American Women in 1969 - Wow look how different they were!

[Winston]

Wow check out these floosy films from the 1960s with Dean Martin as secret agent Matt Helm. The women in it look so floosy, carefree, and uninhibited. Wow. I can't believe these films glorify the playboy lifestyle in a positive light. Movies today would never do that, they all portray playboys in a negative light today, unfortunately. Check out these clips and slides from the Dean Martin films of the 60s below. Wow Matt Helm was an even bigger playboy than James Bond. lol. What you think @jamesbond? lol







His full movie "The Silencers" from 1966 is up on YouTube if you wanna see it.



Why do they always zoom into the eye at the beginning of movies? It's very Illuminati-esque. lol

[gsjackson]

I think so, actually. One anecdote: In 1980 I remember talking to a member of the school board of a district in Tucson. He mentioned a problem the board was addressing -- teachers dating students -- and gave an example of a science teacher who had started dating one of his students in middle school -- 7th to 9th grade in that district -- and eventually married her. The Board's solution to the problem? Requiring teachers to notify them if they were dating a student. Nowadays it would be lost job, a conviction for statutory rape with a 10-year sentence, and on a sex offenders list for life.

I don't know how much this was mainly a phenomenon of the '70s, when things were really loose sexually. My public high school in the '60s seemed much more buttoned down (of course, there was still a dress code then). But generally, I don't think it was nearly so taboo prior to about 30 years ago, in part because women married much younger back then.

Poor Tsar -- born too late. He could have just signed up to sub in the district with the hottest babes, and knocked himself out going for it.

Edit: I'm addressing Winston's 1973 movie Student Teachers. But playboys -- yeah that was an ideal to be aspired to back then. "Playing the field" was considered a good thing. One of the role models for early boomers was Bob Cummings, who played an enthusiastic womanizer on his TV show. Womanizers were admired, and the resentful harpies excluded from the game were holding their tongues.

[Winston]

Interesting biker movie from 1969 called "Hell's Belles". What a great title. It rhymes and has a great ring to it. lol. The chicks in it are pretty cute too.



Another biker movie from 1971 called "The Hard Ride".

[Voyager1]

One thing I've noticed about Western or Westernized women, if they have any beauty they will hide it with tattoos or nose rings or other piercings. Either that or they will over makeup. It's as if they are ashamed of their beauty if they have any.

[Winston]

Wow @gsjackson and @Moretorque. Check out these trailers for the movie "Night Call Nurses" from 1972. If only hospitals today had nurses that are that sexy, floosy, uninhibited, and flirtatious. lol. A film like this would be taboo today. Even in porn films of today, no woman ever acts like this. lol. Too bad the full movie isn't on YouTube.

I know the women in the movie are acting, however you can still tell by looking at them that in real life they would still be far easier to connect with, flirt with and vibe with than the American women of today. Huge difference, like night and day.

[publicduende]

I think so, actually. One anecdote: In 1980 I remember talking to a member of the school board of a district in Tucson. He mentioned a problem the board was addressing -- teachers dating students -- and gave an example of a science teacher who had started dating one of his students in middle school -- 7th to 9th grade in that district -- and eventually married her. The Board's solution to the problem? Requiring teachers to notify them if they were dating a student. Nowadays it would be lost job, a conviction for statutory rape with a 10-year sentence, and on a sex offenders list for life.

I don't know how much this was mainly a phenomenon of the '70s, when things were really loose sexually. My public high school in the '60s seemed much more buttoned down (of course, there was still a dress code then). But generally, I don't think it was nearly so taboo prior to about 30 years ago, in part because women married much younger back then.

Poor Tsar -- born too late. He could have just signed up to sub in the district with the hottest babes, and knocked himself out going for it.

Edit: I'm addressing Winston's 1973 movie Student Teachers. But playboys -- yeah that was an ideal to be aspired to back then. "Playing the field" was considered a good thing. One of the role models for early boomers was Bob Cummings, who played an enthusiastic womanizer on his TV show. Womanizers were admired, and the resentful harpies excluded from the game were holding their tongues.

