The Richard Dawkins Delusion (Satire)

[Winston]

"Does Richard Dawkins exist? Many people would say yes. Terry Tommyrot thinks otherwise. In a revealing interview on "The Big Questions", Dr. Tommyrot explains how belief in Richard Dawkins is, in fact, a harmful delusion, and how it can be explained scientifically."

(A parable within a parody)

[Winston]

Piers Morgan interview with Richard Dawkins.



My comments below the video:

@happierabroad
26 minutes ago (edited)
Dawkins is NOT logical at all Piers. He thinks everything is random yet anyone can clearly see that the human body is intelligently designed and that the sun and moon and stars are designed by an intelligent agent. Even a child can see that. So he is VERY ILLOGICAL. Stop kissing his butt Piers. Dawkins also represents a FALSE dichotomy. Just because Christianity and the Bible are flawed doesn't mean atheism must be true since atheism is highly problematic and flawed too. Both are flawed hence both are false and problematic. The truth is not with either side. Dawkins is so narrow, and so are Christians. Plus anyone can look at the sun and moon and stars and see that there are NOT there by random but by some intelligent design. Anyone can look at a human anatomy textbook too and see that the human body is not formed at random. Even a child can see that. So how can a "rational" adult like Dawkins defend the impossible? Just because religion is flawed doesn't mean everything is random and there is no soul or spirit world. That's a dumb leap that makes no sense. But it seems the establishment wants you to either be an atheist or Christian fundamentalist. Both are wrong and run by mind control.

@happierabroad
1 minute ago (edited)
Piers you're being too nice to Dawkins. He is NOT logical at all. He believes in unproven lies like evolution and the big bang that has NEVER been proven with the scientific method and has ZERO proof and basis. You should have nailed him on that. He is espousing unproven theories and peddling them as fact. He also believes that everything is random and that there is no soul or afterlife or spiritual dimension, simply because religion has its problems. That is a FALSE dichotomy. Just because Christianity and the Bible are flawed doesn't mean atheism must be true since atheism is highly problematic and flawed too. Both are flawed hence both are false and problematic. The truth is not with either side. Dawkins is so narrow, and so are Christians. Plus anyone can look at the sun and moon and stars and see that there are NOT there by random but by some intelligent design. Anyone can look at a human anatomy textbook too and see that the human body is not formed at random. Even a child can see that. So how can a "rational" adult like Dawkins defend the impossible?