Momopi, your spins, Sun Tzu's Art of War, Checkmate!

[Winston]

Momopi,

Some important key points:

Why is it that whenever 9/11 is brought up, especially good news and groundbreaking milestones about it, you resort to spin tactics, ridicule, obfuscation and deception?

Don't you know that that is the mark of man who does NOT have truth on his side? If you had the truth, you could just speak it and it would stand for itself.

But it's obvious you don't, so you have to resort to ridicule and spin tactics. Such tricks don't work against me, cause I can see right through that and call out on it.

You NEVER address the evidence, but instead use cheap shots to belittle anything outside your box. Obviously you are not open to learning new things or contemplating that you might be wrong.

For instance, you said that 1000 architects and engineers is less than one percent of the total, so that means nothing. That's like saying that if 50 people like you, that since 50 out of 6 billion people in the world is less than one percent, that that doesn't count and that it does not demonstrate that you are "likable". Do you see the obvious flaw in that? If not, then this is hopeless.

The bottom line is that MOST engineers who see the evidence DO agree that the official story doesn't add up. You forget that. And you also forget that most people in America are not aware of Building 7, the skyscraper that was not hit by a plane yet fell in 5 or 6 seconds.

You failed to take all that into account, becuase your objective was not truth, but ridicule. You forgot to humble yourself and learn from others who know more than you. Your ego and pride blinded you, as well as your emotional barrier.

I think deep down, even you know that uttery CHAOS and ANARCHY that would result if the mainstream public and media all accepted that 9/11 was an inside job, and that scares you, so you avoid it.

But the truth is the truth, and you are the one avoiding it.

Also, you keep saying that you won't spend any time debating 9/11 unless I pay you. That is another sidetrack and obfuscation. The issue here is: WHAT'S THE TRUTH about what happened on 9/11? And you have not demonstrated what the truth is, either way. So you've failed where it counts the most.

But even if I did pay you to debate this, what would that accomplish? NIST was paid millions of dollars by the government to explain what happened to Building 7, yet they failed and could not explain how fire could drop a 47 story steel skyscraper at free fall speed into its own footprint.

If the government paid you millions of dollars to find out what happened to Building 7, why would you be able to do any better? The smartest person in the world could not explain it!

Sun Tzu's Ancient Art of War:

But you see, spin tactics are no match for basic attack/defense strategies. Do you know anything about the war principles taught in Sun Tzu's Ancient Art of War? One of his key tactics, which I use, is:

"Pit your greatest strength against your enemy's biggest weakness, and you will win."

That is my strategy, and with it, I can always win against spin tactics like yours, by following two simple rules:

1) Highlight and focus on the strongest points and arguments of my side, the ones that cannot be refuted.
2) Attack and focus on the weakest points of your opponent's side. Hammer at them and make them suffer for it. Keep striking at the Achilles Heel of the other side, in other words.

This powerful tactic cuts like a knife through your spin tactics and obfuscation. You can't beat it. Yet you do not attempt to use it. You do not bring up strong arguments for your side or weak arguments on mine. So in basic strategy, you've failed.

Therefore, I would bet that you could not even beat the computer in chess at level one, since you cannot focus on where it counts the most. Correct? What would you bet that you could beat me in chess?

So for example, if I were playing tennis and my strength is my forehand shot, while my opponent's weakness is his backhand side, then a winning strategy would be to keep firing my forehand shots to his backhand side, hence pitting my strength against his weakness, to draw the most errors out of him.

And if I were debating a Christian fundamentalist, I would bring up Bible verses where God ordered the killing of innocent women and children, and ask my opponent: "Do you agree that it's right to kill innocent women and children? Would you do it if God ordered you to?"

In that scenario, whatever answer he gives will incriminate him and destroy his side of the debate, and that in itself is revealing. That's an example of making him suffer for his Achilles Heel or weakness.

Yet you don't do this.

And even if I paid you to, there's no evidence that you would be able to explain the free fall collapse of the WTC into pulverized dust from a few office fires, nor any of the ten characteristics of the collapse with the fire hypothesis that you religiously cling to against all facts, evidence and reality. The intellectuals who support the official story could not, so why could you?

So there is no logical reason to believe that paying you to debate this would make any difference.

And besides, this is about truth and justice, which you are blind to and run away from.

Finally, if you are simply not interested in this topic, then fine. However, let's agree on two things:

However, let's agree on two things:

1. You are on the LOSING side. The rest of the world is seeing the light and the truth about 9/11. And that is RISING, not falling. Only you and the US media still live in FEAR of the truth.

Your refusal to look at this issue is not about time or interest. You simply have a fear or emotional barrier against it. So you run and ridicule it.

You don't even care that the media in Canada, Europe, Australia and Japan are now agreeing that the scientific evidence does NOT support the official story, but the controlled demolition hypothesis. If it was BS, would they do that? No.

History is in the making. And you are on the run. That's the fact.

By your ACTIONS, we can both agree on that. You are RUNNING from the truth and RUNNING from history in the making.

Otherwise turn around and face the facts. Your actions speak for themselves.

You are not living in truth, but in fear. That's why you can't deal with this issue.

Too bad you are not as objective as I am.

2. You are NOT even one percent objective or unbiased about this issue. NOT even one percent! That's why you can't face the facts here. Instead, you are rifled with denial, spin tactics and obfuscation, cause you can't face the truth or the facts or the reality. Therefore, we can conclude that your opinion on 9/11 is absolutely NOT, I repeat NOT, RATIONAL at all. Period.

You can't deny that, so I will take it as an acknowledgement on your part and that we agree on that at least.

With that, I rest my case. Bottom line is that you have a right to not discuss this issue, but by doing so, either way, you acknowledge that you've failed in this debate and that the above final point about you is TRUE.

If you fail to disprove this with facts and reasons, and address the evidence, then this point stands, and you will have proven that you have no objectivity, rationality or credibility when it comes to 9/11, NONE at all.

You can avoid this issue all you want, but by doing so, that points STANDS! If you have nothing further to say, then that point also STANDS.

Either way, you've lost.

Checkmate.

Game over.

Hit "Start" to play again. (but you must abide by the rules of honesty and not employ any obfuscation, ridicule or spin tactics into the game)

[momopi]

"Pit your greatest strength against your enemy's biggest weakness, and you will win."
That is my strategy, and with it, I can always win against spin tactics like yours, by following two simple rules:
1) Highlight and focus on the strongest points and arguments of my side, the ones that cannot be refuted.
2) Attack and focus on the weakest points of your opponent's side. Hammer at them and make them suffer for it. Keep striking at the Achilles Heel of the other side, in other words.

I'm not understanding how this strategy is used to get people to join your bandwagon?