Join John Adams Mon and Wed nights 7:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar!


Share This Page

View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       Elegance Theme       Dark Theme

Rating Women Physically

Discuss dating, relationships and foreign women.
drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Rating Women Physically

Post by drealm »

Most men use a 10 point scale, but I think this is overly complicated. What does each point of difference really count for?

I see 3 real points of difference:

1 (Normally 1-4) Ugly Women

Obese, old, disfigured, birth defects. They couldn't pay you to sleep with them. The act of sex feels disgusting. You're embarrassed to be around them.

2 (Normally 5-6) Average Women

Nothing good or bad stands out, they blend in to the crowd. Sex is adequate but not exciting. You get no bragging rights. You wouldn't pay for it but you'll take it free.

3 (Normally 7-10) Attractive Women

Rare genetic specimens. Sex between #2 and #3 could be the same, the difference is you get bragging rights with #3 and are willing to pay.



Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!

Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!

User avatar
Mr Natural
Freshman Poster
Posts: 297
Joined: October 28th, 2013, 4:20 pm
Location: USA

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Mr Natural »

I've never really thought about it in terms of numbers, but I think most guys think a 7-8 is good looking, a 9 is awesome beautiful and there may not be any such thing as a 10. Although I've seen a few I might just have to give a 10. And overall I would definitely separate them into more than just 3 categories.
Everybody has a plan til they get punched in the mouth
Mike Tyson

drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by drealm »

My point is there aren't big difference between a 7-8-9-10. Nobody would dump an 8 for 9. The main things that separate an average looking girl from a hot girl are bragging rights.

Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5983
Joined: April 16th, 2011, 6:23 pm

Post by Ghost »

.
Last edited by Ghost on April 1st, 2019, 11:51 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1803
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Shemp »

Either you use a linear scale or a curved scale. If the latter, you need to define the curve, and that is way more mathematics than is appropriate for the average internet user. So a linear scale it has to be.

With a linear scale, each point from 1 to 10 has exactly 10% of the population. This is also called a percentile scale, as in top 10% of wealth. Using this linear or percentile scale, HB10s are actually common, just as wealth millionaires are common in the United States.

Attractive women ARE common. About 30% of girls aged 19 are pretty and the differences between very best of that 30% and the others are negligible. Differences increase with age because so many woman let themselves go. Also, makeup and Photoshop make a huge difference in turning merely pretty girls into supermodels. Likewise, a pretty woman who is heavily made up, has her hair poofed up, wearing revealing clothing and high heels, will attract lots of attention, when the same woman dressed for work at office depot (no makeup, hair in a pony tail, khaki pants, button up shirt) will attract no attention.

Finally, we focus too much on faces because we wear so much clothing. At the beach, the focus on the face is reduced and the body is more heavily emphasized. Assuming everyone is in good shape (toned yoga or military type body, as in lean and muscles allowing 10 dead hang pull-ups for men, and equivalent for women) then people start looking quite similar at the beach.

Among circle jerkers (RVF forum, etc), the scale is both implicitly curved (since they would deny that 10% of women get the HB10 label) but no one defines the curve, and also carried out to decimal points, as in HB7.6. Among circle jerkers, the focus is always on the other men, women are just a means to get other men's attention.

Banano
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2011
Joined: June 11th, 2011, 1:26 am

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Banano »

Can you have HB1? Is she ugly or hot?


I think it is stupid to use HB followed by number to describe level of attractiveness, use plain old 1-10 .

User avatar
Zambales
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1516
Joined: August 9th, 2015, 1:41 pm

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Zambales »

I usually put them into four categories physically.

Very Attractive
Attractive enough
Average
Ugly

If I'm looking for a relationship I tend to go for the second one. The very attractive types usually are full of themselves and think they're God's Gift which is a total turn-off for me. They're perfectly feasible for one night though but not for anything more.

User avatar
Zambales
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1516
Joined: August 9th, 2015, 1:41 pm

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Zambales »

drealm wrote:The main things that separate an average looking girl from a hot girl are bragging rights.
If a guy is looking long term with his main priority being a trophy, he's most likely heading for a nasty surprise somewhere down the line. Too many men fall for this one. It's not a competition.

Hero
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1710
Joined: July 3rd, 2008, 1:19 pm

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Hero »

Mr Natural wrote:I've never really thought about it in terms of numbers, but I think most guys think a 7-8 is good looking, a 9 is awesome beautiful and there may not be any such thing as a 10. Although I've seen a few I might just have to give a 10. And overall I would definitely separate them into more than just 3 categories.
I can't think of any perfect 10s that exist today, but 30 years ago, Kathy Ireland, Rachel Hunter, and Holly Hallstrom were definitely 10s (Holly was one of "Barker's Beauties" from "The Price is Right").

I also think that 10 categories is too many, but you need more than 3. 7 categories works for me. The category descriptions would be
1: Vomit
2. Ugly
3. Below average
4. Average
5. Above average/cute
6. Hot
7. Stunning, drop-dead gorgeous.

User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1803
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by Shemp »

3 categories is plenty for me:

No
Maybe
Yes

Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5983
Joined: April 16th, 2011, 6:23 pm

Post by Ghost »

.
Last edited by Ghost on April 1st, 2019, 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by drealm »

Hero wrote:
I also think that 10 categories is too many, but you need more than 3. 7 categories works for me. The category descriptions would be
1: Vomit
2. Ugly
3. Below average
4. Average
5. Above average/cute
6. Hot
7. Stunning, drop-dead gorgeous.
Do you actually treat your 1-3 differently? If they are all undatable and will be ignored then why grade them differently?

drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by drealm »

retiredfrank wrote:3 categories is plenty for me:

No
Maybe
Yes
Mine can be reduced to:

No
Free
Pay

drealm
Junior Poster
Posts: 934
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 9:23 am

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by drealm »

Zambales wrote:
drealm wrote:The main things that separate an average looking girl from a hot girl are bragging rights.
If a guy is looking long term with his main priority being a trophy, he's most likely heading for a nasty surprise somewhere down the line. Too many men fall for this one. It's not a competition.
A trophy may also just be statue that's dead in bed. But I admit I would prefer a trophy, I'm not sure why I have this need.

User avatar
jamesbond
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 11402
Joined: August 25th, 2007, 10:45 am
Location: USA

Re: Rating Women Physically

Post by jamesbond »

drealm wrote:
Zambales wrote:
drealm wrote:The main things that separate an average looking girl from a hot girl are bragging rights.
If a guy is looking long term with his main priority being a trophy, he's most likely heading for a nasty surprise somewhere down the line. Too many men fall for this one. It's not a competition.
A trophy may also just be statue that's dead in bed. But I admit I would prefer a trophy, I'm not sure why I have this need.
I was listening to Tom Leykis a few years ago and a guy called in and said while he was in the process of divorcing his American wife, he met a woman from Russia who was much better looking than his wife.

He said he couldn't wait for his divorce to be final because, "My future trophy wife was warming up in the bullpen." :P
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"

"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Dating, Relationships, Foreign Women”