Richard Dawkins stumped by creationist question

[Mr S]

[MrPeabody]

So, if I understand his evasive answer correctly, he is admitting that a missing link, i.e. fossil evidence of an animal that demonstrates an actual transition between two species, does not exist.

[odbo]

never trust a darwin or a dawkins who wishes he was born one

paid shill. like noam chomsky. goes around lying, then laughs at the followers who believe him behind the scenes.
what a life. it's not even about the money i don't think. too much work..
it's like they get a sexual thrill from being two-faced scum bags.