Schools Now Teaching Kids That Heterosexuality Is Oppression!

[MrMan]

2. Lingam and Yoni. This is the male and female principles which pervade everything in the natural world. These are metaphysical concepts. Every human being, whether male or female has elements of both Lingam and Yoni. This is why you get some men who are more masculine, some men who are more feminine. They express masculinity or femininity based on their level of Lingam or Yoni.

From what I read, these words mean 'penis' and 'female private parts'--- womb, vagina, vulva, etc. (Sorry to be graphic. I don't think there are any kids on the forum.) And 'Lingam' also But you say this is a mystical concept, so is 'spirit penis and 'spirit vagina'? Are those good translations?

So, do you think all men have some 'spirit vagina' in them? Does that make sense to you? How much 'spirit vag' have you got in you? On a scale of one to ten, how big of a yoni are you?

Your making a good case for what Vishal is saying in the video. I've heard this garbage about 'getting in touch with my feminine' side on TV from time to time for years. It's always irked me and sounded like a bunch of kind of gay nonsense. But it probably comes from the influence of Hinduism, probably filtered in through academics who studied Hinduism or through the New Age movement, which pulls from Hinduism and various other systems.

Think about it. This idea that every man is a little woman... having some spirit vag in his personality... and every woman is a little bit a man, having a bit of spirit d in her personality aligns with this transexual garbage. All they have to do is add to it the idea that if you have the technology now to make ones body align with how much spirit vag he's got in him, then you have a justification for this trans garbage. And they can teach the little boys, "Maybe you have a lot of yoni in you. You can get this trans operation and look lik a real girl."

India also has a historical 'third sex', hijra eunuchs, where dudes cut their junk off and aren't considered a man or a woman. That's just low tech transexualism.

I read about the multiple 'genders' of Judaism. It's not the same. Those had to do with intersex individuals, people actually born with birth defects related to their private parts. So someone who had some deficiency might be able to marry but not enter the temple, so Jewish religious scholars gave their legal judgments on that and had different labels for different intersex symptoms. That's different from chopping men's private parts off.

The other idea about man being made male and female, that is one of the old Jewish opinions on that. I was a little familiar with Rashi, who was like late medieval European. The word translated 'rib' in the Adam and Eve story could also be translated 'side', and his opinion was this was front side and back side, that man and woman were created as one being and the woman removed from the man. But Jewish scholars in ancient literature had different opinions on various issues, and this was apparently one old opinion. Be that as it may, once male and female were separated... in this theory... they are separated. They are two beings. There is no room for men turning into women or vice versa.

Yahweh finds men dressing as women to be an abomination. It's disgusting/repulsive. Men having sex with men is also an abomination.

[Mew6ix]

A few school kids in Toronto were groomed by their feminist or gay teachers to change their genders. A lot of parents were castigated by Children's Aid society for preventing the gender change of their Kindergartner or Grade Six child.

There was even a feminist teacher who gave a Grade One student a blowjob, and told the child to become a girl. Toronto Police threatened to arrest the parents for harassing the feminist teacher. It was probably a transgender who has more rights than the boy. Misgendering is also a crime in Toronto too. Jordan Peterson warned us about it when Kathleen Wynne was in power.

Kathleen Wynne's friend Ben Levin, a former bureaucrat in the sex-ed program was charged and convicted for child pornography.

It's not a good idea to have kids these days.

[MrMan]

The meaning of Lingam and Yoni as you have read it is symbolic of the masculine and feminine energies they represent. And again, these are not in any way related to the concept of gender or a person's soul. As I stated above: a straight, biological man, can have high levels of Yoni energy which makes him act affeminate but at the same time it doesn't mess with his sense of identity or his sexuality! The two things are completely different and are being conflated either deliberately to erroneously connect the recent globo homo agenda or unintentionally misinterpreted.

From my perspective who sees this Hindu gender stuff as a bunch of (likely) demonic (literally), dangerous, and disgusting bunk, I disagree. The Hindu perspective that leaks into western culture through New Age, academia, and people in California studying Hinduism, certainly sets the stage, philosophically, for transsexualism.

And some of the 'bad Jews' who are promoting this stuff do so because they have been influenced by bad philosophies like Hinduism, Hindu-influenced New Age or a kind of secular Hedonism, and various other bad worldviews and philosophies.

