Even if guys who are highly intelligent, physically strong, and socially charismatic exist, they are a very very small percentage of the population. Half of everybody with an IQ above 140 is autistic. The median autistic IQ is 110 and 16% of autistic people have an IQ above 130 compared to 2% of the general population. Given that autists represent 25% of all people with an IQ above 130, that means the chances of a neurotypical having an IQ above 130 is only 1.5%. Suppose a neurotypical did have an IQ above 130 and thus had good social skills. Approximately 70% of Americans are overweight and another 5% are underweight. Most people with a healthy/normal body weight are not really muscular either. So the number of individuals who could possibly fit the fold of a muscular, socially skilled person with an IQ above 130 is probably about 0.1%, maybe 0.2% at most.Lucas88 wrote: ↑March 13th, 2023, 6:00 pmBeing BOTH intelligent AND strong is obviously better than being just intelligent or just strong. We don't have to be one-dimensional archetypes. It is possible to combine multiple virtues. That is indeed what a superior man does.Mercer wrote: ↑March 13th, 2023, 4:09 pm@Lucas88 doesn't understand that we don't live in the stone age anymore so strength isn't as important as intelligence. A smart autistic man has more of a chance of surviving and is better for society and raising a family than a dumb low IQ thug who only survives because of welfare, food stamps, public housing, etc. paid for by the "beta males" that Lucas88 likes to insult so much. If not for public assistance paid for with beta tax dollars then these so-called "alpha males" wouldn't survive in the modern era, they only had power when people were primitive. Modern women would choose to reproduce the dumb thug over the smart autistic guy but it's not because his genetics are better. It's also very stupid to assume that because a man is more popular with women then he's a better man. Your average woman today is destroying society with their sexual choices so it's actually the opposite
Women choose for vagina tingles, not for the best genetics. Only feminist retards who have been cucked by liberal and tradcuck propaganda think otherwise. @Lucas88 claims to be a Latin soul yet he sounds more like a western feminist betacuck with his arguments more than anything. Honestly I'd say a guy like @Outcast9428 who would raise a family and prefers everyone to succeed, have a wife, etc. (as long as they work hard and are good people) is more of an "alpha" male than someone who has been brainwashed into thinking being masculine means you're a low IQ retard who has harems of bitches and bullies what he thinks are "weaker" men.
I am both intelligent and strong. I've always excelled at academic and intellectual pursuits. At the same time, I began weight training when I was 13 and have been doing MMA/combat sports training since I was 15. I'm an athletic dude and know how to defend myself.
Some guys have both brains and muscle/athleticism. Maybe you're just jealous!
Keep dreaming that "alpha males" only survive on betabux welfare, bud. Many guys with stereotypically "alpha" traits are perfectly successful in modern society, often having good careers or running their own businesses. Those guys have money, intelligence, physique, charisma and a high degree of male sexual dimorphism all at the same time. In other words, they have intelligence AND all of those other virtues while the nerdy autistic type only has intelligence but nothing else. The fact that some alphas possess both intelligence plus physique and other qualities doesn't seem to sit too well with Outcast. That's because it shatters his superiority complex and exposes him as the low-quality gamma male that he is. That's why he gets so triggered. Lol!
Not all alphas are thugs or criminals. That's just a fallacy that you incels want to push.
Neglecting physical training is utter folly. The health of the body is fundamental. It is always wise to do some form of resistance training. Those who don't do any kind of resistance training will usually see their body go to shit beyond a certain age. Ironically, people who believe that all they need is intelligence while neglecting their physique are not wise at all.
Similarly, not learning some combat skills is foolish. The world around us is always unpredictable. We and our loved ones could be physically attacked when we least expect it. It is wise to learn some fighting techniques, even if it's just basic boxing with a bit of wrestling or Judo. A noble man has the ability to protect his woman. But combat skills shouldn't be used for mindless thuggery. That would be an ignoble misuse of them.
Curiously, Outcast seems to believe that I am supposed to be like him just because we suffer from the same neurological condition. That's because he has constructed a fantasy world of how reality is supposed to be in his own mind and then projects it into everyone and everything else.
