Is Our Earth FLAT and Motionless, Not a Spinning Globe?

[CaptainSkelebob]

@galii the reason the fly doesnt splat against the back window of the car is because inside the fly is part of the cars mass
In the same way we dont get thrown off the planet when its spinning at 32000 miles per hour
We are part of its mass
@gsjackson I think you and other flat earthers dont understand the premise
How can I walk on a train travelling at fast speeds fella???
It aint that I can walk hundreds of miles per hour fella...
Flat earthers dont understand basic scientific concepts
Fair enough they might be theories
But they best explain the world around is and how it works
Scientifically illiterate baboons who believe in flat earth are an insult to humanity
Gravitational force and theory of relativity isnt some BS made up by an evil cabal of satan worshippers or anything
This is widely accepted among the scientific and academic comminitys for the reason that they are the most sensible theory's we have thus far
Until you can provide an accredited source Wacko Jacko
And not some basement dwelling idiot from youtube then ur flat earth shite has no credibility whatsoever
Ok ok OK
Galii
Lets humour this fool for a second
Wacko Jacko we all know how the heliocentric model is supposed to work in alignment with mainstream acedemia
But why dont you tell us how flat earth works
Why is every other planet and star round???
How can a conspiracy so large be contained when we saw how incompetent world leaders were containing a f***ing germ ffs
Why are you so quick to accept delusion and fantasy over reality??
There are so many fields of science which would be revealed to be complete shite if flat earth would be revealed to be true
Its too ludicrous to even consider
You have failed to provide even a slither of compelling evidence to support ur case fella
Galii got you
And I got you
Ppl like you just want the geocentric model to be true coz ur all little narcs who want to believe everything revolves around then
Is it that you fear reason???
Is it that you fear logic???
Or is it that the only thing flat earthers fear is sphere itself

[galii]

@CaptainSkelebob

Thanks for clarifying what I meant. I used GTP to get rid of my swearing but it changed some stuff.

@gsjackson

In all seriousness were you ok with geometry back in school? Because of my job I learned some basics of physics and math so later I went to school again. I had a friend there who spoke very good English I had quite a bit respect for that. Anyway we did homework together. When it came to physics oh lord. I spend the whole day to explain to him what decrease of accelaration means. I could not believe how difficult it was.

I myself had difficulties with 3D imagination and many other stuff otherwise I might have studied stem stuff. So sometimes there are some missing abilities or nobody explained it such that is understandable for ones specific brain.

Btw I think Winston is smart enough to understand it but I think he is just bad faith.

[gsjackson]

@CaptainSkelebob All these matters have been addressed in this thread through the years, including Cornfed's recent sardonic dismissal of the ludicrous "argument" of 'if A and B are spheres then C must be too. Another logical fallacy,

@Galii I knew you wouldn't answer the question. You can't. The advent of flying should have put an end to the spinning ball nonsense, but the lemmings just kept right on walking over the cliff.

[galii]

@CaptainSkelebob All these matters have been addressed in this thread through the years, including Cornfed's recent sardonic dismissal of the ludicrous "argument" of 'if A and B are spheres then C must be too. Another logical fallacy,

@Galii I knew you wouldn't answer the question. You can't. The advent of flying should have put an end to the spinning ball nonsense, but the lemmings just kept right on walking over the cliff.

Dude you are talking nonsense. You do not engage with any basic physics. What you are saying is like saying metal is heavy so it can not fly. So at least assume it can fly which conditions could be reasons to make it fly. Engage with any physics or math. How are you explaining the things in your life without physics at all?

I gave you curvature scale examples to think about but you did not engage same with Cornfeld.

@Pixel--Dude

What do you think? Have you problems visualizing the curvature and spinning globe? Why do you think these guys do not engage regarding any physics and math?



@

[Huddo]

I went for a walk this morning by the Southern ocean and port. I wasn’t blown away by the constant cyclonic winds sail boats need to achieve the current time it takes to travel between South Africa, Australia and South America, if the flat earth map was based in reality. At the port ships were waiting to travel to Antarctica or the ice wall after winter. They will be loaded with new and current trades people and scientists (It’s easy to get a job on the ice wall). Other boats will take private explorers and adventure seekers who might be on an all out mission to the South Pole, wingsuiting for the adrenaline rush or even ice cave diving. I’ve said it before but Metallica even held a concert there. There’s also a company that will also take you to camp on the continent and enjoy its beauty as a private citizen. In a few months I’ll be flying the opposite direction to Doha. It’s astonishing that I’ll cross the Indian Ocean and bottom of India during this journey because on a flat earth map the direct route takes me thousands of Km’s to the North from this path and I’d be flying across Indonesia, Vietnam, China, Tibet and Iran.

Clearly it’s Lemmings who live north of the equator who believe this flat earth BS, because the further you go south the more ridiculous this theory becomes. Believe the Covid hoax or fake moon landing all you like, but you have to be a special type of retard to believe flat earth theory.

