Feminism:Biological, Psychological and Environmental causes?

[fightforlove]

Since we recently had a conversation regarding the biological/psych/environmental causes of homosexuality, I thought it would be good to have a candid discussion on causes of feminism.

There are some obvious environmental causes, most noteably college indoctrination, but are there psychological and biological reasons? The majority of women are not feminist, including ones who go to college. The majority of women reject feminism in favor of traditional female gender persona. Clearly, there has to be more going on here than just college indoctrination.

I notice that most feminists are kind of generic: most feminist women are highly-educated, many of them have high IQs. Most major in the humanities, go into academia, the arts or become lawyers. I do not see very many female doctors, nurses or even businesswomen who are feminist, let alone the common house wife. Most are heteros, but a disproportionately high number of them are lesbians and/or have asexual/ambiguous mannerisms and even asexual/ambiguous physical features. I also notice that nearly all feminists are caucasian women from anglo-phonic countries, particularly the USA. Where are all the african, asian, and hispanic feminists, or for that matter feminists from Continental Europe? Is there something about the anglo-caucasian race that causes feminism to be more prevalent in anglo females? Or, is this simply an anglo-phonic environmental conditioning?

[fschmidt]

I give a full explanation in Human Evolution. In essence, feminism is a natural evolutionary response to the environment of a decaying empire culture.

[abcdavid01]

Good question! College certainly is an important one, but how did it become part of the curriculum in the first place? Well it's standard for academia really. Intellectuals tend to overstate the importance of intelligence. This is the cause of Socialism, which tries to create a rational system out of chaotic economic forces. Of course they always end up mucking everything up because there's no way to really control these huge populations of independent actors and have a more favourable result. Feminism itself is a form of Socialism of course. Feminism is also rooted in the idea of moral relativism. If you don't believe morality was handed down from a creator, it is easy to see why there could be relativism. Indeed, even I think there is cosmic relativism. Nevertheless, there are interpersonal constants for morality, so it's actually quite far from relative. Pretty much everyone believes murder is wrong. So moral relativism gives credence to the idea that there's really no difference between male and female. I think the most insidious thing is their manipulation of language. Actually studying things like phonology and comparing the syntax of different languages shows that there are limits to what the human mind will accept as logical for the development of language systems. They think they are so smart, and usually they actually are, but their arrogance blinds them from seeing these fatal errors! This is why for all my own intelligence I generally find myself happier with people of less intelligence. They know truisms instinctively that most intellects have forgotten. So I feel like it is my duty to make an intelligent case for those truism based on logic rather than religion or tradition. Just as this deeply flawed intellectual class controls our universities, so too do they represent the media establishment. This allows for a bleed over of messages; most women are not radical feminists, but inevitably come to accept certain feminist ideas because they are bombarded with its messages in school, on tv, and online.