their clit as a punching bag

I didn't know the doctor's made them where they'd be able to excrete that type of fluid.

We know your name is 'Daniel' now, so you'd better treat us nicely.

Some of us monogamous types have dealt out thousands of orgasms to our lady also. Why is having sex with more women (and ladyboys in your case) supposed to be a sign of sexual superiority? If you have to go out and have a one night stand, are you able to get sex night after night? Wouldn't you have to settle for a woman (or biological male) who is sub-optimal looking as far as your tastes went? As a young man, I was able to get sexual release night after night from a stunner? (It's not every night at my age.)

I also don't have to exert myself with one liners, buying girls drinks, getting blocked by her friends, getting close to taking a girl home only to go home sexless, etc. I can be dressed in a white T-shirt and a pair of shorts, without leaving the house, and tell my wife, "Let's have sex tonight"-- no lines, no real effort, and that can end up in having sex at 12 AM or something like that.

And it's not empty meaningless sex with a stranger. It's with someone I really care about who knows what I like. Then she cooks for me, too, and mops the kitchen.

If I ever got so old, fat, or decrepit that there is no chance I would ever to be able to pick up some strange girl at a bar, if I were into that, if I'm able to perform at that age, I've got a wife to have sex with. If she gets like that, we can just turn off the lights. Your looks don't last forever. Your sex drive doesn't stay at the same level as when you are young, either. What will you have from all the youthful fornicating when you are old? I've got a wife. I've got kids. They know who I am.

There is also the idea of having kids out there you didn't raise. I mean, assuming you aren't and haven't always been sterile, there could be some poor kid out there whose dad isn't raising him. Doesn't that bother you? I've raised or am raising all of my biological children. I don't have a kid out there that is mine that I don't know about. If someone knocks on my door and says he thinks I'm his dad, I know he's wrong.

Kids raised without their fathers are at a higher risk for all kinds of issues, trouble with the law, teen pregnancy, issue with their education, etc.

[Outcast9428]

Skelebob’s got nothing to worry about, I would never dox anyone on the internet no matter how much I disliked them. Only if they took it upon themselves to dox me.

[Kalinago]

The best thing is multiple committed wives not monogamy!

[Kalinago]

One of the worst and most damaging lies the liberal establishment has convinced the majority of Americans of, is that monogamy somehow will kill your sex life. That once guys' get married, their sexual life goes to pot. That religious, social conservatives are basically just prudes who dislike sex because Christianity taught them that sex was evil. The truth is, nobody thinks sex is evil except for a tiny minority of people, they think certain ways of treating sex is evil. @NGH607's idea that "sexual repression" is what's ruining people is quite frankly ridiculous. Attempts to truly repress sexuality altogether and people who attempt to repress sexuality altogether have been very rare throughout history. Overwhelmingly, the idea has simply been to control what circumstances people are allowed to have it in.

I'm gonna cite @Winston on this one too because he still seems to naively support hookup culture.

Overwhelmingly, as @MrMan has been trying to tell us... Religious, monogamous people by far have the best sex lives. And this is the data supporting that fact...



This study finds that sex within marriage is more fulfilling, that 88% of married people are satisfied with their marital sex lives (contrary to Hollywood's portrayal that most married people are sexless).

https://www.imom.com/poll-shows-sex-wit ... 9BtfvkrKYk

The religiously unaffiliated women were also the least likely to orgasm during sex with only 22% orgasming every time compared to 32% of Evangelical women.

This article shows that 25% of married couples, compared to only 5% of singles, have sex twice a week or more. 61% of singles had no sex at all within the last year, compared to 18% of married people.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/want-mor ... bb9372aff2

In the 1950s, we had significantly more sex then we do today. The average person had sex twice a week or more, in 2004, it seems 1/3 couples had sex twice a week or more, now its only 25%. The article specifically mentions the fact that women work now as the root cause of this...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/aug ... r.research

Women are significantly more likely to orgasm the longer they are in a relationship with a guy. 67% of women orgasmed last time they had sex when they had been in a relationship for 6 months or more compared to only 11% of women who orgasmed during a one night stand.



Women who support traditional gender roles are generally happier then liberal women are...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10 ... 9010003005

Overall, the evidence overwhelmingly points to the conclusion that, far from "repressing everybody's sexuality," traditional, monogamous lifestyles have served to enrich people's sex lives. It is promiscuity, women in the workforce, and hookup culture which is threatening the quality of people's sex lives.

