Pete Buttigieg - Presidential Candidate (D) 2020

[TruthSeeker]

Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg (born January 19, 1982) has served as the mayor of the city of South Bend, Indiana since 2012.

This openly gay mayor is married to his husband Chasten Glezman.

A member of the Episcopal Church, Buttigieg is a congregant at the Cathedral of St. James in downtown South Bend.

The Episcopal Church does not condemn homosexuality. In fact, it's probably encouraged.

Franklin Graham, who is the son of the late evangelist Billy Graham and a prominent supporter of President Trump, slammed Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg for being gay, Christian and married. In a series of three tweets Wednesday, he assailed Buttigieg for remarks he has made about being a gay Christian.

"Presidential candidate & South Bend Mayor @PeteButtigieg is right—God doesn't have a political party," Graham wrote. "But God does have commandments, laws & standards He gives us to live by. God doesn't change. His Word is the same yesterday, today & forever."

Pete Buttigieg. The next President of the United States? I seriously doubt it.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

No sodomites for public office, especially for President. Not only that, but a Mayor of a city, a minor one at that?

His candidacy is purely about 2 things: furthering the normalization of homosexuality in society, and making a national name for himself so he can get a cabinet position and funding clout within the party for future runs of House and Senate seats.

The guy is a short, gamma male who does not even belong in the conversation.

[tom]

Barring a meteor strike Trumps is going to be reelected in 2020. In case case of a meteor strike NASA is making preparations so it might be a mute point.

Many of the candidates make Bernie look like the voice of reason, this is how extreme some of the identity/racist candidates are and the media loves them. Kamala Harris is number one with the active advocate democrats and racist blacks. With Kamala advocating legalizing prostitution, I just cant see radical feminist all going along with that. The Dems are a very fractured party with too many factions. For now its wait and see how radical the Dems will get, maybe Trump will be seen as very moderate compared to what may be coming.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Kamala Harris is number one with the active advocate democrats and racist blacks.

What? Kamala Harris is one of the least "black" persons in America. Her father was just barely black and her mother was "dothead" Indian.

Some black women might be moved by the fact that she identifies as a black woman, but blacks in general would be more inclined to vote for Cory Booker or Wayne Messam.

Kamala is the candidate for savvy feminists who know that the other females could not get black females to the polls in sufficient numbers for the Dems to win. Kamala could do that.

Look for her to be a possible VP selection.

[CannedHam]

He's just one of dozens of Democrat hopefuls for 2020. I think it's probably gonna be Joe "Mr. Touchy Feely" Biden or that old dusty reptile Bernie Sanders that will take on Trump in 2020. Someone old, white and straight so they have the best chance of stealing some disgruntled white voters away from Trump. I think this Steve Buttplug guy is hardly even on anyone's radar.

I think it'll be Biden. Bernie as the nominee basically guarantees a Trump landslide.

[tom]

What? Kamala Harris is one of the least "black" persons in America. Her father was just barely black and her mother was "dothead" Indian.

Some black women might be moved by the fact that she identifies as a black woman, but blacks in general would be more inclined to vote for Cory Booker or Wayne Messam.

Kamala is the candidate for savvy feminists who know that the other females could not get black females to the polls in sufficient numbers for the Dems to win. Kamala could do that.

Look for her to be a possible VP selection.

Kamala is more black than Shawn King, not that it matters. The Dems know they don't stand a chance against Trump, so they will put up the most radical batshit crazy nutjob they can find. Ironically that puts Bernie at the bottom of the candidate list ahead of completely ignored candidates like Andrew Yang who actually appeals to Trump's base. Trump may win by the biggest landslide in US presidential history. The media desperately wants Trump to win, he is good for business.

[tom]

"alt-right" is a made up shaming term and all Trump supporters are guilty of belonging to an imaginary group. 30% of Mexicans actually voted for Trump.

The parties are reshuffling into new different forms and this will take many years. The last time this happened was the 1930's and before that the 1860's. For now the Dems have gone all in with the racist identity politics and it will be a shit show.




