How come lone nut assassins only take out good people?

[Winston]

I have a question for those of you who think conspiracies are all BS delusional fantasies, and that only official government versions of everything are correct. (no matter how many times governments have lied)

The question:

How come lone nut assassins (with no motives by the way) only kill good leaders who preach love, peace and freedom? Examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, and who knows how many more.

How come they never kill evil sociopaths like Dick Cheney, George Bush, Stalin, Hitler, etc?

Isn't that a strange coincidence? Do you buy it? If so, why?

Why is the official version of everything the only correct version of truth? Why? I can never get any of you to answer that.

[MrPeabody]

Why do some always accept the official version as the correct version of truth? My goodness. What a provocative, stimulating question. For me, it’s a matter of personal preference. I prefer to be conned by an attractive gentleman in his 40s with a nice hairdo and a Midwestern accent rather than a 16 year old Youtube media mogul with a tin-foiled hat and pimples. Congratulations! Now you have your answer to that.

[Winston]

That's a stupid marginalization attempt. You sound like the mainstream media. How brainwashed. Richard Gage is an older professional in a suit. So is David Ray Griffin. David Icke is older and polished.

That guy who is an expert on exposing the Fed, Edwin Griffin, looks very wise and polished.

Your marginalization is utterly false and bigoted.

[Ned Zeppelin]

I wouldn't lump George Bush or Dick Cheney in with Stalin and Hitler. George Bush is a good person and he has done a lot of good post-presidency.

[Winston]

How are they different? George Bush killed millions in Iraq. So did Stalin and Hitler. It's just a matter of degree. They are sociopaths either way.

What good has Bush done? Nothing. He is too dumb to do anything. No sane rational society would elect someone like that.

Have you seen Dick Cheney's face and expression? Doesn't it look so evil, cold and monstrous? Isn't it sad and disturbing that someone like that became Vice President?

Can you answer the questions in the OP?

[Winston]

Here at this event, Dick Cheney is called a war criminal by someone in the crowd. Look at his face though. Doesn't it look so evil and cold?



Dick Cheney confronted by We Are Change, a 9/11 Truth group.

[Ned Zeppelin]

While I agree that it is ironic that Stalin and Hitler were never killed, I don't agree with your general assessment that the people you listed were "good". All of them had major character issues.
George W has done a lot of charity work in Haiti and Africa with Bill Clinton so to say he has done nothing is false, along with your assumption that he is "dumb". I am no fan of Dick Cheney, or George Bush for that matter, but, To call them war criminals is ridiculous. To cite that millions died in Iraq, while the numbers are shaky at best, does not equate to the overwhelmingly larger number of people massacred in Nazi Germany and the USSR. I'm not sure if you know that people die in war. Iraq was a war. Stalin starved about 8 million people and Hitler killed 6 million Jews alone in concentration camps. This is entirely different.
If you want to name any US presidents with Stalin and Hitler, you should have named FDR but that is just my opinion.

[Jester]

Here at this event, Dick Cheney is called a war criminal by someone in the crowd. Look at his face though. Doesn't it look so evil and cold?



Dick Cheney confronted by We Are Change, a 9/11 Truth group.

Luke Rudkowski is the man I want to be.

[Winston]

While I agree that it is ironic that Stalin and Hitler were never killed, I don't agree with your general assessment that the people you listed were "good". All of them had major character issues.
George W has done a lot of charity work in Haiti and Africa with Bill Clinton so to say he has done nothing is false, along with your assumption that he is "dumb". I am no fan of Dick Cheney, or George Bush for that matter, but, To call them war criminals is ridiculous. To cite that millions died in Iraq, while the numbers are shaky at best, does not equate to the overwhelmingly larger number of people massacred in Nazi Germany and the USSR. I'm not sure if you know that people die in war. Iraq was a war. Stalin starved about 8 million people and Hitler killed 6 million Jews alone in concentration camps. This is entirely different.
If you want to name any US presidents with Stalin and Hitler, you should have named FDR but that is just my opinion.

What are you smoking? None of the good people I listed were murderers. They stood for good things. Everyone has character issues. So what?

You can't compare RFK or MLK with Dick Cheney.

Bush/Cheney are murderers. Why are you denying that? They started a war under false pretenses and knew that many would die for no good reason. If you say that Bush is innocent, you might as well state that Hitler was innocent too. Where's your consistency?

Many courts around the world have declared Bush to be guilty of war crimes and murder. Bush even confessed to torture and boasts about it too.

See the other thread about this:

viewtopic.php?t=14125

Listen to this famous prosecutor make his case against Bush for first degree murder in the deaths of 100,000 innocent Iraqis and 4,000 American troops. It's airtight and indisputable. He argues that Bush should receive the death penalty with just cause.












Description:

Vincent Bugliosi is an American attorney and author, best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the Tate-LaBianca murders. His most recent book is "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder."

Vincent spoke before a Tent State University / Alliance for Real Democracy event held at Cuernavaca Park in Denver, Colorado during DNC.

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder is a 2008 book by former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi. It argues that George W. Bush took the United States into the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses and should be tried for murder for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq when he leaves office in 2009. The book was virtually ignored by the mainstream media but still sold over 130,000 copies within its first three months of release.

