Entitlement to sex

[Cornfed]

Apologists for the current dystopia often claim that men are not entitled to sex. Why is this? What justifies this belief in a lack of entitlement? Obviously concepts such as entitlement, rights etc. are simply social constructs, but why is it not useful to employ such a construct when it comes to men getting sex?

Traditionally it was thought that provided men worked hard and played by the rules, they were indeed entitled to ongoing sex with a wife and reasonably priced sex with hoes. This belief had several advantages. Obviously it encouraged men to straighten up and fly right in order to get sex. Because most of the breeding under such an arrangement was done by virtuous men and children tend to take after their parents for both genetic and social reasons, this improved the virtuousness of the population over time. Because sex was an entitlement rather than something you had to hustle for on a daily basis, men could work together in a close cooperative fashion, since they were not having to constantly one-up each other to seem like the top man in order to complete for the sexual favors of passing sluts. Meanwhile, omega male seducers and sluts exhibiting themselves were suppressed for the same reasons that other disruptive elements and social parasites were suppressed.

This seems to me like the obvious way to run a harmonious and prosperous society. Why do the supporters of the current system think their favored arrangements are an improvement?

[nicho12]

Apologists for the current dystopia often claim that men are not entitled to sex. Why is this? What justifies this belief in a lack of entitlement? Obviously concepts such as entitlement, rights etc. are simply social constructs, but why is it not useful to employ such a construct when it comes to men getting sex?

Traditionally it was thought that provided men worked hard and played by the rules, they were indeed entitled to ongoing sex with a wife and reasonably priced sex with hoes. This belief had several advantages. Obviously it encouraged men to straiten up and fly right in order to get sex. Because most of the breeding under such an arrangement was done by virtuous men and children tend to take after their parents for both genetic and social reasons, this improved the virtuousness of the population over time. Because sex was an entitlement rather than something you had to hustle for on a daily basis, men could work together in a close cooperative fashion, since they were not having to constantly one-up each other to seem like the top man in order to complete for the sexual favors of passing sluts. Meanwhile, omega male seducers and sluts exhibiting themselves were suppressed for the same reasons that other disruptive elements and social parasites were suppressed.

This seems to me like the obvious way to run a harmonious and prosperous society. Why do the supporters of the current system think their favored arrangements are an improvement?

It's very simple, commercialized sex boosts the economy in the west, they're several reasons for the current system, the first reason is that women are benefiting from it mostly and since women are selfish by nature, they see no desire to abolish the current system even when there's clear proof that the current system is destructive and can not be sustained in the long run. The second group of people benefiting are the elites because of the revenue it generates for them by building strip clubs, using sexy models to advertise their products etc, the third group of people benefiting are the players or selfish men who don't care whether the civilization gets destroyed or not as long as they can pump and dump as many women as they want and in the process creating bastard dysfunctional kids.

One final reason, is that it's the only way they can control men and bring in a one world government

[Cornfed]

It's very simple, commercialized sex boosts the economy in the west, they're several reasons for the current system, the first reason is that women are benefiting from it mostly and since women are selfish by nature, they see no desire to abolish the current system even when there's clear proof that the current system is destructive and can not be sustained in the long run. The second group of people benefiting are the elites because of the revenue it generates for them by building strip clubs, using sexy models to advertise their products etc, the third group of people benefiting are the players or selfish men who don't care whether the civilization gets destroyed or not as long as they can pump and dump as many women as they want and in the process creating bastard dysfunctional kids.

One final reason, is that it's the only way they can control men and bring in a one world government

Well yes, except that it doesn't really benefit women - they are just stupid enough to think it does. But I was hoping that liberals who seriously think the current arrangement is a good thing would explain why.

