Apologizing for the civil rights movement

[Cornfed]

White people supporting the black civil rights movement of the 60s seemed to believe the apparent lousiness and stupidity of the black population was an artifact of white oppression and that if blacks were granted white-type civil rights America would become one big, happy family with everyone dancing around maypoles together and such. Reactionaries expressed the opinion that blacks were genetically different and inferior and that the white model of dealing with them would be a disaster.

Experience has of course shown the reactionaries to be exactly right. The question is why there has not been more contrition from white libtards who drank the ZOG cool aid and helped bring about this scourge. I don't know of any high profile libtards that have made a public statement pointing out that they were wrong. That would be the least they could do, but really they should also will their assets to charities benefiting the victims of their policies and then hang themselves. I guess libtards have no honor.

[leavingusa]

This line of thinking is an epidemic among libtards.

If we only gave them more free shit they'll be nice, stop hurting everyone and get a job.

[Brazor]

Experience has of course shown the reactionaries to be exactly right. The question is why there has not been more contrition from white libtards who drank the ZOG cool aid and helped bring about this scourge. I don't know of any high profile libtards that have made a public statement pointing out that they were wrong. That would be the least they could do, but really they should also will their assets to charities benefiting the victims of their policies and then hang themselves. I guess libtards have no honor.

White liberals would never apologize. It would be out of character for them to do so. But they know as much as any reactionary that they were horribly wrong. That's why they resort to vicious name-calling and smears whenever someone reasonably argues that the civil rights movement was a waste.

[abcdavid01]

Yes, reactionism...it's beautiful. Conservatives are accused of wanting to live in the 1950's. Reactionaries want to live in the 1750's or the 15th century. Screw the Enlightenment man.

No, for the "libtards" they're still convinced they're out for the little guy. Even since they've been in power they still have to keep up the charade that they haven't won. What happens to the revolutionaries when the revolution's over? They just keep fighting ghosts of their own making.

[zacb]

Actually, blacks were doing better before the whole "Great Society" BS. Sure civil rights needed reformed. But now many sit on their butts, and it appears this epidemic is spreading to others (whites, Hispanics, although Asian's and Jews seem to be weathering it pretty well.)

[zacb]

Yes, reactionism...it's beautiful. Conservatives are accused of wanting to live in the 1950's. Reactionaries want to live in the 1750's or the 15th century. Screw the Enlightenment man.

No, for the "libtards" they're still convinced they're out for the little guy. Even since they've been in power they still have to keep up the charade that they haven't won. What happens to the revolutionaries when the revolution's over? They just keep fighting ghosts of their own making.

Sounds like Communism. Once one group becomes the in group, whats happens to the out group .

[Contrarian Expatriate]

White people supporting the black civil rights movement of the 60s seemed to believe the apparent lousiness and stupidity of the black population was an artifact of white oppression and that if blacks were granted white-type civil rights America would become one big, happy family with everyone dancing around maypoles together and such. Reactionaries expressed the opinion that blacks were genetically different and inferior and that the white model of dealing with them would be a disaster.

Experience has of course shown the reactionaries to be exactly right. The question is why there has not been more contrition from white libtards who drank the ZOG cool aid and helped bring about this scourge. I don't know of any high profile libtards that have made a public statement pointing out that they were wrong. That would be the least they could do, but really they should also will their assets to charities benefiting the victims of their policies and then hang themselves. I guess libtards have no honor.

I love it when our resident Mensa-rejects have novel thoughts.

[Brazor]

This August will be the 50th anniversary of the civil rights March on Washington. This event is where Martin Luther King gave his embarrassing "I have a dream" speech -- perhaps the worst famous speech in American history. The event also inspired passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964, which outlawed segregation, the Voting Rights Act, and the Immigration Act (both 1965).

LBJ gave away the store, and still blacks were not satisfied. They wanted only more and more. Not surprisingly, blacks became more resentful, more militant, and more openly hateful of whites.

And the resentful envy of the blacks influenced others. Women, homosexuals, and other non-whites were inspired to challenge white, heterosexual men for decades to come. Whereas once the Democratic Party (pre-1960) used to represent the white working man, today it is the party of any freak or loser who wants to stick it to whitey. Black violent crime against whites -- almost non-existent during Jim Crow segregation -- soared after the 1960s. Despite billions of dollars and government programs like affirmative action and Head Start, blacks still lag behind whites and the other races. A President can no longer order the Army to arrest and deport a million illegal Mexicans (as President Dwight Eisenhower did in 1954 with "Operation Wetback"), for fear of appearing "racist."

After 50 years, the catastrophic results of the civil rights movement are now clear. Far from a noble advance, the civil rights movement is in fact a milestone in the history of the terminal decline of the United States.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

This August will be the 50th anniversary of the civil rights March on Washington. This event is where Martin Luther King gave his embarrassing "I have a dream" speech -- perhaps the worst famous speech in American history. The event also inspired passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964, which outlawed segregation, the Voting Rights Act, and the Immigration Act (both 1965).

LBJ gave away the store, and still blacks were not satisfied. They wanted only more and more. Not surprisingly, blacks became more resentful, more militant, and more openly hateful of whites.

And the resentful envy of the blacks influenced others. Women, homosexuals, and other non-whites were inspired to challenge white, heterosexual men for decades to come. Whereas once the Democratic Party (pre-1960) used to represent the white working man, today it is the party of any freak or loser who wants to stick it to whitey. Black violent crime against whites -- almost non-existent during Jim Crow segregation -- soared after the 1960s. Despite billions of dollars and government programs like affirmative action and Head Start, blacks still lag behind whites and the other races. A President can no longer order the Army to arrest and deport a million illegal Mexicans (as President Dwight Eisenhower did in 1954 with "Operation Wetback"), for fear of appearing "racist."

After 50 years, the catastrophic results of the civil rights movement are now clear. Far from a noble advance, the civil rights movement is in fact a milestone in the history of the terminal decline of the United States.

Keep the faith. If you work hard, you'll find a job and perhaps even earn the affections of a women.

We understand your resentments, but look inward, not to other groups for your personal failings.

[Cornfed]

Keep the faith. If you work hard, you'll find a job and perhaps even earn the affections of a women.

We understand your resentments, but look inward, not to other groups for your personal failings.

That is what the Anglo-Zionist banksters running the show would advise. It is not surprising that you, as one of their exotic house pets, would echo their sentiments.

[Roccia]

If females and niggers have equal rights to men then lets give rights to all animals... A female that is primitive human and a nigger ugga bugga nigga ugga baboon with 60 iq...

Females are between animal and human male. So yes they deserve more rights than animals, but no as much as humans same with niggers. Females are useless only can have sex with them they are too primitive. Females never evolved they are stuck with the brain of homo erectus. Niggers are another homo species with average iq of 60 while humans have 100 iq so it reasonable to not give them equal rights to humans.