How many men has the average woman had sex with?

[marklambo]

Repatriate's topic about how many women we had sex with motivated me to create this topic. We all know that the Western woman spreads her legs around a lot but it's interesting that I found some links from women that admitted to how many men they had sex with. Here are some links and examples...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 527AAKXpoJ
http://streetknowledge.wordpress.com/20 ... eally-had/
http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-857994.htm
http://www.experienceproject.com/questi ... any/633328

33 year old - 72 men
50 year old - 20 men
23 year old - 13 men
33 year old - 5 men
age unknown - 90-100
15 year old - 19 men
16 year old - over 20 men
29 year old - 86 men
49 year old - over 400 men / 15 women
21 year old - 44 men
18 year old - 32 men / 1 woman
17 year old - 14 men (She claims to have regretted all but 2) ...yea...right...
15 year old - 15 men (She claims that she had feelings for 7 of them)
17 year old - 18 men
21 year old - 16 men / also women...but did not disclose
16 year old - 4 men
30 year old - 20 men
50 year old - She says...."you really don't want to know, and I really don't want to know. As long as I am the only current one, that is all that matters to me." I wouldn't be surprised if her numbers are in the 4 digit range...
34 year old - over 50 men
13 year old - 6 men

Ok, these are numbers posted by real women online of all ages. There were many more examples but I didn't feel like listing them all, there were too many. This clearly goes to show how often women have sex with random men. These are mainly all from American sites so I will assume these are primarily American women.

I found it very amusing how some would try to justify their numbers by saying they regretted most, or how they had feelings for only a certain amount, etc.

We already know this but it is definitely safe to conclude that the average American woman sleeps around a lot, and in many cases, they have more random sex than men do. Take a look at even the minors, they're already on target to reach over 100 by the time they're in their 20s.

[momopi]

You cannot use "average" for this. A survey like this assumes the respondent is sexually active, or have had sex. Given a group of girls, if 50% have had sex and the other 50% are virgins, an "average" number of sexual partners would be incorrectly applied to the virgins.

Another example, in college you might have ~50% of the students who are sexually active within the past year, while the other half were "dry". So an average number of sexual partners they had over the past year would be incorrectly applied to those who didn't get any.

[Jeremy]

The vast majority of college girls have had between 0 and 5:

http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2012/08/0 ... by-gender/

Also, the most attractive girls tend to have the fewest:

http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2013/02/1 ... asual-sex/

This jives with what I saw. For instance, the hottest girl from my dorm (now 23) has been dating the same guy since the beginning of first year uni.

[mrmillersd]

Honestly, there are 150 million women, at least 40 million between 16-35. I dont think American women are sluttier than any other women. European girls definitely are more liberal towards sex, as their society as a whole. You go to Paris or Berlin, plenty of nude bilboards advertising etc.


Eastern european girls are also quite dirty. They have insane rates of STDS and start at a young age. It is sad that some 14 year olds in eastern eruope have STDS, and already have had more partners than most american women.

https://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/ ... p98_en.pdf

[Teal Lantern]

Racking up those kinds of numbers would imply that at least some of those men didn't have the top "game" skills.
It probably won't stop the whiners from claiming that all women only sleep with the top 10% of men, though.

[Repatriate]

Racking up those kinds of numbers would imply that at least some of those men didn't have the top "game" skills.
It probably won't stop the whiners from claiming that all women only sleep with the top 10% of men, though.

Here's what i've noticed..men who do fit into the top 10-20% who are extraordinary in looks, money, or status do get laid a lot. They can rack up astoundingly high lay counts just in the U.S. alone.

Average to good looking women will settle for a provider type man but they will "sow their oats" in their youth and sleep with men like this. This explains why the average for women probably falls into the 20-30 range but for men in the 10-15 range. If you looked at it on a bell curve I bet most women would fall into the middle. Whereas for men there would be extremes on both ends..guys who never get laid and guys who have 300-400+ lay counts in the U.S.

[fightforlove]

If you looked at it on a bell curve I bet most women would fall into the middle. Whereas for men there would be extremes on both ends..guys who never get laid and guys who have 300-400+ lay counts in the U.S.

This. There is data from multiple sources showing that there are more virgin males than females. One source stated that virgin males outnumber virgin females 2.5:1. I haven't found much data about the average # of lays the average joe/jane gets in a lifetime, but we can rest assured that higher percentages of women are getting laid a decent, if not high amount as OPs links demonstrate. These links are skewed towards the higher side of the spectrum, though, as Jeremy said, there are also many women in the 1-5 partner range and I've seen this. But there are probably a bit more men than women in the 1-5 range if anything, and there are considerably more males than females carrying V-cards. The 80-20 theory is alive and well. Practically any young woman in America can quite easily and quickly get laid 1-5 or more times if they wish. The only women who survive and hold onto the V are either 300 pounds, or come from a super religious household, or more likely both. On the other hand, there are more virgin males and a stock-pile of "AFCs" scrabbling in the 1-5 bracket.

