Maybe breeding with blacks is the whole problem

[Cornfed]

I read a theory that rather than the plethora of hominid races we think exist, there are really two species - humans (i.e. whites) and black simians, with everyone else being some mixture. It goes without saying that only more or less pure bred whites can found any sort of self-sustaining civilization. What inevitably happens is that they import blacks and mixed species individuals as pets and livestock, the lower castes of whites start to breed with them, the inferior simian genes start to percolate upwards and the society therefore turns to crap. There are various theories proposed as to why advanced civilization turn to crap, but perhaps these are a symptom of blackening. Perhaps breeding with pet animals that happen to be reproductively compatible is the real Original Sin.

[droid]

Is the girl on you avatar a white+black mix?

[Cornfed]

Is the girl on you avatar a white+black mix?

They are Korean, so according to the theory, ultimately yes.

[gnosis]

I'm not sure genetic tests on East Asians would show they have African DNA.

Also, where do Jews fit into this?

[Ghost]

.

[Cornfed]

Everyone has a variety mixed in, though in differing amounts. Even if such a thing as a 'pure-bred white' existed at one time, it certainly would not exist now.

The interesting thing is what they are a mixture of though. I don't know if everyone really is just a mixture of (white) humans and blacks, but it sounds right. In any case, preventing the further contamination of remaining human populations is a no-brainer.

[Moretorque]

From my reading the Great One is putting out fiction as Obama would say, the more variances your DNA has states how old a species is and from my reading blacks by far have the most varied human DNA.

They were even saying tribes from a few 100 miles of one another had more variances than the rest of humanity and that is one way how they know Africans have been here way longer than all others.

Corny just accept the Blackman as being the earliest flower of humanity until we could finally get to the Rose of a speciman such as yourself.

[sentinel89]

When you mix shit with ice cream, it's good for the shit but bad for the ice cream.

[mattyman]

On face value, this seems like one of those 'lets blame one race for all of our suffering; diatribes. Come on, this site, the original articles by Winston, make it seem like the sort of place that's against that kind of nonsense. Isn't being persecuted and ostracised, and finding people who don't do that what this site's about?

Anyway;
"the more variances your DNA has states how old a species is and from my reading blacks by far have the most varied human DNA."
Well said bud.

Please don't drop to the standards of debate of 'black vs. white' that really lowers the whole tone to sub-plebian standards and seems inconguent with a lto of the articlkes I've read on the sites. I wish the mods would acknowledge this important point. Isn't blaming each other one of the things the milatary industrial complex wants us to focus on to divert us from finding out the facts of what's really going on? Blame the blacks, blame the poor. I don't know what brought this up, but I will try to relate to where the OP is coming from.

Forget about how much the rich nick from taxpayers, forget about their tax-havens, forget how the policies of conservatives are damaging to the economy, about the fact that conservatives receive their donations from some of the most discpicable, predatory people.

Your note is most likely fuelled by being on the receiving end of political correctness and feeling you can't vent your feelings because of thus.

The reason I'm bringing this up is not to bash people of colour, but to bring-up the fact that a lot of people fear that they can't speak their mind without the fear of being shouted down (dont' bring-up feminism). Whether it be to loneliness, economic poverty or else; if people feel they can't talk about it, they'll find something to blame it on. This leads to ANGER which can be projected towards groups in ways normal people ordinarily wouldn't be. It's NOT BEING ALLOWED TO EXPRESS VIEWS which leads to opinions like this.

I hate to seem like and advocate of political correctness, please for the love of god, don't start on the narrative 'black people take our women, 'black people are lazy'.

Black people are NOT your enemy, you've taken in the narative of what the real evil wants.

Feminism is one of your real enemies.

[sentinel89]

blacks can't build produce civilization. A dissolution of the white population of America means a dissolution of American civilization. It's really that simple. The problem is Jews. Jews promote race mixing and feminism.

[MrMan]

I read a theory that rather than the plethora of hominid races we think exist, there are really two species - humans (i.e. whites) and black simians, with everyone else being some mixture. It goes without saying that only more or less pure bred whites can found any sort of self-sustaining civilization. What inevitably happens is that they import blacks and mixed species individuals as pets and livestock, the lower castes of whites start to breed with them, the inferior simian genes start to percolate upwards and the society therefore turns to crap. There are various theories proposed as to why advanced civilization turn to crap, but perhaps these are a symptom of blackening. Perhaps breeding with pet animals that happen to be reproductively compatible is the real Original Sin.

