Your articles suck like hell. I looked at both of them. The first one is a chart saying that you should not ingest 50 percent hydrogen peroxide. Well duh. You are supposed to use 35 percent food grade hydrogen peroxide. The second article was a short blast article that cited the FDA and American Cancer Society as bastions of truth and authority and are corruption free. NOT! We all know the FDA makes money from big pharma and they are all in the corruption cartel together. Read the first few chapters of "The One Minute Cure" listed above and you will see how corrupt the FDA is and never trust it again. It also claims that just because one man was censored by the FDA in 1942, that his claims must be bad or wrong. As if the FDA only censors the bad guys and has no interest in protecting the trillion dollar pharmaceutical cartel. Yeah right. So naive. You are so gullible man.droid wrote: Lol the only "Protocol" I'd like to follow is public tarring and feathering of flat-earthers, no-forests-on-earth, and other time wasters like this one.
It's naive at best to think that "oxygen" will be available to cells via ingestion of a compound like this. It will probably screw up your gut microorganisms in the best case scenario.
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9924301
http://www.hellawella.com/debunking-dan ... n-peroxide
How come the FDA refuses to endorse even one natural cure? It's like it is claiming that no natural cures of any sort exist. The only cures that exist are from big pharma. What a coincidence. Not. You must suck totally at detecting corruption or understanding how this world works and how industry cartels work. You have a lot to learn droid. Read the first few chapters of the PDF above please. You have the good guys and bad guys mixed up.
So only government sources are against using hydrogen peroxide or oxygen therapy as cures? No objective independent freethinking sources? lol
Furthermore, how do you explain the 15,000 doctors in Europe who endorse oxygen therapy, and the 650 third party positive reviews on Amazon.com? Your articles don't take those into account.