[Maverick]

If you looked at it on a bell curve I bet most women would fall into the middle. Whereas for men there would be extremes on both ends..guys who never get laid and guys who have 300-400+ lay counts in the U.S.

This. There is data from multiple sources showing that there are more virgin males than females. One source stated that virgin males outnumber virgin females 2.5:1. I haven't found much data about the average # of lays the average joe/jane gets in a lifetime, but we can rest assured that higher percentages of women are getting laid a decent, if not high amount as OPs links demonstrate. These links are skewed towards the higher side of the spectrum, though, as Jeremy said, there are also many women in the 1-5 partner range and I've seen this. But there are probably a bit more men than women in the 1-5 range if anything, and there are considerably more males than females carrying V-cards. The 80-20 theory is alive and well. Practically any young woman in America can quite easily and quickly get laid 1-5 or more times if they wish. The only women who survive and hold onto the V are either 300 pounds, or come from a super religious household, or more likely both. On the other hand, there are more virgin males and a stock-pile of "AFCs" scrabbling in the 1-5 bracket.

It seems to be that most of the guys on this forum overestimate how difficult it is to get laid in the US.

It's pretty easy to get your notch count up with relatively attractive girls if that's what you're looking for (though looks and level of drunkenness may very).

[djfourmoney]

That one video with the social experiment, you know the guy that asked women randomly would they have sex with them and contrast that with how many men would have sex with that girl who asked random guys.

The shocking is the men that said no.... Of course a woman can f**k as much as she wants and isn't labeled a slut. Women with 100+ partners are missing out, they should have at least gotten paid for it (Porn).

[YaManBT]

Racking up those kinds of numbers would imply that at least some of those men didn't have the top "game" skills.
It probably won't stop the whiners from claiming that all women only sleep with the top 10% of men, though.

Here's what i've noticed..men who do fit into the top 10-20% who are extraordinary in looks, money, or status do get laid a lot. They can rack up astoundingly high lay counts just in the U.S. alone.

Average to good looking women will settle for a provider type man but they will "sow their oats" in their youth and sleep with men like this. This explains why the average for women probably falls into the 20-30 range but for men in the 10-15 range. If you looked at it on a bell curve I bet most women would fall into the middle. Whereas for men there would be extremes on both ends..guys who never get laid and guys who have 300-400+ lay counts in the U.S.

Exactly right again. You stay winning threads, my dude.

[NorthAmericanguy]

Good topic......

Here is my take on this subject guys.... A woman could have been with 30 different guys, and another woman could have only been with 1 man, but the woman who has only been with 1 man could still have had more sex then the woman who was with 30 guys.

I know that a woman who has been with a lot of different guys is deemed to have lower value, but a woman who had only 1 boyfriend in her life could have had a boyfriend who banged her every other day for years and might even introduced her to kinky sex stuff that turned her out.

At the end of the day, when you're just looking for a pump and dump, or just a girlfriend, a woman's sexual past does not matter. However, if you're looking for a wife, I believe you should find a woman who has had very few sexual experiences, or you should find a virgin altogether. Why? Because you can't turn a ho into a housewife.

[Jester]

Honestly, there are 150 million women, at least 40 million between 16-35. I dont think American women are sluttier than any other women. European girls definitely are more liberal towards sex, as their society as a whole. You go to Paris or Berlin, plenty of nude bilboards advertising etc.


Eastern european girls are also quite dirty. They have insane rates of STDS and start at a young age. It is sad that some 14 year olds in eastern eruope have STDS, and already have had more partners than most american women.

https://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/ ... p98_en.pdf

If that's so, then you have to wonder why we THINK of AW as sluttier. Maybe it's the way they talk and joke about sex like men?

[HouseMD]

Most studies I have seen put a large number of women in the 3 partners or less range (think of all the good ones that married right off in high school) and a large number of women at 10+. Trouble is, none of these studies captures the full story- many of those married women will one day divorce, and slut it up, and all of the women in these studies are still active and will continue to have one or more partners till they die.

Between those issues and the fact that each generation likely had a docent amount of sex and that women are often dishonest about their asexual histories, the truth is we will probably never know how much sex the average woman has.

Undisputed fact though-women in New Zealand are the sluttiest in the world on any given study, with an average of over 20 asexual partners do to a "f**k first, get to know you later" dating culture.


http://i.stuff.co.nz/life-style/22444/K ... -the-world

[Anti-American]

Undisputed fact though-women in New Zealand are the sluttiest in the world on any given study, with an average of over 20 asexual partners do to a "f**k first, get to know you later" dating culture.


http://i.stuff.co.nz/life-style/22444/K ... -the-world

That article was done back in 2007. Since it's 2013, does NZ still have the most promiscuous in the world?