Dindu kills reporters on air

[Cornfed]

In this TNB outrage, a pavement ape films himself shooting a reporter and cameraman and the female they were interviewing. More evidence that blacks are not compatible with human society. If you are not pushing for the total expurgation of blacks from human society, then as far as I am concerned you deserve to be horribly killed by them.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/26/us/vi ... ting-wdbj/

[Yohan]

There are daily incidents with firearms in the USA, in all directions, for sure not always are blacks the victims.

Nobody will deny that USA has a problem with racism. Unfortunately some idiots do not know anymore between wrong and right, they see only their race and nothing else.

About illegal use of guns, it depends where you are in USA. There are many nice places in USA, where you need not to be worried about security, there are however also entire streets in some cities where 90 percent of the population has been in jail, released, jail again in and out... totally low-life.

Some black people are truly useless, while others are successful, often in sports or as entertainers, often doing jobs in the military etc., but there is also so-called 'white trash' full with alcohol and drugs, while many white people are able to keep a good living standard and show up with good behavior.

Every country has to deal with its own problems.

The problem about USA is more external than internal. US-citizens are showing up worldwide, teaching others about human rights and moral values, what foreign countries with different culture should do or should not do, the US-government is following even its own US-citizens around the world asking for paying of US-income tax for earnings they made overseas etc. etc.

For sure, USA has plenty of problems, this county is far away to be called the 'paradise'...

[Cornfed]

^ You are babbling incoherently.

[zboy1]

Insanity. My Chinese students are asking why the U.S. is so crazy sometimes...lol.

[Yohan]

Insanity. My Chinese students are asking why the U.S. is so crazy sometimes...lol.

And what are you answering to them?

[zboy1]

Insanity. My Chinese students are asking why the U.S. is so crazy sometimes...lol.

And what are you answering to them?

At this point, after seemingly hundreds of crazy events in the States over the past year, I don't know how to respond anymore. I just say to them, in a non-direct way, that moving to the U.S. and other Anglo countries is a bad idea. Stay in China I always tell them; the future is in Asia, not the West (but most reject my advice, unfortunately).

[Gadfly]

The problem about USA is more external than internal. US-citizens are showing up worldwide, teaching others about human rights and moral values, what foreign countries with different culture should do or should not do,

I don't think the US teaches moral values to other nations. It doesn't teach other nations about, say, chastity, or modesty in dress or behavior.

Nor does it teach about faithfulness and fidelity in marriage. Or about enduring hardship rather than evading responsibilities or duties.

The US teaches other nations about freedom, democracy, and human rights, which are not moral values at all. They are false and fraudulent, and don't teach a nation's people how to live a virtuous, moral life.

[gsjackson]

The numbers of whites among these hyper-narcissist, sociopathic, lash-out-at-society shooters far exceeds the number of blacks. So this episode, put into context, really isn't grist for your racist mill, Corny.

What's interesting to me is that it is another instance of "homocide" being swept under the rug by the media. The guy proclaims himself to be a poof, noting that this is somewhat central to his problems, and, in accordance with the dictates of PC etiquette, no further mention is made of the fact.

[Break the chains]

Not surprising that details 'black' and 'homosexual' were left out when they applied to the perpetrator rather than the victim(s).

Typical western liberal PC-thug media bias.

[Cornfed]

Here is the dindu's actual footage:
http://www.infowars.com/graphic-shockin ... t-of-view/

[jamesbond]

Not surprising that details 'black' and 'homosexual' were left out when they applied to the perpetrator rather than the victim(s).

Typical western liberal PC-thug media bias.

I find it interesting they aren't calling this a 'hate crime' since it fits all the perimeters of what a hate crime is. The shooting of the black parishioners at the church in South Carolina by that white guy was called a hate crime.

The shooter from Virginia filmed the whole shooting ON HIS CELL PHONE! Here is the footage of the on air shooting that is still up on YouTube.

[Ghost]

.

[Moretorque]

I think some Space Monsters took control of his mind.

[Gadfly]

http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/will-obama-s ... -shooting/

WILL OBAMA SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SHOOTING?

It’s been 48 hours since two white, straight TV news people were shot dead at point-blank range during a live-shot, and another woman injured, by a black, homsexual, racial-hate-espousing man who later killed himself, after sending a rambling, 23-page fax of grievances to ABC News.

Strangely, two things have not happened since that incident in Virginia:

Other than to have his White House spokesman blame the attack on the Second Amendment, Barack Obama hasn’t said a word about this crystal clear example of what he would call a “hate crime” – one that is racially motivated and partly motivated by grievances related to “sexual identity” issues.
Despite the attack overshadowing all other stories in the national media, ABC News has not released the entirety of shooter Vester Lee Flanagan’s manifesto sent only to that one news agency.