I would say this idiotic theory is ethnocentric, probably concocted by an American whose racial experience was largely limited to some part of the US where most of the population is either white are black. There are so many ethnicities in the world, why would white or black be the only main ethnicities?

Western civilization has become very powerful over the past several hundred years. Many nations of 'white' people all interacting together, fighting wars after the introduction of gun powder, with ever-increasingly sophisticated munitions. After these westerners learned to sail around the world (especially some of the darker ones, who had Moorish blood probably) Europeans started dominating other countries. A revolution in scientific procedure after the Protestant Reformation also contributed to 'whites' dominating much of the world.

But spin the clock back several hundred years. China had more advanced naval technology, able to sail as far as Africa, long before Europeans were capable of such things. They farmed in rows and developed certain types of ploughing technology before Europeans. They also had paper and gun powder before Europeans.

Egypt had an advanced civilization for the ancient world. They probably had some 'dark' white people, and some partially black folks in some of their dynasties.

Why would American native peoples be considered part white and part black? They didn't have the wheel, but they sure did contribute quite a lot to the world in terms of agriculture, corn (maize)-- bred from some tiny grass, most types of beans, squash, potatoes, sweet potatoes. I've read that half the world's food comes from the Americas. They didn't have the wheel. Mayans did invent a writing system. But the peoples in Meso-America were able to build some of the largest cities in the world. The Incas were able to tie together an empire in the tall Andes mountains, store potatoes, and feed people when they harvests were poor.

[sentinel89]

"We wuz Egyptians!!" "We wuz kangz!"

LOL. Sure, blacks built a great civilization and then whites came out of caves in Europe and stole all their technology and have enslaved and held them down for the past 500 years.

Neither the Egyptians nor the Moors were predominately sub-Saharan blacks.

[Adama]

This is only because you believe the crap that is evolution, which was brought to us by eugenists, like Charles Darwin and his clan of interbreeders. Darwin's family thought they were so awesome that they would only marry their cousins, to keep their superior genes in the family. Not even to horde wealth but for their so called superior genes. That didn't work out too well for them. Charles Darwin himself thought that blacks were closer to apes than humans, implying that blacks were man-like apes, like gorillas and chimps. But since he was against slavery, everyone thinks he was a cool dude.

Here's a tip for telling the difference between species and races in Darwinian evolution: species generally can't breed with one another, with the exception that closely related species can produce infertile offspring. Races can interbreed and have offspring that can mate and have other offspring.

So although we call dogs and wolves different species, in reality they are just races, because they can breed and make fertile offspring. The name given to them by humanity is irrelevant.

Now if blacks and whites were different species, then there could not be any interbreeding, because their offspring wouldn't be fertile. Each time a white and a black got together to make a child, that child would not be able to grow up and to produce children of its own. That's how you know humans are only one species.

I would agree that the state of black civilization isn't advanced, there is poverty, crime and violence. That doesn't make them a different species though. I wouldn't even blame people who don't want to live in a black neighborhood either, for the above reasons.

However theories like this just don't hold water, and you'd have to wonder about the type of person who comes up with such theories and what their motivation is. You men here are surface level only people, like most. I could inform you of the history of the Freemasons, the Democrats and Albert Pike creating the KKK to prevent blacks in the south from voting because they were all voting Republican, and how the Democrat party positively destroyed the progress southern blacks had made after the end of the Civil War. But since our focus is on the hatred of blacks rather than on finding truth, it would be a waste of my time. Anyone who is interested can look this up. You can start with the welfare system and how Senator Patrick Moynahan informed everyone that giving welfare and removing the father from the home would destroy blacks and civilization. They knew what they were doing, but they did it anyway, despite the warnings from whites who were not racist, such as Senator Moynahan. None of you ever heard of that either, I bet. Too busy buying into the infiltrated racial theories.

Don't you know that society is all about division of every type? Who created feminism? Intelligence agencies did. Who is behind the KKK? Freemasonry and the Democrat party. Racism is a created divide and conquer psyop. Everything you see on TV is an orchestration presented in a way to program your mind as to how to think, most especially to divide everyone, and to brainwash us with filth (disgusting abominations, such as adultery, homosexuality, etc on tv to show us how to behave).

And what benefit is any of this going to have on your life? Is this going to help you find a wife? Or does this explain why you don't have a wife or a great job?

[Adama]

Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, informs us in the New Testament of the true nature of the human family:

Acts 17
24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; 25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; King James Version (KJV)


God never mentions race unless it is about running a competition. Also, Moses married an Ethiopian, which is a black race. Moses' brother Aaron was upset that Moses had done this, but God wasn't happy with Aaron for being upset at Moses for this reason. And if memory serves me correctly, Miriam was struck with leprosy for one whole week for this reason.

