Repug's Iowa winner rigged

[Cornfed]

Oh come on. Here is who won the Iowa candidacy, according to the lamestream media. A spic immigrant POS who is clearly ineligible to stand in the first place who everybody (including his own family) hates. This joke of a person is winning over Trump? How stupid do they think the average person really is? Pretty stupid, it would seem.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-el ... imaries/IA

[gnosis]

The alternative explanation is that the caucus wasn't rigged and people really are that clueless.

But I understand the sentiment. Cruz makes my blood boil.

[Cornfed]

I think it is more a case of outright electoral fraud with the goal of electing the Sea Hag. It is incredible that the establishment think they can get away with this in the Internet era. They got away with it in '04, but that was one non-entity running against another. Maybe this is what we need to trigger the overthrow of evil Western regimes.

[Moretorque]

It is fraud, anybody who properly explains the purpose of the 2nd amendment will never make it to the oval office.

Bernie Sanders was cheated as well, Hillary can't even remotely fill her campaign events so how can she have possibly won ?

[gnosis]

If Trump doesn't win the New Hampshire caucus, then I will be convinced fraud is involved.

It does look suspicious. How could Cruz have beaten Trump? And how could the Sea Hag have beaten Bernie Sanders?

[gsjackson]

In the U.S. we have his thing called evangelical Christianity, which includes among its number many Iowa Republicans. They vote, and when motivated they get out there and work for their candidate, as about 12,000 of them did for Cruz in Iowa.

The religious right has been mobilized again -- as they were after Roe v Wade -- by the U.S. Supreme Court usurping from the states the issue of gay marriage. The issue is right in Cruz's wheelhouse. He's a constitutional lawyer who has argued many cases before the Supreme Court. He hits on the issue hard, and can discuss it with complete sophistication from a constitutional standpoint. That's why he won in Iowa.

[Cornfed]

It turns out that Microsoft provided the system that tallied the votes for free and happen to be the second highest donor to Rubio after Goldman Sachs. Rubio got more than twice as many votes as forecasts predicted. So perhaps the fix is in whereby the primaries will be rigged in favor of Rubio, who will become the establishment candidate no-one really likes who can then lose to the Sea Hag. It would be incredible if the forces of evil got away with it this time, but then again, who is going to stop them?

[Cornfed]

The New Hampshire result is as you would expect, with Trump easily winning for the Repugs and Sanders beating the Sea Hag. It will be interesting to see how the establishment come up with a plausible way of getting the Sea Hag appointed.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/2016-ele ... hampshire/

[gsjackson]

The New Hampshire result is as you would expect, with Trump easily winning for the Repugs and Sanders beating the Sea Hag. It will be interesting to see how the establishment come up with a plausible way of getting the Sea Hag appointed.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/2016-ele ... hampshire/

Oh, they already have. She currently leads in delegates something like 394 to 46, thanks to something called super-delegates, pillars of the establishment all. It's completely rigged, and if Sanders starts catching her, they'll probably just start jimmying the voting machines.

What Democrats do have to consider, though, is what a wretched candidate she has proven herself to be time and again. The media can spin the narrative of her inevitability all they want, but she still has to open her mouth at certain points, and whenever she does she loses votes by the hundreds of thousands.

[gsjackson]

Another establishment tactic to get the nomination for their favorite sea hag:

http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/dnc-makes-sw ... m4Bu6Lo.99

[Cornfed]

It looks like Trump has won in South Carolina, so things may be back on track.

[Cornfed]

The only plausible way I can think of for the Repugs to rig the election against Trump now is for a couple of the other leading candidates to drop out and tell their supporters to vote for the lead remaining establishment candidate. Then when they rig the voting machines it might seem like the voters had all done as they were told and so the count was believable.

[gnosis]

It looks like Trump has won in South Carolina, so things may be back on track.

Thank God.

[Moretorque]

The only plausible way I can think of for the Repugs to rig the election against Trump now is for a couple of the other leading candidates to drop out and tell their supporters to vote for the lead remaining establishment candidate. Then when they rig the voting machines it might seem like the voters had all done as they were told and so the count was believable.

fIRST OFF I THINK FROM THE BEGGINING GOING BACK WELL OVER a decade they had plans for Obama not to leave office and be a permanent dictator. They may be far behind schedule and may need to do another presidential election.

It's no problem, they will rig the election and have Hillary beat Trump and say it was the towering intellect of the Blackman that saved the day and he could see right through his treasonous falsehoods and proclaim the Va-gina vote trumped Trump as well.

If they can pull it off I believe they want to not have the election with some sort of calamity ? coming up soon.

[Cornfed]

Are any business scandals on the horizon for Trump? So far is is just petty whining about overpriced real estate courses and things. Anyone know if there is worse to come?