Christ-Hating Queer Murderer Controlled By Vicious SPLC Jews

[Jester]

http://www.freenorthamerica.ca/viewtopi ... =18&t=9506

(1) This news was 100% blacked out by Jewish-owned/intimidated AngloSphere media.

(2) I challenge anyone here to dispute my headline.

[Zero_Tolerance_Man]

I just love these anti-Semitic posts on here. F you, muthafuucker. Shove this sh!t up to a$$

[fschmidt]

Jester, how do you explain the fact that the SPLC classifies the Jewish Defense League as a hate-group?

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/i ... nse-league

My answer: The SPLC is a liberal hate-group that hates everyone else, even non-liberal Jews.

[fightforlove]

Do you have other links to confirm this story?

[Jester]

Do you have other links to confirm this story?

SPLC had their fingers in the rogue undercover operation that enabled the Oklahoma City bombing:
http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/27/flash ... y-bombing/

SPLC is officially "relied on" by the FBI - essentially giving them carte blanche for domestic spying:
"The FBI has partnered with the SPLC "to establish rapport, share information, address concerns, and cooperate in solving problems". Due to legal limitations on the FBI, it relies on the SPLC and other civil rights organizations in collecting data on hate groups"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_P ... Law_Center

Re the Jewish-Owned Media blackout, I have TV news on every day. If I don't see a story covered, as far as I'm concerned, it wasn't covered.

What made me angry enough to do the OP, is not the domestic espionage or vicious smear tactics by SPLC. Like domestic espionage by ADL, it is an old story. What made me angry is the press blackout. Queers are shooting Christians and it doesn't even make the news.

It just seemed like adding insult to injury.

[Jester]

Jester, how do you explain the fact that the SPLC classifies the Jewish Defense League as a hate-group?

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/i ... nse-league

My answer: The SPLC is a liberal hate-group that hates everyone else, even non-liberal Jews.

I certainly see SPLC as dangerous, and JDL as just amusing these days. But it may not have been too amusing for my young Jewish acquaintance when he was attacked and beaten up by (also my acquaintance) Irv Rubin of the JDL, for the thought-crime of denying the Holocaust Story.

And then there was the Armenian travel agency blown up in New York City back in the 70's by the JDL. A young woman was killed, if memory serves. The caller took credit and said (as JDL always did), "Never Again, Never Again". The JDL targeted the agency because "they sell trips to the Soviet Union".

So what's my point? JDL is a terrorist organization. Doesn't mean irredeemable, consigned to hell forever, IMO. As I stated above, I later met Irv Rubin, and liked him. Hell, Yasir Arafat was certainly a terrorist, but then became a symbol of compromise. So I am not getting huffy about terrorism here. The point is simply that JDL is, or was, indeed a hate organization. Whereas Focus on the Family* is an advocacy group for the beleaguered minority of believing Christians. No bombs, no beatings.

So SPLC targeting FOF and JDL as hate groups does not make them "fair and balanced."



*I dislike FOF btw, but that's another story.

[Jester]

I just love these anti-Semitic posts on here. F you, muthafuucker. Shove this sh!t up to a$$

So you didn't want to try to disprove the headline, I guess...

[fschmidt]

So SPLC targeting FOF and JDL as hate groups does not make them "fair and balanced."

What is FOF? Anyway, my point wasn't that the SPLC is "fair and balanced". My point was that the SPLC is primarily a liberal hate group and the fact that it contains some Jews is irrelevant.

[Jester]

So SPLC targeting FOF and JDL as hate groups does not make them "fair and balanced."

What is FOF?

Sorry, "FOF" meant Focus On The Family, the organization that was attacked.

Anyway, my point wasn't that the SPLC is "fair and balanced". My point was that the SPLC is primarily a liberal hate group and the fact that it contains some Jews is irrelevant.

Could be.

No need to be sensitive though.

I might complain about the Italian Mafia, but EuroBrat doesn't get mad about it. Maybe he's gonna whack me later...

Don't know what Ladislav thinks when I complain about the Russian Mafia...

[fschmidt]

No need to be sensitive though.

I might complain about the Italian Mafia, but EuroBrat doesn't get mad about it. Maybe he's gonna whack me later...

Don't know what Ladislav thinks when I complain about the Russian Mafia...

Jews seem to be the most picked on group here. At least phrases like "Italian Mafia" or "Russian Mafia" are qualified. I wouldn't have a problem bashing a "Jewish Mafia" or even "Liberal Jews" but making statements about Jews generally doesn't make sense. Also, the AngloSphere media isn't all Jewish-owned. The biggest owner is Rupert Murdoch who isn't Jewish. Also see:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... media.html

[Jester]

Jews seem to be the most picked on group here.

