PUAs say that a man is 100% responsible for how a relationship goes and everything is always his fault. There is a lot of emphasis on giving the woman exactly what she wants, at any given time. Being "masculine" means being a mind-reader. Basically, the whole "red pill" thing boils down to "I found a more effective way to supplicate women". All bad female behavior is blamed on evolutionary psychology, because women have no agency and cannot be held accountable for their actions.
Racial nationalism (I'm white, so in my case WN, but it applies to everyone) is basically a solid idea for all races, and was how everyone thought up until about 1965 North America and Europe. Without hating everyone, the Chinese, Indians, Kenyans, etc. put their own national interests first. This is good and healthy, and Europeans should be no different. However, there is a strong p***y-whipped element and worship of "white Aryan goddesses" that is just laughable. All bad female behavior is blamed on the Joos, because women have no agency and cannot be held accountable for their actions. Basically, white nationalism is a Jewish supremacism conspiracy theory that turns a blind eye to female behavior. It's pretty much dying out because the baby-boomers are absolutely out of touch with what girls today are actually like.
MGTOW says you can't win, so don't even play. Even escaping the Anglosphere is not a solution, because if you bring her back to the U.S. she can screw up your life. They just think that women are inherently bad and nothing can be done. But if you bring a girl back to a country where she has all the legal and social advantages, is she a bad person or are you just a person who makes bad choices?
If your best friend had green eyes, would you go to an island with them where people with green eyes were allowed to imprison non-greens and take all their money, with no legal consequences? Would your friend be offended that you did not want to go visit such a place? Is this a matter of morality and character, or just a really badly structured deal? MGTOW is saying that if you put the knife in her hand, put it to your throat, and beg her to cut you, while society and the legal system cheer her on, she is an evil person for following through.
Giving up all legal and social power and relying on the mercy of your girl is not a good way to live life, but that is the reality in the west. Even if you never get divorced, she will always have you in a guillotine on a day to day basis. This is why relationships in the west are so bad. Women have all the power and no accountability. Dating advice will not change that fact. Acting "alpha" and lifting weights will not change that.
The REAL problem is that the west is a matriarchy. There are three things a man has no control over in America. This is REAL oppression on a medieval level.
- Circumcision: The penis is partially amputated at birth without anesthetic. Women are complaining about oppression while infant boys are mutilated daily. Can you even imagine the shrieks if anything like this was happening to white north American women? It would be a daily national crisis, but p***y-whipped American guys are too dumb to realize they are holding a winning card that trumps rape.
- Child support: Men have no reproductive rights, but have to pay, no matter what. This should be abolished.
- Alimony: Men almost always earn more (because they work harder and make better choices) but women can divorce them on a whim.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDJmeR3bnfM[/youtube]
These are the three pillars of oppression in the west, and until they are destroyed it makes sense to check out of society. PUAs think you can overcome systemic oppression with dating advice. They are wrong. You can't outsmart an oppressive legal system by lifting weights and acting tough. Racial nationalists turn a blind eye to the issue and are just incredibly naïve.
It sort of seems like the more obsessed with "manliness" a group of guys is, the more p***y-whipped they actually are. Who is really more "manly", a skinny Asian guy in Ukraine who keeps his position of power, or a roided-up jock in America who puts his life at the mercy of female whims? I'm starting to think the first guy is actually more masculine, and the second one is an unfortunate and psychologically f***ed up guy trapped by female expectations.


MGTOW is wrong because they say that the true nature of women is evil and untrustworthy, but they don't make the connection that this behavior is only allowed in the oppressive west. If I enter a business deal that says my partner can leave at any time and take all the assets, does that mean my business partner is a bad person when they act in their own best interests, or am I just stupid? In the west, even if you find a good woman, you are putting yourself at the mercy of another person not to screw you over. You are always in the inferior position because of the legal system. Does that mean women are bad, or does it just mean the system is giving them power they should not have?
If I live in Russia and my 19-year-old girlfriend gets pregnant and says she wants to leave, or starts acting badly, you know I would tell her? "Good luck!"

MGTOW says women are evil because if you surrender all power they will take advantage of you. But I say you can still live life and not put yourself in a position to be taken advantage of, by going abroad and STAYING THERE. Bringing a girl to the U.S. is like a Muslim woman bringing her foreign husband to Saudi Arabia. As soon as you touch U.S. soil you are the bitch because of the structural nature of the legal and social system. She might be merciful, but you are still at an enormous disadvantage. Better not to give them that power in the first place.