Is the White race superior? Consider the historical facts...

[starchild5]

Don't be Jewed people..

Again...

How can a superior race come out of Inferior race.

This whites came out of blacks is giant load of Jewish Psy-Op...

The original mother was African for all of us is again JEWISH crap...Mind Manipulation...

Everything Originated in Africa...Another Psy-Op

The Aliens are messing with your Mind people..WAKE THE F UP...

[Kradmelder]

Don't be Jewed people..

Again...

How can a superior race come out of Inferior race.

This whites came out of blacks is giant load of Jewish Psy-Op...

The original mother was African for all of us is again JEWISH crap...Mind Manipulation...

Everything Originated in Africa...Another Psy-Op

The Aliens are messing with your Mind people..WAKE THE F UP...

They don't.That is nigger BS to try say they are the same as white people, or that they are people at all.

https://genographic.nationalgeographic. ... n-journey/

Humanoids originate in east africa, The negroid race originated in west africa, from a branch of humanoids that left east africa. They are an offshoot of original humanoid ancestors. White people are a totally different branch. A white man does not have niggers in his ancestry unless hia ancestors committed bestiality with one of those savages. There are no arrows from west africa to europe.


Kapoid race (not negro)
Haplogroups: L0, E, A


Across Africa
Humans traveling this route spread from east-central Africa to southern Africa. Their descendants include central African Pygmies and the Khoisan—the famous Bushmen of the Kalahari. The Pygmies live in the rain forests as hunter-gatherers. The Khoisan people live in the harsh lands of southern Africa. Some of them are hunter-gatherers; others herd livestock.


Haplogroups: H, U, W, R - White People


From Central Asia Into Europe
This migration brought early humans into western and Central Asia, where they then turned west and crossed the grasslands of southern Russia into Europe. There, they encountered Neanderthals and practiced a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. The subsequent interbreeding between Neanderthals and early modern humans has resulted in traces of Neanderthal DNA in many people today.


Haplogroups: H, J, K, N, T, W, G, J, White People

From the Fertile Crescent Into Europe
The early humans on this migration brought knowledge of farming and agriculture with them from the Fertile Crescent into Europe. This revolutionized how people lived, creating a shift from a nomadic lifestyle to a settled one. It enabled advances in tool-making, pottery, weaponry, and other aspects of human life.

Haplogroups: L, B, E - The most worthless race - darkies


Central Africa to West Africa
Early humans moved from Central Africa to West Africa in this migration. Their descendants include the Bantu-speaking peoples. The Bantu had an advanced farming culture, and were the first people in sub-Saharan Africa to work iron. Later expansions to the east and south introduced agriculture across Africa and spread the Bantu languages throughout the continent.


Whites DID NOT emerge from these lowest of all forms to come out of the origins of man. Darkies evolved separately, more likely by interbreeding with apes, which they resemble.

A haplogroup is a genetic population group of people who share a common ancestor on the patrilineal or matrilineal line. Haplogroups are assigned letters of the alphabet, and refinements consist of additional number and letter combinations. Note that whites and darkies have different letters. Hence we share no paternal or maternal line with darkies. We have nothing to do with them, and want nothing to do with them. If they would only leave white people alone, we would get one fine.

The best thing the E haplogroup could do is return to west central africa, all whites woulc leave, so they can die of their diseases, starve and eat each other. The world would be a better place and wouldn't mourn their passing.

[Kradmelder]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogrou ... groups.png

Note on the map niggers are all E1 or E3 and migrated west to west africa. From there these locusts migrated south to infest the continent.

The bushmen, natives of southern africa are A2 and A3, not related to niggers either. You see no routes from niggers towards white people's lands, so there is no evolution from niggers towards human beings.

It is a good thing, because if whites were to come from niggers, we would be just as useless.

[Moretorque]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogrou ... groups.png

Note on the map niggers are all E1 or E3 and migrated west to west africa. From there these locusts migrated south to infest the continent.

The bushmen, natives of southern africa are A2 and A3, not related to niggers either. You see no routes from niggers towards white people's lands, so there is no evolution from niggers towards human beings.

It is a good thing, because if whites were to come from niggers, we would be just as useless.

OK then where did whites come from ?

[Blue Murder]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogrou ... groups.png

Note on the map niggers are all E1 or E3 and migrated west to west africa. From there these locusts migrated south to infest the continent.

The bushmen, natives of southern africa are A2 and A3, not related to niggers either. You see no routes from niggers towards white people's lands, so there is no evolution from niggers towards human beings.

It is a good thing, because if whites were to come from niggers, we would be just as useless.

OK then where did whites come from ?

Mate, don't waste your time on him. You actually make his whole "superior" argument valid by giving him play. Just sigh and move on.