That was true in 80s Europe and Italy, too. In Middle School (10-13) I remember hanging out with this friend who had the same home computer as me and his father had a not-so-well hidden stash of Playboy and Le Ore, the latter being Italy's monthly gospel of eroticism and pornography (it shut down in 1994, so I learn). He would sneak out into his dad's bedroom and come out with the stash, and we would dig into it like thirsty dogs. I clearly remember seeing entire feature articles, some with explicit photos and all, talking about pre-pubescent girls having affairs with older men. That's material that would end anyone living in the Europe or Italy of today, straight to jail.

And then Jodie Foster's scenes in Taxi Driver and The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane, from 1976. I clearly remember a scene in the latter, where she gets naked and nonchalantly invites her young friend and partner in crime to join her in bed. Very little sense of taboo or censorship, back then.

I think the watershed moment that "taught" the world that the world is full of child abusers and any sexual activities involving underage girls is inherently traumatic and criminal, was the case of Mark Dutroux, the Belgian serial child abuser and killer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux).

I am personally not a big fan of adults who obsess with underage girls, for whatever reasons. Nothing good can ever come out of a relationship between two parties who are at completely different stages of their psychological and sexual development. It is true, though, that society up until the '80s seem to be at least silent, if not tolerant, of activities sexualising children, down to commercial pornography.

[gsjackson]

There wasn't any sexualizing of children back then, at least in the U.S. That's what you see now -- little girls shaking their booties on Tic Toc, or some such, and it's no doubt part of the Satanic revolution that is being foisted upon us. You were allowed to have childhoods back then. But during the days of the "sexual revolution" adolescent girls who were fully developed sexually were very interested in sex, thought it was good for their health, as one 16-year-old girl told me in 1980, and there weren't the same taboos if teachers took advantage of the situation. Time Magazine -- then a big part of the Zeitgeist -- had a cover story in 1973 titled "The American Teenager." The article would have been described more accurately if "and Sex" had been added to the title.

[publicduende]

There wasn't any sexualizing of children back then, at least in the U.S. That's what you see now -- little girls shaking their booties on Tic Toc, or some such, and it's no doubt part of the Satanic revolution that is being foisted upon us. You were allowed to have childhoods back then. But during the days of the "sexual revolution" adolescent girls who were fully developed sexually were very interested in sex, thought it was good for their health, as one 16-year-old girl told me in 1980, and there weren't the same taboos if teachers took advantage of the situation. Time Magazine -- then a big part of the Zeitgeist -- had a cover story in 1973 titled "The American Teenager." The article would have been described more accurately if "and Sex" had been added to the title.

I am referring to having underage girls and boys depicted in something so clear and explicit that now it wouldn't even be possible to put it on a script, let alone shoot it. That Jodie Foster scene in The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane makes perfect sense in the context of the movie, but it's something that would be impossible to have right now. There are countless other examples, e.g. indie French or German movies from the same decade (70-80).

I think both girls and boys are interested in sex after puberty, this applies during the sex revolution years as much as now. The difference is that now everything seems covered by the thick blanket of what's PC, what's good for this and that silent minority and what constitutes a crime. Keeping both girls and adults in a constant state of titillation (the ass-shaking TikTok girls you refer to) and, at the same time giving them the most powerful ways to create and consume those thoughts (TikTok and the countess sites), that's cruel, Satanic cruel.

[gsjackson]

Interesting. I didn't see the Jodie Foster movie or any of the others. I don't think the concept of sexualizing children would have even entered my head in those days. When Joe Paterno, head football coach of Penn State, said that he couldn't even imagine having sex with children, after it was shown that one of his assistants had been buggering little boys, I sort of believed him. He was a high-minded straight arrow of the first rank, and for most of his life pedophelia wasn't an identifiable part of the culture. It had always existed, of course -- as an Air Force lawyer in the '50s, my father sent away for life a fellow officer who had been preying on his Boy Scout troop -- but it wasn't something you heard anything about until maybe the '90s. Now it's front and center in public consciousness, and the Satanists are prodding here and there at its normalization.

