60 year old Englishwoman gets ton of dates with young men

[MatureDJ]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

[OutWest]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

No, they don't have to. The little Brit man-boys are just pathetic.

[Cornfed]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

No, they don't have to. The little Brit man-boys are just pathetic.

Assuming they can't afford to go overseas or hire decent hoes, aren't scum and aren't in a particular occupation that females are attracted to, what superior options would they be likely to have?

[Hero]

what superior options would they be likely to have?

Jacking off.

[Cornfed]

what superior options would they be likely to have?

Jacking off.

Well yes, but maybe they are trying to start at the bottom and work their way up. Jacking off is a dead end hobby.

[OutWest]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

No, they don't have to. The little Brit man-boys are just pathetic.

Assuming they can't afford to go overseas or hire decent hoes, aren't scum and aren't in a particular occupation that females are attracted to, what superior options would they be likely to have?

Sometimes people spend too much time whimpering. I don't know if you spent time in the UK, but even there, girls are to be found, and a few of them quite decent. That is even true in the USA, hard as it is to believe. Rare indeed, but most good things are rare anywhere you go. I am past 50 and happily married here, but were I single, I am confident I could find a girl in any major metro area, or as in the case of the UK, the smaller towns are especially productive. Yes, they are hard to find, but you only need one. There is a level of narcissism with many of the posters here that would limit their ability to even notice a young woman with a quality heart. No, it is not the case that any man can do it- it takes a certain type, but it is achievable for many.

When I was back in Oregon, I made the acquaintance of a couple of rather extraordinary young women, and I could not think of a single man I could introduce them to. Yes, there are plenty of men with a poor likelihood of success...dudes with an butt-crack up to their shoulders...still dreaming of cheerleaders...just like there are plenty of damned homely women who will never go on a date in their life as much as they might like to think that in a fair world, George Clooney would show up.

Even in poor hunting grounds, success in finding a GF/wife is possible, but not many men want to pay the admission. I am certainly willing to exchange PMs with someone sincere who is looking to improve their chances, but in reality I think most are just looking for an easy lay.

[Cornfed]

^ Bit like some old cunt from the sixties saying "Yep, I could go into any factory and get a job - just look the manager straight in the eye, give him a firm handshake, and it was all good. If you can't then that's on you." You are stuck on stupid. Shame on you.

[Banano]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

No, they don't have to. The little Brit man-boys are just pathetic.

Assuming they can't afford to go overseas or hire decent hoes, aren't scum and aren't in a particular occupation that females are attracted to, what superior options would they be likely to have?

Sometimes people spend too much time whimpering. I don't know if you spent time in the UK, but even there, girls are to be found, and a few of them quite decent. That is even true in the USA, hard as it is to believe. Rare indeed, but most good things are rare anywhere you go. I am past 50 and happily married here, but were I single, I am confident I could find a girl in any major metro area, or as in the case of the UK, the smaller towns are especially productive. Yes, they are hard to find, but you only need one. There is a level of narcissism with many of the posters here that would limit their ability to even notice a young woman with a quality heart. No, it is not the case that any man can do it- it takes a certain type, but it is achievable for many.

When I was back in Oregon, I made the acquaintance of a couple of rather extraordinary young women, and I could not think of a single man I could introduce them to. Yes, there are plenty of men with a poor likelihood of success...dudes with an butt-crack up to their shoulders...still dreaming of cheerleaders...just like there are plenty of damned homely women who will never go on a date in their life as much as they might like to think that in a fair world, George Clooney would show up.

Even in poor hunting grounds, success in finding a GF/wife is possible, but not many men want to pay the admission. I am certainly willing to exchange PMs with someone sincere who is looking to improve their chances, but in reality I think most are just looking for an easy lay.

Whats wrong with easy lay? Men shouldnt settle before 40 and in meantime should date as many girls as possible,
Forget about 1 woman, you need many...options are better than no options..80% of females are sluts so odds of finding a normal one are so slim and theres always 80% chance you will end up with skank...and you will think 'she is not like that. shes diff'..I see many decent men settling for low value woman due to lack of options, the best thing for men would be to abolish marriage altogether. The only people who benefit from marriage are women, lawyers and government at the expense of beta male or low value male, alphas will always be alphas but betas are finished

[Teal Lantern]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html

I'm 60. . . and irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached': Read MONICA PORTER'S unashamed account of how she took 15 lovers - most of them under 30 - and two in one day

So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

"Irresistible to men of 20 who want sex with no strings attached".
Uh-huh. And rest stop toilets are "irresistible" to people who need a free, convenient, no strings attached place to drop a duece. .

[OutWest]

^ Bit like some old c**t from the sixties saying "Yep, I could go into any factory and get a job - just look the manager straight in the eye, give him a firm handshake, and it was all good. If you can't then that's on you." You are stuck on stupid. Shame on you.

Enjoy your misery...it becomes you.

[OutWest]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... rings.html
So now young, evidently decently looking men have to date grannies? WTF?

No, they don't have to. The little Brit man-boys are just pathetic.

Assuming they can't afford to go overseas or hire decent hoes, aren't scum and aren't in a particular occupation that females are attracted to, what superior options would they be likely to have?

Sometimes people spend too much time whimpering. I don't know if you spent time in the UK, but even there, girls are to be found, and a few of them quite decent. That is even true in the USA, hard as it is to believe. Rare indeed, but most good things are rare anywhere you go. I am past 50 and happily married here, but were I single, I am confident I could find a girl in any major metro area, or as in the case of the UK, the smaller towns are especially productive. Yes, they are hard to find, but you only need one. There is a level of narcissism with many of the posters here that would limit their ability to even notice a young woman with a quality heart. No, it is not the case that any man can do it- it takes a certain type, but it is achievable for many.

When I was back in Oregon, I made the acquaintance of a couple of rather extraordinary young women, and I could not think of a single man I could introduce them to. Yes, there are plenty of men with a poor likelihood of success...dudes with an butt-crack up to their shoulders...still dreaming of cheerleaders...just like there are plenty of damned homely women who will never go on a date in their life as much as they might like to think that in a fair world, George Clooney would show up.

Even in poor hunting grounds, success in finding a GF/wife is possible, but not many men want to pay the admission. I am certainly willing to exchange PMs with someone sincere who is looking to improve their chances, but in reality I think most are just looking for an easy lay.

Whats wrong with easy lay? Men shouldn't settle before 40 and in meantime should date as many girls as possible,
Forget about 1 woman, you need many...options are better than no options..80% of females are sluts so odds of finding a normal one are so slim and theres always 80% chance you will end up with skank...and you will think 'she is not like that. shes diff'..I see many decent men settling for low value woman due to lack of options, the best thing for men would be to abolish marriage altogether. The only people who benefit from marriage are women, lawyers and government at the expense of beta male or low value male, alphas will always be alphas but betas are finished

If the easy lay is granny...maybe it's time to re-think the plan...many girls deserve whatever they get, but its kinda funny to celebrate going for the easy lay, and then complain that 80% of girls are sluts.
I thought sluts = easy lay. I would think most on this forum would think sluts were the bomb.
Apparently few men on this forum are tuned into the slut mine...sluts would seem to be by definition, an easy lay, so you would think most would be in hog-heaven. Marriage is risky business in the USA and the the West, so why not avail yourself of the 80% of girls out there who are going for anything in pants? Terminally refused ogre type dudes seem convinced that those girls that reject their man-pretty selves are all sluts. Well if 80% are sluts, there are not enough handsome bucks to go around and the betas would seem to be getting it quite a bit.

[Cornfed]

I thought sluts = easy lay.

Slut = easy lay for some men (scumbags, mostly).