[Wolfeye]

In answer to what they're "for"- it's kind of like the question: "What's the meaning of life?" The problem is that the question is incongruent- it presents life as a task, which it's not. It's hard for some people to get their head around that, especially if you live in an highly work-centric place like the US. What it IS could be hard to articulate, if at all possible, but that doesn't mean it's "nothing" projected as an answer.

Anyway, I notice people have a strong tendency to leave out a lot of human history when talking about whites & this overall subject. There's a massive amount of history that's not accounted for & people usually dismiss oral tradition (here in the US, they actually went to great lengths in school to paint it in an untrustworthy way- completely disregarding the concept that people can chisel lies into to stone or write them down just as easily as they can type them on a keyboard).

Another thing to notice is that the white peoples have done quite a bit with the seeming intention of destroying the world. I mean as an actual, but unstated, goal. There was a widespread concept of living like an eating contest- to dissolve/consume as much as possible & make as big a mark as they can. I don't know that it NEVER was this what with blacks or asians or anyone else, but the whites got a bit scary for quite some time & some still are that way. I think whites are frequently the ones that are insane, at least in the delusional way (ex: someone thinking reality is what they say it is, declaring that all blonde women are his mother, and killing as many as he can).

That said, it's not all one-sided. In a way, it might not even be seen as a competition. I think the various tribes in North America tended to have a lot that was good, it's just seen by some as not being that way because they lost in battle. The thing is, the concept that someone will win if they're right is just like the concept that if you'll be believed if you tell the truth- it CAN happen, but there's no ambient "Santa Claus Principle" to make ONLY deserved things happen. The idea that good goes to good & bad goes to bad is common in victim-blaming & doesn't even make sense if you look at it- how does someone deserve bad in that case? Someone would have to have made the "first move" & that means that, in that instance, good didn't go where it was supposed to.

[Moretorque]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogrou ... groups.png

Note on the map niggers are all E1 or E3 and migrated west to west africa. From there these locusts migrated south to infest the continent.

The bushmen, natives of southern africa are A2 and A3, not related to niggers either. You see no routes from niggers towards white people's lands, so there is no evolution from niggers towards human beings.

It is a good thing, because if whites were to come from niggers, we would be just as useless.

OK then where did whites come from ?

Mate, don't waste your time on him. You actually make his whole "superior" argument valid by giving him play. Just sigh and move on.

I don't know why people argue with nature, as I have stated many times evolution says blacks are compatible with whites. Just look at Bill Clintons half black son that is trying to get a DNA test to prove he is Bill's son.

How people can argue with something that has been doing the nasty to create life for billions of years and decides what is workable towards the road of perfection such as evolution......

Bill likes his pu$$y doesn't he..

[Russian1860]

Nice topic. The question, which has no answer.
Because from the evolutionary point of view no one is superior.

The ancient Egyptians were far more advanced than white savages 10 thousands year ago.
Mongol empire managed to enslave 2/3 of Eurasia 700 years ago. And from this point of view they were superior than folks, they enslaved.

The white empire has been thriving for more than 2000 years, but the superiority tends to fade away. Developing countries, most of whom consist of different race people, develop much faster than traditionally white countries. Who knows who will be superior in 100 years? Maybe it will be Asians?

Also many people on here consider jews as a separate race and accuse them to grab international monetary system. So maybe for the time being jews are superior than whites? People hate jews, because they were more clever, than they. If to follow this logic, blacks fairly accuse whites, who enslaved and exploited them

Now let’s define a word “white”. Who is white? I am Russian and I am white. But could Russian savages be considered as a peer for those sophisticated whites, originated from Europe, 1000 years ago? Even now “western world” opposes Russia. So it turns out, that whites can be divided into “genuine” whites and “second best” whites, right? If to dig up deeper this way, then we can divide whites into separate countries. Portugal was a great empire, who pioneered the world discovery, but now they are just one of the fairly poor European countries. And contrary situation with the USA. Because everything tends to change.

If we admit, that not all whites are the same, then how can we generalize blacks, Indians, or Asians? And how can we compare them all just because of the color of skin and facial features?

[Kradmelder]

For the 1 millionth time, no one dislikes jews, blacks or anyone because of their facial features or colour of their skin, or their religion etc. They dislike them for their BEHAVIOUR. Liberals deliberately try to ignore this and keep going back to colour to make racialism look ridiculous, where in fact it is real ad based on facts and truths.

No one dislikes jews because they are more clever than whites. Asians also have a higher IQ. No one dislikes asians for that. No one disliked their faith or the shape of their nose. No one disliked jews at all as about every white nation let them in. They grew to dislike them due to their unscrupulative, manipulative, money grubbing greedy behaviour, so they get expelled.

No one dislikes blacks for having by far the lowest IQ on average. Blacks are disliked for their thieving and criminality.