Hinduism also has a god for men who want to have their junk cut off so they can be recognized by a community considered to be a 'third gender'. These guys get their junk cut off, then dress up like women, acting all effeminate. The difference between that and full trans gender operation people is they now have technology to allow the man's junk to be changed to _look like_ women's junk and even participate in bizarre homosexual sex acts that replicate intercourse with a woman.

I am pretty sure this sickening junk I've heard from the '80's about 'getting in touch with your feminine side' is Hindu-influenced also.

As far as connecting the dots a bit tighter, if you want, I will see if I could contact Vishal and ask if he can do that. I think I am on a forum with him still. I had one interaction with him before that I recall.

I'll give you an example of what I mean. I work with a guy called Martin. He is a straight guy with a girlfriend. When I first trained him on the job I thought he was gay because he is really effeminate and acts really feminine. He isn't gay, neither is he confused about his gender, neither is he repressing his "true" self. He is already his true self. A straight, biological male and a male soul who just so happens to have higher levels of Yoni energy which makes him more sensitive and feminine than most other men who have higher levels of Lingam energy and lower levels of Yoni energy.

The first part I follow, then the Hindu explanation junk. One can use that explanation for a trans man made to look like a female. The man feels like he is a woman trapped in man's body. One could say he had a bunch of yoni energy, and not much lingam energy. It isn't a large leap from there to say they have this operation and some hormones to make him express the yoni energy physically.

After all, Hinduism has hijras. It is intertwined with Hinduism, too. They have a goddess they worship that is involved in their initiation ceremony. Hinduism has already had its version of 'trans' from way back before these sick operations were developed.

I worked with a guy when I lived overseas. He sounded a little gay when he first went to work there. He had a girlfriend back in the US, and didn't seem gay from the stuff he said, except using a bit of gay slang and that slightly effeminate manner of speaking. After a few weeks of working there, the slight whiney gay speech patterns he'd been expressing went away. From his stories, he'd been working retail with some gay dudes. He'd picked up some of their mannerisms. No Hindu explanation needed.

That's two examples of straight people who have high energies of either Lingam or Yoni which is contrary to their biological sex or the gender of their soul, which I already explained I believe is fixed. Male souls always incarnate as males. Female souls incarnate as females.

The trans philosophy fits well with Hinduism. Hinduism has this male and female energy inside the opposite gender. It just takes a little tweak to turn into this trans mess we have. It is probably from the Hindu energy.

From my perspective as a Christian, where God made male and female and is disgusted by men dressing as women and women dressing as men, you can see how the Hindu philosophy seems gross, warped, and potentially partly behind this trans junk.

Also, in Hindu mythology, male and male gods can have children together and female with female, so it definitely offers a lot of fuel for the LGBT ideologies.

As for myself, to answer your question, I think I have a high level of Lingam energy as I act masculine. But I do have some Yoni energy as well. Hopefully these images will give you a clearer impression of what I mean by the concept of Lingam and Yoni.

So you think you have a little womb/vagina/vulva energy in you? Okay. I don't believe in that stuff. But if that is how you think of yourself, that's your opinion.

The fact that you have found evidence of transexuals in Hinduism only means it existed back then and was tolerated. It doesn't mean that Hinduism is advocating this behaviour. Only that it is tolerated. Just because some modern "thinkers" like John Money want to conflate this duality of masculine and feminine energies with sex and gender does not mean that this is derived from Hinduism. If anything it has been subverted and made as something perverse by pedophiles and nutcases who want to sexualise kids and make a profit from their ill-informed transition to the opposite sex. That is immoral and it is wrong!

Without the weird Hindu philosophy, there may have been nothing to build the trans philosophy on.

Most denominations of Hinduism do not seek converts or to push their ideological beliefs onto others as Christianity does. Also, 95% of Hindus live in India, not the west. Gay marriage was legalised in the west before it was legal in India, which is/was a predominantly homophobic country. With these facts in mind, how can you further justify your position?

Sexualizing kids? How old are temple prostitutes in India when they are recruited? Don't they recruit devadasi when they are little girls?

Immoral pedophiles and western libertines have drawn from immoral Hindu philosophy and added to it. But their ideology isn't compatible with Christianity or Judaism. The Jews that support this stuff draw from other ideologies.

I'm not saying Talmudic Judaism is pristine or not without some fatal flaws. But it isn't as bizarre as his Hindu stuff. One thing a Jew can do to be a really bad Jew is to practice Hinduism.