They damn well should be.

They are a nation like Germans or French, tens of millions at least dispersed throughout the world, pretending they're just like everyone else, while maintaining fierce tribal loyalty. Their religion reaches them to look out for number one, and win at all costs. (The messsage of Purim.) They are unsurpassed in brilliance, persistence, determination, and other virtues. They control half or more of the world's liquid wealth. They control the "only remaining superpower", plus have their own tax-haven-cum-missile-base in so-called "israel". Some of them practice witchcraft (Kabbalah) and call it religion, and those who don't still usually close ranks and defend those who do. Many Jews believe there is a Jewish conspiracy, or at least a lot of Jewish power, and they like that fact and revel in it. So they damn well should be picked on more than any other group.

Damn.

Do you want to admit i'm right, or do I need to post a LOT of links proving everything I just said? Say the word.

At least phrases like "Italian Mafia" or "Russian Mafia" are qualified. I wouldn't have a problem bashing a "Jewish Mafia" or even "Liberal Jews" but making statements about Jews generally doesn't make sense.

OK, I'll try to be more accurate, and talk about "Jewish tribalists" or "Tribalistic Jews". I don't like to say conspiracy, because it's not always behind closed doors, and Jews are usually much more transparent and bald-faced about the evil they do than Whites are. To me "conspiracy" better fits Freemasons, or the bowels of the Vatican.

Also, the AngloSphere media isn't all Jewish-owned. The biggest owner is Rupert Murdoch who isn't Jewish.

Sorry, wrong. Murdoch is a Jew. I don't care if he's been sprinkled, or has a tree in his house at Christmas.
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=110225
More evidence is available if needed.

All the media in the U.S. are Jew-controlled. If you don't like hearing that, then please suggest to some Jewish owners that they sell some of their media properties to "gentiles". They could reduce their profile in the NWO and that would be OK with me.

Trust me, I don't like even saying it, because it implies that our most dangerous adversaries are Jews. IMO they are not. If I were eliminating enemies, I would start with the ones that look most like White Christians. The wolf in sheep's clothing thing.

[odbo]

I just love these anti-Semitic posts on here. F you, muthafuucker. Shove this sh!t up to a$$

So you didn't want to try to disprove the headline, I guess...

Relax, he's just a jew who has got zero tolerance for truth. He has already chimped out before like many 'chosenites' when stumbling upon a discussion of the actions of his tribe. Jews in the west are unaccustomed to people being aware of their history. Jews like to talk shit about Anglos, Blacks, and everything in between (fyi chimpout and niggermania is controlled by Jews) but go ape shit when the focus is put on them. He couldn't see his hypocrisy if his life depended on it. Here is what his site wishes it was: http://incogman.com/

[cavallero]

This news was 100% blacked out by Jewish-owned/intimidated AngloSphere media

A bit melodramatic don't you think. If the media had to run with a story every time a nutter discharges a firearm in the good old USA, there wouldn't be any time for real news.
Your headline may contain some truth but it could be libelous to call him a murderer. He's obviously a nutter. He may spend 3 years in jail for various offences but could receive treatment in an instition indefinitely. I'd be pushing for the institution. It would be safer for everybody. By definition the nutter may have received electromagnetic messages from splcenter.org but that hardly the SPLC's fault is it?

[Zero_Tolerance_Man]

Yeah, I was born a Jew, so what. I find your blatant hatred of Jews offensive. How would you
Ike if I started posted negative comments about niggers, chinks, or whatever group you fit into? F you a$$hole!
You should be attacking Feminist trash, not other members you moron.

[zboy1]

Yeah, I was born a Jew, so what. I find your blatant hatred of Jews offensive. How would you
Ike if I started posted negative comments about niggers, chinks, or whatever group you fit into? F you a$$hole!
You should be attacking Feminist trash, not other members you moron.

Well, that's the way Winston wants it: free speech is protected here. Blacks, Asians, and White people have also been attacked on here as well, btw. If I was owner of the forum, I would ban race-related topics, but it's Winston's site not mine, so he can do whatever he wants with the forum. I think he's wrong, but what can I do?

Talking about race and religion is fine, as long as it doesn't cross-the-line with racial slurs and overt racist images, and attacking other members personally. The overt spammers and racists have already been banned, but those talking about Jewish influence in society--is a legit topic imo. Does not make them "Anti-Semites" for thinking that way. Can you not even admit your 'tribe' does not have undue influence in American society i.e. Hollywood, AIPAC, Federal Reserve, Wall Street, and the U.S. government?