Would You Date A Single Mom?

[The]

Very simple and straightforward question.....Yes or no? and why?...

Curious to hear the responses....

[droid]

I refused to do it in America. Well actually I wasn't good enough for them Lol and i 'failed' to court enough also.

I've dated and approached a few of them here in Colombia, just to get rolling with something, and since they're nicer. But yeah, as others have posted, their kids are #1 in the list of course.

There is an epidemic of this down here and it's kind of part of the culture, but i think this is more of a recent development. I don't ask them anymore " do you have kids", but "how many kids do you have".



"Dedicated to the 4 million single moms in the country"
"There's no such thing as 'single moms', only 'moms'"


I think players here just bail out, but now there is the added ingredient of women wanting to be "independent", so everyone seems to be ok with this.
It seems the order here is the other way around Lol, First they have the kids and THEN they enter the carousel. That's actually kind of smart LMAO

[drealm]

No.

Because single mothers deserve to die.

[drealm]

No.

Because single mothers deserve to die.

Now that's just retarded, brother. If she was left by her husband, or widowed, why does she deserve to die and pay for her unfortunate circumstances? And what of the children of such a woman?

No it's not retarded. And unless you are a Biblic Jew, you are not my brother.

If she was left by her husband, it's her fault for choosing a jerk.

If she's widowed, this is referred to as a widow, not a single mother.

She deserves to die because her circumstances aren't unfortunate. They are predictable and chosen by her.

Her children deserve to die too.

[droid]

wtf? is this taliban anatol all over again? If she chose a jerk it's her problem, as long as you don't have to sponsor her in any way.
Actually it's better that they're around to absorb the eager beta providers that would otherwise compete with you for the better women.
So aside from being yet another sick weirdo, your logic doesn't hold.

[Cornfed]

wtf? is this taliban anatol all over again? If she chose a jerk it's her problem, as long as you don't have to sponsor her in any way.
Actually it's better that they're around to absorb the eager beta providers that would otherwise compete with you for the better women.
So aside from being yet another sick weirdo, your logic doesn't hold.

It is all of our problem in that we have to deal with the loathsome jerk progeny and the consequences of jerks being rewarded with sex and reproduction. Hence females that have sex with jerks, i.e. essentially all Western skanks, really are a scourge. Drealm's statement, while a little absolutist, is largely accurate.

[Cornfed]

If she was left by her husband, it's her fault for choosing a jerk.

He may have been a jerk masquerading as a righteous man. People can be fooled, it happens every day. Does that make the one who's fooled as guilty as the one doing the fooling?

No doubt that happens but it is probably exceptional. If the female and her family discussed the subject thoroughly and picked a suitably well reputed man from a well reputed family to sire her children, it would likely be a rare event that they would get it wrong. I imagine most dirtbag-humping goes on because of, not in spite of, the full knowledge of the female that she is humping a dirtbag.

[droid]

wtf? is this taliban anatol all over again? If she chose a jerk it's her problem, as long as you don't have to sponsor her in any way.
Actually it's better that they're around to absorb the eager beta providers that would otherwise compete with you for the better women.
So aside from being yet another sick weirdo, your logic doesn't hold.

It is all of our problem in that we have to deal with the loathsome jerk progeny and the consequences of jerks being rewarded with sex and reproduction. Hence females that have sex with jerks, i.e. essentially all Western skanks, really are a scourge. Drealm's statement, while a little absolutist, is largely accurate.

We have to deal with that progeny because of state sponsorship and media indoctrination. Remove that, and they will have to behave properly, namely seeking responsible men.

[Cornfed]

wtf? is this taliban anatol all over again? If she chose a jerk it's her problem, as long as you don't have to sponsor her in any way.
Actually it's better that they're around to absorb the eager beta providers that would otherwise compete with you for the better women.
So aside from being yet another sick weirdo, your logic doesn't hold.

It is all of our problem in that we have to deal with the loathsome jerk progeny and the consequences of jerks being rewarded with sex and reproduction. Hence females that have sex with jerks, i.e. essentially all Western skanks, really are a scourge. Drealm's statement, while a little absolutist, is largely accurate.

