Feminism = Socialism, Satanism, NWO

[tom]

This is probably nothing shocking or new. Feminism = Socialism or Vice versa
But this is more than assigning a name, its what it means that's important.
Feminist want special privileges and financial support with no obligations.
And socialism is all about central government control and forcible redistribution of wealth.
The seizure of men's wealth and endless arrays of government programs benefiting women are promoted by feminist. They will look to the state as the ultimate alpha male. They will see nothing wrong with the state taking men's freedom and happiness. All this has caused a large change in male female relations in the West.



http://mises.org/
This site has a lot on libertarian stuff, you wont find any libertarian feminist there, I have not seen any yet, the two ideas seem to be polar opposites.

Ayn Rand could be more in a libertarian vain, but she is generally not liked by feminist or the left. Having direct experience with living a day to day existence under socialism she understands what it means and does.

[DevilsAdvocate]

This is probably nothing shocking or new. Feminism = Socialism or Vice versa
But this is more than assigning a name, its what it means that's important.
Feminist want special privileges and financial support with no obligations.
And socialism is all about central government control and forcible redistribution of wealth.
The seizure of men's wealth and endless arrays of government programs benefiting women are promoted by feminist. They will look to the state as the ultimate alpha male. They will see nothing wrong with the state taking men's freedom and happiness. All this has caused a large change in male female relations in the West.



http://mises.org/
This site has a lot on libertarian stuff, you wont find any libertarian feminist there, I have not seen any yet, the two ideas seem to be polar opposites.

I'm afraid feminism goes way beyond socialism. Feminism is the scientific conspiracy to turn the women against the men, on purpose, so that the entire society will collapse at some point. Or let's say it will be so weaken by this that it can easily be swayed, just as a women can easily be swayed.

This is actually a satanic evil agenda against all of mankind, and if people truly understood it and understood who was doing this on a worldwide basis people wouldn't stand for it, and call for these peoples heads.

But people are not going to understand anymore than they understand anything else, and therefore the people who are doing this do so with no threat against them whatsoever, or at least none that I know about.

Anyway, they are doing it and nobody can stop them.....

From history we know what's going to happen and what society will look like. It will be homosexual by nature and all the young kids will think it's normal to be a fag and weird not to....

People are natural sheep so they will follow along perfectly and become little miss ladyboy or mangina.

I guess it's better to take it up the ass then to get no ass at all.....

You see the satanic perversion now?

And if taking it up the ass just isn't something you can stomach, no problem, they got some nice robot girls for you to get some jollies with....

Women are doing the same thing....

Welcome to planet earth 2012, I hope you like collapses, because one is coming, these kind of situations don't last that long. Impossible to say how much longer there is to go, but it won't last forever, history shows that time and time again like clockwork.....

But just as they are artificially creating this situation they will artificially create the ending as well, by crashing world markets in one day, which will bring about what they want which is total chaos around the world.

When this happens this USA will turn into a nightmare and military clampdown of the entire society, and people will be taken away to the camps just as 1917 Russia. The same exact type of people who did that in 1917 Russia is the same exact people in control of the USA right now, and they are going to do the same exact thing.....

It's all they know to do, which is to destroy, they love that and get off on it, just the exact opposite of what it's like to build something up.

But here is the real kicker, they are the ones to built up the USA on purpose just so they could destroy it, these people are sick mother fuckers.....

Signed,

Devils Advocate

[polya]

...

[publicduende]

This is probably nothing shocking or new. Feminism = Socialism or Vice versa
But this is more than assigning a name, its what it means that's important.
Feminist want special privileges and financial support with no obligations.
And socialism is all about central government control and forcible redistribution of wealth.
The seizure of men's wealth and endless arrays of government programs benefiting women are promoted by feminist. They will look to the state as the ultimate alpha male. They will see nothing wrong with the state taking men's freedom and happiness. All this has caused a large change in male female relations in the West.



http://mises.org/
This site has a lot on libertarian stuff, you wont find any libertarian feminist there, I have not seen any yet, the two ideas seem to be polar opposites.

Ayn Rand could be more in a libertarian vain, but she is generally not liked by feminist or the left. Having direct experience with living a day to day existence under socialism she understands what it means and does.

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

[PeterAndrewNolan]

This is probably nothing shocking or new. Feminism = Socialism or Vice versa
But this is more than assigning a name, its what it means that's important.
Feminist want special privileges and financial support with no obligations.
And socialism is all about central government control and forcible redistribution of wealth.
The seizure of men's wealth and endless arrays of government programs benefiting women are promoted by feminist. They will look to the state as the ultimate alpha male. They will see nothing wrong with the state taking men's freedom and happiness. All this has caused a large change in male female relations in the West.



http://mises.org/
This site has a lot on libertarian stuff, you wont find any libertarian feminist there, I have not seen any yet, the two ideas seem to be polar opposites.

