The Effects Of Female Virginity And Promiscuity

[wuxi]

The following graphs will show that male promiscuity does not effect longterm relationships as much as female promiscuity.

Number of lifetime sexual partners.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/201 ... -data.html

Virgin brides vs. non-virgin brides.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/201 ... -risk.html

[The_Adventurer]

Wuxi, aren't you in China? You know those of us here can't see that. WHy not post some highlights in the text of your message.

I am guessing the general consensus is that promiscuity in women = higher divorce rates? And that virgin brides means lower divorce rates?

[ladislav]

My mother was one. And I am happy I am not a son of a slutty woman.
I think they way it used to be before is that people married very young and both were virgins. Now that you have gov't imposed age limits and then you have to wait until you are financially capable, and finish college, that kind of puts a strain on the sexual desire and people try and satisfy it on the side as doing it through marriage is hard. It used to be you got married and brought your wife to live at home with your extended family. Now, it is no longer the case. That is also the cause of promiscuity among many others.
In many countries, also, women used to be ( and still are) tolerant of mistresses and occasional flings with hookers and all. As long as the man fulfills his family responsibility, he is free to discreetly play around. Women there wisely understand that a man is much hornier by nature and needs variety. So, no divorce would ensue as long as it would not be in her face. That tolerant attitude on part of a woman paradoxically keeps the family strong. Lol.

[wuxi]

Wuxi, aren't you in China? You know those of us here can't see that. WHy not post some highlights in the text of your message.

I am guessing the general consensus is that promiscuity in women = higher divorce rates? And that virgin brides means lower divorce rates?

Sorry I forgot theres members in China. Basicly, the divorce rate for women goes way up after just one sexual partner.

Sexual Partner Divorce Risk

Cohabitation, that is "living together" before marriage has been shown to increase the risk of subsequent divorce of a couple. Many investigators have felt that the practice of cohabitation is selective for people who don't value marriage highly and hence are more likely to divorce when stress is put onto the marriage. In essence, it was thought that the cohabitors more "liberal values" placed them at higher risk of divorce.

Jay Teachman, an academic, investigated this matter further. The study, which is available online, makes for interesting reading. Teachman's genius was to look stratify the cohabitors risk of divorce by the by the number of sexual partners/cohabiting history.

The study was based on data from the National Survey of Family Growth 1995 cycle and involved over 6500 women.

It was controlled for a host of variables.

The study was in no way sponsored or funded by any conservative organisation.

Teachman's conclusion:

The results presented in this article replicate findings from previous research: Women who cohabit prior to marriage or who have premarital sex have an increased likelihood of marital disruption. Considering the joint effects of premarital cohabitation and premarital sex, as well as histories of premarital relationships, extends previous research. The most salient finding from this analysis is that women whose intimate premarital relationships are limited to their husbands—either premarital sex alone or premarital cohabitation—do not experience an increased risk of divorce. It is only women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship who have an elevated risk of marital disruption. This effect is strongest for women who have multiple premarital coresidental unions. These findings are consistent with the notion that premarital sex and cohabitation have become part of the normal courtship pattern in the United States. They do not indicate selectivity on characteristics linked to the risk of divorce and do not provide couples with experiences that lessen the stability of marriage.

Executive summary: It's not the liberal values, it the number of partners that matter.

And,

This limitation notwithstanding, the results presented here should shift attention away from research that focuses on the selection of individuals into cohabitation and premarital sex to a focus on the selection of individuals who do not marry the individuals with whom they first cohabit or initiate first sex. It may well be the case that, irrespective of the legal status of the relationship, the relevant distinction to make is between people who form multiple relationships and people who form a single, longer lasting relationship.

(My highlighting)


The paper data and methods can be found here. Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent. Marital Dissolution Among Women

Oh, in table 4 of the study, Teachman gives probabilities of divorce, which for fun, we will map onto the Heritage Foundation's study.

10 year divorce rate of the Teachman study group was 34%. (I didn't use the 5 year divorce risk in Teachman's paper since the Heritage study made its calculations on the people being married more than 5 years)

Teachman didn't plot the risk by the number of sexual partners, merely that more than one and in different relationship contexts, so I have simply marked the range of his findings. Note, the really disturbing one still holds. A soon as a woman has had more than one partner her long term marital stability risk drops to near 50%.

[The_Adventurer]

"Sorry I forgot theres members in China. Basicly, the divorce rate for women goes way up after just one sexual partner. "

Man, I forgot about this post and just came back to it now! Man, society is doomed, or at least western society. Try to find a virgin old enough to legally marry!

I think I will hold out until I find a virgin, or just never get married.

[keius]

Looks like everything's based on a male dominated society where traditional women simply must put up with our s**t.

Of course, nowadays, i'd say we live in a pseudo-male dominated society where the traditional woman is in danger of extinction. That being the case, they will no longer put up with our s**t? And as Terrance put it, our western society is doomed?

Makes me wonder if anyone on this board has ever encountered a real virgin before...and not any fake ones....there's lots of them floating around lol

[Repatriate]

In many countries, also, women used to be ( and still are) tolerant of mistresses and occasional flings with hookers and all. As long as the man fulfills his family responsibility, he is free to discreetly play around. Women there wisely understand that a man is much hornier by nature and needs variety. So, no divorce would ensue as long as it would not be in her face. That tolerant attitude on part of a woman paradoxically keeps the family strong. Lol.

That's because sex from the male point of view isn't viewed as something immoral or warped with puritanical beliefs. There's a rational social understanding in those countries that men need sex but don't easily get attached to the people they are screwing. It's inherently different for most women because it's tied to biological necessity. Women DO get more attached to men they have sexual relations with unless they are the exception and/or raised in an environment (like America) that puts less emphasis on emotional bonding and more on individual self satisfaction.

[E_Irizarry]

My mother was one. And I am happy I am not a son of a slutty woman.

Even though my mother was extremely dysfunctional, she wasn't a harlot. I hope her soul is resting peacefully though. Hence I co-sign what LadiSlav is saying here.

[E_Irizarry]

Do you guys know what is nuts? ...that Black American women look better at a pre-age of consent than they do when they hit 19 or 20 and above even.

Call me a pedophiliac, but some underage girls look hot as hell compared to their legal counterpart women.

Would I do them? Hell no. There are too much anti-male laws in Western society.

[The_Adventurer]

Uncle Ruckus (The Boondocks) said it best. "See that [white] woman there? Her body is a temple. A black woman's body is a temple of doom. She done spat out 4 kids by the time she's 21, and it's all downhill from there!"

[ssjparris]

that is tooo funny terrance. yeah i see really super hot looking 16 year females walking around with big boobs large butt and small waist lines on latinas and blacks. the blacks do get f***ed up a little by adult age.

[jamesbond]

It seems like there are a lot of women in America who have the morals of an alley cat. Some of them look like alley cats too, check out the picture below! lol

[Repatriate]

It seems like there are a lot of women in America who have the morals of an alley cat. Some of them look like alley cats too, check out the picture below! lol

God that's repulsive. You know a lot of American guys would think that she's hot too.