Moral values and small govt vs big govt and crime

[Winston]

Heres something interesting for you all to know: did you know that the founding fathers of america, as well as many great philosophers, said that in a society with strong moral and religious principles and values, government control is not necessary, because people will usually do whats right, moral and good. In that case, the government can afford to remain a small size, there only to preserve basic freedoms and liberties. Thats what Thomas Jefferson and John Adams advocated as the ideal scenario.

In such a society, protecting the rights of the people to bear arms could be a good thing. But if a society is immoral, degenerate, and violent, then obviously giving guns to citizens would be a bad thing.

In any case, the sad truth is that the modern US government and elite most likely prefer a society that is immoral, dangerous and degenerate, because that gives them the excuse they need to instate ever increasing government control and security and grow the size of government as well. Obviously its not in the interest of governments or politicians to reduce government control or size, because no money or bribes will come from that, generally speaking.

So to some degree, they have to keep a certain portion of society immoral, dangerous and degenerate (e.g. inner city) in order to justify government control and law enforcement. Its very political, which they regard as a necessary evil.

If they really wanted to, they could get rid of all crime and drugs on the streets, the same way they got rid of Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan in WW2 so efficiently and effectively. But they obviously dont want to do that because its not in their best interest and agenda to do so. This explains why they always have to keep the "war on drugs" going perpetually even though they could easily end it if they wanted to.

Obviously if they got rid of all crime on the streets tomorrow, then people would say, "Great! Now we can govern ourselves and have a small government again". They cant have that of course. They cant have people feeling that government is unnecessary. So big government needs crime and terrorism to exist so they can justify their own existence. Thats the ugly truth. Its kind of like how batman cant let his arch nemesis, the joker, die because his existence gives purpose to batmans existence and identity. Thats why at the end of the movie "Dark Knight" (2008) batman saves the joker from falling to his death at the end of the film.

Of course, the government will never openly admit all this directly, but its easily deducible from basic logic. Even great movies like Robocop (original 1987 one) depict this reality by showing how at the highest levels of law enforcement and mafia, the leaders of both camps work and conspire together to promote each others interests because they need each other.

This is also the reason why there is so much excessive and unnecessary violence in modern American movies and television. Its not there by accident, or because people want it and are begging for it. No way. Its there to keep peoples minds depraved and degenerate, and also to help incite some violence in real life too. They know that violence on TV will undoubtedly trigger a certain percentage of people to be violent. Even if its just a small percentage, its just enough they need to justify more government control and security, especially since people will want it. Thats definitely going on in america today, and even mainstream people can sense it instinctively. Once they have even a little violence in society, they can then use the media to inflate it and exaggerate it all they want, to keep people in fear and paranoia and feeling weak, so that all they will do is consume evermore.

Of course, the Jews and Zionists are a factor here too. Every truth seeker knows that the Jews and Zionists run the US media and own it. Back in the 1920s, the Jews ran the media and entertainment industry in Germany too during the Weimar republic. During that time, entertainment and theatre in Germany was full of debauchery and depravity. Adolf Hitler was disgusted by that and it was one reason he wanted to kick the Jews out of Germany. So this is nothing new.

In the 16th century, an Italian diplomat, political scientist and writer named Niccolo Machiavelli wrote an instructional book called "The Prince" about how elite rulers can stay in power by creating and managing their own enemies through whats known as "controlled opposition". Having perceived public enemies will get the rulers own people to require their protection, while at the same time keeping them in power. Its a brilliant and effective way for elites to control people and stay in power, which they've been using ever since then. And no doubt, the US and Zionist elites use those methods today, whilst creating both domestic and foreign enemies abroad in the form of threats and terrorism. Its all very sickening but necessary to them.

But of course, youre not supposed to care about any of this. Youre supposed to focus on trashy degenerate meaningless stuff like Miley Cyrus, Kim Kardashian, or the basketball game on TV. Youre not supposed to be seeking truth. You dont need to know the truth. Only they do. You dont. Youre just part of the cattle and ignorant masses. Youre supposed to be unaware, weak, fearful and easily controllable and believe whatever the media tells you. Otherwise you are a weird oddball and misfit. Its sickening and upside down.

[Moretorque]

Mr. Wu, have you ever read the statistics on the Blackman ?, as Henry Kissinger stated " you will be grateful when the UN steps in to restore order "