[gsjackson]

I went for a walk this morning by the Southern ocean and port. I wasn’t blown away by the constant cyclonic winds sail boats need to achieve the current time it takes to travel between South Africa, Australia and South America, if the flat earth map was based in reality. At the port ships were waiting to travel to Antarctica or the ice wall after winter. They will be loaded with new and current trades people and scientists (It’s easy to get a job on the ice wall). Other boats will take private explorers and adventure seekers who might be on an all out mission to the South Pole, wingsuiting for the adrenaline rush or even ice cave diving. I’ve said it before but Metallica even held a concert there. There’s also a company that will also take you to camp on the continent and enjoy its beauty as a private citizen. In a few months I’ll be flying the opposite direction to Doha. It’s astonishing that I’ll cross the Indian Ocean and bottom of India during this journey because on a flat earth map the direct route takes me thousands of Km’s to the North from this path and I’d be flying across Indonesia, Vietnam, China, Tibet and Iran.

Clearly it’s Lemmings who live north of the equator who believe this flat earth BS, because the further you go south the more ridiculous this theory becomes. Believe the Covid hoax or fake moon landing all you like, but you have to be a special type of retard to believe flat earth theory.

So let's see. You've said Antarctica exists and people go there. Oookay. No argument there.

I don't know what an accurate flat earth looks like, but on this one the route from Australia to Doha looks about the same as the trip you anticipate.

https://www.amazon.com/Flat-Earth-Map-G ... UW6PO?th=1

And from these minor points you feel justified in calling the people who find persuasive the hundreds of arguments set out in this years-long thread retards? I don't know what to say except f**k you, asshole. Bend over and take your next shot from Dictator Dan.

[gsjackson]

@CaptainSkelebob All these matters have been addressed in this thread through the years, including Cornfed's recent sardonic dismissal of the ludicrous "argument" of 'if A and B are spheres then C must be too. Another logical fallacy,

@Galii I knew you wouldn't answer the question. You can't. The advent of flying should have put an end to the spinning ball nonsense, but the lemmings just kept right on walking over the cliff.

Dude you are talking nonsense. You do not engage with any basic physics. What you are saying is like saying metal is heavy so it can not fly. So at least assume it can fly which conditions could be reasons to make it fly. Engage with any physics or math. How are you explaining the things in your life without physics at all?

I gave you curvature scale examples to think about but you did not engage same with Cornfeld.

@Pixel--Dude

What do you think? Have you problems visualizing the curvature and spinning globe? Why do you think these guys do not engage regarding any physics and math?



@

You're just a bullshitter, a poseur who contributes absolutely nothing to this thread. Disengage permanently.

[galii]

@CaptainSkelebob All these matters have been addressed in this thread through the years, including Cornfed's recent sardonic dismissal of the ludicrous "argument" of 'if A and B are spheres then C must be too. Another logical fallacy,

@Galii I knew you wouldn't answer the question. You can't. The advent of flying should have put an end to the spinning ball nonsense, but the lemmings just kept right on walking over the cliff.

Dude you are talking nonsense. You do not engage with any basic physics. What you are saying is like saying metal is heavy so it can not fly. So at least assume it can fly which conditions could be reasons to make it fly. Engage with any physics or math. How are you explaining the things in your life without physics at all?

I gave you curvature scale examples to think about but you did not engage same with Cornfeld.

@Pixel--Dude

What do you think? Have you problems visualizing the curvature and spinning globe? Why do you think these guys do not engage regarding any physics and math?



@

You're just a bullshitter, a poseur who contributes absolutely nothing to this thread. Disengage permanently.

I know it is hard thing to have an allergy against science, physics and math. Numbers can be scary.
Numbers like this:


The speed of Earth can be calculated by determining the Earth's circumference and dividing it by the length of one day. The equatorial circumference of Earth is approximately 40,075 kilometers.

However, it's important to note that the Earth's speed is not constant, as it varies depending on the latitude. At the equator, the Earth completes one rotation in about 24 hours, resulting in a speed of:

Speed = Circumference / Time
Speed = 40,075 km / 24 hours

Calculating this, we find:

Speed = 1670.6 km/h

Therefore, the approximate speed of Earth at the equator is around 1670.6 kilometers per hour.

I asked GPT the speed in Oslo:

To calculate the speed of the Earth at a specific location such as Oslo, we need to consider the latitude of that location. Oslo is situated at a latitude of approximately 59.9 degrees North.

Using the same method as before, we can calculate the speed of the Earth at Oslo:

Calculate the radius:
radius = Earth's equatorial radius * cosine(latitude)

The equatorial radius of Earth is approximately 6,378.1 kilometers.

radius = 6,378.1 km * cos(59.9°)
radius ≈ 6,378.1 km * 0.5299
radius ≈ 3,378.2 km

Calculate the circumference:
Circumference = 2 * π * radius

Circumference ≈ 2 * 3.14159 * 3,378.2 km
Circumference ≈ 21,207.9 km

Calculate the speed:
Speed = Circumference / Time

Since the Earth completes one rotation in approximately 24 hours, we can calculate the speed:

Speed ≈ 21,207.9 km / 24 hours

Calculating this, we find:

Speed ≈ 883.7 km/h

Therefore, the approximate speed of the Earth at the latitude of Oslo (59.9 degrees North) is around 883.7 kilometers per hour.