I've said before that I personally do not care if people want to be gay or transexual. What people do in the privacy of their own homes is none of my business. What pisses me off is the indoctrination in schools and how kids, who haven't even fully developed a sense of personal identity yet are having these concepts of gender pronouns and homosexuality forced upon them with teachers talking about bullshit such as mentioned in the article in this thread. "Heterosexuality is Oppression" how f***ing ridiculous is it to teach that sentiment to kids?!

I agree it's outlandish, but when practicing the perversion at home faced a real potential prison sentence, we didn't hear this garbage at home either. I don't know if the SCOTUS will overturn past decisions, and allow these old laws to be enforced, but if they did, that might help us a little. The danger is evil-minded Congress people and state legislators trying to legislate immorality.

Kids being sexualised because of idiots like Sigmund Freud who talked about repressed sexual urges of children, and Alfred Kinsey who talked about rape and incest being healthy for kids with his research into how long it takes children to orgasm, is part of the problem today!

Yes, they contributed some negative ideas. Freud focused way too much on sexual repression. Kinsey's research methodology was bad, but the stuff he researched in the books indicate some very evil stuff was going on with the children. Back then, social science research hadn't shown just how damaging child molestation was, so evil sexual libertines were pushing the idea that sex with kids was okay. There seems to have been some push-back against this, but somehow Kinsey didn't come out looking like a villain in the public eye or when he is taught about in psychology. Maybe something like a BLM cancel culture, Juneteenth style initiative should be launched against some of these perverts

Combined with the perverted bullshit pushed by John Money who tried to encourage some parents to bring their boy up as a girl because the boy lost his penis in an accident. Its because of him that the concept of gender was turned into some fluid and meaningless concept and this is being pushed in schools today. Funnily enough Money was another pedophile who forced the twins to simulate sexual acts on each other whilst he examined their genitals.

Yes, but Hindu thought is a backdrop behind some of this thinking. The trans philosophy fits with the idea of men having feminine energy. There becomes a justification for 'he's a man trapped in a woman's body' type thinking. For me, I hear that, and I think something is wrong with your mind (soul, spirit, and or thinking) that needs to be fixed, not your body.

In the cases of both Kinsey and Money we see the abuse of children being ignored because it was in the name of science! These are the guys who have given rise to all this nonsense, not Hinduism. You are making an erroneous connection in order to push the blame onto Hinduism and further assert the moral superiority of Christianity.

I don't know that John Money had any kind of Hindu influence. The idea of masculine and feminine sides or energies in western thought, academia, even psychology is probably due to Hindu influence, and this provides an alternative perspective which supports pro-trans-surgery type thinking. It's not the only influence, and one of them.

To conclude, the saying "getting in touch with your feminine side" is not suggesting you put on a floral patterned dress and a pair of tights and start prancing about in front of the mirror. It means, from my perspective at least, developing traits that are influenced by Yoni energy such as intuition and a nurturing nature etc.

But that's what Hijra do, after having their junk cut off (e.g., but tying a string around it until it dies then cutting it off, or whatever other method), then they have a Hindu ceremony, and get accepted as a Hijra. These are low tech trans people, and this is intertwined with Hinduism.

[MrMan]

upload images online


upload images online

This is the sort of gross Hindu philosophy I was talking about. And somehow, it infected western culture a bit. I have heard people expressing these junk ideas on TV since I was a kid. There was a commercial that said, "Get in touch with your feminine side."

Some time back, I watched a video by Men's Rights Activist Warren Farrell. Farrell is probably one of the more educated and reasonable sounding well known MRAs I've heard of. He didn't mention Hinduism, but he mentioned this talk of men having a 'feminine side.' He rejected the idea. He said a man can be nurturing, for example, as a man. These are not feminine traits. Men and women both have them.

This warped Hindu thinking does lay the groundwork, at least in some people's minds, for transsexualism. And Hinduism has it's own very old version of transsexualism with the Hijras.

I'm no expert on this stuff, but I had a Geography teacher in high school who had been to India and focused excessively on India in his class. He had us all read 'City of Joy', and part of it dealt with the life of a Hijra. It was pretty nasty stuff, telling a little about how the guy was castrated. I'll continue in the next post.