In reality, I am nothing like Outcast; I have a completely different personality and psychological constitution and have a somewhat different life history. Outcast is a weakboy who got bullied throughout school and college and seemingly did nothing about it. I myself on the other hand started doing strength training, took up martial arts, made myself strong, and fought back against the bullies. After a certain point, all of the bullying stopped and people were forced to respect me (or at least leave me alone). I actually did something about the bullying. That's because I'm strong and have a fighting mentality and am neither a weakboy nor a pvssy like Outcast is.
I was always smart enough to cultivate virtues other than just intelligence. I also focused on physique, athleticism and combat skills. Outcast on the other hand isn't really that smart. He is often unable to understand simple nuances, can only think in simplistic black-and-white terms and hastily projects his own unfounded assumptions onto things. He's obviously just a one-dimensional midwit who thinks that he's much smarter than what he actually is.
Outcast seems to think that I look down on "misfits" and that my rightful place is among misfits (specifically "nerds") like him. Nah, I see through you guys' delusions and warped hackneyed perceptions of the world and want no part of your mindless groupthink or echo chambers.
I don't hate nerdy misfits. Rather I simply observe that they don't have many desirable traits and wouldn't want to be like them. Moreover, their subculture and style just don't resonate with me.
I don't see the need to bully weaker men either. Likewise, I recognize that their weakness is an undesirable trait, but at the same time I am mostly indifferent towards them and will leave them alone as long as they don't do anything to provoke me.
Outcast also delusionally believes that he has more "self-awareness" than I do and claims that he somehow knows what's best for me - namely, hanging around with nerds and social outcasts. That was the motive behind his most recent sperg-out about me going to Latin America supposedly because I don't want to be with "socially awkward people". Lol! I think that I had self-awareness aplenty. As early as the age of 15 or 16 I instinctively intuited that I needed to learn Spanish and move to a Hispanic country. And, just as I anticipated, my social life improved tremendously. I'm not compatible with Anglo culture. My own nature meshes better with Hispanic culture. I've been saying this all along. But Pastor O'Castor just doesn't want to listen.
@Mercer Its funny that Lucas says I'm a midwit for being "one dimensional." He has said this in the past...
I didn't just graduate from college. I got through it while admittedly having atrocious studying habits. I probably only studied two hours a week. I've mentioned before how much I hated college, being extremely unmotivated was a big part of my life there. I did not feel like there was any point in me being there, I was only doing it because I felt compelled to finish what I had started. Despite terrible studying habits, I still ended up getting B average grades. This is despite the fact that some assignments, I simply didn't do at all. Some classes, I got an A in despite not having read a single page of the textbook. The college I went to is also a pretty competitive school. The reason I got fairly good grades was because I am extremely good at essay writing. Any essay I got, I could get an A in. Even the multiple choice exams, I could usually figure out what the answer was based on simply knowing the subject matter well enough to get the correct answer. Other students I met simply couldn't believe how well I was able to do with such horrible studying habits. Pretty much everybody else I knew who acted like I did failed out. I knew one guy who studied for an exam for two days straight. He wouldn't do anything, he spend all day studying for two days. A total of 24 hours. He got a grade of 78%. I studied for the same exam for about two hours and got 92%.Outcast is undoubtedly intelligent and admits that he's a bit of a nerd. Even though I rarely agree with him, I recognize that he is more than capable of writing out coherent arguments and expressing himself well. Intellect is definitely his strong point in contrast to his lack of physical development and primal masculinity. I don't know what field of expertise Outcast has but he's mentioned that he graduated from college and seems to read a lot.
I have never bothered to get a real IQ test, but my father has... His IQ is 136. I don't believe mine is quite that high. My dad when he was my age did have slightly stronger intellectual abilities, some that would appear almost superhuman. He could, for example, remember a ten minute speech word for word. I can't do that, I have pretty good memory but it isn't quite that precise. Intelligence, however, is mostly determined by genetics and having a father with an IQ of 136 pretty much guarantees a highly intelligent son.