I find it absolutly hilarious that a incel little omega faggit thinks he knows what sexual superiority is
Being sexually superior means you know how to satisfy a woman in the bedroom!!!
Ive f***ed loads of women and had them screaming my name
DANIEL OH YEAH DANIEL!!!
Ive had their wet pussys squirting all over my face like a supersoaker everytime my tongue is using their clit as a punching bag

I didn't know the doctor's made them where they'd be able to excrete that type of fluid.

We know your name is 'Daniel' now, so you'd better treat us nicely.

Some of us monogamous types have dealt out thousands of orgasms to our lady also. Why is having sex with more women (and ladyboys in your case) supposed to be a sign of sexual superiority? If you have to go out and have a one night stand, are you able to get sex night after night? Wouldn't you have to settle for a woman (or biological male) who is sub-optimal looking as far as your tastes went? As a young man, I was able to get sexual release night after night from a stunner? (It's not every night at my age.)

I also don't have to exert myself with one liners, buying girls drinks, getting blocked by her friends, getting close to taking a girl home only to go home sexless, etc. I can be dressed in a white T-shirt and a pair of shorts, without leaving the house, and tell my wife, "Let's have sex tonight"-- no lines, no real effort, and that can end up in having sex at 12 AM or something like that.

And it's not empty meaningless sex with a stranger. It's with someone I really care about who knows what I like. Then she cooks for me, too, and mops the kitchen.

If I ever got so old, fat, or decrepit that there is no chance I would ever to be able to pick up some strange girl at a bar, if I were into that, if I'm able to perform at that age, I've got a wife to have sex with. If she gets like that, we can just turn off the lights. Your looks don't last forever. Your sex drive doesn't stay at the same level as when you are young, either. What will you have from all the youthful fornicating when you are old? I've got a wife. I've got kids. They know who I am.

There is also the idea of having kids out there you didn't raise. I mean, assuming you aren't and haven't always been sterile, there could be some poor kid out there whose dad isn't raising him. Doesn't that bother you? I've raised or am raising all of my biological children. I don't have a kid out there that is mine that I don't know about. If someone knocks on my door and says he thinks I'm his dad, I know he's wrong.

Kids raised without their fathers are at a higher risk for all kinds of issues, trouble with the law, teen pregnancy, issue with their education, etc.

Marital patriarchal polygamy is the best of both worlds but you want to push your Christian nonsense worldview on all men.

I can have both the good of variety and committed relationships in polygamy.

With none of the bad like getting bored with one wife or chasing women with uncertainty and no real connection or intimacy.

Yahweh also gave multiple wives to David and them punished him by giving those women to his close friend to sleep with in public?

[Outcast9428]

@Kalinago

Polygamous assholes are worse then bar hopping, one night standers. Hell yes I will delightfully push my Christian "nonsense" on all men. Just as the law righteously imposes objective morality on criminal scum do I advocate the law bring justice to sexual degenerates who harm others just as grievously if not more then people currently criminalized. Men like you do not care about the people who's lives you will destroy by taking multiple wives. You are simply a hypocrite who wants to be a degenerate but can't accept that with degeneracy comes a degenerate woman to be your wife.

[Kalinago]

@Kalinago

Polygamous assholes are worse then bar hopping, one night standers. Hell yes I will delightfully push my Christian "nonsense" on all men. Just as the law righteously imposes objective morality on criminal scum do I advocate the law bring justice to sexual degenerates who harm others just as grievously if not more then people currently criminalized. Men like you do not care about the people who's lives you will destroy by taking multiple wives. You are simply a hypocrite who wants to be a degenerate but can't accept that with degeneracy comes a degenerate woman to be your wife.

How can you claim it's wrong if your God condones it in the bible ?

My God Al khadir the green man as the occult sufis called him, enki is a polygamist.

It's the best of both worlds with no bad effects.

Not being a prude is not degeneracy.

If you can please all your wives and support them nothing wrong with it and you actually take care of your women unlike degenerate bar hoppers.

You're just jealous because you base your morality on a mistranslated verse from Jesus which would make him a feeble hypocrite since he gave David Saul's wives.

Misery loves company and you're stuck with a aging one wife whereas I can always get a new wife on top of my committed and intimate partners for variety and novelty as I age.

Seething caude deep down you're jealous bitch boy?

[Kalinago]

@MarcosZeitola I can get multiple hot redbones cheaply in Ethiopia by offering a good bride price to the arsi oromo pastoralists there who all practicd polygamy as their marriage norm.

I can then move there on a passive income that's wealthy over there but middle class here and offer my wives and family a middle class lifestyle which is already a luxury in that country.

I just need to invest in being a system integrator and maybe I can be a billionaire there lol



Work smart not hard?