Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Discuss issues related to politics, government and law.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by Cornfed »

This is the lamestream media's initial version. I wonder what the actual version will be. The bitch is going to be torn to shreds. She doesn't know who she is up against.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... annotated/
pandabear
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2077
Joined: December 30th, 2012, 7:54 pm
Location: USA

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by pandabear »

Hillary wrote:Really, ever since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, America has distinguished itself as a haven for people fleeing religious persecution, believing in religious freedom and religious liberty.
No. The "Pilgrims" moved here because they just didn't think that the English Puritans were Puritanical enough. Nothing at all to do with religious freedom and liberty. They brought with them their own version of Shariah Law.
pandabear
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2077
Joined: December 30th, 2012, 7:54 pm
Location: USA

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by pandabear »

Cornfed wrote:The bitch is going to be torn to shreds. She doesn't know who she is up against.
Who is going to tear her to shreds? Some internet trolls? And how? By calling her names? :roll:
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by OutWest »

pandabear wrote:
Hillary wrote:Really, ever since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, America has distinguished itself as a haven for people fleeing religious persecution, believing in religious freedom and religious liberty.
No. The "Pilgrims" moved here because they just didn't think that the English Puritans were Puritanical enough. Nothing at all to do with religious freedom and liberty. They brought with them their own version of Shariah Law.

It would help to educate yourself. The Pilgrims were NOT Puritans. They were separatists. They did not behead people for disagreement. There was far more freedom, FAR MORE, than you find today. Upon landing safely at Plymouth, the Pilgrims gave thanks to God and then broke open a keg of beer. Even the Puritans were not as repressive as is supposed today by those desperate to paint them with the same brush.
Never the less, once Puritans established dominant power in Massachusetts, they began to restrict the liberties of others, in ways that would be seen as minor in the world today.

Roger Williams was banished from Massachusetts for preaching against the Puritans. He was not beheaded or some such Islamic BS. He went on to found Rhode island next door, a place of great liberty at the time. And no, the Puritans did not launch a jihad against Rhode island, they just let them be.
pandabear
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2077
Joined: December 30th, 2012, 7:54 pm
Location: USA

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by pandabear »

OutWest wrote:They did not behead people for disagreement.
Of course not. They hanged people, or burned them at the stake.
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by OutWest »

pandabear wrote:
OutWest wrote:They did not behead people for disagreement.
Of course not. They hanged people, or burned them at the stake.

You are poorly educated. Please provide the name of one person burned at the stake for religious disagreement in America. The salem witch trials were not the order of the day.
The witch trials were a case of mass hysteria that occurred from 1692 till the spring if 1993. In all, about 20 women were hanged. Within the next few years, apologies and restitution was made and by 1710 it was widely condemned within the Puritans world as a grave injustice. None were burned at the stake .

By contrast, tens of thousands were tortured to death in the Spanish Inquisition.

Was anyone ever burned at the stake in America! Yes, this was used against black men in cases where they were accused of rape. This often took place in conjunction with lynching. Such things took place till the 1950s in the south. It had nothing to do with Pilgrims or Puritans.

When it came to injustice, the Puritans were amateurs, and repentant ones at that. In the USA, from the 1880s to 1968, about 4500 people were lynched, the majority being black.
These events did not involve trials or Puritans.
Interestingly, Wilberforce, who worked to end slavery, one of England's very profitable trades, was an Anglican puritan.

Unlike the Puritans, who quickly brought the shameful witch trial hysteria to an and and repented from it, including apologies and restitution, the victims of race based lynchings
or their survivors, received nothing.

Prior to the salem witch trials, the puritans
Persecuted Quakers, and several Quakers were hanged in the 1600s.

So, there were a number of injustices during the Puritans period in Massachusetts, but comparing Puritans to ISIS or other similar extreme groups is a fool's errand
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote: By contrast, tens of thousands were tortured to death in the Spanish Inquisition.

Was anyone ever burned at the stake in America! Yes, this was used against black men in cases where they were accused of rape. This often took place in conjunction with lynching. Such things took place till the 1950s in the south.
This is getting a bit off topic, but weren't the things you think were bad obviously largely good? The Inquisition initially rooted out the evil scheming Jews pretending to be Christians and may have only killed 10k people in its multi-century history. Compared to what the likes of Obongo and the Sea Hag have done just over the last few years, 10k deaths is hardly worth mentioning. The lynching of blacks in the South would have to be one of the most efficient crime prevention programs in history, saving scores of thousands of innocent victims. Think of all the crime and expense happening right now for want of lynching a few niggers.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by Cornfed »

pandabear wrote:
Cornfed wrote:The bitch is going to be torn to shreds. She doesn't know who she is up against.
Who is going to tear her to shreds? Some internet trolls? And how? By calling her names? :roll:
Yes, it terms of rhetoric, debate and meme wars, she will be torn to shreds. Literally physically tearing her to shreds ( like, say, her victims in Benghazi) would be doing her a favor at this point.
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6193
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 2:37 pm

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by Adama »

Cornfed wrote:
OutWest wrote: By contrast, tens of thousands were tortured to death in the Spanish Inquisition.

Was anyone ever burned at the stake in America! Yes, this was used against black men in cases where they were accused of rape. This often took place in conjunction with lynching. Such things took place till the 1950s in the south.
This is getting a bit off topic, but weren't the things you think were bad obviously largely good? The Inquisition initially rooted out the evil scheming Jews pretending to be Christians and may have only killed 10k people in its multi-century history.
The Inquistion has merely damned most of the Spanish world to hell. It wasn't just the Jews that were banned. True, non Catholic, Christianity (from the Bible, not from the church institution or a man who calls himself spiritual Father) was also banned. That has damned almost all of the Spanish speaking world to hell, since Catholicism is not Christianity but its own unique religion under the guise of Christianity.

Also, as you have noted, the Inquisition "forced" many Jews to become crypto Jews. That's a worse version than the original. They just went into hiding and began to work more stealthfully and secretly. It didn't really root them out.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
w.p.o.
Freshman Poster
Posts: 447
Joined: March 16th, 2016, 2:45 pm

Re: Sea Hag's Alt-Right speech

Post by w.p.o. »

99.9% of her audience (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) have never heard of alternative news. Hitlery is p.o.ed because she can't control the alternative media and conservative radio like the democrats do with the alphabet news (abc. nbc, msnbc, cnn). Similar to organized crime, there are 2 things communists hate the most: Competition and whistle-blowers. Alex Jones, who gets his info from the horses mouth (former/current FBI agents, former/current secret service agents, border patrol, law enforcement, congressmen, etc) is the ultimate whistle-blower. Drudge report being the ultimate alternative news site. Hitlery (a Treasonous card carrying commie AND a racketeer) is at complete odds with the US constitution. She wants to do away with the entire document. Everything ran smoothly for bonnie and clyde in the 70s, 80s, and early 90s. The lamestream media was in the tank for the dems - and still are. Now that we have the internet, the birdies are coming home to roost. No wonder Al gore and other brain dead liberal politicians hate the internet.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics, Government, Law”