The media is no help in seeing what is actually happening, this is how things were in 2016,



Gays have effectively moved to the swing vote category, they could move all the way over as Trump is by far the most gay friendly President in history. This is the why for Peter Buttigieg. A quasi pornographic alternative counter narrative to Peter Thiel. This could push evangelicals to swing.

The Greens may get split over nuclear power. For over a decade a major grass roots movement for new 4th gen nuclear has been going. They are both right and left. And Trump may push this, perhaps post 2020.

[tom]

Beto O'Rourke calls for $5 trillion to fight climate change. They are trying to out do each other with crazier proposals.

[MatureDJ]

If I had to make a bet, I would say Mayor Pete wins. He is clearly the best candidate in the race. He is a veteran (US Navy). And his homosexuality is almost not an issue since folks for whom this would be an issue are already voting for the other party. Of course, Uncle Joe might just win by default.

I don't see how Trump wins. He has a persistent lower 50s disapproval rate, and it is a hard, personal disapproval, not something that can be changed based on circumstances. Hillary would beat him in a rematch, which means that anyone would beat him.

[tom]

"alt-right" is a made up shaming term and all Trump supporters

Ah, no. The alt-right do actually have corporeal existence. For example, I have defined myself as alt-right for a few years now and when I look down I see arms and legs and a torso and such, so it follows that the alt-right must exist to some extent.

Of coarse you exist and know the ideas that could be called alt-right are a collection of alternative narratives (red pill, MGTOW, MRA, etc) that have been developing over the last few decades.

Main steam media has indoctrinated the masses to automatically think the "the alt-right" is something very bad having something to do with goose stepping 1940's Nazi's or the Klan is going to steal your children. The term alt-right is consistently used as a smear by main stream media, it is used interchangeably with terms such as Nazi, neo Nazi, Kul Klux Clan or white supremacist. Main stream media will not investigate what the alt-right is actually about because it is used as a term to demonize anyone with a nuanced view that is different from fundamentalist left dogma. See what happened to the person who made the Red Pill Movie.

The GOP was forced to begin the process of remaking itself in 2016, the Dems are forced to do the same now.

[tom]

If I had to make a bet, I would say Mayor Pete wins. He is clearly the best candidate in the race. He is a veteran (US Navy). And his homosexuality is almost not an issue since folks for whom this would be an issue are already voting for the other party. Of course, Uncle Joe might just win by default.

I don't see how Trump wins. He has a persistent lower 50s disapproval rate, and it is a hard, personal disapproval, not something that can be changed based on circumstances. Hillary would beat him in a rematch, which means that anyone would beat him.

Remember the media experts and polls saying Trump did not stand a chance? These polls were and still are 100% propaganda, they do not reflect what is actually going on. The truth is nothing in the news is correct its all propaganda. The media has been repeatedly caught making spectacular lies. The general public is beginning to not trust the media.

Daniella Diaz, the one who claimed Trump had a 1% chance of getting nominated, is part of the new breed of advocate reporters. They are not journalist, they push predetermined politically correct narratives. Daniella Diaz is fresh out of college and indoctrinated into the SJW religion. There is a massive oversupply of these social justice indoctrinated women. The idealistic narratives these women naively believe are highly dysfunctional, catastrophically destructive if attempted and often have nothing to do with actual reality.

[MatureDJ]

Regardless of the results in 2016 - in which he had an absolutely putrid opponent - Trump has simply dug himself too big of a hole to get out of, and there is no "perfect storm" of a Hillary opponent out there that I can see. And who cares what some feminist chick thinks his chances of winning the nomination were (I thought he had a great chance from the beginning). The middle-road folks that voted for him just thought, "why not give him a chance", but by him being nihilistic about the ACA (among other things), he will lose enough of these folks in the key states. It's really a shame as he could have done the outsider shtick well and laid a truly populist path, but he let his Republican minders tell him to do some important unpopular things (tax cuts, trying to kill the ACA), as well as hire virtual lunatics as his political aides.

