This might be great news. When male freaks win most female events, these events might come to be seen as the silly travesties that they are, and the whole concept of female sports and praising the pitiful efforts of females might be abandoned.
http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/01 ... tify-with/
Trannies to be allowed to compete at Olympics

Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
-
- Junior Poster
- Posts: 550
- Joined: January 25th, 2013, 3:35 pm
Re: Trannies to be allowed to compete at Olympics
This is fairly ridiculous, I'm quite familiar with anti-doping violation rules for Olympic sports. Obviously this has become a giant (stupid) deal in the media regarding "doping" especially in the case of Lance Armstrong (he was not accused of using any substances that are not bioidentical to human hormones...)
All right, the threshhold they're using for testosterone for a supposed "woman" is outrageous. 288ng/dl. The max physiologically normal level for a woman is 75ng/dl. So they're allowing a "woman" to compete with over 4 times the amount of testosterone possible for a woman physiologically, whilst presumably other female competitors are not able to run around with 4x the amount of testosterone as the max physiologically normal level.
Compounding this issue, for testosterone to be used for a man in WADA tested sport, it's generally very very hard to get a therapeutic use exemption, and what makes me downright angry is men with a level of 288ng/dl generally are denied use of testosterone by WADA/USADA, as USADA/WADA will deny TUEs generally for "low normal" testosterone levels, which 288 technically is according to many labs that use the 250 standard (though this 250 standard is bullshit unless said person is like 90 years old...) I've heard of cases of men having levels of 150ng/dl wanting to compete in masters competitions (ie, 40, 50, 60+) competitions getting denied TUEs for testosterone. So it's pretty clear the IOC and WADA really do have a basically Satanic and anti-male agenda with this, in light of applying this standard to men competing but then allowing them to compete as women while saying their testosterone level is "normal" or they're just SOL because of bad genetics or any other nonsense.
All right, the threshhold they're using for testosterone for a supposed "woman" is outrageous. 288ng/dl. The max physiologically normal level for a woman is 75ng/dl. So they're allowing a "woman" to compete with over 4 times the amount of testosterone possible for a woman physiologically, whilst presumably other female competitors are not able to run around with 4x the amount of testosterone as the max physiologically normal level.
Compounding this issue, for testosterone to be used for a man in WADA tested sport, it's generally very very hard to get a therapeutic use exemption, and what makes me downright angry is men with a level of 288ng/dl generally are denied use of testosterone by WADA/USADA, as USADA/WADA will deny TUEs generally for "low normal" testosterone levels, which 288 technically is according to many labs that use the 250 standard (though this 250 standard is bullshit unless said person is like 90 years old...) I've heard of cases of men having levels of 150ng/dl wanting to compete in masters competitions (ie, 40, 50, 60+) competitions getting denied TUEs for testosterone. So it's pretty clear the IOC and WADA really do have a basically Satanic and anti-male agenda with this, in light of applying this standard to men competing but then allowing them to compete as women while saying their testosterone level is "normal" or they're just SOL because of bad genetics or any other nonsense.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 3978 Views
-
Last post by OutWest
-
- 9 Replies
- 6068 Views
-
Last post by Winston
-
- 19 Replies
- 7871 Views
-
Last post by gredman
-
- 5 Replies
- 1479 Views
-
Last post by Jackfruits
-
- 17 Replies
- 10118 Views
-
Last post by Jeremy