"Diversity" Is About Disinheriting Whites

Discuss racial, ethnic and multicultural issues. Warning: The topics here are likely to be taboo, so if you are easily offended, you are better off not participating here.
Killhoffa
Freshman Poster
Posts: 114
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 8:31 am

Post by Killhoffa »

The decline of white supremacy, basically it's about the genetic survival of the white race. Whites are a global minority, and Taco aren't you married to a filipina? You don't seem to be too concerned when it comes to women of other ethnic backgrounds! You all run your a$$e's all over the place trying to pursue women of other races, yet bark this white supremacy bullshyt! I don't think the rest of the world gives a f#ck!
A WOMAN'S THOUGHTS DO NOT DEFINE A MAN; NOR DO HER EXPECTATIONS DICTATE HIS LIMITATIONS!
Killhoffa
Freshman Poster
Posts: 114
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 8:31 am

Post by Killhoffa »

HouseMD wrote:
Taco wrote:Here's proof white men are not winning in America.

White Men Can't Work
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-1 ... -cant-work
Way to look at one piece of data and jump to conclusions. All men have a lower labor force participation rate than 50 years ago, not just whites. Part of that is driven by the aging of the population, as figures track ALL men over 20, of which many are retired. Another factor that messes with the data is that those in college are not participating in the labor force. With many pursuing graduate degrees, that puts a whole population of college students over 20 out of the labor force, though this factor is small compared to the 37 million retired Americans out there, the vast majority of which are white men. Blacks are hurting for employment due to a multitude of other factors in addition to those mentioned previously. Lower rates of educational attainment, living in areas with few available job opportunities, and high rates of incarceration make black labor rates dismal in comparison to whites. There are more unemployed men, certainly, but we need to look closer at the data.

Image

You're missing the big picture. The endgame is not to disinherit whites, it is to disinherit MEN.

Image

Men need to work together if there is ever to be a way out of this, regardless of race. So long as one part of society is weak, we are all weaker as a whole.

Occasionally a guy will get screwed out of a government job because he is white. But far more often, he will be passed over to hire or promote a woman.

You forgot systematic white supremacy, and how the black community in this "Cuntry" has been disenfranchised before and after slavery! The white flight movement, sundown towns, and all the loan and grants specifically given to whites by the United States "Godvernment"! So in lue; the wealth was pass down in the white community and the debts in the black community! The white community was given alot, but looks like Obama gone f@ck it up for you guys.
A WOMAN'S THOUGHTS DO NOT DEFINE A MAN; NOR DO HER EXPECTATIONS DICTATE HIS LIMITATIONS!
Taco
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5467
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 9:30 am

Post by Taco »

Killhoffa wrote:The decline of white supremacy, basically it's about the genetic survival of the white race. Whites are a global minority, and Taco aren't you married to a filipina? You don't seem to be too concerned when it comes to women of other ethnic backgrounds! You all run your a$$e's all over the place trying to pursue women of other races, yet bark this white supremacy bullshyt! I don't think the rest of the world gives a f#ck!
I didn't have a choice, I had to marry a woman from another race because white women are too far gone.

The constitution of the US was set up to protect white Christian people only and was later changed to include all people. "We the people", means whites only. I'm indebted to Eustace Mullins for this insight.

"During the ensuing two hundred years, all of the arguments for and against the Constitution, as presented in our courts of law, and most particularly, in the Supreme Court of the United States, have been worthless, because they have refused to mention the explicit purpose of the Constitution, the protection of the people of Shem from racial and religious persecution. Many scholars freely admit that the Constitution was written to limit the powers of government, and to guarantee freedoms to the people, but because these discussions never mention just who these "people" are, the discussions never approach reality. Certainly the Constitution cites certain basic "rights," but these rights apply only to the people of Shem.

The people of Shem remain convinced that bankers do not finance Communism, and that wealthy people will not give up their holdings. The Illuminati-Communist plan continues the battle of the Canaanites against the people of Shem. Until they realize this, the people of Shem remain doomed to destruction." - Eustace Mullins
Killhoffa
Freshman Poster
Posts: 114
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 8:31 am

Post by Killhoffa »

Taco wrote:
Killhoffa wrote:The decline of white supremacy, basically it's about the genetic survival of the white race. Whites are a global minority, and Taco aren't you married to a filipina? You don't seem to be too concerned when it comes to women of other ethnic backgrounds! You all run your a$$e's all over the place trying to pursue women of other races, yet bark this white supremacy bullshyt! I don't think the rest of the world gives a f#ck!
I didn't have a choice, I had to marry a woman from another race because white women are too far gone.

The constitution of the US was set up to protect white Christian people only and was later changed to include all people. "We the people", means whites only. I'm indebted to Eustace Mullins for this insight.

"During the ensuing two hundred years, all of the arguments for and against the Constitution, as presented in our courts of law, and most particularly, in the Supreme Court of the United States, have been worthless, because they have refused to mention the explicit purpose of the Constitution, the protection of the people of Shem from racial and religious persecution. Many scholars freely admit that the Constitution was written to limit the powers of government, and to guarantee freedoms to the people, but because these discussions never mention just who these "people" are, the discussions never approach reality. Certainly the Constitution cites certain basic "rights," but these rights apply only to the people of Shem.