[Winston]

Another biker movie from the 60s. This one is from Britain and is about a cute lone girl riding a motorcycle across Europe while having psychedelic visions and reminiscing about her multiple lovers. She reflects on the concept of free love and why life can't be free of restrictions. It's pretty cool and the girl riding is pretty cute and has a lovely British accent. Here's the whole movie below. It's pretty cool with lovely English countryside scenery and psychedelic visions and symbolism.

It's from 1968. Her name is Marianne Faithful and she had a very pretty face. It's a bit like "Easy Rider" and has a similar ending too. Apparently, the elite want it to be known that the penalty for being a freespirit is death. Not necessarily physical death, it could be metaphorical death too in the sense that you are isolated from society and banished from the system. That's why freespirits tend to die at the end of their movies, like in "Easy Rider" and "Into the Wild" etc. It's also a standard Luciferian theme to bring down someone when they are in ecstasy too, because if you think about it, whenever you are in a state of ecstasy because you have everything you want and everything is going your way, that's when the universe is about to make everything come crashing down. That's not a coincidence, but deliberate, because the universe props you up like a fat cow before slaughtering you metaphysically to drain the maximum energy from you. It's deliberate and calculated and an obvious pattern if you think about it. Everything is a parasite in this universe, including the gods and the matrix itself, that's why we are all batteries for them just like in the Matrix movies.

Btw, how come girls in the 60s like the one in this movie didn't complain about "guys only wanting them for sex"? They just went with the flow and made love to whoever they wanted to, but didn't complain like today's girls do about "all men only wanting sex".

The Girl on the Motorcycle (1968)

[WanderingProtagonist]

There wasn't any sexualizing of children back then, at least in the U.S. That's what you see now -- little girls shaking their booties on Tic Toc, or some such, and it's no doubt part of the Satanic revolution that is being foisted upon us. You were allowed to have childhoods back then. But during the days of the "sexual revolution" adolescent girls who were fully developed sexually were very interested in sex, thought it was good for their health, as one 16-year-old girl told me in 1980, and there weren't the same taboos if teachers took advantage of the situation. Time Magazine -- then a big part of the Zeitgeist -- had a cover story in 1973 titled "The American Teenager." The article would have been described more accurately if "and Sex" had been added to the title.

Ran into some of those videos on Tik Tok but I don't see a single person there telling them to do it or forcing them either. The kids are acting entirely on their own accord just like me and my brother did when we flashed our dicks at age 9 to two older females, nobody was there telling us to do it. We did it on our own accord. Yes, we got our asses kicked when the old lady saw us doing it and reported us to our mother. But the thing is kids have all kinds of influences around them that don't give a shit. Look at Miley Cyrus and how she ended up. She started out as a role model for girls doing innocent disney stuff, then she got tired of that and realized she could become bigger than she already was so she got rid of her good girl image and went and became a f***ing whore. Now all of her songs and music videos are sexualized as hell and every female teenager/child that looked up to her see what she is and what she have become so they want to imitate that. Does Miley even care that she's a shitty role model now? No, she don't care, she's going to wait until she turns 40 or 50 years old one day and then talk about how she regret it even though she's too stupid to stop doing it now while she's still young. Westerners don't care about being better influences or role models.

So when your role models are mostly adult women doing the same attention craving stuff throughout media, what do you expect the kids to do? Imitate the shit for the same end results. But women will not stop doing what they do just because kids are imitating them. The fact is those little girls behaving like that on Tiktok will be the future of egomaniac females who end up worse than the women we have today. That's the whole reason Western females are trash all they want is attention and validation on a constant basis.

[Winston]

Wow check out this song from 1961 called "Travelin' Man" by Ricky Nelson. The lyrics glorify the playboy lifestyle and freespirited romance with many women. This version below contains images of many different women along with the song. lol. How come the 1960s allowed songs like this to glorify the playboy fun lifestyle but modern songs don't? lol. What you think @Moretorque and @gsjackson? Do you remember this classic song?

[Space Invaders]

Travelin Man was before my time but, wow, what a fantastic tune. Songs back then had real soul and real feeling, unlike today's garbage music.

[Winston]

Wow check out all these things that people could do in the 1960s that are BANNED today. Why doesn't mainstream media tell you about this? lol

[Winston]

Wow check out these 13 things from the 1960s that kids today will never understand. lol