I'm afraid feminism goes way beyond socialism. Feminism is the scientific conspiracy to turn the women against the men, on purpose, so that the entire society will collapse at some point. Or let's say it will be so weaken by this that it can easily be swayed, just as a women can easily be swayed.

This is actually a satanic evil agenda against all of mankind, and if people truly understood it and understood who was doing this on a worldwide basis people wouldn't stand for it, and call for these peoples heads.

But people are not going to understand anymore than they understand anything else, and therefore the people who are doing this do so with no threat against them whatsoever, or at least none that I know about.

Anyway, they are doing it and nobody can stop them.....

From history we know what's going to happen and what society will look like. It will be homosexual by nature and all the young kids will think it's normal to be a fag and weird not to....

People are natural sheep so they will follow along perfectly and become little miss ladyboy or mangina.

I guess it's better to take it up the ass then to get no ass at all.....

You see the satanic perversion now?

And if taking it up the ass just isn't something you can stomach, no problem, they got some nice robot girls for you to get some jollies with....

Women are doing the same thing....

Welcome to planet earth 2012, I hope you like collapses, because one is coming, these kind of situations don't last that long. Impossible to say how much longer there is to go, but it won't last forever, history shows that time and time again like clockwork.....

But just as they are artificially creating this situation they will artificially create the ending as well, by crashing world markets in one day, which will bring about what they want which is total chaos around the world.

When this happens this USA will turn into a nightmare and military clampdown of the entire society, and people will be taken away to the camps just as 1917 Russia. The same exact type of people who did that in 1917 Russia is the same exact people in control of the USA right now, and they are going to do the same exact thing.....

It's all they know to do, which is to destroy, they love that and get off on it, just the exact opposite of what it's like to build something up.

But here is the real kicker, they are the ones to built up the USA on purpose just so they could destroy it, these people are sick mother fuckers.....

Signed,

Devils Advocate

DA is 110% correct.

Nice to have you here...at last someone else who has actually read what happened in russia and is fully aware the same forces are at work in the west now.

You are quite rare sir...so please stay!!

[PeterAndrewNolan]

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

[publicduende]

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

I read something off that site a year ago or something. It's the worst kind of right-wing nonsense salad mate. It puts Mortal Kombat to shame, to do a combo attack of gays, jews, women and Illuminati in the same article.

I know you had a very bad experience with your ex-wife, possibly more women as well so your opinions are shaped by your life. Yet I am not prepared to wipe out 100+ years of real feminist struggles off the map because of a website titled "exposing feminism and the NWO". This is stuff a Taleban would be ashamed of. Peter, sorry I have agreed with some of your ideas in the past, you come across as a man of integrity but some of your other ideas are far too extreme and many of us (including myself) can't associate them to anything they have read, seen or experimented first-hand.

Women have always been cruel and manipulative, when allowed to behave so, all across history and cultures. Yet I believe decline in our society has far nastier causes than a teenager pulling Makow's dick out in a park or playing "male" videogames. Do you want to talk about the shameful decline in real wages that forces wives to taker on deeply unsatisfying jobs just to help paying the bills? Do you want to talk about absentee parents, mums and dads alike, or complete delegation of kids upbringing to schools and media?

[OutWest]

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

I read something off that site a year ago or something. It's the worst kind of right-wing nonsense salad mate. It puts Mortal Kombat to shame, to do a combo attack of gays, jews, women and Illuminati in the same article.

I know you had a very bad experience with your ex-wife, possibly more women as well so your opinions are shaped by your life. Yet I am not prepared to wipe out 100+ years of real feminist struggles off the map because of a website titled "exposing feminism and the NWO". This is stuff a Taleban would be ashamed of. Peter, sorry I have agreed with some of your ideas in the past, you come across as a man of integrity but some of your other ideas are far too extreme and many of us (including myself) can't associate them to anything they have read, seen or experimented first-hand.

Women have always been cruel and manipulative, when allowed to behave so, all across history and cultures. Yet I believe decline in our society has far nastier causes than a teenager pulling Makow's dick out in a park or playing "male" videogames. Do you want to talk about the shameful decline in real wages that forces wives to taker on deeply unsatisfying jobs just to help paying the bills? Do you want to talk about absentee parents, mums and dads alike, or complete delegation of kids upbringing to schools and media?