[MrMan]

I found this encyclopedia article on hijras I'll be quoting and commenting on at https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sci ... aps/hijras, quoted from Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender: Culture Society History

Hijrās
Hijrās constitute a religious community of sexually charged and sexually ambiguous men who dress and act like women. They are religious ascetics who are required to be celibate servants of the goddess Bahucharā Mātā. Many undergo castration, and some work as homosexual prostitutes.

This is in Hinduism. Castration, acting effeminate, homosexual prostitution--- part of Hinduism.

One of the stories told about Bahucharā Mātā is that she cut off her breasts to avoid being raped by thieves; this suggests that her male priests should castrate themselves in imitation of her act. Of equal religious significance is the fact that hijrās identify with the sexually ambivalent god Śiva, who is both the great ascetic and the virile husband, particularly in his ardhanāriśvara form of half man-half woman and in the legend of his self-castration.

More Hinduism. They aren't just a secular trans community. It's all intertwined with Hindu religion-- an ancient form of Hindu homo-trans perversion.

In many ways hijrās seem to mimic devadāsīs: women dedicated to the temple who enact the role of divine courtesans, each of whom usually has a male patron who is her lover. As with devadāsīs the ritual roles of hijrās center on temple festivals, births, and marriages. In the temples of Bahucharā Mātā they act as her servants, tell stories about her, and bless her worshippers. After the birth of a male child hijrās visit the child's home to sing and dance, examine the child's genitals, and demand money for blessing him with fertility, prosperity, and a long life. Hijrās who have lost masculinity or who represent the third sex (tritīya prakriti), such as hermaphrodites, transvestites, and homosexuals, seemingly are perceived as individuals who have intimate knowledge of changeable or inadequate sex organs. If the infant's genitals are ill defined or are those of a hermaphrodite, the hijrās have the right to claim the baby as one of them.

So these gay-acting trans men, dressed like women, come to the home of a newborn baby boy and look at baby boy genitals. Do you want to be a part of a religion that lets men like this look at your little boys genitals? Would you want to give up your kid to a group like this?

India may not be trying to push the evil trans agenda on every child to the extent the trans have, but Hinduism certainly has a niche for it, a niche for men becoming trans men, getting castrated (they didn't have the full surgery in ancient times), looking at little boy genitals, taking the baby. And the religion backs up the strange trans people taking a little baby.

Can't you see the parallel? There is evidence for a bit of Hindu influence in our culture that opened up the door for this-- this 'feminine side' garbage, for example, and influence on some of the early psychologists.

One of the problems with demon worship is the philosophies and practices they nudge men toward are often not good for them. Also, the various religious stories show that the gods of these religious systems are not that moral. Zeus, Ares, Aphrodite, and Odin, for example had affairs. Hindu religion has male gods having a child.

Some Hindu temples also bring in little girls to be molested as life-long temple prostitutes. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-indi ... SKCN1C126K

Greek mythology had the story of Ganymede, whom Zeus took to Olympus to be his cupbearer because he was so beautiful, and there was a belief that his was Zeus' boy-lover also. In Latin his name was Catamitus. 'Catamite'-- a word for a boy kept for gay sex, comes from this.

Canaanite polytheism was also very nasty, with lots of perverted sex, along with child sacrifice. One of the many problems with these polytheistic religions, aside from worshipping the wrong spirits instead of the true creator God, is that they aren't moral religions. The gods are immoral in the stories. Greeks developed philosophy to handle moral issues. Their religion certain fell short. They had gods for evil stuff. Thieves had a god, all part of the religion. Hindus have child molestation in prostitution, trans castrated gay-acting men who have a 'right' to take babies into their cult, and other nasty stuff.

These are dirty evil religions. You should repent and serve the true God.

Some of you guys might complain about Jews promoting this stuff. There are Jews who have rebelled... hard... against God. Some of them are involved with Hindu-influenced cults out in California, or are secular, non-religions, and have embraced an expanded view of sexuality held by people like Hugh Hefner and Alfred Kinsey. A Jew embracing Hinduism is being a really bad Jew. If you embrace Hinduism, you are drinking from the same cesspool they drink from. Maybe you can complain that they stuck their straw in really deep and are drinking the really chunky sludge, but its all from the same cesspool.

[CaptainSkelebob]

Schools are teaching kids no such thing Im a teacher and I can tell you all that this is nonsense. Classes are given to raise awareness and nothing else
Im not for it personally but thats the world we live in today