[galii]

@Pixel--Dude

I agree that the simulation theory or these kind of theories have their legitimacy depending on the context. In this thread I do not think they have the legitimacy.

Like when people are child rapists we do not give them compassion because of these kind of perspectives. Though in special contexts it is possible but in general it is a big NONO.

The problem with flat earthers they seem to be like homeless people who through their poop at people. From a certain perspective you could say that these guys are enlightened and see the reality as it is that is why they through their poop. They have a good reason to do it. We just don't get reality because we are NPCs.

I am not shure how much compassion one should exercise. As I do not believe in free will the principles from which I should act become too vague anyway.

But in a day to day life we normally act 'reasonable'. When you need a surgery you do not ask your neighbour to do it. You 'trust' offically credited doctors more but you can not be shure.


Edit:

Flat Earthers seem to be like leftists who claim that what you identify with is what you are. A man becomes a women or a horse though you can not change your race because.

[Cornfed]

What do you guys think of simulation theory? Could simulation theory give credence to flat earth? Think about it. If our world was a simulated reality, and I mean simulated by a supreme God (whatever you want to call it) consciousness and not aliens with supercomputers etc, then couldn't that mean flat earth could be real?

Obviously the universe is some sort of simulation. The dispute is as to what is being simulated. The particular mainstream religious cosmology can't be real because it is internally contradictory and its mathematical equations produce impossibilities. Hence they have to resort to weird stuff such as relativity, string theory, eleven dimensions etc. rather than just admitting they don't know what they are talking about and giving up like they should.

[galii]

@Pixel--Dude

The thing with the simulation theory is after mentioning it not much can be said about it. Yes if we live in a simulation everything is possible depending on the programming. Now what? Most flat earthers do not care about it anyway. They rather want to attack science because it is not 'common sense'

I think most flat earthers are bad faith. If you do not want to do the work and learn the math a little bit then you can not criticize the math people use to prove globe earth.

If they would really be curious they would dig deeper. They would try to understand for example the atom model and so on. They rather say something like the atom bomb is a hoax. Period. Argument is because somebody in the internet said so. No need to learn any science.

Reasonig and argumentation do not count. Feelings do count.

[Cornfed]

If they would really be curious they would dig deeper. They would try to understand for example the atom model and so on.

What was your reasoning for trusting mainstream cosmology again? If it is because you trust the establishment then before you answer please get your covaids boosters up to date and start a prophylactic course of AZT.

[galii]

If they would really be curious they would dig deeper. They would try to understand for example the atom model and so on.

What was your reasoning for trusting mainstream cosmology again? If it is because you trust the establishment then before you answer please get your covaids boosters up to date and start a prophylactic course of AZT.

Right I should trust the flat earth model that does not exist from scientifically illiterate people. My bad. Like a guy said it is not enough to be retarded to be a flat earther. You have to be special kind of retarded.

You said everybody will die in 3 years because of Covid. We are so stupid we don't realize that we are dead.

[Cornfed]

If they would really be curious they would dig deeper. They would try to understand for example the atom model and so on.

What was your reasoning for trusting mainstream cosmology again? If it is because you trust the establishment then before you answer please get your covaids boosters up to date and start a prophylactic course of AZT.

Right I should trust the flat earth model that does not exist from scientifically illiterate people.

OK, so like females and males who may as well be females it is simply a matter of who you trust and you trust whoever is in charge. Fair enough I guess. It is not as if you have the capacity of making up your own mind based on the available evidence or anything like that. On that basis you are right, your lords and masters are indeed ordering you to believe in whatever nebulous conception of the globe earth model you have. They are also ordering you to take more boosters, so don't forget that.

[galii]

If they would really be curious they would dig deeper. They would try to understand for example the atom model and so on.

What was your reasoning for trusting mainstream cosmology again? If it is because you trust the establishment then before you answer please get your covaids boosters up to date and start a prophylactic course of AZT.

Right I should trust the flat earth model that does not exist from scientifically illiterate people.

OK, so like females and males who may as well be females it is simply a matter of who you trust and you trust whoever is in charge. Fair enough I guess. It is not as if you have the capacity of making up your own mind based on the available evidence or anything like that. On that basis you are right, your lords and masters are indeed ordering you to believe in whatever nebulous conception of the globe earth model you have. They are also ordering you to take more boosters, so don't forget that.

Yes you got it. I am very allergic against science, math, numbers, physics and thinking. That is why I did not spend anytime thinking about the scientific models. I never did any math about it. I never tried to find answers to questions. That is why I god destroyed by big brained flat earthers. They brought the math, the physcics and I got dizzy and gave up.