While I am sure Lucas is 120+ in IQ, I doubt he is 130+. He claims my "one dimensional" behavior is a sign of being a midwit. The truth is, his excessively extra-dimensional ideology is actually a classic sign of midwits trying to act more intelligent then they actually are. Now, I don't believe Lucas is actually a midwit. But I don't think he's a whole lot smarter then one. What intelligence basically comes down to is pattern recognition and ultimately being able to manipulate patterns correctly in order to achieve the right result. A political ideology is basically just the human systems equivalent of building a computer. A computer requires many parts in order to work, they need to be arranged in a certain order, you need to have all the right parts in all the right places. Otherwise, the computer doesn't work. Likewise, human systems are the same way.
Lucas seems to believe that you can just switch parts and place them wherever you want and expect the computer, or in this case, human organization system... To work. Any criticism of this way of thinking is deemed as black and white thinking by him and lacking in nuance. The truth is, his ideology is a disaster and he doesn't even seem to fully understand what his ideology is. He displays a deficiency in his ability to see how ideas that may technically be different flow together and enhance one another. Not only that but he seems fundamentally confused as to what his ideas actually stand for.
He claims to be an anti-feminist, yet he supports women working, he supports sexual promiscuity, he strongly opposes marriage and advocates in favor of what is essentially "alpha male" supremacism, and he's deeply hostile to all Abrahamic religions. I'd actually argue that nobody on this forum is more consistently feminist then Lucas is. He seems to have an interest in maintaining female privilege at the expense of average guys so that the top males of society can keep their advantage over average to low status men. Any opposition he has to feminism is incredibly shallow and superficial. Perhaps most bizarrely, he actually believes that automation is going make the skills of highly intelligent, "beta nerds" unnecessary and that automation is going to usher in an age where alpha males reign supreme because of women not needing men's labor anymore. He doesn't seem to understand that even if his scenario of automation killing jobs were to occur, it would in-fact be the highly intelligent beta nerds who'd be the only ones left who have skills that robots cannot do. He doesn't recognize that his idea of automating jobs/labor away and distributing resources equally among everyone is communist by definition thus making him an extreme left-winger.
Even the anti-semitism, while at first glance, one might think of him as an extreme right-winger for advocating war against the Jewish World Order... Its actually not incompatible with extreme leftism when you examine his reasons for being so anti-semitic. His reasons for anti-semitism primarily seems to come down to what is essentially class struggle rather then having an opposition to cultural marxism pushed by the Jews. He mostly dislikes the Jewish financial system. However, he seems to support every aspect of cultural Marxism with the exception of some particularly extreme stuff pushed by the 2010s/2020s far left. His ideology is actually remarkably consistent, however, with old fashioned far left ideology. Yet he doesn't recognize that all of these ideas are what lead to the society he hates the most... The UK. A society washed in cultural marxism which he superficially opposes but deep down is in favor of.
Lucas is the type of guy who's proud of the fact that his ideology essentially "breaks the left-right spectrum" and probably believes this makes him more unique and intelligent for having come up with something completely new. The reality is, if you've "broken the left-right spectrum," its because your ideas don't flow together and create a cohesive system. You've just mixed and matched with no regard to whether the ideas actually work in tandem with one another. Being able to come up with a bizarre and unique ideology is not a sign of exceptional intelligence. It actually shows a fundamental deficiency in pattern recognition skills. You can mess with a computer all you want, but unless you put all the correct parts in the right order/places... All the work you've done is not only meaningless, but it would have been better if you had just not tried at all because you've probably broken it.
Lucas is like an unqualified computer engineer trying to repair the computer of modern society but who's ideas would actually break it even more if implemented because he is utterly unqualified to speak about political ideas when he doesn't even understand what he essentially stands for.
My ideology and behavior is one dimensional because it is actually consistent and makes sense. It was constructed by using real life examples of what happened when these ideas were put forth. I have some innovative ideas that expand on this and are intended to bring about a society which is very similar to the ones I've used as examples but they're all ideas which fit into the same basic philosophy that created the real life examples I talk about.