Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
You have to wonder is this can possibly be serious. Presumably to expand their population of future potential voters, Ohio Republicucks have banned the abortion of retard babies. Of course the abortion of healthy babies deemed inconvenient to the female’s career as a bar-hopping slut is still fine.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... diagnosis/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... diagnosis/

Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
Why is a retarded fetus considered sacred but a healthy fetus isn't? The women who want to abort their retarded baby will just do it in another state.
I never liked Ohio. This doesn't really surprise me.
I never liked Ohio. This doesn't really surprise me.
Re: Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
It sounds like a step in the right direction. Maybe they hope a judge won't want to knock down a law designed to protect babies with Down Syndrome. Who wants to do that?
And maybe they hope that the law will nudge the country toward doing away with murdering babies altogether.
And maybe they hope that the law will nudge the country toward doing away with murdering babies altogether.
Re: Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
You have to wonder whether the Repugs want to sabotage their own party. It seems it is fine by them if a female goes in to kill her healthy baby who might grow to be a Nobel Prize winning scientist in order to emotionally torture her boyfriend. I mean, what is tax funded health care for if not things like that? But if a female wants to abort a tard in order to save society a fortune and have a normal child in its place, that is apparently just evil. And this preference for retards over healthy children is what they imagine is going to appeal to voters. Just unreal.
Re: Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
Cornfed wrote: ↑December 17th, 2017, 3:55 pmYou have to wonder whether the Repugs want to sabotage their own party. It seems it is fine by them if a female goes in to kill her healthy baby who might grow to be a Nobel Prize winning scientist in order to emotionally torture her boyfriend. I mean, what is tax funded health care for if not things like that? But if a female wants to abort a tard in order to save society a fortune and have a normal child in its place, that is apparently just evil. And this preference for retards over healthy children is what they imagine is going to appeal to voters. Just unreal.
I suspect a lot of lawmakers who are in favor of this want to protect the healthy babies, too, and are hoping to use an emotionally charged issue to nudge in that direction. Maybe they hope the discrimination aspect of discriminating against babies with Down's Syndrome will deter liberal judges from striking it down. I can understand why someone would approve any anti-murder legislation that came across in cases where murder is legal. Supporting this bill is not support for killing healthy babies. It's a vote against killing babies with Down's Syndrome.
Re: Bizarre Ohio abortion ban
MrMan wrote: ↑December 17th, 2017, 5:14 pmCornfed wrote: ↑December 17th, 2017, 3:55 pmYou have to wonder whether the Repugs want to sabotage their own party. It seems it is fine by them if a female goes in to kill her healthy baby who might grow to be a Nobel Prize winning scientist in order to emotionally torture her boyfriend. I mean, what is tax funded health care for if not things like that? But if a female wants to abort a tard in order to save society a fortune and have a normal child in its place, that is apparently just evil. And this preference for retards over healthy children is what they imagine is going to appeal to voters. Just unreal.
I suspect a lot of lawmakers who are in favor of this want to protect the healthy babies, too, and are hoping to use an emotionally charged issue to nudge in that direction. Maybe they hope the discrimination aspect of discriminating against babies with Down's Syndrome will deter liberal judges from striking it down. I can understand why someone would approve any anti-murder legislation that came across in cases where murder is legal. I haven't read the bill, but I assume supporting this bill is not support for killing healthy babies. It's a vote against killing babies with Down's Syndrome.
It's also a way to get the extreme feminists and other liberal protesters on film in support of killing unborn babies with Down's Syndrome. It is a drop in the bucket, but it might help encourage public sentiment against their extreme views.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 2286 Views
-
Last post by Cornfed
-
- 21 Replies
- 9256 Views
-
Last post by Cornfed
-
- 2 Replies
- 1325 Views
-
Last post by komei888
-
- 8 Replies
- 4259 Views
-
Last post by All_That_Is_Man
-
- 30 Replies
- 12983 Views
-
Last post by Craigmiller