Feminists seem to want straight marriage criminalized!

[traveller]

I have read quite a lot of stuff about feminists, and it is really scary what a lot of feminists like to do to guys who go abroad for love, marry a woman who is a decade younger than him, and all else.

Sometimes, one thing I have been thinking is that maybe one of the goals of feminism is criminalization of all straight marriage nationwide, even making straight marriage, dating, or even guys being within less than even 75 feet of a woman, a capital felony under Federal law, even punishable by sentences as harsh as 150 years minimum to life in Federal supermax prison without parole and with even a third of the sentence spent in solitary confinement, or even the death penatly.

Don't get me wrong, there is a positive side of feminism; women being able to work, especially if her husband has a disability, or if she is widowed, plus women being able to vote. Shamefully, there is also a negative side of feminism; no-fault divorce, guys having to wait for the woman to approach him first, especially at nightclubs, guys having to fear getting kicked out of the club for asking a woman if she'd like to dance, even in a polite and friendly manner, plus police listening only to the woman's side when something criminal occurs and the guy always ends up going to jail, even if the woman started it.

[Cornfed]

Sometimes, one thing I have been thinking is that maybe one of the goals of feminism is criminalization of all straight marriage nationwide.

It is already illegal. If something regularly results in the regime bankrupting or imprisoning you then obviously it is illegal. Sure some people are currently getting away with it, but that is the same for other crimes. The intent is to have all breeding aged females as a giant harem of the elite.

Don't get me wrong, there is a positive side of feminism; women being able to work, especially if her husband has a disability, or if she is widowed, plus women being able to vote.

Females have always been able to work in Western society. Letting them vote and participate in government is predictably disastrous. They aspire to be total parasites and so always vote for a strong central regime that steals from everyone else to give to them and foists the consequences of their lousy behavior onto others.

[Quiet_observer]

Yep. they're also the ones pushing for a Genderless society. Strange days, indeed.

[cdnFA]

Women's reaction to going overseas is based on two things from what I can see.
1: The disgust of some guy going over with the idea of getting some docile doormat to dominate. You know how we all come across as an Adama type.
2: The disgust many women have over guys who are losers. The same hostility you see towards any guy who dares show the "entitlement" of wanting some human companionship like how dare we.

To extend from that to the idea that they want straight marriage criminalized is reading way too much into things.

I am sure there are extreme fringe elements in feminist that are for that. One girl even suggested that most guys should be killed off except for what is needed for breeding stock but exceptions are exceptions. Rudolf Hess loved the cock but it doesn't mean all Nazis are gay, although they did have a keen sense for uniform fashion and loved thrusting deep into the enemy rear over and over so... maybe.

The whole police taking the woman's side thing isn't feminism. It's bullshit mangina gentleman moves. After all the gentleman sees a woman as a child and folks will generally take the side of children. You know like how guys say they will punch any other guy who steps up to a girl. Usually it is the more knuckle dragging old school types that go on like that.

As for speaking to women at nightclubs, does a bad reaction happen, sure but come on. People do it all the time.
Hell I was at the gym a few days ago and noticed a large breasted woman on the skipping rope. I asked her if it hurt, having moobies I notice it is uncomfortable to jog and my moobs are nowhere near as large and are backed by beef. She didn't take offensive at all, not in the slightest, and I am twice her age and repulsive to women.

[Ghost]

.

[Jonny Law]

Some of the girls here in Thailand treat me like a f***ing King. And I love it.

-Advice-
Go for the poor farm girls who cannot speak English They literally cannot say no.

[jamesbond]

It already is criminal. What is called marriage in the West is not marriage - it is a counterfeit. Real marriage is illegal in the West.

How true that is!

[Quiet_observer]

It already is criminal. What is called marriage in the West is not marriage - it is a counterfeit. Real marriage is illegal in the West.

+1 Spot on!

[traveller]

It already is criminal. What is called marriage in the West is not marriage - it is a counterfeit. Real marriage is illegal in the West.

So then, I take it that this means that people are already being arrested and thrown in prison for getting married for real in the West?

Because what I was saying is that it seems as though especially certain feminists seem to want to see especially men going to prison for the sole reason of being married or interacting with women. Taken off the streets, locked away like a serial killer. Sometimes I even think there are feminists that even want women thrown in prison for marrying guys, too, and having the married man and woman locked away in separate prisons; even two different prisons located in in two different states. It's even as though feminists want to see straight marriage punishable by even 100 years to life in Federal prison for all/both involved.

[Shemp]

The whole police taking the woman's side thing isn't feminism. It's bullshit mangina gentleman moves. After all the gentleman sees a woman as a child and folks will generally take the side of children. You know like how guys say they will punch any other guy who steps up to a girl. Usually it is the more knuckle dragging old school types that go on like that.

"White knighting" is the term you want. Save the damsel in distress, and hope she rewards you for it, while simultaneously eliminating competition. I'm MGTOW so I don't condemn white knighting. I condemn nothing. All I care about is saving myself, not saving society. I watch out for white knights because they might hurt me. And I avoid being a white knight myself, because the reward the white knight receives is often as not a booby prize.

[cdnFA]

"White knighting" is the term you want. Save the damsel in distress, and hope she rewards you for it, while simultaneously eliminating competition. I'm MGTOW so I don't condemn white knighting. I condemn nothing. All I care about is saving myself, not saving society. I watch out for white knights because they might hurt me. And I avoid being a white knight myself, because the reward the white knight receives is often as not a booby prize.

Thanks for the reminder, that is the best term. I am how do you say, ah yes old.

I don't like white knighting, I just see it as lame.

The worst white knighting is on escort review boards when people white knight for whores.
Don't get me wrong, I like and respect whores [strippers not so much] and don't agree with treating them badly because they are soylent green not because they have warm wet places.
However when you see some guy rushing to the defence of a whore who is obviously in the wrong and fighting tooth and nail, I shake my head.
Not only is there no chance of her f***ing you unless you pay for it but she will f**k pretty much anyone who pays for it. To debase yourself for a chick who wouldn't even see you as being worthy to spit on unless you paid her is just beyond sad.

As least your typical white knight if he is attractive enough could potentially either score or get some from a bystander. On a forum? Will prostitutes? Sigh.

[books]

Women are the ones benefiting in 95% of the straight marriages, so the marriage institution will not die
so soon.

The good news is that 3 times less men are getting married nowadays, compared to 25 years ago.

More and more men are getting wiser and refusing to put themselves in
the situation of where 90% of married men are:

they get very lousy sex, once per month at best, while they stand to lose anytime
half of their wealth and 18 years of monthly payments to the children and exwife,
in case of divorce

[cdnFA]

Women are the ones benefiting in 95% of the straight marriages, so the marriage institution will not die
so soon.

The good news is that 4 times less men are getting married nowadays, compared to 25 years ago.

Without a real source, I'll just go ahead and put that 4 times stats in the BS pile.

Less dudes are getting married but they are shacking up and ending up common law married at least among the lower classes. Not much material difference.

[books]

http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablo ... es-uk-data

[Ghost]

.