The average contribution to family income made by a working woman is very close to the average increase in taxation on families as it has increased since WWII. Since WWII, women went to work, and most of that money in terms of increased family income has ended up going to pay for government. And women "Forced to take deeply unsatisfying jobs" , oh the horrors! What an injustice!
Women going to work is needed to pay for government on all levels. Once government discovered the potential of "Rosie riveter" in WWII, it was a forgone conclusion as to what would happen. Combine those elements with the agenda of public education, and you end up with a public that is what you have now in the USA.

[publicduende]

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

I read something off that site a year ago or something. It's the worst kind of right-wing nonsense salad mate. It puts Mortal Kombat to shame, to do a combo attack of gays, jews, women and Illuminati in the same article.

I know you had a very bad experience with your ex-wife, possibly more women as well so your opinions are shaped by your life. Yet I am not prepared to wipe out 100+ years of real feminist struggles off the map because of a website titled "exposing feminism and the NWO". This is stuff a Taleban would be ashamed of. Peter, sorry I have agreed with some of your ideas in the past, you come across as a man of integrity but some of your other ideas are far too extreme and many of us (including myself) can't associate them to anything they have read, seen or experimented first-hand.

Women have always been cruel and manipulative, when allowed to behave so, all across history and cultures. Yet I believe decline in our society has far nastier causes than a teenager pulling Makow's dick out in a park or playing "male" videogames. Do you want to talk about the shameful decline in real wages that forces wives to taker on deeply unsatisfying jobs just to help paying the bills? Do you want to talk about absentee parents, mums and dads alike, or complete delegation of kids upbringing to schools and media?

The average contribution to family income made by a working woman is very close to the average increase in taxation on families as it has increased since WWII. Since WWII, women went to work, and most of that money in terms of increased family income has ended up going to pay for government. And women "Forced to take deeply unsatisfying jobs" , oh the horrors! What an injustice!
Women going to work is needed to pay for government on all levels. Once government discovered the potential of "Rosie riveter" in WWII, it was a forgone conclusion as to what would happen. Combine those elements with the agenda of public education, and you end up with a public that is what you have now in the USA.

That sounds like my argument. In the 50s in the US, and the 60s/70s in Italy, a single-salary family could happily make ends meet, afford to buy a town centre flat and most importantly allow the wife to focus on kids' upbringing, keeping the house in order and probably be an excellent chef and a good 'un in the sack. By deeply unsatisfying I mean jobs a woman is forced to take on, like serving fries in a drive-through, rather than something she embraces out of skills or passion, like teaching.

The sad thing is not women going to work per se. The sad thing is your government splashing the additional tax revenues in waging wars across the planet and bailing out banks who screwed themselves to oblivion in the derivatives casino.

[OutWest]

I find it quite shocking to equate socialism with feminism. True, the progressive ideas that led to feminism were born out of socialist or liberal left circles. Just don't confuse the historical feminism of women who fought lifelong battles in parliament and on the streets to gain things that we now consider granted, like voting power or benefits for staying at home with the kids, with the stoopid "p***y power" attitude that you find quite copiously on the media. Some if not most of that is a campaign to make women into better consumers, and I find it very reprehensible that the same campaigns are targeting girls younger and younger in age.

A socialist to me is someone who is in control of his wealth and means of productions, and also knows how much they need to give back to society so that the maximum collective benefit is extracted. Many Victorian age industrialists and philantrophists were far closer to being socialist than many of these corrupted masks we find in power now.

By the same token, a real "feminist" to me is a woman who is in control of her life by knowing exactly what her aspirations are, and how much she needs to hold back for the sake of her "natural" mission of mother. A woman like this is not just a feminist. She's also a very intelligent and wise woman.

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

I read something off that site a year ago or something. It's the worst kind of right-wing nonsense salad mate. It puts Mortal Kombat to shame, to do a combo attack of gays, jews, women and Illuminati in the same article.

I know you had a very bad experience with your ex-wife, possibly more women as well so your opinions are shaped by your life. Yet I am not prepared to wipe out 100+ years of real feminist struggles off the map because of a website titled "exposing feminism and the NWO". This is stuff a Taleban would be ashamed of. Peter, sorry I have agreed with some of your ideas in the past, you come across as a man of integrity but some of your other ideas are far too extreme and many of us (including myself) can't associate them to anything they have read, seen or experimented first-hand.

Women have always been cruel and manipulative, when allowed to behave so, all across history and cultures. Yet I believe decline in our society has far nastier causes than a teenager pulling Makow's dick out in a park or playing "male" videogames. Do you want to talk about the shameful decline in real wages that forces wives to taker on deeply unsatisfying jobs just to help paying the bills? Do you want to talk about absentee parents, mums and dads alike, or complete delegation of kids upbringing to schools and media?