[nicho12]

It's very simple, commercialized sex boosts the economy in the west, they're several reasons for the current system, the first reason is that women are benefiting from it mostly and since women are selfish by nature, they see no desire to abolish the current system even when there's clear proof that the current system is destructive and can not be sustained in the long run. The second group of people benefiting are the elites because of the revenue it generates for them by building strip clubs, using sexy models to advertise their products etc, the third group of people benefiting are the players or selfish men who don't care whether the civilization gets destroyed or not as long as they can pump and dump as many women as they want and in the process creating bastard dysfunctional kids.

One final reason, is that it's the only way they can control men and bring in a one world government

Well yes, except that it doesn't really benefit women - they are just stupid enough to think it does. But I was hoping that liberals who seriously think the current arrangement is a good thing would explain why.

I don't think most liberals are stupid not to see the coming catastrophe, I believe most liberals understand that the current system is on life support but continue to support it for various reasons, the first and most important reason most liberals support the current system is because the current system shields them from retribution by right wing white nationalists who see liberals as traitors, can you imagine what would happen to liberals if the current system fell, most wouldn't live for more than a day or two before they're hunted down and butchered by White Nationalists. I have spoken to some liberals a couple of them who told me that they regret ever supporting the black civil rights movement, they didn't think that it would result in the destruction of most American cities and neighborhoods but can't reverse back the hand in time because they've now made themselves known to the ku kluxers and other white nationalists that they're traitors. It's not just the liberals who are afraid of being lynched but also the politicians and other people who depend on the current system

[Cornfed]

^ That is an optimistic view of the situation. I hope you are right.

[nicho12]

^ That is an optimistic view of the situation. I hope you are right.

That's my analysis of the situation because anyone in the world with half a brain can see that the current system is a ticking time bomb, most people especially the liberals, politicians, feminists etc hope that the bomb doesn't explode during their life times

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Apologists for the current dystopia often claim that men are not entitled to sex. Why is this? What justifies this belief in a lack of entitlement? Obviously concepts such as entitlement, rights etc. are simply social constructs, but why is it not useful to employ such a construct when it comes to men getting sex?

Traditionally it was thought that provided men worked hard and played by the rules, they were indeed entitled to ongoing sex with a wife and reasonably priced sex with hoes. This belief had several advantages. Obviously it encouraged men to straighten up and fly right in order to get sex. Because most of the breeding under such an arrangement was done by virtuous men and children tend to take after their parents for both genetic and social reasons, this improved the virtuousness of the population over time. Because sex was an entitlement rather than something you had to hustle for on a daily basis, men could work together in a close cooperative fashion, since they were not having to constantly one-up each other to seem like the top man in order to complete for the sexual favors of passing sluts. Meanwhile, omega male seducers and sluts exhibiting themselves were suppressed for the same reasons that other disruptive elements and social parasites were suppressed.

This seems to me like the obvious way to run a harmonious and prosperous society. Why do the supporters of the current system think their favored arrangements are an improvement?

If you still are having trouble at this stage in your life Cornfed, you have simply lost the genetic lottery in terms of appeal to women. No, you are not "entitled" to sex any more than a fat, nasty skank is entitled to have sex with you (although that might be your one shot to reproduce).

Women perceive you as low status and as a social parasite yourself and they have no interest in taking a chance at becoming pregnant with your spawn. Sorry if the truth hurts.

[Cornfed]

If you still are having trouble at this stage in your life Cornfed, you have simply lost the genetic lottery in terms of appeal to women. No, you are not "entitled" to sex any more than a fat, nasty skank is entitled to have sex with you (although that might be your one shot to reproduce).

Women perceive you as low status and as a social parasite yourself and they have no interest in taking a chance at becoming pregnant with your spawn. Sorry if the truth hurts.

Lol, you dysgenics crack me up, and you genuinely believe it is all about muh dik. How could you think otherwise? Oh well, it doesn't matter what I say, you will still be what you are.

[Devil Dog]

Apologists for the current dystopia often claim that men are not entitled to sex. Why is this? What justifies this belief in a lack of entitlement? Obviously concepts such as entitlement, rights etc. are simply social constructs, but why is it not useful to employ such a construct when it comes to men getting sex?