The people of Shem remain convinced that bankers do not finance Communism, and that wealthy people will not give up their holdings. The Illuminati-Communist plan continues the battle of the Canaanites against the people of Shem. Until they realize this, the people of Shem remain doomed to destruction." - Eustace Mullins
Well, I think it's something common here the States! The world is changing and it's true that the constitution was written for whites by whites! Nothing in equal opportunity in mind since this was a land dominated by Anglos. I've become aware that once I start to travel abroad and eventually settle It will be a good idea to leave this color shyt here in Amerikkka! I'm happy for you and your wife because love has no color, but it does in the States I talk to women online from the Latin America to South east Asia! Even some Eastern European chicks. I must admit they're nothing like white women here in the States sh!t is kinda crazy to me. I ask them what their parents think and family and friends think and it's no big deal! Setting up Skype sessions it's really cool man!:Can't wait till I'm on the ground, which could be the early part of this yr. I rather just bounce for hood though, anyway I like your post Taco, your one of the most conscience people on this site besides Winston himself!
A WOMAN'S THOUGHTS DO NOT DEFINE A MAN; NOR DO HER EXPECTATIONS DICTATE HIS LIMITATIONS!
Halwick
Freshman Poster
Posts: 329
Joined: September 10th, 2013, 9:39 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: "Diversity" Is About Disinheriting Whites

Post by Halwick »

Taco wrote:The US population is more than 75% White and Christian. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests in their own house.

"Diversity" Is About Disinheriting Whites
http://henrymakow.com/the_truth_about_diversity.html
I won't be surprised that the pure Caucasian will be extinct in the U.S. by 2050 if not sooner.
Diversity is just another liberal social engineering for encouraged miscegenation to eliminate the Caucasian race. The liberals believe when the Caucasian race is eliminated and ethnicities so intermixed, racism will be eliminated. (Yeah, right...)

Of course that doesn't mean in the so-called "Diversified World" you can't have pure Negro, Asian or Latino and Indigenous ethnicity, you just can't have pure Caucasians.
tre
Junior Poster
Posts: 604
Joined: September 15th, 2013, 1:08 am
Location: USA

Post by tre »

If there is no economic collapse, then Caucasians would likely be extinct in the USA by 2050. However, if there is an economic collapse...all bets are off. If anything, the Elitist controlled government and Elitist owned media is causing more racial and party division than ever before. In a true economic collapse, most of the survivors will be in outer lying areas with food/water storage and guns with plenty of ammo. Who do you think makes up the majority of these people? Unless the government puts their military (or UN soldiers) out to destroy these people, then Caucasians will only increase their percentage in the USA. By Caucasians, I mean Caucasians that buy guns and ammo. The liberal anti-gun Caucasians would be screwed. If they have no means to protect themselves or their food/water...they aren't keeping anything. The Elitists want a certain percentage of us dead so why not have the people kill themselves off? It sure makes their jobs a lot easier.

I do know a Black Libertarian that has a 2nd home in this area (mostly white area). He is one of the few that is preparing his family for what might come within the next few years. Despite what many think, Conservatives hate Liberals more than they hate other races. I think the same could be said for the other side, but I'm not sure (most of the people I know are Conservative). I'm one of the few Libertarians in the area and I relate to those that believe the way I do (Libertarians)...regardless of race. I'll just watch both mainstream parties destroy each other....I have no dog in that fight. I will, however, protect my family...I won't run from that responsibility. I'd fly back to the USA from abroad just to be there for that...

I'd honestly prefer that Caucasians be extinct in 2050 than to be witness to a true economic collapse. I don't want to see the bloodshed and horror that would involve...
The_Adventurer
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1383
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 9:17 am

Post by The_Adventurer »

The people of Shem are middle eastern people. Jews and Arabs. Why would the constitution be set up to protect them?
“Booty is so strong that there are dudes willing to blow themselves up for the highly unlikely possibility of booty in another dimension." -- Joe Rogan
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2790
Joined: August 13th, 2012, 4:48 pm
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Post by Teal Lantern »

The Hated White Race
by David Yeagley · June 16, 2009 · 61 Comments ·
White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children.
"Leaping in" presumes voluntarily.
Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.
Hmmm, a mind reader.
This denigration of race is a cruel mockery of manhood. It is a pathetic testimony of the personal irresponsibility and malignant selfishness of failed men. Indeed, a careless woman is generally such for the lack of a caring father.
Because if a woman behaves badly, somewhere, there is a man at fault for it. White Knight Nationalism.
Like the universal law of aesthetics. We want beauty. Superior beauty lies in the white race.

Universal law? Then someone had better tell the "white women [] leaping in bed with black men".
The author couldn't be bothered to explain all those half-anglo kids all over South East Asia fathered by Anglo men.

It's only "miscegenation" and wrong when the dick involved isn't white.
Bigots are a special kind of amusing ... as long as they aren't in power.
не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
MarkDY
Freshman Poster
Posts: 181
Joined: February 14th, 2011, 6:22 pm
Location: Annapolis
Contact:

Post by MarkDY »

Mr S wrote:If one is of European heritage and is living in one of the Anglophile, now 'multicultural' countries of UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and United States you will not recognize these countries in another 20+ years or more. You will become a stranger in your own land.
This is my plan. I believe South America is the place to go. I was in Bogota in 2010. There is a small Chinese immigrate population there. But I doubt the Colombians would allow a major wave of immigration that would radically change the city's demographics.
One of my ex-pat friends in Costa Rica made a good point. If an American (Canadian, etc..) marries into a local middle class family, he should be able to put his children in the best private schools and colleges. It could be possible that in a generation, many powerful people in Latin America might have American fathers or grandfathers.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Racial, Ethnic, Multicultural Issues”