Liberals will call it racist to talk about the facts of white civilisation. But it is the truth that White people invented and built over 90%of things that have benefited and contributed to civilisation. Everybody wants to live in the white man's world (except the few like winson and others on here ) but they don’t want the white man ruling it. However, when blacks take it over you get once prosperous nations that become like Rhodesia, South Africa and haiti. And look what the USA has become with Obongo. So what they want can only exist under the white man. There would be no modern functioning societies without white people, it is undeniable. The only other people who have the potential mental and abilities and work ethic are eastern Asians (such as Japanese, Koreans, Chinese),te lighter asians.

Yes there are dumb lazy whites and a few clever hard working blacks. However the percentages in each race result in achievement for one as a group and failure for the other. White people are not the most superior in average IQ (behind jews and some asians), but as a whole come are a very successful race. Whites also have superior physical strength, despite what the jew media shows of white men being weak and effeminate. Whites completely dominate all weightlifting, arm wrestling, and strongman competitions, together with very light skinned central asians, who as the haplogroup migration map shows, are the closest relatives to whites.

Asians and Whites are the only races capable of evolving and developing. If we race mix we will dumb down our society from diversity and genetic dilution, Asians know this so keep their nations free of large scale immigration, but they will accept whites. Whites have the weakness of liberalism, compassion, guilt and pity, which jews exploit, to make us mix with races that will bring whites down through parasitic relationships. Chinese and japanese have to problem keeping their race identity strong. And they would kill to keep it that way.

Jews are trying to degrade, split apart and dilute whites to weaken us. They even exploit weaknesses to pit us against each other because they view white people as the biggest threat. They know whites historically have stood up to jews and expelled them. White people are capable of standing up against them. Jews know the only way they an subjugate whites is by infiltration and destroying the white societies from within, especially through white women. Promoting multiculturalism and the propagating of perversions to destroy the morals of white society is their way to divide and conquer.

[Russian1860]

Kradmelder,

from the evolutionary point of view, your theory doesn’t hold a water.

You consider the period of 2 thousand years as something extremely long or even infinite. But in terms of evolution, that is just an instant. Egyptians were superior 10 thousands years ago, whites are superior now. In future probably Asians will be superior for many centuries in a row. Then blacks, then whites again. And it will be endless circle.

If we had this discussion 100 years ago, would you mention Asians as a challenger to substitute white race? Of course not. For example, look at Japan, or South Korea. Who could predict 100 years ago that they will become so developed like now? Same with African countries. Nobody knows, how and when they will evolve and develop. That is just a matter of time.

You mentioned physical leadership of the white race. I disagree. The average height of European man in the dark ages was 160 cm, while people of negroid race were 180 cm and higher even that time. But even if to speak about nowadays. Look at the shape of an average, I want to emphasize word average, black man. They are mostly muscular, as every man should be. Now compare with an average european man. Who will win? Modern sport is a business, which require a lot of money to be involved. Thus first world countries tend to dominate in the professional sport. But it doesn’t reflect the state of affairs in general.

That said, you have a point and I can’t say that I totally disagree with you. But no matter what, you try to tie up your reasoning with blacks and jews.

[Moretorque]

For the 1 millionth time, no one dislikes jews, blacks or anyone because of their facial features or colour of their skin, or their religion etc. They dislike them for their BEHAVIOUR. Liberals deliberately try to ignore this and keep going back to colour to make racialism look ridiculous, where in fact it is real ad based on facts and truths.

No one dislikes jews because they are more clever than whites. Asians also have a higher IQ. No one dislikes asians for that. No one disliked their faith or the shape of their nose. No one disliked jews at all as about every white nation let them in. They grew to dislike them due to their unscrupulative, manipulative, money grubbing greedy behaviour, so they get expelled.

No one dislikes blacks for having by far the lowest IQ on average. Blacks are disliked for their thieving and criminality.

Liberals will call it racist to talk about the facts of white civilisation. But it is the truth that White people invented and built over 90%of things that have benefited and contributed to civilisation. Everybody wants to live in the white man's world (except the few like winson and others on here ) but they don’t want the white man ruling it. However, when blacks take it over you get once prosperous nations that become like Rhodesia, South Africa and haiti. And look what the USA has become with Obongo. So what they want can only exist under the white man. There would be no modern functioning societies without white people, it is undeniable. The only other people who have the potential mental and abilities and work ethic are eastern Asians (such as Japanese, Koreans, Chinese),te lighter asians.

Yes there are dumb lazy whites and a few clever hard working blacks. However the percentages in each race result in achievement for one as a group and failure for the other. White people are not the most superior in average IQ (behind jews and some asians), but as a whole come are a very successful race. Whites also have superior physical strength, despite what the jew media shows of white men being weak and effeminate. Whites completely dominate all weightlifting, arm wrestling, and strongman competitions, together with very light skinned central asians, who as the haplogroup migration map shows, are the closest relatives to whites.