Numbers 12

1 And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.

10 And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous.

[Adama]

I read a theory that rather than the plethora of hominid races we think exist, there are really two species - humans (i.e. whites) and black simians, with everyone else being some mixture. It goes without saying that only more or less pure bred whites can found any sort of self-sustaining civilization. What inevitably happens is that they import blacks and mixed species individuals as pets and livestock, the lower castes of whites start to breed with them, the inferior simian genes start to percolate upwards and the society therefore turns to crap. There are various theories proposed as to why advanced civilization turn to crap, but perhaps these are a symptom of blackening. Perhaps breeding with pet animals that happen to be reproductively compatible is the real Original Sin.

I would say this idiotic theory is ethnocentric, probably concocted by an American whose racial experience was largely limited to some part of the US where most of the population is either white are black. There are so many ethnicities in the world, why would white or black be the only main ethnicities?

Western civilization has become very powerful over the past several hundred years. Many nations of 'white' people all interacting together, fighting wars after the introduction of gun powder, with ever-increasingly sophisticated munitions. After these westerners learned to sail around the world (especially some of the darker ones, who had Moorish blood probably) Europeans started dominating other countries. A revolution in scientific procedure after the Protestant Reformation also contributed to 'whites' dominating much of the world.

But spin the clock back several hundred years. China had more advanced naval technology, able to sail as far as Africa, long before Europeans were capable of such things. They farmed in rows and developed certain types of ploughing technology before Europeans. They also had paper and gun powder before Europeans.

Egypt had an advanced civilization for the ancient world. They probably had some 'dark' white people, and some partially black folks in some of their dynasties.

Why would American native peoples be considered part white and part black? They didn't have the wheel, but they sure did contribute quite a lot to the world in terms of agriculture, corn (maize)-- bred from some tiny grass, most types of beans, squash, potatoes, sweet potatoes. I've read that half the world's food comes from the Americas. They didn't have the wheel. Mayans did invent a writing system. But the peoples in Meso-America were able to build some of the largest cities in the world. The Incas were able to tie together an empire in the tall Andes mountains, store potatoes, and feed people when they harvests were poor.

As for white civilizaton, isnt it interesting that Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of this nation, thought that Native Americans lived a superior way of life. I don't think Native Americans were paying property taxes or worrying about their children being turned into gays in kindergarten by a lesbian teacher.


” To those who remained behind, it was often rumored that those who had gone over to the Indians had been “captured.” While some captives were taken, more often the whites took up Indian life without compulsion. As Franklin wrote to Peter Collinson May 9, 1753:

The proneness of human Nature to a life of ease, of freedom from care and labour appear strongly in the heretofore little success that has attended every attempt to civilize our American Indians. . . . They visit us frequently and see the advantages that Arts, Science and compact Society procure us; they are not deficient in natural understanding and yet they have never strewn any inclination to change their manner of life for ours, or to learn any of our Arts.
While Indians did not seem to have much inclination to exchange their culture for the Euro-American, many Euro-Americans appeared more than willing to become Indians at this time:

When an Indian child has been brought up among us, taught our language and habituated to our customs, yet if he goes to see his relations and makes one Indian Ramble with them, there is no perswading him ever to return. And that this is not natural [only to Indians], but as men, is plain from this, that when white persons of either sex have been taken prisoners young by the Indians, and lived awhile among them, tho’ ransomed by their Friends, and treated with all imaginable tenderness to prevail with them to stay among the English, yet within a Short time they become disgusted with our manner of Life, and the care and pains that are necessary to support it, and take the first good Opportunity of escaping again into the Woods, from whence there is no reclaiming them.
Franklin followed with an example. He had heard of a person who had been “reclaimed” from the Indians and returned to a sizable estate. Tired of the care needed to maintain such a style of life, he had turned it over to his younger brother and, taking only a rifle and a matchcoat, “took his way again to the Wilderness.” Franklin used this story to illustrate his point that “No European who has tasted Savage Life can afterwards bear to live in our societies.” Such societies, wrote Franklin, provided their members with greater opportunities for happiness than European cultures. Continuing, he said:

The Care and Labour of providing for Artificial and fashionable Wants, the sight of so many Rich wallowing in superfluous plenty, whereby so many are kept poor and distress’d for Want, the Insolence of Office . . . the restraints of Custom, all contrive to disgust them with what we call civil Society.”—-http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/FFchp5.html http://thetribalway.com/?p=462