[MatureDJ]

"alt-right" is a made up shaming term and all Trump supporters are guilty of belonging to an imaginary group. 30% of Mexicans actually voted for Trump.

The parties are reshuffling into new different forms and this will take many years. The last time this happened was the 1930's and before that the 1860's. For now the Dems have gone all in with the racist identity politics and it will be a shit show.

I think the original meaning of alt-right was for a true populist right-wing movement, that yes, advocated pushing for reduced legal and obliterated illegal immigration (which is somewhat what Trump is doing, since he still seems to like foreign workers) for ethnocentric reasons, but also to be a true White Man's worker party. If you care to read up on the owner of the Alt-Right moniker, Richard Spencer, you'll see that he supports national health care and a stipend for intelligent women to forgo a career and have children (how to stop the untermensch from doing that, I'm not sure), among other ideas that typically are associated with the Left. Of course, they are against global trade, and for something that sure sounds like a jobs program. And they are for strengthening the environment. Basically, they put the needs of the people (OK, white people for them) in front of the needs of the cosmopolitan businessman. They are also conservative with family issues, and it's not to be misogynistic, but simply to keep the white birth rate up.

All things being equal, I like to vote ethnocentrically, but will vote against my race if there is a superior candidate (e.g., Obama) and/or the party that supposedly of my tribe advocates against most of my important issues (which the Republican Party does, with the exception of immigration, which I agree with Trump more or less on).

[MatureDJ]

And his homosexuality is almost not an issue since folks for whom this would be an issue are already voting for the other party.

I would have thought enough Dems were revolted by faggotry for this to be a factor. Not the majority, but enough to make him non-viable.

No, those Democrats that are revolted are called "Republicans" already.

[tom]

I think the original meaning of alt-right was for a true populist right-wing movement, that yes, advocated pushing for reduced legal and obliterated illegal immigration (which is somewhat what Trump is doing, since he still seems to like foreign workers) for ethnocentric reasons, but also to be a true White Man's worker party. If you care to read up on the owner of the Alt-Right moniker, Richard Spencer, you'll see that he supports national health care and a stipend for intelligent women to forgo a career and have children (how to stop the untermensch from doing that, I'm not sure), among other ideas that typically are associated with the Left. Of course, they are against global trade, and for something that sure sounds like a jobs program. And they are for strengthening the environment. Basically, they put the needs of the people (OK, white people for them) in front of the needs of the cosmopolitan businessman. They are also conservative with family issues, and it's not to be misogynistic, but simply to keep the white birth rate up.

All things being equal, I like to vote ethnocentrically, but will vote against my race if there is a superior candidate (e.g., Obama) and/or the party that supposedly of my tribe advocates against most of my important issues (which the Republican Party does, with the exception of immigration, which I agree with Trump more or less on).

• Agreed the operational alt-right is a 100% very real grass roots movement, this existed well before the term alt-right became common.

• The massive Mexican immigration wave had already stopped years before Trump came in and it is and will continue to have a major impact. Also Mexicans are way more conservative than the left believes, 30% voted for Trump in 2016 in spite on Trumps overt anti illegal immigration from Mexico (US Mexicans don't want the competition surprise surprise) and the non stop race baiting by mainstream media which includes Telemundo. More may vote Trump in 2020.

• The main supporters of the left are single women (feminist), this is why abortion is a far bigger issue with the left than the right. They need there prime supporters to stay single so they can hijack the maternal instinct redirecting to the lefts political causes. These leftist single women (feminist) advocate the practice unrestricted game while making it illegal for men to do the same. This has created an arms race where anything goes, this unrestricted sexual warfare maximizes distrust. Family's tend to be small or never created in the first place.

I spent some time in Salt Lake City, the woman are definitely different, much more polite and also the lack of racism as compared to Los Angeles, my Filipina girlfriend really noticed this. Many more children too, its like a 1950's microcosm.