Asians and Whites are the only races capable of evolving and developing. If we race mix we will dumb down our society from diversity and genetic dilution, Asians know this so keep their nations free of large scale immigration, but they will accept whites. Whites have the weakness of liberalism, compassion, guilt and pity, which jews exploit, to make us mix with races that will bring whites down through parasitic relationships. Chinese and japanese have to problem keeping their race identity strong. And they would kill to keep it that way.

Jews are trying to degrade, split apart and dilute whites to weaken us. They even exploit weaknesses to pit us against each other because they view white people as the biggest threat. They know whites historically have stood up to jews and expelled them. White people are capable of standing up against them. Jews know the only way they an subjugate whites is by infiltration and destroying the white societies from within, especially through white women. Promoting multiculturalism and the propagating of perversions to destroy the morals of white society is their way to divide and conquer.

Our rulers that you call " the Jews " are just using the idiot class to get rid of and displace the whites. They really just want all the technologies the whites invented the last 100 years or so but not them because this is competition for the rule of the planet.

Next depopulate the planet then use the technology to rule with a 3 tier system, Elite then a well armed managerial class to uphold the dictates enforced upon the lower slave class or worker runt class.

They feel with all the technical gadgets people in a lot of cases are obsolete!

[Blue Murder]

Nice topic. The question, which has no answer.
Because from the evolutionary point of view no one is superior.

The ancient Egyptians were far more advanced than white savages 10 thousands year ago.
Mongol empire managed to enslave 2/3 of Eurasia 700 years ago. And from this point of view they were superior than folks, they enslaved.

The white empire has been thriving for more than 2000 years, but the superiority tends to fade away. Developing countries, most of whom consist of different race people, develop much faster than traditionally white countries. Who knows who will be superior in 100 years? Maybe it will be Asians?

Also many people on here consider jews as a separate race and accuse them to grab international monetary system. So maybe for the time being jews are superior than whites? People hate jews, because they were more clever, than they. If to follow this logic, blacks fairly accuse whites, who enslaved and exploited them

Now let’s define a word “white”. Who is white? I am Russian and I am white. But could Russian savages be considered as a peer for those sophisticated whites, originated from Europe, 1000 years ago? Even now “western world” opposes Russia. So it turns out, that whites can be divided into “genuine” whites and “second best” whites, right? If to dig up deeper this way, then we can divide whites into separate countries. Portugal was a great empire, who pioneered the world discovery, but now they are just one of the fairly poor European countries. And contrary situation with the USA. Because everything tends to change.

If we admit, that not all whites are the same, then how can we generalize blacks, Indians, or Asians? And how can we compare them all just because of the color of skin and facial features?

I consider Jews to be white, but other than that you raise some interesting points. You're actually somewhat intelligent, especially when you said the last bit (that I highlighted). Like it or not, no entire group is responsible for civilisation. Certainly not whites. Individuals who do the actual inventing are, and that's a fact. Of course, when one actually cracks open a book, you find that there was plenty of invention and innovation from ALL (yes ALL) races. By the "without x no y" argument, whites would have been wiped out ages ago since the Chinese invented gunpowder, which is used to this day. Other than that, it's quite silly to hate millions of people based on their skin colour, but that's just the sanity talkin' I suppose.

[Citizen]

I consider Jews to be white,

My Jews are white but lots of Jews are not white.

[Moretorque]

I consider Jews to be white,

My Jews are white but lots of Jews are not white.

That's why you read books by guys like Shlomo Sand...........He finally realized he was being conned by the Zionist money changers so he denounced his Judaism.

[Wolfeye]

See, here's what I don't get: The Jews are supposedly behind everything (and a lot of shit is piloted by Jews, it seems), but they frequently get bad-mouthed as complete assholes. How is this going to happen? Why would this happen? I know there are Jews that are in command of a lot of shit, don't get me wrong- I DO think there are Jewish people at the driver's seat with a lot of things. I just don't think it's an agenda to advance the Jews as a group so much as it is an agenda to do f***ed-up shit & make money (malice & money, generally in that order).

As for the blacks, it's truly shocking how insightful some can be- especially since others are shockingly stupid. And I mean REALLY stupid. The kind of stupid that doesn't come from being uneducated. The kind that comes from it being a personal drive to be that way. Like it's their "black belt" to be a fuckin' idiot. And as well know, stupid & violent makes for a hell of a mix. I don't feel the need to support them when they get too shot up over bullshit to work any more than I feel the need to support the next kid they're not going to bother with. THAT bullshit seems to come solidly from rich, arrogant white people that give orders & poorer, possibly more arrogant people (of all shades, but largely whites) that put them in motion.