The average contribution to family income made by a working woman is very close to the average increase in taxation on families as it has increased since WWII. Since WWII, women went to work, and most of that money in terms of increased family income has ended up going to pay for government. And women "Forced to take deeply unsatisfying jobs" , oh the horrors! What an injustice!
Women going to work is needed to pay for government on all levels. Once government discovered the potential of "Rosie riveter" in WWII, it was a forgone conclusion as to what would happen. Combine those elements with the agenda of public education, and you end up with a public that is what you have now in the USA.

That sounds like my argument. In the 50s in the US, and the 60s/70s in Italy, a single-salary family could happily make ends meet, afford to buy a town centre flat and most importantly allow the wife to focus on kids' upbringing, keeping the house in order and probably be an excellent chef and a good 'un in the sack. By deeply unsatisfying I mean jobs a woman is forced to take on, like serving fries in a drive-through, rather than something she embraces out of skills or passion, like teaching.

The sad thing is not women going to work per se. The sad thing is your government splashing the additional tax revenues in waging wars across the planet and bailing out banks who screwed themselves to oblivion in the derivatives casino.

If you take the time to look at the numbers, the long term insolvencies of the US are pretty much the same as what Western Europe is experiencing now- vote buying with entitlement promises that are unsustainable, especially in the face of a demographic implosion.
The Western European powers have defense expenditures that are minimal, (the US tax payer was always there as the sucker)
and yet they are going bankrupt, starting first of course with the southern tier. The whole "Euro-project" right now is an exercise in
suckering the German taxpayer through some devious form of communitized debt in such a way that those German voters don't catch onto it. So far it is not working, and the best they can do is kick the can down the road a bit.

Germany is prosperous because they are excellent manufacturers of a wide range of products desired by the rest of the world.
What a concept! LOL

Outwest

[polya]

Men talking about feminism doesn't last for long! If you all really believe a collapse is around the corner, you'd better leave and find your foreign woman soon. Why not go to Russia - I have and I didn't even need a translator. By the way there were 3 revolutions in Russia, one in 1905 & 2 in 1917- so I know what I'm talking about here.

[publicduende]

publicduende,
your comment is so full of fail. I suggest you read Henry Makows site just as a starter. And listen to everything DA tells you. I can't be bothered wasting my time on someone who would write comments so full of fail.

I read something off that site a year ago or something. It's the worst kind of right-wing nonsense salad mate. It puts Mortal Kombat to shame, to do a combo attack of gays, jews, women and Illuminati in the same article.

I know you had a very bad experience with your ex-wife, possibly more women as well so your opinions are shaped by your life. Yet I am not prepared to wipe out 100+ years of real feminist struggles off the map because of a website titled "exposing feminism and the NWO". This is stuff a Taleban would be ashamed of. Peter, sorry I have agreed with some of your ideas in the past, you come across as a man of integrity but some of your other ideas are far too extreme and many of us (including myself) can't associate them to anything they have read, seen or experimented first-hand.

Women have always been cruel and manipulative, when allowed to behave so, all across history and cultures. Yet I believe decline in our society has far nastier causes than a teenager pulling Makow's dick out in a park or playing "male" videogames. Do you want to talk about the shameful decline in real wages that forces wives to taker on deeply unsatisfying jobs just to help paying the bills? Do you want to talk about absentee parents, mums and dads alike, or complete delegation of kids upbringing to schools and media?

The average contribution to family income made by a working woman is very close to the average increase in taxation on families as it has increased since WWII. Since WWII, women went to work, and most of that money in terms of increased family income has ended up going to pay for government. And women "Forced to take deeply unsatisfying jobs" , oh the horrors! What an injustice!
Women going to work is needed to pay for government on all levels. Once government discovered the potential of "Rosie riveter" in WWII, it was a forgone conclusion as to what would happen. Combine those elements with the agenda of public education, and you end up with a public that is what you have now in the USA.

That sounds like my argument. In the 50s in the US, and the 60s/70s in Italy, a single-salary family could happily make ends meet, afford to buy a town centre flat and most importantly allow the wife to focus on kids' upbringing, keeping the house in order and probably be an excellent chef and a good 'un in the sack. By deeply unsatisfying I mean jobs a woman is forced to take on, like serving fries in a drive-through, rather than something she embraces out of skills or passion, like teaching.

The sad thing is not women going to work per se. The sad thing is your government splashing the additional tax revenues in waging wars across the planet and bailing out banks who screwed themselves to oblivion in the derivatives casino.