May I pose a few questions about these omissions:

Why do you suppose Barack Obama was so quick to jump to conclusions about potential racial motivations behind the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, when there were none, and so slow to do so in the case of Vester Lee Flanagan, where they are documented by the attacker himself?

Do I need to explain the difference?

The man who killed Michael Brown was a white police officer acting in self-defense. Any potential for him to continue his career path as a law enforcement officer was doomed by the actions of Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder, who sent a legion of investigators to Ferguson to see that justice was done. At the end of the day, Holder was reluctantly forced by the facts on the ground to conclude the white police officer acted justifiably under the circumstances.

Meanwhile, the man who killed reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward was a gay, black man who let the entire world know the motivations for his cold-blooded murders – racial hatred and a vague contention that he had been offended by something his two former colleagues said or did with regard to his identification as “gay.”

Here we have two stark contrasts in cases of shootings involving whites and blacks. There are, of course, hundreds of examples like these. But I am first and mainly interested in suggesting that Obama’s view of such violence is racist.

He very clearly wants to find examples of white-on-black gun violence to exploit them for political gain.

He very clearly is not interested in finding examples of black-on-white gun violence that is, without question, motivated by racial hatred. It doesn’t fit into his political narrative.

Of course, if a straight person murdered in cold blood two homosexuals and put out a manifesto explaining the killings were, in part, motivated by grievances against homosexuals based on their sexual identity, is there any question Obama would be all over the incident – condemning it, using it to make his case for special rights based on sexual identity and new hate-crime laws?

Realistically, everyone must admit in their hearts and minds that Obama has a double-standard here as big as his appetite for demonization of his political adversaries.

It is prima facie evidence that Obama is not interested in equal justice under the law. To Obama, some people are more equal than others – especially if they are black or “gay.”

Alison Parker and Adam Ward weren’t the right color. They were just gunned down because they were white heterosexuals – not members of protected minority groups. The shooter was, so no comment is needed here.

And what about ABC’s notable decision not to release publicly the full text of Vester Lee Flanagan’s hate-tinged manifesto?

Why is that? Isn’t the fax they received directly from the assailant a news goldmine for the network? Why is ABC holding back?

Could it be there is much, much more in that message that doesn’t fit into ABC’s worldview and narrative? Are there other connections and admissions Flanagan made in that message that would “hurt the cause of political correctness” that reigns supreme in the newsrooms of the elite establishment media?

I just wonder.

Obama: Do you have nothing to say about the tragic murders in Virginia besides having your government-paid mouthpieces blame guns?

ABC: You’ve selectively released a few morsels from the manifesto. Where’s the beef? What are you hiding?

http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/dis-integrating-america/

DIS-INTEGRATING AMERICA

The Wednesday morning murders of 24-year-old Roanoke TV reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward, 27, were a racist atrocity, a hate crime. Were they not white, they would be alive today.

Their killer, Vester L. Flanagan II, said as much in his farewell screed. He ordered his murder weapon, he said, two days after the slaughter of nine congregants at the African-American AME church in Charleston, South Carolina.

“What sent me over the top was the church shooting,” said Flanagan.

To be sure, racism does not fully explain why Flanagan, fired from that same WDBJ7 station, committed this act of pure evil.

Black and homosexual, he said he was the target of anti-gay slurs from black males and racial insults from white colleagues. He had gotten himself fired from other jobs in broadcasting. He carried a grab bag of grudges and resentments.

Yet, in the last analysis, the Washington Post headline got it right: “Gunman’s letter frames attack as racial revenge.”

Other news organizations downplayed the racial aspect. But had those murdered journalists been young and black, and their killer a 40-something “angry white male,” the racial motivation would have been front and center in their stories.

Now, Black America is surely as sickened by this horror outside Roanoke as was White America by the Charleston massacre.

But it is hard to see how and when we come together as a people. For racial crimes and race conflict have become “the story” everyone seizes upon – since Ferguson in the summer of 2014.

On the first anniversary of Michael Brown’s death, protesters blocked public buildings in St. Louis and St. Louis County, shut down I-70 at rush hour. In Ferguson, hoodlums rioted and looted for days.

What justification was there for such lawlessness?

Explained some in the press, it was to protest the failure to prosecute a white cop who had killed an “unarmed black teenager.”

Left out of most stories was that Brown, 18, had knocked over a convenience store, throttled a clerk half his size and was unarmed only because he failed to wrest a gun away from Officer Darren Wilson, whom a grand jury declared had acted in self-defense when he shot the charging 290-pound Brown.

