Pixel--Dude wrote: ↑July 28th, 2022, 6:38 am
@WilliamSmith I watched a documentary entitled "What is a Woman" and it really got me triggered. Have you seen it? It's about an hour and a half long and features Matt Walsh travelling America to question people both for and against transgenderism and all this gender pronoun shit. I thought it would be something you would appreciate.
I'll post a link to somewhere you can watch the documentary below, for those who can't be arsed with the documentary I will give a brief summary of some of the key points below about the origin of this philosophy of sexualising kids and pushing the trans agenda onto them.
First, kids as young as 5 being taught sex education in schools and therefore sexualising children originates with Alfred Kinsey, who believed human beings were overtly sexual beings even from birth. Part of his research was conducted at a prison where he questioned pedophiles and shared their view that children are sexual.
I did not hear about the research at a prison part. There is a woman who claims her father molested her and believes Kinsey had him paid to do it for research. Kinsey wrote down response times to apparent orgasm in small children.
Kinsey's work was also terrible from a modern methodological approach. One of my research methods professors would tell the story of either Campbell or Stanley, one of the two co-authors who wrote a book on experimental design still cited today, who talked to Kinsey about this. He said he'd rather see a random sample of 100 people than a sample of 10,000 people Kinsey met at bars. Kinsey had a selection error. If you survey sex perverts about sex, you get different answers. The 10% homosexual percentage comes from Kinsey.
Kinsey conducted experiments so he could document the orgasms of children and even babies. He was a truly sadistic pervert! A f***ing jew and a dirty pedophile who disguised his pedophile tendencies as "research".
I never heard he was Jewish. This site claims it was editted because it wrongly claimed Kinsey as Jewish previously
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/2014-09- ... f3663a0000. Wikipedia says he was raised Methodist and turned atheist. I don't know if he conducted the research on children directly himself. Whatever the case, this is a serious ethical issue.
The second part of the agenda is inspired by Dr John Money, another f***ing sick pedophile who disguised sexual experimentation on kids as scientific research. Two twins were taken to the hospital for circumcision but there was an accident where some electrical equipment on a cauterizing needle malfunctioned and burnt off the penis of one of the small boys.
I never heard that he was a pedophile. Maybe his writings were sympathetic to it, so who knows? I never heard he had the two brothers have sex. The boy he talked the parents into raising like a girl sure had a rough life.
I've read something from an Indian man that Money was influenced by a warped Hindu idea that there is male and female in each person. I always hated that stupid saying where a man says, 'Getting in touch with my feminine side.' I am a man and I don't have a 'feminine side.' If I cook or take care of a kid, I do it as a man. It's not about a 'feminine side.'
John Money, a sex change psychologist believed they could bring one of the twins up as a girl and nurture would override nature. But the twin didn't act or behave as a female, it made him depressed so the parents went against John Money's advice and told the boy the truth and he transitioned back.
Apparently John Money also conducted sexual experiments by making the twins perform sexual acts on each other. Proving he is just another sick degenerate. Both twins eventually killed themselves. One with a drug overdose and the other through suicide.
Do you have a source you could share on this experiment?
The combined philosophies of Kinsey and Money have paved the way for the pedo elites of today to push the globohomo and trans agenda in an attempt to destroy our children, our sexual identity and mental health! As well as usher in their new ideal of legal pedophilia.
There were a lot more people involved. Kinsey was a cog in the machine of having a culture where men want to bang a lot of chicks as a normal thing, too. So was Hugh Hefner.
I hope the current Supreme Court becomes activists in overturning past evil overreach. A federal law that forbids sex discrimination was used against a company where someone made a decision based on the idea that a woman should conform to some gender norm in regard to workplace performance in the 1980's. The LGBT folks latched onto that, and during the Obama administration, the EEOC used that ruling to promote the trans stuff. I am hoping the courts just overturn the whole thing and say laws on that topic on the federal level are not constitutional.
If not discriminating based on sex gives special legal rights to homosexuals, what about pedophiles? There are men from a young age who claim to be have attracted to males from their youth. There are men who are attracted to little boys or little girls from their youth. It is just as much an 'orientation' as being homosexual. How can it not be? It is the way they feel. So if laws not protect 'sexual orientation' as a discriminating factor for hiring, on what legal basis can they keep a pedophile from working at the pre-school or the zoophile from working at the chicken house or cattle ranch? They need to get rid of these stupid legal protections based on sexual orientation.
And like domestic violence and laws on sexually assault, this type of discrimination is selectively enforced. If someone interview with a man for a job, and asked him if the company supports LGBT issues, said he was gay, and he wanted a company that was supportive... what would happen if the interviewer said he was talking about his sex life and threw his CV in the round file? The company could get in trouble?
But what if a man is interviewed and says, "I am attracted to redheaded women with big breasts. I want to make sure this company is supportive of men who are attracted to redheaded women with big breasts." If she threw his CV in the round file because he talked about his sex life, would the company be in trouble? No.
But it is more perverted, unusual, and shameful for a man to be attracted to other men. Some subset of the male population is going to be attracted to redheads with big breasts. That's a normal thing that keeps the species going. Talking about either during a job interview should be enough for an employer to reject an applicant if he/she so chooses. But the LGBT folks get special protections.
Big pharma also plays a part in this agenda and have made hundreds of millions in profit from gender confused young adolescents and in some cases f***ing children who had reassignment surgery!
Let me clarify. It took me a second to figure out your were cussing the kids here. You aren't saying big pharma has sex with little kids are you? I'm not sure how that would work.
: 
too right am I hateful and intolerant towards pedophiles!