I can't deny polytheism is based on erroneous premises

[69ixine]

if God were not unique,he would be composed of a unique and shared nature,making him a caused composite,with ontologically distinct real parts,and thus not self-sufficient in his own being,and thus he would not be absolute reality and perfection itself.need and composition are privations.anything made of parts is in need of those parts,for it,the effect to exist and made reality,so anything with parts cannot be perfection.
but we see that in the world,there are gradations of perfection,and they must have their cause of being made by a ultimate perfection,which would as aforementioned necessarily be uncomposed of real distinct parts or factors.which means it's immutable.and immaterial.
basically the concept of a changing God or gods is impossible,divinity is synonymous with self-suffiency and perfection.it is the absolute,so nothing can share in it.it is infinite,thus not made finite by others on it's level.
by absolute I mean full and or overflowing with goodness,infinite meaning not privated.
Ibn Arabi's Islam and maimonidean Judaism have the closest conception of God that makes sense.

[69ixine]

if God were not unique,he would be composed of a unique and shared nature,making him a caused composite,with ontologically distinct real parts,and thus not self-sufficient in his own being,and thus he would not be absolute reality and perfection itself.need and composition are privations.anything made of parts is in need of those parts,for it,the effect to exist and made reality,so anything with parts cannot be perfection.
but we see that in the world,there are gradations of perfection,and they must have their cause of being made by a ultimate perfection,which would as aforementioned necessarily be uncomposed of real distinct parts or factors.which means it's immutable.and immaterial.
basically the concept of a changing God or gods is impossible,divinity is synonymous with self-suffiency and perfection.it is the absolute,so nothing can share in it.it is infinite,thus not made finite by others on it's level.
by absolute I mean full and or overflowing with goodness,infinite meaning not privated.
Ibn Arabi's Islam and maimonidean Judaism have the closest conception of God that makes sense.

I think there are multiple gods and goddesses, as people mentioned throughout various mythologies all over the world. I believe in one creator of the universe though, this same creator also created the pantheon of gods and goddesses I mentioned.

I don't believe this creator is the god of the bible though. Are you still Christian? I believe the creator, or Supreme Being is more in alignment with the Hindu conception of Brahman. A supreme consciousness from which all our souls are derived.

Brahman is the All is everything and we are all living inside Brahman’s dream, so like a simulated reality, but from consciousness rather than a computer simulation.
viewtopic.php?style=11&f=32&t=47230 this is in alignment with the Hermetic principle of Mentalism, which postulates everything is mental. Check out my thread and the video in there about how everything is just waves of potential until observed by a conscious onlooker.

As for Brahman being perfection and unchanging I'm not too sure about that. I know it sounds contradictory, but could it be that Brahman is both perfection and evolutive at the same time?

Thoughts @Lucas88?

totally agree,though we are brahman's timeless creations in his act of being,like how the sun shines but from it's perspective just is the sun,but we are given being or illuminated,we are not brahman,brahman is nirguna.

of course everything is conscious,everything is causally efficacious,even inert objects make themselves manifest and eist,which is an act,so they have a low level of consciousness too.energy and consciousness are like light and illimining,quality and substance are selfsame synonyms.

matter is just condensed energy.brahman is pure spirit and immutable and simple as much as possible.

[69ixine]

if God were not unique,he would be composed of a unique and shared nature,making him a caused composite,with ontologically distinct real parts,and thus not self-sufficient in his own being,and thus he would not be absolute reality and perfection itself.need and composition are privations.anything made of parts is in need of those parts,for it,the effect to exist and made reality,so anything with parts cannot be perfection.
but we see that in the world,there are gradations of perfection,and they must have their cause of being made by a ultimate perfection,which would as aforementioned necessarily be uncomposed of real distinct parts or factors.which means it's immutable.and immaterial.
basically the concept of a changing God or gods is impossible,divinity is synonymous with self-suffiency and perfection.it is the absolute,so nothing can share in it.it is infinite,thus not made finite by others on it's level.
by absolute I mean full and or overflowing with goodness,infinite meaning not privated.
Ibn Arabi's Islam and maimonidean Judaism have the closest conception of God that makes sense.

I think there are multiple gods and goddesses, as people mentioned throughout various mythologies all over the world. I believe in one creator of the universe though, this same creator also created the pantheon of gods and goddesses I mentioned.

I don't believe this creator is the god of the bible though. Are you still Christian? I believe the creator, or Supreme Being is more in alignment with the Hindu conception of Brahman. A supreme consciousness from which all our souls are derived.

Brahman is the All is everything and we are all living inside Brahman’s dream, so like a simulated reality, but from consciousness rather than a computer simulation.
viewtopic.php?style=11&f=32&t=47230 this is in alignment with the Hermetic principle of Mentalism, which postulates everything is mental. Check out my thread and the video in there about how everything is just waves of potential until observed by a conscious onlooker.

As for Brahman being perfection and unchanging I'm not too sure about that. I know it sounds contradictory, but could it be that Brahman is both perfection and evolutive at the same time?

Thoughts @Lucas88?

I didn't want to call out mr jeebu and jehova because of the christian fanatics on this forum,but christianity is a true polytheism,not a monotheism where God is changeless and impassible,obv.