Since then, we have had the Eric Garner incident on Staten Island, where a 345-pound black man, suffering from diabetes, asthma, obesity and heart disease, died of heart failure after being wrestled to the ground by five cops, none of whom was charged.

Came then the death of Freddie Gray in Baltimore, while in police custody. There, six officers have been charged. Then came the death of a 12-year-old black kid in Cleveland, who was waving a toy gun.

As the incidents pile up, with white cops shooting black suspects, and black criminals killing white cops, the news goes viral, and America divides along the lines of race and color, and between black and blue.

Though, let it be said, the violence in Ferguson and Baltimore was child’s play compared to Watts in ’65, Detroit and Newark in ’67, and D.C. and 100 other cities after Dr. King’s assassination in 1968.

“Can we all get along?” pleaded Rodney King, when South Central exploded in rioting, arson and looting after the L.A. cops who had beaten King were exonerated.

Answer: Probably not.

For what seems certain, ensuring that our racial divide widens and deepens, is that more incidents like those involving Michael Brown, Eric Garner and Freddie Gray are inevitable.

Why so?

First, violent crime, declining since the early 1990s, is rising again. And violent crime in black communities is many times higher than in the white communities of America.

Collisions between black suspects and criminals and white cops are going to increase, and some of these collisions are going to involve shootings. And such shootings not only trigger fixed, deep-seated beliefs about cops, criminals and injustice, they also cause an instantaneous taking of sides.

Moreover, this is the sort of “news” that instantly goes viral through the Internet, Facebook and 24-hour cable TV.

Liberals and Democrats take sides with the black community out of solidarity and to solidify their political base, while Republicans stand with the cops, law-and-order conservatives and the Silent Majority in Middle America.

The race issue has even begun to split the Democrats.

When former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, a card-carrying liberal, attended a conference of Netroots Nation and responded to a chant of “Black Lives Matter!” with the more inclusive, “Black Lives Matter! White Lives Matter! All Lives Matter!” he was virtually booed off the stage.

O’Malley proceeded to apologize for including the white folks.

To many Americans, even many who did not vote for him, the election of Barack Obama seemed to hold out the promise that our racial divide could be healed by a black president.

Even Obama’s supporters must concede it did not happen, though we would, again, argue angrily over why.

[BlackKnight]

Blah, white people have no right to be outraged. Lets talk about the Taino genocide (1492-1518) is where the Spanish wiped out most of the Tainos (Arawaks), the native people of the northern Caribbean (present-day Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Bahamas, etc).

According to one estimate, genocide and disease wiped out 3 million of the 3.5 million Tainos – 85%. Most were already dead when smallpox arrived in 1518.
Christopher Columbus made La Taina, the land of the Tainos, into a living hell. It went way beyond simply killing those who fought Spanish rule. The Spanish had the Tainos:

*grilled,
*cut up into pieces like sheep,
*run down by hunting dogs and torn to pieces,
*strung up and burned alive 13 at a time – in memory of Jesus and his 12 Apostles.

According to one report, Columbus once punished a man found guilty of stealing corn by having his ears and nose cut off and then selling him into slavery. Testimony recorded in the report claims that Columbus congratulated his brother Bartolome on "defending the family" when the latter ordered a woman paraded naked through the streets and then had her tongue cut out for suggesting that Columbus was of lowly birth.

They killed even women and children.

Even babies: the Spanish threw babies against rocks and into rivers – and laughed. They cut off pieces of Tainos for entertainment. They cut off their heads for practice. They raped women and girls – and brought back syphilis to Europe.

The Spanish were kinder to their animals than to the Tainos.

They killed Tainos by the thousands, even those who brought them food and gifts. They killed half the people of the kingdom of Maguana outright.

After the killing fields, the Spanish divided the remaining Tainos among themselves to teach them the Christian faith:

*For Taino men that meant working in the mines, often being worked to death. As many as 90% died within in three months.
*For Taino women that meant working the land, even the heavy work that men used to do.
*There was so little food that babies died for lack of milk. Children died of hunger by the thousands. Men were worked so hard in the mines that few children were born.

Columbus demanded a certain amount gold or cotton from each Taino over the age of 13. Those who failed to meet his demands had their hands cut off.

Because of their gross mismanagement of governance, Columbus and his brothers were arrested and imprisoned upon their return to Spain from the third voyage. They lingered in jail for six weeks before busy King Ferdinand ordered their release. Not long after, the king and queen summoned the Columbus brothers to the Alhambra palace in Granada. There the royal couple heard the brothers' pleas; restored their freedom and wealth; and, after much persuasion, agreed to fund Columbus' fourth voyage.

https://abagond.wordpress.com/2013/09/2 ... -genocide/