------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions collected by general induction from phaenomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagined, till such time as other phaenomena occur, by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to exceptions.
This rule we must follow, that the argument of induction may not be evaded by hypotheses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mathe ... kIII-Rules
This rule concisely expresses scientific inductive reasoning as opposed to liberal (Plato-based) hypothesized fantasies.
Join John Adams Mon and Wed nights 7:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar!
Share This Page
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics Basic Theme Prosilver Theme
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar!
Share This Page
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics Basic Theme Prosilver Theme
Isaac Newton's 4th rule of reasoning
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
-
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 7870
- Joined: January 20th, 2009, 1:10 am
- Location: Chiang Mai Thailand
Re: Isaac Newton's 4th rule of reasoning
Nice.
Corollaries:
(1)
Noone should dare any longer to bring up Darwin's Theory of Evolution of the Spec ies Through Survival of the Fittest (whatever it was called), since there are no examples from which it is derived.
Instead we may infer that an Intelligent, actively engaged Creator created our world - since all examples of creation that we know of, did indeed have a creator (shoes, pancakes, kites, etc.)
(2)
Persons inclined to sneer about "conspiracy theories" and offer tortuous explanations involving bizarre coincidences (like Oswald leaning out the window and firing a "magic bullet" from a left-handed position, or three steel buildings crumbling into dust because two of them were hit by airplanes), should now stand down, when more clearer, simpler explanations are available.
Corollaries:
(1)
Noone should dare any longer to bring up Darwin's Theory of Evolution of the Spec ies Through Survival of the Fittest (whatever it was called), since there are no examples from which it is derived.
Instead we may infer that an Intelligent, actively engaged Creator created our world - since all examples of creation that we know of, did indeed have a creator (shoes, pancakes, kites, etc.)
(2)
Persons inclined to sneer about "conspiracy theories" and offer tortuous explanations involving bizarre coincidences (like Oswald leaning out the window and firing a "magic bullet" from a left-handed position, or three steel buildings crumbling into dust because two of them were hit by airplanes), should now stand down, when more clearer, simpler explanations are available.
"Well actually, she's not REALLY my daughter. But she does like to call me Daddy... at certain moments..."
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 4714 Views
-
Last post by E Irizarry R&B Singer
-
- 5 Replies
- 4251 Views
-
Last post by Winston
-
- 0 Replies
- 3318 Views
-
Last post by starchild5
-
- 0 Replies
- 3380 Views
-
Last post by jamesbond
-
- 42 Replies
- 20249 Views
-
Last post by Voyager1