We have to deal with that progeny because of state sponsorship and media indoctrination. Remove that, and they will have to behave properly, namely seeking responsible men.

Right, but in the meantime the females are scum. It is ultimately not their fault that they are scum, but they are scum nonetheless.

[drealm]

Does that make the one who's fooled as guilty as the one doing the fooling?

Yes.

How can you "predict" betrayel?

By testing people.

Nobody enters a marriage or relationship expecting the worst.

Wrong. Some women are attracted to the worst men, because they are the worst men.

An error of judgement, while unfortunate, is hardly a reason for someone to die.

I dispute that this is an error in judgement. And if it is, death is lesson learned.

What the hell? The children are innocent in all this, the victims of their parents' mistakes. What could they have possibly done to deserve death, when they never asked to be born into such a relationship or brought into this world in general?

The penalty for violating laws in the Hebrew Bible is generational. You cannot contest the fact that stupidity of a prior generation affects the fate of a future generation.

That still does not make Drealm's statement that the woman deserves to die any less unreasonable. And his statement of the children also deserving death, is even more insane. If in the "sane society" you speak of, the exes and children of dirtbags are put to death, that is cruel, insane and uncalled for. Better would be to treat a woman like that as a pariah, then to kill her and her children.

One may never punish a child for the crimes of his parents. There is no justice in that.

I never said "put to death" or "kill". All I said was "deserve to die". I did not specify how she will die. I would approve of a scenario along the lines where she can't support herself and starves to death.

[MrMan]

No, cuz I'm already married.

If I were still in my '20's, I'd probably want a virgin.

If I became a widower, I'd consider virgins and widows who'd been faithful to their husbands. A widow with a child would be a possibility, especially since I have a bunch of kids myself. It's a big deal to ask some virgin with no experience being a mother to raise your kids. She may feel taken advantage of or ripped off, and the lack of experience could be a problem. If the man serves as a step-father to her child or children, she's thankful her child/children have a father figure.

If I were my age and never had married, I might consider the faithful widow. I don't know if I'd consider a woman with a child or not if I'd never had any.

But under none of these scenarios would I want a woman with a living 'baby daddy' out there to be a part of our lives.

[MrMan]

I'd like to point out that the Hebrew Bible does not prescribe death to single mothers. If a married or betrothed woman willingly had sex with a man who was not her husband, that was a death penalty crime. But no one was to be put to death without two or three witnesses. A girl who gave up her virginity in her father's house and let herself be married off as a virgin also risked the death penalty.

[The]

You know the reason why I posted the question is because at my contract job I have this female co-worker who keeps flirting with me all the time, no matter what....She is obviously attracted to me... She is cute as a motherf***er, BUT she is a single mother.....

I am bothered by the fact that she allowed some negro minstrel to run up in her raw and get her pregnant, but the "father" ... doesn't see the kid nor does he even live in the same state as the child!

My little head is saying "man you need to f**k that bitch and f**k her real good and nut all over her face" while my BIG HEAD is saying "you need to follow your own moral code: no dating co-workers and no dating single mothers (especially black ones), no matter how attractive they are....There is a reason why the "Father" is not with the mother in the first place"....

I think I'd listen to my BIG HEAD on this one...I think it knows best....

[S_Parc]

No.

Because single mothers deserve to die.

Now that's just retarded, brother. If she was left by her husband

I believe in the 80/20 principle, 80% of the time, single women do tend to have a children and get involved with some jerk, living in some state of denial about that person or believing that the person could change in time.

So from a probabilistic p.o.v, I'd avoid single mothers.

Mel had given up on women to be with me, because she knows what a good person is and thus, doesn't buy into the whole victimhood consciousness, which many AWs adhere to.

[S_Parc]

My little head is saying "man you need to f**k that bitch and f**k her real good and nut all over her face" while my BIG HEAD is saying "you need to follow your own moral code: no dating co-workers and no dating single mothers (especially black ones), no matter how attractive they are....There is a reason why the "Father" is not with the mother in the first place"....

I think I'd listen to my BIG HEAD on this one...I think it knows best....

The rule here which trumps that other is the 'no dating co-workers' one, never let your source of livelihood overlap with your boinking.