Traditionally it was thought that provided men worked hard and played by the rules, they were indeed entitled to ongoing sex with a wife and reasonably priced sex with hoes. This belief had several advantages. Obviously it encouraged men to straighten up and fly right in order to get sex. Because most of the breeding under such an arrangement was done by virtuous men and children tend to take after their parents for both genetic and social reasons, this improved the virtuousness of the population over time. Because sex was an entitlement rather than something you had to hustle for on a daily basis, men could work together in a close cooperative fashion, since they were not having to constantly one-up each other to seem like the top man in order to complete for the sexual favors of passing sluts. Meanwhile, omega male seducers and sluts exhibiting themselves were suppressed for the same reasons that other disruptive elements and social parasites were suppressed.

This seems to me like the obvious way to run a harmonious and prosperous society. Why do the supporters of the current system think their favored arrangements are an improvement?

If you still are having trouble at this stage in your life Cornfed, you have simply lost the genetic lottery in terms of appeal to women. No, you are not "entitled" to sex any more than a fat, nasty skank is entitled to have sex with you (although that might be your one shot to reproduce).

Women perceive you as low status and as a social parasite yourself and they have no interest in taking a chance at becoming pregnant with your spawn. Sorry if the truth hurts.

Corn****, how can you refute this? You are in China, right? Others are getting loads of good looking poon there while you are continuing with your little half-baked rationalizations and excuses. Man, you must be in the bottom 5%.

[Cornfed]

Corn****, how can you refute this? You are in China, right?

No

Others are getting loads of good looking poon there while you are continuing with your little half-baked rationalizations and excuses. Man, you must be in the bottom 5%.

I realize that blacks and psychopaths who think it is a good thing for their daughters to become corporate whores can't be expected to think of anyone but themselves, but I am trying to engage in discussion of what is best for society in general. It is not good enough for me to scavenge benefits for myself from a dying civilization and hope I die of old age before the whole thing crashes and burns. I want to succeed as part of a community that succeeds. It is a given that such sentiments will be unintelligible to those with no moral character.

[Tezcatlipoca]

I don't think it is about men being entitled to sex, it is about women realizing that sex should not be something to be earned! This concept is so strange to most people even men! Sex is not something you should trade or barter for, it should be done out of a sense of fun, enjoyment, intimacy, sharing, etc. Instead society and people have degraded us by making it into a commodity to be bartered for on the open market and bought like a piece of gum that you pick up, use up, and then spit out! Women try to control men for money out of fear for children, men do the same to women to ensure the child is theirs, and society to keep from caring for too many orphans, but when did we lose the ability to let sex help us tap into our innermost selves? To fully expose your soul to another being and be cherished as something divine?!

[matthewcoury]

Apologists for the current dystopia often claim that men are not entitled to sex. Why is this? What justifies this belief in a lack of entitlement? Obviously concepts such as entitlement, rights etc. are simply social constructs, but why is it not useful to employ such a construct when it comes to men getting sex?

Traditionally it was thought that provided men worked hard and played by the rules, they were indeed entitled to ongoing sex with a wife and reasonably priced sex with hoes. This belief had several advantages. Obviously it encouraged men to straighten up and fly right in order to get sex. Because most of the breeding under such an arrangement was done by virtuous men and children tend to take after their parents for both genetic and social reasons, this improved the virtuousness of the population over time. Because sex was an entitlement rather than something you had to hustle for on a daily basis, men could work together in a close cooperative fashion, since they were not having to constantly one-up each other to seem like the top man in order to complete for the sexual favors of passing sluts. Meanwhile, omega male seducers and sluts exhibiting themselves were suppressed for the same reasons that other disruptive elements and social parasites were suppressed.

This seems to me like the obvious way to run a harmonious and prosperous society. Why do the supporters of the current system think their favored arrangements are an improvement?

i have thought about this many times....in past societies every man who was a hard worker had a wife to have sex with....it was an automatic part of life....in europe and other countries around europe it is still very acceptable the idea that women should want to give sex to men