If you take the time to look at the numbers, the long term insolvencies of the US are pretty much the same as what Western Europe is experiencing now- vote buying with entitlement promises that are unsustainable, especially in the face of a demographic implosion.
The Western European powers have defense expenditures that are minimal, (the US tax payer was always there as the sucker)
and yet they are going bankrupt, starting first of course with the southern tier. The whole "Euro-project" right now is an exercise in
suckering the German taxpayer through some devious form of communitized debt in such a way that those German voters don't catch onto it. So far it is not working, and the best they can do is kick the can down the road a bit.

Germany is prosperous because they are excellent manufacturers of a wide range of products desired by the rest of the world.
What a concept! LOL

Outwest

Some of the reasons for the US decline vs European decline are similar: demographic slowdown, less productivity and more debt-fuelled consumption. European countries have had the kinds of social assistance programmes you Americans despise so much for the best part of 60 years, so a big part of the deficits come from a system that is clearly unsustainable as you say. Italy has her own host of peculiar problem, like an extremely privileged political class that sucks incredible amounts of money off the public coffers while being lazy, inefficient and corrupt. This applies not only to our parliament, but virtually every political institution, from council to regional level. We're still organised as a fiefdom, and a bloody expensive one.

The whole Euro project is something Germany benefitted immensely for the past 20 years. Curiously enough Italy used to be a little Germany before the Euro: we had excellent hi-tech manufacturing expertise, think avionics and space technology, robotics and specialised mechanics. Plus, Italy could always devalue Lira to be more competitive and our working class had lower wages anyway, so was more competitive than France and Germany on the global market. With the Euro, France and Italy lost that monetary leverage and were in fact encouraged to do the same things US did: compete globally by outsourcing to cheap labour countries and be contented to satisfy demand by acquiring more debt. Germany kept their policies and manufacturing system almost intact, at the price of a few smart compromises (like a 10/15% global paycut for the manufacturing industry, which was absorbed because they earned twice as much as an Italian worker anyway), and sucked market share off France and Italy.

Now it's the "what goes around comes around" phase, where Germany is being asked to shoulder the long-term costs of the benefits they themselves received, for 20 years. It remains to be seen whether they are prepared to do so. The Eurozone will collapse in less than two years, and it's gonna be a good thing, if you ask me.

[publicduende]

Men talking about feminism doesn't last for long! If you all really believe a collapse is around the corner, you'd better leave and find your foreign woman soon. Why not go to Russia - I have and I didn't even need a translator. By the way there were 3 revolutions in Russia, one in 1905 & 2 in 1917- so I know what I'm talking about here.

I don't see the correlation: the world is gonna end, I'll better look for a Russian bride

[gsjackson]

The average contribution to family income made by a working woman is very close to the average increase in taxation on families as it has increased since WWII. Since WWII, women went to work, and most of that money in terms of increased family income has ended up going to pay for government. And women "Forced to take deeply unsatisfying jobs" , oh the horrors! What an injustice!
Women going to work is needed to pay for government on all levels. Once government discovered the potential of "Rosie riveter" in WWII, it was a forgone conclusion as to what would happen. Combine those elements with the agenda of public education, and you end up with a public that is what you have now in the USA.

That added income women in the workforce have brought to households -- it hasn't been going to fund government the last 40 years. It's been shipped off to the FIRE sector in the form of interest on inflated mortgages, credit cards, etc., etc. Both the real economy of goods and services and governments at all levels are being starved by the financial sector. The consumer debt economy has reached the end of its tether.

As far as the US going bankrupt: It is a sovereign nation that can create its own currency, unlike countries in the Eurozone. It can fund any damn thing it wants to, including public works projects that would put millions to work and get the real economy going again. We can't do this, though, because of the mythology perpetrated by banksters that printing money outside of their debt system would be inflationary.

[DevilsAdvocate]

Men talking about feminism doesn't last for long! If you all really believe a collapse is around the corner, you'd better leave and find your foreign woman soon. Why not go to Russia - I have and I didn't even need a translator. By the way there were 3 revolutions in Russia, one in 1905 & 2 in 1917- so I know what I'm talking about here.

I don't see the correlation: the world is gonna end, I'll better look for a Russian bride

You don't have the brainpower to see any correlation, you cannot begin to imagine how mind boggling stupid you are. You are a feminist man, or what I would call a sissy boy Jew.

You Jews are the filth and disgust of this entire planet.....

Go take your promotion of feminism and shove it straight up your Jew ass.....

Signed,

Devils Advocate