Militia occupation in Oregon

[Cornfed]

It looks like armed resistance to the ZOG over land confiscations, similar to the Bundy ranch saga in Nevada, is now taking place in Oregon. May this trend continue.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/peac ... n-36061121

[Ghost]

.

[Cornfed]

Does anyone know what the protesters' main complaint is? Is it that the feds do not rightfully own the land in the first place? That the feds are trying to force ranchers off their lands in order to confiscate them, perhaps to use as security for foreign debt? Something like that?

In any case, good on them for standing up to the ZOG, although it would be better if they occupied something more meaningful. This and the standoff in Nevada should be a good lesson for the Occupussies. Imagine how great the impact would have been if all the Occupy protesters had been armed and well disciplined.

[gnosis]

Here is a youtube clip of Ammon Bundy giving his take on the situation:




Check out http://bundyranch.blogspot.com/ for more on the Bundy's take on the situation.


You can also read this for more information: http://www.dailywire.com/news/2303/here ... en-shapiro

From the article:

"Their “Arson” Was An Attempt to Protect Their Land Use. In 2001, the Hammonds initiated a burn on their property – the goal of which, according to the Hammonds, was to kill weeds that suck up water. The fire expanded outside their property and burned 138 acres of federal land. The Hammonds put out the fire themselves; no federal firefighters were used. According to the Hammonds, they called BLM beforehand for permission. In 2006, the Hammonds initiated a backfire in order to prevent their property from being burned by lightning. One acre of federal land was apparently burned. The federal government charged the father-and-son duo under anti-terrorism laws, calling for a five-year mandatory minimum federal sentence."

[Cornfed]

Thanks for that. I'm wondering whether Ammon shouldn't have tried to tie this to a general movement to drive people off the land pursuant to UN Article 21 or whatever, which it probably is.

[Ghost]

.

[gnosis]

So the Hammonds didn't want the help and this group that is occupying the building is apparently trying to force the hand of the Patriots/Militias around the U.S. This seems to be very unfavorable. If your plan is to kick off the Second American Revolution, you don't want to start with a disadvantage.

Not necessarily, look at it this way:

1) If the Feds come down hard (Waco style), the patriots may be lionized, and more men may flock to their cause.

2) If the Feds don't come down hard, they will look weak, and more men will get the idea that resisting the Feds is possible, thus potentially increasing the number of similar incidents in the future.

[onethousandknives]

The Bundies are agent provocateurs.

[Cornfed]

So the Hammonds didn't want the help and this group that is occupying the building is apparently trying to force the hand of the Patriots/Militias around the U.S. This seems to be very unfavorable. If your plan is to kick off the Second American Revolution, you don't want to start with a disadvantage.

The Hammonds are under threat from the feds, who could easily send them to some hellhole. Most people in their position would back down. The issue is not really about them though. It is clearly part of a general plan by the regime to drive ranchers off their land on any nonsense pretext.

[Moretorque]

The fraudulent money system is what makes all this go.

[Ghost]

.

[OutWest]

So the Hammonds didn't want the help and this group that is occupying the building is apparently trying to force the hand of the Patriots/Militias around the U.S. This seems to be very unfavorable. If your plan is to kick off the Second American Revolution, you don't want to start with a disadvantage.

The Hammonds are under threat from the feds, who could easily send them to some hellhole. Most people in their position would back down. The issue is not really about them though. It is clearly part of a general plan by the regime to drive ranchers off their land on any nonsense pretext.

I not aware of efforts to "drive ranchers off their land". As a former rancher, (550 cow/ calf pairs) I have a pretty decent background with the issues involved. Often times ranchers use the term " Our land" to refer to land they merely lease from the BLM or the Forest Service. When required management practices were changed, many ranchers reacted with resentment, loosing sight of the fact that it is not "their land".

If there are land seizure cases otherwise, I would hope to see some details.

[Cornfed]

It seems the forces of evil have stormed the resistance. I hope this will touch off a revolution.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/oregon-standof ... d=36537136

[Cornfed]

So unless they are retarded they probably thought they were travelling under a federal promise of safe conduct. Don't trust the feds, guys.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/oregon-sta ... -1.3421438

edit: They are retarded anyway.

[Moretorque]

He bee care about dat chit, the Blackman gonna chase daa ball good in dee coliseum in Sanfagcisco comm'in up.

Go Stallions!