Female perceptions then and now

[Cornfed]

To illustrate changed perception of Western females, consider how a high quality, intelligent female would view me 100 years ago vs. today. Back then I would have a reproductive advantage over dirtbags, since I would be able to do higher value work in conjunction with other quality men and I would pass these qualities onto my descendants, who would similarly be able to support more children, so the female would find me sexy. I would similarly be able to provide the female with a good lifestyle and vicarious social status, so would have a high utility value. For these reasons the female would look up to me, satisfying female hypergamy.

Consider the situation now. Since the ZOG pays for solo mothers and takes care of their bastards in various ways, I am at a massive reproduction disadvantage to dirtbags pumping and dumping sluts, so no longer sexy. The female can get more resources than I can give her either in some bogus affirmative action career or by spawning bastards on welfare, so I am of no value. Even if I too have a good career, since she can get this easily just by showing up and having a vagina, she won't be impressed, so as far as she is concerned all of a sudden I am a loser.

Hence thanks to the ZOG I have gone from a sexy useful winner to a repellent worthless loser, all without me actually doing anything.

[Adama]

The whole welfare thing only applies to single mothers of fatherless children. You aren't eligible for those women anyway. You wouldn't want that kind of woman. So it's moot. Don't complain if some inner city whore doesn't want you. You don't want one of them and you know it. Yet somehow you use this as justification for your frustration.

All this means is, there will be many female doctors supporting house husbands. I know one man who is a stay at home dad and his wife is an ER doc. I know another guy with a desk job whose wife is a doctor in a hospital. These women get better jobs than men. That means the women will be supporting the man or they will be living in a shack.

The real problem in such marriages is who calls the shots, but that's up to them.

Also, stop using that evolutionary psychobabble to justify this line of thinking. There were losers even 100 or 200 years ago. Usually they just got together with someone of their same class. So it isn't about financial status or social standing, because there should be a cohort of women of similar standing. The problem lies elsewhere.

I've also known some unemployed losers who were dating some hot chicks.

Attraction is not an equation. Maybe some women are making some rational choices based upon resource calculations or whatever, but I think most women just pick based on how their private parts tingle, similar to men. Attraction is not a choice. It is simply a matter of, does the other person's mere presence excite you. That either takes place in the heart or in the soul. It isn't a rational choice unless there is a dynasty involved or some arranged marriage. Now it is about love.

[gnosis]

Only successful, thriving cultures value intelligent, virtuous men. Loser cultures like this one toss them on the scrap heap.

If it's any consolation, the scum who sneer at you for not being scum don't really have a future. Their loathsome descendants will go down with the ship.

[jamesbond]

If it's any consolation, the scum who sneer at you for not being scum don't really have a future. Their loathsome descendants will go down with the ship.

Exactly, it will then be poetic justice.

[MrMan]

To illustrate changed perception of Western females, consider how a high quality, intelligent female would view me 100 years ago vs. today. Back then I would have a reproductive advantage over dirtbags, since I would be able to do higher value work in conjunction with other quality men and I would pass these qualities onto my descendants, who would similarly be able to support more children, so the female would find me sexy. I would similarly be able to provide the female with a good lifestyle and vicarious social status, so would have a high utility value. For these reasons the female would look up to me, satisfying female hypergamy.

Consider the situation now. Since the ZOG pays for solo mothers and takes care of their bastards in various ways, I am at a massive reproduction disadvantage to dirtbags pumping and dumping sluts, so no longer sexy. The female can get more resources than I can give her either in some bogus affirmative action career or by spawning bastards on welfare, so I am of no value. Even if I too have a good career, since she can get this easily just by showing up and having a v****a, she won't be impressed, so as far as she is concerned all of a sudden I am a loser.

Hence thanks to the ZOG I have gone from a sexy useful winner to a repellent worthless loser, all without me actually doing anything.

100 years ago, you probably could have found more women less repulsed by your calling blacks monkeys and things like that. I don't know if you talk like that in front of the ladies, but you probably couldn't have gotten away with talking like you did above about sexual issues publically like that as easily.

[Cornfed]

100 years ago, you probably could have found more women less repulsed by your calling blacks monkeys and things like that. I don't know if you talk like that in front of the ladies, but you probably couldn't have gotten away with talking like you did above about sexual issues publically like that as easily.

That is yet another thing that has lowered the status of quality men and made us less attractive to females - being expected to kowtow to simians, faggots etc. - but it is mainly the economic situation that is the problem.