Bugliosi argues that Bush intentionally misled Congress and the American people about the evidence that he said mandated going into Iraq and overthrowing Saddam Hussein. Therefore, Bugliosi argues, the deaths of over 4,000 American soldiers and 100,000 Iraqi civilians since hostilities began (as of spring 2008) amount to murder. He further states that any of the 50 state attorneys general, as well as any district attorney in the United States, has ample grounds to indict Bush for the murder of any soldier or soldiers who live in their state or county. Bugliosi says that if he were prosecuting the case, he would seek imposition of the death penalty, and that impeachment alone would be "a joke", considering the magnitude of Bush's alleged crimes.

The strongest evidence against Bush, Bugliosi says, is a speech on October 7, 2002 claiming that Iraq posed an imminent threat to the security of the United States and was capable of attacking America at any time with his stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. However, a National Intelligence Estimate of less than a week earlier stated that while Iraq did have WMD capability, it had no plans to use it except in self-defense. Moreover, according to Bugliosi, the president and his administration edited the "White Paper", or declassified version of the NIE released to Congress and the public, in a way that made the Iraqi threat seem more ominous than it actually was. In addition, Bugliosi says that the Manning Memo shows that, far from making serious efforts to avoid war, Bush considered the possibility of provoking Saddam into starting a war by sending U2 reconnaissance aircraft, falsely painted in UN colors, on flights over Iraq along with fighter escorts. He also argues that Bush pressured intelligence agencies to find proof that Saddam somehow helped al-Qaeda plan the 9-11 attacks.

[PeterAndrewNolan]

Mind controlled slaves. Fritz Springmeyer is the leading author on this.

I read he estimates 2 million such mind controlled slaves in the US. Hence they can be made to go shoot up anything. Hence they need to be killed or taken into "care" immediately after the event.

[Winston]

Btw, see parts 3 and 4 above. He talks about how happy and feeling good Bush said he was feeling after killing 100,000 people. How can you shills here not be disgusted by that? You guys are sick. Really. If that's not sociopathic, then I don't know what is.

[C.J.]

The question:
How come lone nut assassins (with no motives by the way) only kill good leaders who preach love, peace and freedom? Examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, and who knows how many more.
How come they never kill evil sociopaths like Dick Cheney, George Bush, Stalin, Hitler, etc?
Isn't that a strange coincidence? Do you buy it? If so, why?
Why is the official version of everything the only correct version of truth? Why? I can never get any of you to answer that.

So... Why do "good" people get killed, why other, evil people live to their 100s?
Answer is simple: those evil people are doing something RIGHT. Someone's looking at them and saying "Good job. I won't kill you." those good people you're talking about? Those people are evil, crooked folks. The male Kennedys were a bunch of johns and pedophiles. John K was the same as any other person employed by the elite, but he had a conscience. Martin Luther was a huge pervert. A hypocrite, he slipped up. All the people you listed were shills for the elite, but maybe deep down they didn't like it. Maybe JFK shouldn't have had Marilyn Monroe as his personal whore, or MLK practically grow two faces! :p

[MrPeabody]

That's a stupid marginalization attempt. You sound like the mainstream media. How brainwashed. Richard Gage is an older professional in a suit. So is David Ray Griffin. David Icke is older and polished.

That guy who is an expert on exposing the Fed, Edwin Griffin, looks very wise and polished.

Your marginalization is utterly false and bigoted.

You sound like a shill for the second matrix. Listening to the "polished" David Icke telling us that reptiles rule the earth is certainly going to enhance mental clarity and improve the lives of everyone here.

[ExpeditionSailor]

I have a question for those of you who think conspiracies are all BS delusional fantasies, and that only official government versions of everything are correct. (no matter how many times governments have lied)

The question:

How come lone nut assassins (with no motives by the way) only kill good leaders who preach love, peace and freedom? Examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, and who knows how many more.

How come they never kill evil sociopaths like Dick Cheney, George Bush, Stalin, Hitler, etc?

Isn't that a strange coincidence? Do you buy it? If so, why?

Why is the official version of everything the only correct version of truth? Why? I can never get any of you to answer that.

I've never accepted the official explanation for JFK's assassination. From the little I know about ballistics (and I'm not a professional or expert in the field), there is simply no way Lee Harvey Oswald could have taken JFK out shooting from such an extreme angle with a short-barrelled rifle like the Mannlicher-Carcano he was alleged to have used. The 6.5mm Swedish round used in the Mannlicher-Carcano is a flat-shooting round, meaning it doesn't have a lot of drop. But fired from a short-barrelled carbine, it would have too much drop for Oswald to be able to take such a quick shot under enormous pressure.

Oswald was a red herring. That's why he was taken out so quickly after being arrested. He could have told the truth about what really happened if he had lived.

I personally believe there were other shooters involved. Probably Mafia who wanted JFK dead because he destroyed the gambling industry in Cuba, among other things that pissed off the Mafia.

[Repatriate]

How come lone nut assassins (with no motives by the way) only kill good leaders who preach love, peace and freedom? Examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon, and who knows how many more.

How come they never kill evil sociopaths like Dick Cheney, George Bush, Stalin, Hitler, etc?

Isn't that a strange coincidence? Do you buy it? If so, why?

Why is the official version of everything the only correct version of truth? Why? I can never get any of you to answer that.

You realize there were at least 3 different assassination attempts on Hitler's life right? Stalin also had many attempts too. The reason why the "evil" seem to get away with things for a long time is because they are paranoid sociopaths who eliminate potential threats or surround themselves with layers of confidantes and secret police.